Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Suzanne L. Wolden is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Suzanne L. Wolden.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2002

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Richard J. Wong; D. T. Lin; Heiko Schöder; Snehal G. Patel; Mithat Gonen; Suzanne L. Wolden; David G. Pfister; Jatin P. Shah; Steven M. Larson; Dennis H. Kraus

PURPOSE: Patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 143 patients with previously treated HNSCC who underwent 181 PET scans at our institution from May 1996 through April 2001 to detect recurrent disease. Disease recurrence within 6 months was used as the gold standard for assessing true disease status at PET. RESULTS: With equivocal sites considered positive, the sensitivity and specificity of PET for detecting recurrence overall were 96% and 72%, respectively. PET was highly sensitive and specific at regional and distant sites. At local sites, sensitivity was high, but specificity was lower because of false-positive findings. One fifth of all false-positive PET scans occurred at sites of known inflammation or infection. The a...


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Concurrent Cetuximab, Cisplatin, and Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced, Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Phase II Study of a New Combined-Modality Paradigm

David G. Pfister; Yungpo Bernard Su; Dennis H. Kraus; Suzanne L. Wolden; Eric Lis; Timothy Aliff; Andrew J. Zahalsky; Simone Lake; Michael N. Needle; Ashok R. Shaha; Jatin P. Shah; Michael J. Zelefsky

PURPOSE Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab has activity in squamous cell carcinoma and enhances both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We conducted a pilot phase II study of a new combined-modality paradigm of targeted therapy (cetuximab) with chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had stage III or IV, M0, squamous cell head and neck cancer. Treatment included concomitant boost radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d weeks 1 to 6; boost: 1.6 Gy 4 to 6 hours later weeks 5 to 6; 70 Gy total to gross disease), cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously weeks 1 and 4), and cetuximab (400 mg/m2 intravenously week 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 weeks 2 to 10). RESULTS Twenty-two patients were enrolled (median age, 57 years; range, 41 to 72 years; median Karnofsky status, 90%; range, 70% to 90%; oropharynx primary tumor, 59% of patients; T4, 36%; N2/3, 77%; stage IV disease, 86%). One patient did not receive study treatment because of an ineligible diagnosis. The severity of expected, acute toxicities was typical of concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy alone. Grade 3 or 4 cetuximab-related toxicities included acne-like rash (10%) and hypersensitivity (5%). However, the study was closed for significant adverse events, including two deaths (one pneumonia and one unknown cause), one myocardial infarction, one bacteremia, and one atrial fibrillation. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the 3-year overall survival rate is 76%, the 3-year progression-free survival rate is 56%, and the 3-year locoregional control rate is 71%. CONCLUSION This regimen is not currently recommended outside of the clinical trial setting. Further investigation of its safety profile is needed. However, preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and further development of this targeted combined-modality paradigm is warranted.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2001

Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer

Margie Hunt; Michael J. Zelefsky; Suzanne L. Wolden; Chen-Shou Chui; Thomas LoSasso; Kenneth E. Rosenzweig; Lanceford M. Chong; Spiridon V. Spirou; Lisa Fromme; Moira Lumley; Howard A Amols; C.C. Ling; Steven A. Leibel

PURPOSE To implement intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for primary nasopharynx cancer and to compare this technique with conventional treatment methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between May 1998 and June 2000, 23 patients with primary nasopharynx cancer were treated with IMRT delivered with dynamic multileaf collimation. Treatments were designed using an inverse planning algorithm, which accepts dose and dose-volume constraints for targets and normal structures. The IMRT plan was compared with a traditional plan consisting of phased lateral fields and a three-dimensional (3D) plan consisting of a combination of lateral fields and a 3D conformal plan. RESULTS Mean planning target volume (PTV) dose increased from 67.9 Gy with the traditional plan, to 74.6 Gy and 77.3 Gy with the 3D and IMRT plans, respectively. PTV coverage improved in the parapharyngeal region, the skull base, and the medial aspects of the nodal volumes using IMRT and doses to all normal structures decreased compared to the other treatment approaches. Average maximum cord dose decreased from 49 Gy with the traditional plan, to 44 Gy with the 3D plan and 34.5 Gy with IMRT. With the IMRT plan, the volume of mandible and temporal lobes receiving more than 60 Gy decreased by 10-15% compared to the traditional and 3D plans. The mean parotid gland dose decreased with IMRT, although it was not low enough to preserve salivary function. CONCLUSION Lower normal tissue doses and improved target coverage, primarily in the retropharynx, skull base, and nodal regions, were achieved using IMRT. IMRT could potentially improve locoregional control and toxicity at current dose levels or facilitate dose escalation to further enhance locoregional control.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1998

