Suzanne van Beek

Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance

PURPOSE To quantify local geometrical uncertainties in anatomical sub-regions during radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Local setup accuracy was analyzed for 38 patients, who had received intensity-modulated radiotherapy and were regularly scanned during treatment with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for offline patient setup correction. In addition to the clinically used large region of interest (ROI), we defined eight ROIs in the planning CT that contained rigid bony structures: the mandible, larynx, jugular notch, occiput bone, vertebrae C1-C3, C3-C5, and C5-C7, and the vertebrae caudal of C7. By local rigid registration to successive CBCT scans, the local setup accuracy of each ROI was determined and compared with the overall setup error assessed with the large ROI. Deformations were distinguished from rigid body movements by expressing movement relative to a reference ROI (vertebrae C1-C3). RESULTS The offline patient setup correction protocol using the large ROI resulted in residual systematic errors (1 SD) within 1.2 mm and random errors within 1.5 mm for each direction. Local setup errors were larger, ranging from 1.1 to 3.4 mm (systematic) and 1.3 to 2.5 mm (random). Systematic deformations ranged from 0.4 mm near the reference C1-C3 to 3.8 mm for the larynx. Random deformations ranged from 0.5 to 3.6 mm. CONCLUSION Head-and-neck cancer patients show considerable local setup variations, exceeding residual global patient setup uncertainty in an offline correction protocol. Current planning target volume margins may be inadequate to account for these uncertainties. We propose registration of multiple ROIs to drive correction protocols and adaptive radiotherapy to reduce the impact of local setup variations.

Correction strategies to manage deformations in head-and-neck radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To optimize couch shifts based on multiple region-of-interest (ROI) registrations and derive criteria for adaptive replanning for management of deformations in head-and-neck (H&N) cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight ROIs containing bony structures were defined on the planning-CT and individually registered to daily cone-beam CTs for 19 H&N cancer patients. Online couch shifts were retrospectively optimized to correct the mean setup error over all ROIs (mean correction) or to minimize the maximum error (MiniMax correction). Residual error distributions were analyzed for both methods. The number of measurements before adaptive-intervention and corresponding action-level were optimized. RESULTS Overall residual setup errors were smallest for the mean corrections, while MiniMax corrections reduced the largest errors. The percentage of fractions with residual errors >5 mm was 38% versus 19%. Reduction of deformations by single plan adaptation was most effective after eight fractions: systematic deformations reduced from 1.7 to 0.9 mm. Fifty percent of this reduction can already be achieved by replanning 1/3 of the patients. CONCLUSION Two correction methods based on multiple ROI registration were introduced to manage setup errors from deformations that either minimize overall geometrical uncertainties or maximum errors. Moreover, the registrations could be used to select patient with large deformations for replanning.

Deformable Image Registration for Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer: Accuracy and Precision in the Presence of Tumor Changes

PURPOSE To compare deformable image registration (DIR) accuracy and precision for normal and tumor tissues in head and neck cancer patients during the course of radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirteen patients with oropharyngeal tumors, who underwent submucosal implantation of small gold markers (average 6, range 4-10) around the tumor and were treated with RT were retrospectively selected. Two observers identified 15 anatomical features (landmarks) representative of normal tissues in the planning computed tomography (pCT) scan and in weekly cone beam CTs (CBCTs). Gold markers were digitally removed after semiautomatic identification in pCTs and CBCTs. Subsequently, landmarks and gold markers on pCT were propagated to CBCTs, using a b-spline-based DIR and, for comparison, rigid registration (RR). To account for observer variability, the pair-wise difference analysis of variance method was applied. DIR accuracy (systematic error) and precision (random error) for landmarks and gold markers were quantified. Time trend of the precisions for RR and DIR over the weekly CBCTs were evaluated. RESULTS DIR accuracies were submillimeter and similar for normal and tumor tissue. DIR precision (1 SD) on the other hand was significantly different (P<.01), with 2.2 mm vector length in normal tissue versus 3.3 mm in tumor tissue. No significant time trend in DIR precision was found for normal tissue, whereas in tumor, DIR precision was significantly (P<.009) degraded during the course of treatment by 0.21 mm/week. CONCLUSIONS DIR for tumor registration proved to be less precise than that for normal tissues due to limited contrast and complex non-elastic tumor response. Caution should therefore be exercised when applying DIR for tumor changes in adaptive procedures.

