Suzanne McClure

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU, adriamycin, and mitomycin-C (FAM) versus surgery alone for patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A southwest oncology group study

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate FAM [5-FU (5-fluorouracil), doxorubicin, mitomycin C] chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected TNM stage I, II, or III gastric carcinoma. Patients and Methods: One hundred ninety-three eligible patients were accrued from 1978 to 1991 in a phase III trial comparing six cycles (1 year) of postoperative FAM chemotherapy with observation only. Results: The median follow-up on this study was 9.5 years. For all patients, no differences (log-rank analysis) in disease-free survival (p=0.45) and overall survival (p=0.57) between FAM therapy (93 cases) and surgery (100 cases) were observed. Quality of surgical resection affected survival irrespective of FAM use. Cases with curative resection, defined in a retrospective review of pathology and surgical reports as cases having no evidence of residual disease in the abdomen and tumor-free margins >1 cm, had superior survival compared to cases not meeting these requirements (p<0.001). FAM was well tolerated with 6% (five of 90) of cases demonstrating grade IV hematologic toxicity. There were two drug-related fatalities (one cardiomyopathy, one hematolytic uremic syndrome). Conclusion: FAM is not effective adjuvant therapy for TNM stage I, II, and III patients with resected gastric cancer. Future adjuvant studies must emphasize prospective surgical quality control to assure enrollment of appropriately staged and resected cases and wide participation to assure adequate case accrual over a reasonable period.

Phase II Trial of Menogaril in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: a Southwest Oncology Group Trial

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of menogaril against non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) in a group of previously treated patients.Patients and methods: Sixty-two eligible patients with a histologic diagnosis of NHL were enrolled, 35 of who had intermediate or high-grade histologies and 27 of who had low-grade lymphomas. Patients with intermediate or high-grade lymphomas had received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen, while patients with low-grade histologies had received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Menogaril was administered at 160 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 hour, once every 28 days.Results: Among the 35 patients with intermediate or high-grade lymphomas who were evaluable for response, 6 of 35 patients achieved a partial response (PR) for a response rate of 17% (95% confidence interval: 7%−34%). Median survival in this group of patients was 13 months. For those patients with low-grade lymphoma, 5 of 26 patients achieved a PR for a response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval: 6%−38%). No complete responses were observed in either patient group. The incidence of serious (grade 3 or 4) toxicity for those with intermediate/high-grade and low-grade lymphomas was 43% and 44%, respectively. Most of these toxic effects consisted of reversible myelosuppression. Menogaril was discontinued in 2 patients due to prolonged neutropenia. Cardiotoxicity was observed in 4 patients, requiring discontinuation of the drug in 1 patient. No treatment-related deaths occurred and the overall toxicity was felt to be acceptable.Conclusion: The observed antitumor activity of single agent menogaril against both intermediate/high-grade and low-grade lymphomas was modest. Further exploration of this agent in patients with non-Hodgkins lymphomas does not seem warranted.