Second cancers following pediatric Hodgkin's disease.

Suzanne L. Wolden; Kathleen R. Lamborn; S F Cleary; David J. Tate; Sarah S. Donaldson

PURPOSE To define the magnitude of second cancer risk among pediatric Hodgkins disease survivors and to determine which factors influence this risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS At Stanford,694 children and teenagers were monitored for 1 to 31.6 years (mean, 13.1) after treatment for Hodgkins disease. Relative risks (RRs), actuarial risks, and absolute excess risks for second malignancies were calculated. The influences of sex, age, stage, splenectomy, treatment and relapse were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS Fifty-six patients developed 59 secondary malignancies: 48 solid tumors, eight leukemias, and three non-Hodgkins lymphomas. The RR of developing a second cancer was 15.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6 to 21.5) for females and 10.6 (95% CI, 6.6 to 16.0) for males. Breast cancer (n = 16) and sarcoma (n = 13) were the most common solid tumors. The actuarial risk at 20 years follow-up evaluation was 9.7% for males, 16.8% for females, and 9.2% for breast cancer. The median interval to diagnosis of a second malignancy was shortest for leukemia, 4.3 years, and longest for lung cancer, 18.4 years. Relapse of Hodgkins disease increased the risk of second malignancy (hazards ratio [HR] = 2.6, P < .001). Hodgkins disease stage, patient age, splenectomy, and treatment modality did not appear to alter overall risk, although chemotherapy was associated with subsequent leukemia. CONCLUSION Aggressive Hodgkins disease therapy is successful, but patients have a significant risk of second malignancy. Newer treatment programs focus on obtaining a relapse-free cure of Hodgkins disease with judicious use of radiation and alkylating agent chemotherapy. Survivors of pediatric Hodgkins disease require lifelong evaluation and cancer screening.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1995

Radiation therapy for primary intracranial germ-cell tumors

Suzanne L. Wolden; William M. Wara; David A. Larson; Michael D. Prados; Michael S. B. Edwards; Penny K. Sneed

PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnosis, therapy, and survival of patients with intracranial germ-cell tumors. To define the role of prophylactic craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy necessary to impact on survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-eight patients with surgically confirmed or suspected primary intracranial germ-cell tumors treated at UCSF between 1968-1990 were reviewed. Thirty-four patients had a pathologic diagnosis, including 24 germinomas, 3 malignant teratomas, 2 choriocarcinomas, 1 embryonal carcinoma, 1 endodermal sinus tumor, and 3 mixed tumors. Information obtained included histology, location, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG), metastatic evaluation, radiation details, survival, and sites of failure. Minimum follow-up time was 2 years and ranged to a maximum of 24 years, with a median of 8 years. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 16 years with 36 males and 12 females. Ten of 32 patients had elevated B-HCG at diagnosis; 6 of 29 had elevations of AFP. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology was negative in 35 of 36 patients evaluated; myelography or spinal MRI was positive in only 1 of 31 patients studied. Five-year actuarial disease-free survival after irradiation was 91% for germinomas, 63% for unbiopsied tumors, and 60% for nongerminoma germ-cell tumors with doses of 50-54 Gy to the local tumor site with or without whole-brain or whole-ventricular irradiation. Routine prophylactic cranio-spinal axis irradiation was not given with a spinal only failure rate of 2%. Eleven of 48 patients have expired, with an actuarial 5-year survival rate of 100% for germinomas, 79% for nonbiopsied tumors, and 80% for nongerminoma germ-cell tumors. CONCLUSION With complete diagnostic craniospinal evaluation, spinal irradiation is not necessary. Cure rates for germinomas are excellent with irradiation alone. Multidrug chemotherapy is necessary with irradiation for nongerminoma germ-cell tumors. Histology is the most important prognostic factor; therefore, all patients should have surgical conformation of their diagnosis so that appropriate treatment can be given.