Adaptive radiotherapy with an average anatomy model: Evaluation and quantification of residual deformations in head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To develop and validate an adaptive intervention strategy for radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer that accounts for systematic deformations by modifying the planning-CT (pCT) to the average misalignments in daily cone beam CT (CBCT) measured with deformable registration (DR). METHODS AND MATERIALS Daily CBCT scans (808 scans) for 25 patients were retrospectively registered to the pCT with B-spline DR. The average deformation vector field () was used to deform the pCT for adaptive intervention. Two strategies were simulated: single intervention after 10 fractions and weekly intervention with an from the previous week. The model was geometrically validated with the residual misalignment of anatomical landmarks both on bony-anatomy (BA; automatically generated) and soft-tissue (ST; manually identified). RESULTS Systematic deformations were 2.5/3.4mm vector length (BA/ST). Single intervention reduced deformations to 1.5/2.7 mm (BA/ST). Weekly intervention resulted in 1.0/2.2mm (BA/ST) and accounted better for progressive changes. 15 patients had average systematic deformations >2mm (BA): reductions were 1.1/1.9 mm (single/weekly BA). ST improvements were underestimated due to observer and registration variability. CONCLUSIONS Adaptive intervention with a pCT modified to the average anatomy during treatment successfully reduces systematic deformations. The improved accuracy could possibly be exploited in margin reduction and/or dose escalation.

Evaluation of Tumor Shape Variability in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients Over the Course of Radiation Therapy Using Implanted Gold Markers

PURPOSE This study quantifies tumor shape variability in head-and-neck cancer patients during radiation therapy using implanted markers. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-seven patients with oropharyngeal tumors treated with (chemo)radiation were included. Helical gold markers (0.35 × 2 mm, 3-10/patient, average 6) were implanted around the tumor. Markers were identified on planning computed tomography (CT) and daily cone beam CT (CBCT). After bony anatomy registration, the daily vector length on CBCT in reference to the planning CT and daily marker movement perpendicular to the gross tumor volume (GTV) surface at planning CT (d(normal)) of each marker were analyzed. Time trends were assessed with linear regression of the (markers). In 2 patients, 2 markers were implanted in normal tissue to evaluate migration by measuring intermarker distances. RESULTS Marker implantation was feasible without complications. Three-dimensional vectors (4827 measurements, mean 0.23 cm, interquartile ratio 0.24 cm) were highest in base of tongue sublocalization (P<.001) and bulky tumors (vectors exceeded 0.5 cm in 5.7% [0-20 mL], 12.0% [21-40 mL], and 21.7% [≥ 41 mL], respectively [P<.001] of measurements). The measured inward time trend in 11/27 patients correlated with the visual observed marker pattern. In patients with an outward trend (5/27) or no trend (11/27), visual observation showed predominantly an inhomogeneous pattern. Remarkably, in 6 patients, outward marker movement was observed in the posterior pharyngeal wall. The difference in distance between normal tissue markers (1 SD) was 0.05-0.06 cm without time trend, indicating that implanted markers did not migrate. CONCLUSIONS During head-and-neck radiation therapy, normal tissue markers remained stable. Changes in position of tumor markers depended on sublocalization and tumor volume. Large differences in marker patterns between patients as well as within patients were observed. Based on our study, the cranial and caudal border in the posterior pharyngeal wall are at highest risk to be covered insufficiently. Furthermore, implanted markers could help identify patients with an actual shrinkage of the GTV who might benefit from mid-radiation therapy redelineation to reduce toxicity.

