Suzanne Narayan
Metropolitan State University of Denver
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Suzanne Narayan.
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2005
Marsha L. Lewis; Kenneth Hepburn; Suzanne Narayan; Laura Nelson Kirk
This study examined the relationship between four framing categories of caregiving (Relational, Instrumental, Reactive, Role Acquiring), derived from interviews with spouse caregivers, and scores on standardized measures of responses to and outcomes of caregiving. Participants were 132 spouses recruited into a larger intervention study of family caregivers of communitydwelling persons with dementia. Qualitative data were analyzed using constant comparative method; quantitative data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Findings demonstrated that relational spouses scored better than spouses in the other three categories, indicating greater positive well-being. Relational spouses also scored significantly lower than instrumental and reactive spouses on a composite caregiver distress measure (p = 0.003). These results suggest that interventions may need to be tailored to spouses with different caregiving perspectives.
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2002
Kenneth Hepburn; Marsha L. Lewis; Suzanne Narayan; Jane B. Tornatore; Karin Lindstrom Bremer; Carley Wexler Sherman
A method of constant comparative analysis was used to code open-ended interviews with 132 spouse caregivers regarding their experiences in caregiving. Results of this analysis yielded 69 qualitative code categories. We used these categories to compare the caregivers on several groupings that the literature has identified as providing meaningful ways to differentiate among caregivers. We used the qualitative responses to compare the caregivers by caregiver gender, care-recipient dementia severity, and duration of caregiving. Results partly confirmed previous findings that wife caregivers are more distressed than husbands, but the results also indicated these caregivers were more similar than dissimilar. The other analyses likewise indicated greater similarities than dissimilarities in the caregiving experience. We next continued the analysis and, using the coding categories as a springboard, identified four distinct patterns for construction of the meaning of the caregiving experience in the caregivers’ discourse. These discourse-derived framing categories, applicable in about three-quarters of the caregivers, offered other ways to distinguish among caregivers. Further analysis of these robust groupings showed important differences among the groups. These framing categories suggest ways to differentiate among caregivers, based on their perception of their role in the caregiving situation, ways that might point the way to intervention strategies for each of the groupings.
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2000
Marsha L. Lewis; Kenneth Hepburn; Suzanne Narayan; Robin M. Lally; Sheila Corcoran-Perry; Melitta K. Maddox; Kyla Dropkin; Susan Hasse
Families provide the majority of care for persons with Alzheimers disease. Multiple aspects of caregiving, including decision-making, lead to caregiver burden and stress. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the decision situations faced by caregivers. Nine female spouse caregivers participated in focus groups to solicit the decision situations they faced while caring for their husbands. Some 183 decision situations were grouped into 14 decision-making topics and five other topical categories: physical safety and wellness; cognitive and emotional; relationships; caregiver well-being; and legal. Categories were organized under two themes: decision situations related to self-care and decision situations related to spouse care. The majority of decision situations relate to maintaining the caregivers well-being. Implications for nursing and further study are discussed.
Cancer Nursing | 1999
Marsha L. Lewis; Sheila Corcoran-Perry; Suzanne Narayan; Robin M. Lally
Health professionals have an obligation to understand womens decision making about mammography and to advocate for their active participation in health care decision making. Although mammography is a major screening measure for the second largest cancer killer of women, only approximately half of women older than age 50 years, and fewer older than age 70 years, undergo mammography in accordance with American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify womens overall decision-making approaches when considering mammography. Subjects were a purposive, convenience sample of 50 women in the community who had made a decision about mammography; they included those who chose to have mammograms and those who decided not to have mammograms according to the pre-1997 ACS guidelines. Subjects participated in audiotaped interviews. Results indicated that women approached the mammography decision differently, regardless of the decision they made. Three overall decision-making approaches to addressing risk factors, issues about mammography, or other factors before their decision were evident. The approaches were (1) thoughtful consideration; (2) cursory consideration; and (3) little or no consideration. Each approach has implications for nurses who assist women in making decisions about mammography.
American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2015
Suzanne Narayan; Mathew Varghese; Kenneth Hepburn; Marsha L. Lewis; Isabel Paul; Rozina Bhimani
This study reports on the first phase of an investigation aimed at adapting The Savvy Caregiver program, a successful family caregiving curriculum developed in the United States, for application in South India. Thirty family members caring for a person with dementia were interviewed regarding their experiences as caregivers (CGs). Qualitative interviews were conducted with the family member at a geriatric clinic, while other diagnostic procedures were being carried out with the person with dementia. Findings from the study revealed that although family members understood the term CG, none could identify a word for CG in his or her language. There was little understanding of dementia as an illness. Family CGs reported feeling distressed, overwhelmed, and frustrated with caregiving. Caregivers were interested in an educational program, but many had unrealistic expectations for what they wanted to learn. The findings provide directions for adapting The Savvy Caregiver curriculum for Indian family CGs.
Journal of Gerontological Nursing | 2001
Suzanne Narayan; Marsha L. Lewis; Jane B. Tornatore; Kenneth Hepburn; Sheila Corcoran-Perry
Clinical Gerontologist | 2006
Kenneth Hepburn; Marsha L. Lewis; Laura Nelson Kirk; Suzanne Narayan; Karin Lindstrom Bremer; Jane B. Tornatore
Research in Nursing & Health | 1997
Suzanne Narayan; Sheila Corcoran-Perry
Cancer Nursing | 1997
Marsha L. Lewis; Valinda Pearson; Sheila Corcoran-Perry; Suzanne Narayan
Nursing & Health Sciences | 1999
Sheila Corcoran-Perry; Suzanne Narayan; Sally Cochrane