Cancer Journal | 2002

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Steven A. Leibel; Zvi Fuks; Michael J. Zelefsky; Suzanne L. Wolden; Kenneth E. Rosenzweig; Kaled M. Alektiar; Margie Hunt; Ellen Yorke; L Hong; Howard Amols; C Burman; Andrew Jackson; G Mageras; Thomas LoSasso; Laura Happersett; Spiridon V. Spirou; Chen-Shou Chui; C. Clifton Ling

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy represents a recent advancement in conformal radiotherapy. It employs specialized computer-driven technology to generate dose distributions that conform to tumor targets with extremely high precision. Treatment planning is based on inverse planning algorithms and iterative computer-driven optimization to generate treatment fields with varying intensities across the beam section. Combinations of intensity-modulated fields produce custom-tailored conformal dose distributions around the tumor, with steep dose gradients at the transition to adjacent normal tissues. Thus far, data have demonstrated improved precision of tumor targeting in carcinomas of the prostate, head and neck, thyroid, breast, and lung, as well as in gynecologic, brain, and paraspinal tumors and soft tissue sarcomas. In prostate cancer, intensity-modulated radiotherapy has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity and has permitted tumor dose escalation to previously unattainable levels. This experience indicates that intensity-modulated radiotherapy represents a significant advancement in the ability to deliver the high radiation doses that appear to be required to improve the local cure of several types of tumors. The integration of new methods of biologically based imaging into treatment planning is being explored to identify tumor foci with phenotypic expressions of radiation resistance, which would likely require high-dose treatments. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy provides an approach for differential dose painting to selectively increase the dose to specific tumor-bearing regions. The implementation of biologic evaluation of tumor sensitivity, in addition to methods that improve target delineation and dose delivery, represents a new dimension in intensity-modulated radiotherapy research.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003

Long-Term Event-Free Survival After Intensive Chemotherapy for Ewing’s Family of Tumors in Children and Young Adults

E. Anders Kolb; Brian H. Kushner; Richard Gorlick; Caroline Laverdiere; John H. Healey; Michael P. LaQuaglia; Andrew G. Huvos; Jing Qin; Ha Thanh Vu; Leonard H. Wexler; Suzanne L. Wolden; Paul A. Meyers

PURPOSE To improve the long-term event-free survival of patients with Ewings family of tumors (EFTs) using high-dose, short-term chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS P6 was a prospective study of previously untreated patients with newly diagnosed EFTs. Patients received seven cycles of chemotherapy. Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 6 consisted of cyclophosphamide 2,100 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 2, and a 72-hour continuous infusion of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 and vincristine 2 mg/m2 starting day 1. Cycles 4, 5, and 7 consisted of 5 consecutive days of ifosfamide 1,800 mg/m2/d and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients were enrolled from 1991 to 2001 (median age, 18.7 years; range, 3.7 to 39.9 years). At diagnosis, 44 patients had local-regional disease, and 24 had distant metastases. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rate for patients with local-regional disease is 82%; overall survival (OS) is 89%. The 4-year EFS rate for patients with distant metastases is 12%; the OS rate is 17.8%. All events occurred within 51 months of diagnosis. Four patients with distant metastases had progressive disease during therapy, and no patient with local-regional disease experienced disease progression during therapy. CONCLUSION Sustained EFS and OS can be achieved with intensive chemotherapy in children and young adults with local-regional EFTs. This therapy is relatively ineffective in the treatment of metastatic EFTs.