Evaluation of a Single-Isocenter Technique for Axillary Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer

The aim of this study was to develop a technique for axillary radiotherapy that minimizes the risk of radiation-induced damage to the surrounding normal tissue (i.e., arm, shoulder, lung, esophagus, and spinal cord) while keeping the risk of a nodal recurrence to a minimum. A planning study was performed in 20 breast cancer patients. The target volume of the axillary treatment encompassed the periclavicular and axillary lymph node areas. The 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) information in this study was used to outline the lymph node areas and the organs at risk (i.e., the esophagus, spinal cord, brachial plexus, and lung). A conventional AP-PA technique (with a transmission plate placed in the AP beam) was evaluated. In addition, a new single-isocenter technique consisting of AP/PA fields using a gantry rotation of +/-20 degrees and a medial AP segment was developed. Both techniques were compared by evaluation of the calculated dose distributions and the dose-volume histograms of the target volume and surrounding organs at risk. The field borders and humeral shielding were redefined based on the 3D anatomical references. Adapting the humeral shielding reduced the irradiated volume by 19% and might contribute to a reduction of the incidence of arm edema and impairment of shoulder function. The maximum radiation dose in the esophagus and spinal cord was reduced by more than 50% using the single-isocenter technique. The difference between both techniques with respect to the mean doses in the target volume and lung, and the maximum dose in brachial plexus, was not statistically significant. Moreover, the single-isocenter technique allowed a fast and easy treatment preparation and reduced the execution time considerably (with approximately 10 minutes per fraction).

Pre-clinical experience of an adaptive plan library strategy in radiotherapy of rectal cancer: An inter-observer study

Background and purpose The clinical target volume (CTV) in radiotherapy of rectal cancer is subject to large deformations. With a plan library strategy, the treatment may be adapted to these deformations. The purpose of this study was to determine feasibility and consistency in plan selection for a plan library strategy in radiotherapy of rectal cancer. Material and methods Thirty rectal cancer patients were included in this retrospective study with in total 150 CBCT scans. A library of CTVs was constructed with in-house built software using population statistics on daily rectal deformations. The library consisted of five plans based on: the original CTV, two larger, and two smaller CTVs. An inter-observer study (study-I) was performed to test the consistency in plan choices between four observers (all RTTs). After five months the observers were asked to re-evaluate (study-II) the same set of scans based on refined guidelines. Results In study-I the observers reached accordance with the majority choice in 69% of cases. This improved to 87% in study-II. The consensus meeting revealed that inconsistency in choices mainly arose from inadequate instructions, which were later clarified and formulated more accurately. Conclusion Plan selection based on daily CBCT scans for rectal cancer patients is feasible, and can be performed consistently by well-trained RTTs.

Local interfractional setup reproducibility for 2 individual head and neck supports in head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE In radiation therapy, head and neck (H&N) supports and thermoplastic masks are used to reproduce the setup of patients for H&N treatment. Individualized supports that include the shoulders may improve the immobilization of the upper thorax region. The purpose of this study was to compare the local misalignment of the supraclavicular region using a vacuum cushion H&N support to a more simple in-house modified, clinically standard H&N support. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two groups of 15 patients were evaluated: the first group of patients was positioned using a vacuum cushion as an individual head support and the second group with a modified Posifix headrest (MPH). A total of 316 cone beam computed tomography (CBCTs; ~ 10 scans per patient) were evaluated using a multiple region of interest registration protocol. Local setup errors were measured using chamfer matching on the CBCT scan to the planning CT scan for 9 bony structures (cervical vertebrae 1, 3, 5, and 7 [C7], lower jaw, hyoid bone, larynx, skull, and jugular notch). In this study, we compared the local residual misalignments of the bony structures and in particular those of the jugular notch and C7 as surrogates of the shoulders and thorax region. The workload was qualitatively evaluated on the basis of open interviews. RESULTS The significant differences in group mean, systematic error, and random error of the local residual misalignments between the 2 groups for jugular notch and C7 were equal or smaller than 0.5 mm and 0.1 degrees, and for the other 7 bony structures were equal to or smaller than 0.6 mm and 1.2 degrees (larynx). There were no large differences in workload. CONCLUSIONS No clinically relevant differences were found between a modified Posifix headrest and an individual vacuum cushion for H&N cancer patients in local posture change at the level of the clavicle and upper thorax.