Suzanne G. Haynes

Outcomes of Comprehensive Heart Care Programs in High-Risk Women

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to improve the fund of knowledge, reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and attain Healthy People 2010 objectives among women in model womens heart programs. METHODS A 6-month pre/post-longitudinal educational intervention of high-risk women (n = 1310) patients at six U.S. womens heart programs consisted of comprehensive heart health counseling and use of American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Evidence-Based Guidelines as enhancement to usual care delivered via five integrated components: education/awareness, screening/risk assessment, diagnostic testing/treatment, lifestyle modification/rehabilitation, and tracking/evaluation. Demographics, before and after knowledge surveys, clinical diagnoses, laboratory parameters, and Framingham risk scores were also determined. Changes in fund of knowledge, awareness, and risk reduction outcomes and Healthy People 2010 objectives were determined. RESULTS At 6 months, there were statistically significant improvements in fund of knowledge, risk awareness, and clinical outcomes. Participants attained or exceeded >90% of the Healthy People 2010 objectives. Proportions of participants showing increased knowledge and awareness of CVD as the leading killer of women, of all signs and symptoms of a heart attack, and calling 911 increased significantly (11.1%, 25.4%, and 34.6%, respectively). Health behavior counseling for physical activity, diet, and diabetes as CVD risk factors increased significantly (28.3%, 28.2%, and 12.5%, respectively). There was a statistical 4.1% increase in participants with systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140/90 mm Hg, a 4.7% decrease in participants with total cholesterol (TC) >240 mg/dL, a 4.5% decrease in participants with TC >200 mg/dL, a 5.9% decrease in participants with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <50 mg/dL, a 4.4% decrease in participants with HDL-C <40 mg/dL, and an 8.8% increase in diabetics with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS CVD prevention built around a comprehensive heart care model program and AHA/ACC Evidence-Based Guidelines can be successful in improving knowledge and awareness, CVD risk factor reduction, and attainment of Healthy People 2010 objectives in high-risk women. Thus, these programs could have a dramatic and lasting impact on the health of women.

The DHHS Office on Women's Health Initiative to Improve Women's Heart Health: Focus on Knowledge and Awareness Among Women with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

UNLABELLED Abstract Background: The diversity of the U.S. population and disparities in the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) require that public health education strategies must target women and racial/ethnic minority groups to reduce their CVD risk factors, particularly in high-risk communities, such as women with the metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODS The data reported here were based on a cross-sectional face-to-face survey of women recruited from four participating sites as part of the national intervention program, Improving, Enhancing and Evaluating Outcomes of Comprehensive Heart Care in High-Risk Women. Measures included baseline characteristics, sociodemographics, CVD related-knowledge and awareness, and Framingham risk score (FRS). RESULTS There were 443 of 698 women (63.5%) with one or more risk factors for the MS: non-Hispanic white (NHW), 51.5%; non-Hispanic black (NHB), 21.0%; Hispanic, 22.6%. Greater frequencies of MS occurred among Hispanic women (p<0.0001), those with less than a high school education (70.0%) (p<0.0001), Medicaid recipients (57.8%) (p<0.0001), and urbanites (43.3%) (p<0.001). Fewer participants with MS (62.6%) knew the leading cause of death compared to those without MS (72.1%) (p<0.0001). MS was associated with a lack of knowledge of the composite of knowing the symptoms of a heart attack plus the need to call 911 (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.97, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Current strategies to decrease CVD risk are built on educating the public about traditional factors, including hypertension, smoking, and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). An opportunity to broaden the scope for risk reduction among women with cardiometabolic risk derives from the observation that women with the MS have lower knowledge about CVD as the leading cause of death, the symptoms of a heart attack, and the ideal option for managing a CVD emergency.

The Office on Women's Health Initiative to Improve Women's Heart Health: Program Description, Site Characteristics, and Lessons Learned

AIMS Improving, Enhancing and Evaluating Outcomes of Comprehensive Heart Health Care Programs for High Risk Women has funded six diverse centers to provide chronic disease risk factor screening and lifestyle interventions for women and focuses specifically on low-income, minority women. RESULTS This article describes the rationale for these diverse programs across the country, all focusing on improving outcomes for women with or at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The six programs include College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University, Christ Community Health Services in Memphis, Womens Heart Center of Fox Valley Cardiovascular Consultants, University of Minnesota, University of California Davis Womens Cardiovascular Medicine Program, and Yale-New Haven Hospitals Womens Heart Advantage. CONCLUSIONS We present six differing approaches to womens heart programs. Based on this experience, promoting CVD prevention in women is a feasible healthcare delivery strategy for health promotion and for delivering preventive strategies for high-risk women. It is possible to deliver heart-healthy programs through existing healthcare infrastructures. These programs provide important models for public health, voluntary, and other health organizations to develop networks for population-based, targeted, relatively low cost programs that support Healthy People 2010 objectives for lifestyle changes and cardiovascular health. Ongoing longitudinal analysis of the programs will provide information about clinical outcomes and sustainability of such programs beyond the funding period.

Two Tailored Provider Curricula Promoting Healthy Weight in Lesbian and Bisexual Women.

PURPOSE Provider curricula to reduce potential weight bias or stigma in treating lesbian and bisexual (LB) women who are overweight or obese were pilot-tested in two unique settings. Trainings used LB cultural competency and motivational interviewing techniques to improve provider-patient interactions. METHODS Two training formats were used: Clinic Format and Academic Format. Clinic Format training was pilot tested at Lyon-Martin Health Services, a Program of HealthRight360, a community health center serving women, lesbians, and transgender people in San Francisco and in two community settings. Academic Format training was pilot tested by the Mautner Project of Whitman-Walker Health with physicians, medical residents, and students at Georgetown, George Washington, Howard, and Vanderbilt Universities. Both programs measured provider knowledge and attitude change. RESULTS Both programs saw significant percentage point gains in knowledge about LB womens avoidance of health care based on body size. Participants in the Academic Format program saw the greatest gain in knowledge about understanding health care avoidance (30 percentage point increase), whereas Clinic Format program participants gained most in understanding how to appropriately discuss weight loss with patients (23 percentage point increase). CONCLUSIONS Both programs increased provider knowledge about the barriers to health care facing LB women who are overweight and obese, reducing the potential for future negative interactions. However, the two programs differed in how they conceptualized the relationship between weight and health, likely contributing to differences in knowledge gain among participants at each site. Future studies should test differences between the two formats across site type or staff baseline knowledge differences.