Suzanne Lee
RMIT University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Suzanne Lee.
Midwifery | 2014
Suzanne Lee; Susan Ayers; Des Holden
INTRODUCTION risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies affects their decisions about perinatal care and is of interest to anyone involved in the care of pregnant women. This paper provides a metasynthesis of qualitative studies of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies. METHODS a systematic search of eight electronic databases was conducted. Additional papers were obtained through searching references of identified articles. Six studies were identified that reported qualitative research into risk perception in relation to high risk pregnancy. A metasynthesis was developed to describe and interpret the studies. FINDINGS the synthesis resulted in the identification of five themes: determinants of risk perception; not seeing it the way others do; normality versus risk; if the infant is ok, I׳m ok; managing risk. CONCLUSIONS this metasynthesis suggests women at high risk during pregnancy use multiple sources of information to determine their risk status. It shows women are aware of the risks posed by their pregnancies but do not perceive risk in the same way as healthcare professionals. They will take steps to ensure the health of themselves and their infants but these may not include following all medical recommendations.
Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2016
Suzanne Lee; Susan Ayers; Des Holden
Abstract Introduction: Women consider factors including safety and the psychological impact of their chosen location when deciding whether to give birth in hospital or at home. The same is true for women with high-risk pregnancies who may plan homebirths against medical advice. This study investigated women’s decision-making during high-risk pregnancies. Half the participants were planning hospital births and half were planning homebirths. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews set in a hospital maternity department in the UK. Twenty-six participants with high-risk pregnancies, at least 32 weeks pregnant. Results were analysed using systematic thematic analysis. Results: Three themes emerged: perceptions of birth at home and hospital; beliefs about how birth should be; and the decision process. Both groups were concerned about safety but they expressed different concerns. Women drew psychological comfort from their chosen birth location. Women planning homebirths displayed faith in the natural birth process and stressed the quality of the birth experience. Women planning hospital births believed the access to medical care outweighed their misgivings about the physical environment. Discussion: Although women from both groups expressed similar concerns about safety they reached different decisions about how these should be addressed regarding birth location. These differences may be related to beliefs about the birth process. Commitment to their decisions may have helped reduce cognitive stress.
Women and Birth | 2016
Suzanne Lee; Des Holden; Susan Ayers
INTRODUCTION Where to give birth is a key decision in pregnancy. Women use information from family, friends and other sources besides healthcare professionals when contemplating this decision. This study explored womens use of lay information during high risk pregnancies in order to examine differences and similarities in the use of information in relation to planned place of birth. Half the participants were planning hospital births and half were planning to give birth at home. METHODS A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews set in a hospital maternity department in South East England. Twenty-six participants with high risk pregnancies, at least 32 weeks pregnant. Results were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three themes emerged: approaches to research - how much information women chose to seek out and from which sources; selection of sources - how women decided which sources they considered reliable; and unhelpful research - information they considered unhelpful. Women planning homebirths undertook more research than women planning to give birth in hospital and were more likely to seek out alternative sources of information. Women from both groups referred to deliberately seeking out sources of information which reflected their own values and so did not challenge their decisions. CONCLUSIONS There are similarities and differences in the use of lay information between women who plan to give birth in hospital and those who plan homebirths. Professionals working with women with high risk pregnancies should consider these factors when interacting with these women.
Midwifery | 2016
Suzanne Lee; Susan Ayers; Des Holden
The British Journal of Midwifery | 2014
Suzanne Lee
British Journal of General Practice | 2017
Susan Button; Alexandra Thornton; Suzanne Lee; Judy Shakespeare; Susan Ayers
Midwifery | 2016
Suzanne Lee; Susan Ayers; Des Holden
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2018
Susan Ayers; Rosalind Crawley; Susan Button; Alexandra Thornton; Andy P. Field; Chris Flood; Suzanne Lee; Andrew Eagle; Robert Bradley; Donna Moore; Gill Gyte; Helen Smith
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2018
Rosalind Crawley; Susan Ayers; Susan Button; Alexandra Thornton; Andy P. Field; Suzanne Lee; Andrew Eagle; Robert Bradley; Donna Moore; Gill Gyte; Helen Smith
Archive | 2018
Susan Ayers; Rosalind Crawley; Susan Button; Alexandra Thornton; Andy P. Field; C Flood; Suzanne Lee; Andrew Eagle; Robert Bradley; Donna Moore; Gillian Ml Gyte; Helen Smith