Cancer | 2006

Sensorineural hearing loss in combined modality treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

W.C. Chen; Andrew Jackson; Amy Budnick; David G. Pfister; Dennis H. Kraus; Margie Hunt; Hilda E. Stambuk; Sabine Levegrün; Suzanne L. Wolden

Combined modality therapy has become the standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, yet the combined ototoxic effects of radiation and cisplatin are poorly understood. The incidence and severity of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) with combined modality therapy was evaluated and the dose–response relation between radiation and hearing loss was investigated.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer: An Update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience

Jeremy Setton; N. Caria; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Lawrence Koutcher; Suzanne L. Wolden; Michael J. Zelefsky; Nicholas Rowan; Eric J. Sherman; Matthew G. Fury; David G. Pfister; Richard J. Wong; Jatin P. Shah; Dennis H. Kraus; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D. Schupak; D. Gelblum; S. Rao; Nancy Y. Lee

PURPOSE To update the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centers experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between September 1998 and April 2009, 442 patients with histologically confirmed OPC underwent IMRT at our center. There were 379 men and 63 women with a median age of 57 years (range, 27-91). The disease was Stage I in 2%, Stage II in 4%, Stage III in 21%, and Stage IV in 73% of patients. The primary tumor subsite was tonsil in 50%, base of tongue in 46%, pharyngeal wall in 3%, and soft palate in 2%. The median prescription dose to the planning target volume of the gross tumor was 70 Gy for definitive (n = 412) cases and 66 Gy for postoperative cases (n = 30). A total 404 patients (91%) received chemotherapy, including 389 (88%) who received concurrent chemotherapy, the majority of which was platinum-based. RESULTS Median follow-up among surviving patients was 36.8 months (range, 3-135). The 3-year cumulative incidence of local failure, regional failure, and distant metastasis was 5.4%, 5.6%, and 12.5%, respectively. The 3-year OS rate was 84.9%. The incidence of late dysphagia and late xerostomia ≥Grade 2 was 11% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the feasibility of IMRT in achieving excellent locoregional control and low rates of xerostomia. According to our knowledge, this study is the largest report of patients treated with IMRT for OPC.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2000

Management of Breast Cancer After Hodgkin’s Disease

Suzanne L. Wolden; Steven L. Hancock; Robert W. Carlson; Don R. Goffinet; Stefanie S. Jeffrey; Richard T. Hoppe

PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence, detection, pathology, management, and prognosis of breast cancer occurring after Hodgkins disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-one cases of breast cancer in 65 survivors of Hodgkins disease were analyzed. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 24.6 years for Hodgkins disease and 42.6 years for breast cancer. The relative risk for invasive breast cancer after Hodgkins disease was 4.7 (95% confidence interval, 3.4 to 6. 0) compared with an age-matched cohort. Cancers were detected by self-examination (63%), mammography (30%), and physician exam (7%). The histologic distribution paralleled that reported in the general population (85% ductal histology) as did other features (27% positive axillary lymph nodes, 63% positive estrogen receptors, and 25% family history). Although 87% of tumors were less than 4 cm, 95% were managed with mastectomy because of prior radiation. Two women underwent lumpectomy with breast irradiation. One of these patients developed tissue necrosis in the region of overlap with the prior mantle field. The incidence of bilateral breast cancer was 10%. Adjuvant systemic therapy was well tolerated; doxorubicin was used infrequently. Ten-year disease-specific survival was as follows: in-situ disease, 100%; stage I, 88%; stage II, 55%; stage III, 60%; and stage IV, zero. CONCLUSION The risk of breast cancer is increased after Hodgkins disease. Screening has been successful in detecting early-stage cancers. Pathologic features and prognosis are similar to that reported in the general population. Repeat irradiation of the breast can lead to tissue necrosis, and thus, mastectomy remains the standard of care in most cases.

Collaboration


Dive into the Suzanne L. Wolden's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy Y. Lee

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis H. Kraus

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Zelefsky

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David G. Pfister

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leonard H. Wexler

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jatin P. Shah

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian H. Kushner

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Rao

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard J. Wong

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael P. LaQuaglia

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge