Sven A. Danner

New developments in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections

New techniques have emerged for the detection of bacteria in blood, because the blood culture as gold standard is slow and insufficiently sensitive when the patient has previously received antibiotics or in the presence of fastidious organisms. DNA-based techniques, hybridisation probes, and PCR-based detection or protein-based detection by mass spectroscopy are aimed at rapid identification of bacteria and provide results within 2 h after the first signal of growth in conventional blood cultures. Also, detection of microorganisms directly in blood by pathogen-specific or broad-range PCR assays (eubacterial or panfungal) shows promising results. Interpretation is complex, however, because of detection of DNA rather than living pathogens, the risk of interfering contamination, the presence of background DNA in blood, and the lack of a gold standard. As these techniques are emerging, clinical value and cost-effectiveness have to be assessed. Nevertheless, molecular assays are expected eventually to replace the current conventional microbiological techniques for detection of bloodstream infections.

HIV monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors: a systematic review

Objective:To assess the efficacy of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy. Design and methods:Systematic review of all protease inhibitor-monotherapy studies published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at conferences to date. Data of randomized controlled trials were pooled to yield common odds ratios. Results:Twenty-two protease inhibitor-monotherapy studies were identified. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 395 out of 582 (67.9%) patients had undetectable HIV-RNA at the end of follow-up. In the six randomized controlled trials (all lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy), the risk of therapy failure was greater on monotherapy: 121 out of 364 (33.2%) patients on monotherapy against 64 out of 280 (22.9%) patients on HAART [pooled odds ratio 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.02–2.13, P = 0.037)]. Regarding patients with successfully resuppressed HIV-RNA upon (re-)introducing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as nonfailures, the risk of therapy failure was comparable: 98 out of 364 (26.9%) against 64 out of 280 (22.9%) patients [odds ratio 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.72–1.53, P = 0.81)]. Conclusion:The overall efficacy of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy is inferior to HAART. The efficacy improves in patients started on monotherapy after suppressed HIV-RNA for at least 6 months. Ten percent of patients have viral rebound with HIV-RNA levels between 50 and 500 copies/ml. Possible explanations are lack of HIV suppression in particular cells or compartments, alternative resistance mechanisms, and nonadherence. Once proven that reintroduction of NRTIs, in patients with loss of viral suppression, is safe and effective, a broader use of simplification of HAART to protease inhibitor monotherapy might be justified. This review supports that the majority of patients with prolonged viral suppression on HAART can successfully be treated with protease inhibitor monotherapy. Arguments for this strategy are NRTI/NNRTI side effects, NRTI/NNRTI resistance, and costs.

Quantitative Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis DNA in Blood To Diagnose Bacteremia in Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

ABSTRACT Direct detection of bacterial DNA in blood offers a fast alternative to blood culture and is presumably unaffected by the prior use of antibiotics. We evaluated the performance of two real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and for Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia directly in blood samples, without prior cultivation. Whole-blood samples for PCR were obtained simultaneously with blood cultures from patients admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital. After the extraction of DNA from 200 μl of blood, real-time PCR was performed for the specific detection and quantification of S. aureus and E. faecalis DNA. The sensitivity for bacteremia of the S. aureus PCR was 75% and that of the E. faecalis PCR was 73%, and both tests had high specificity values (93 and 96%, respectively). PCR amplification reactions were positive for S. aureus for 10 (7%) blood samples with negative blood cultures, and 7 (4%) PCR reactions were positive for E. faecalis. The majority of these PCR results were likely (50%) or possibly (42%) related to infection with the specific microorganism, based on clinical data and radiological and microbiological investigations. PCR results were concordant for 95% of paired whole-blood samples, and blood culture results were concordant for 97% of the paired samples. We conclude that the detection of S. aureus and E. faecalis DNA in blood by real-time PCR enables a rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and that a positive DNAemia is related to proven or possible infection with the specific microorganism in the majority of patients with negative blood cultures.

Zidovudine/lamivudine for HIV-1 infection contributes to limb fat loss.

Background Lipoatrophy is known to be associated with stavudine as part of the treatment for HIV infection, but it is less clear if this serious side effect is also related to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors like zidovudine. We aimed to determine whether zidovudine-sparing first-line antiretroviral therapy would lead to less lipoatrophy and other metabolic changes than zidovudine-containing therapy. Methodology/Principal Findings Fifty antiretroviral therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected men with an indication to start antiretroviral therapy were included in a randomized single blinded clinical trial. Randomisation was between zidovudine-containing therapy (zidovudine/lamivudine+lopinavir/ritonavir) and zidovudine-sparing therapy (nevirapine+lopinavir/ritonavir). Main outcome measures were body composition assessed by computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan and lipid profile before and after 3, 12, 24 months of antiretroviral therapy. In the zidovudine/lamivudine+lopinavir/ritonavir group, from 3 months onward limb fat decreased progressively by 684±293 grams (estimated mean±standard error of the mean)(pu200a=u200a0.02) up to 24 months whereas abdominal fat increased, but exclusively in the visceral compartment (+21.9±8.1 cm2, pu200a=u200a0.008)). In contrast, in the nevirapine+lopinavir/ritonavir group, a generalized increase in fat mass was observed. After 24 months no significant differences in high density lipoprotein and total/high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio were found between both treatment groups, but total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in the nevirapine+lopinavir/ritonavir group (6.1±0.2 versus 5.3±0.2 and 3.6±0.1 versus 2.8±0.1 mmol/l respectively, p<0.05). Virologic response and safety were comparable in both groups. Conclusions/Significance Zidovudine/lamivudine+lopinavir/ritonavir, but not nevirapine+lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients, is associated with lipoatrophy and greater relative intraabdominal lipohypertrophy, suggesting that zidovudine/lamivudine contributes to both these features of lipodystrophy. These findings support to no longer consider zidovudine/lamivudine as one of the preferred possible components of first-line antiretroviral therapy where alternative treatments are available. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00122226

Prevalence and determinants for malnutrition in geriatric outpatients

BACKGROUND & AIMSnFew data is available on the nutritional status of geriatric outpatients. The aim of this study is to describe the nutritional status and its clinical correlates of independently living geriatric older individuals visiting a geriatric outpatient department.nnnMETHODSnFrom 2005 to 2010, all consecutive patients visiting a geriatric outpatient department in the Netherlands were screened for malnutrition. Nutritional status was assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). Determinants of malnutrition were categorized into somatic factors (medicine use, comorbidity, walking aid, falls, urinary incontinence), psychological factors (GDS-15 depression scale, MMSE cognition scale), functional status (Activities of Daily Life (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL)), social factors (children, marital status), and life style factors (smoking, alcohol use). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and sex and all other risk factors were performed to identify correlates of malnutrition (MNA < 17).nnnRESULTSnIncluded were 448 outpatients, mean (SD) age was 80 (7) years and 38% was men. Prevalence of malnutrition and risk for malnutrition were 17% and 58%. Depression, being IADL dependent, and smoking were independently associated with an increased risk of malnutrition with ORs (95%CI) of 2.6 (1.3-5.3), 2.8 (1.3-6.4), 5.5 (1.9-16.4) respectively. Alcohol use was associated with a decreased risk (OR 0.4 (0.2-0.9)).nnnCONCLUSIONnMalnutrition is highly prevalent among geriatric outpatients and is independently associated with depressive symptoms, poor functional status, and life style factors. Our results emphasize the importance of integrating nutritional assessment within a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Future longitudinal studies should be performed to examine the effects of causal relationships and multifactorial interventions.

Clinical, immunological and virological response to different antiretroviral regimens in a cohort of HIV-2-infected patients

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical, immunological and virological response and the emergence of resistance towards antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a cohort of HIV-2-infected patients. DesignObservational study. PatientsHIV-2-infected patients residing in the Netherlands. ResultsFrom 1995 to 2001 seven patients failed various ART regimens. The resistance mutations were analysed retrospectively. Development of mutations proved to be similar to that observed in HIV-1-infected patients, with the exception of a higher occurrence of the Q151M mutation within the reverse transcriptase gene. In a prospective study, comprising 13 consecutive naive HIV-2-infected patients, all patients achieved plasma HIV-2-RNA suppression below the detection limit (500 copies/ml). The antiretroviral regimen consisted of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and indinavir, with a boosting dose of ritonavir; the median follow-up was 91 weeks. Two patients experienced a temporary virological rebound, while at the same time therapeutic drug monitoring showed sub-therapeutic plasma levels of indinavir. ConclusionSustained viral suppression in HIV-2-infected patients can be achieved using an antiretroviral regimen of two NRTIs and boosted indinavir or lopinavir.

Protease inhibitors atazanavir, lopinavir and ritonavir are potent blockers, but poor substrates, of ABC transporters in a broad panel of ABC transporter-overexpressing cell lines

OBJECTIVESnA possible mechanism for HIV therapy failure is the efflux of HIV drugs from viral target cells or certain body compartments by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, allowing ongoing viral replication. Here, we investigated the interaction between protease inhibitors (PIs) and ABC transporters.nnnMETHODSnTo explore the potential blocking capacity of PIs, we exposed cells overexpressing multidrug resistance 1 P-glycoprotein (MDR1 P-gp), multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) to established cytotoxic substrates with or without one of the PIs atazanavir, lopinavir or ritonavir. Furthermore, to assess whether PIs serve as substrates, cell growth-inhibitory effects of these PIs were evaluated on cells overexpressing 1 of 11 ABC transporters and their parental counterparts.nnnRESULTSnAtazanavir, lopinavir and ritonavir were highly effective in reversing resistance against established substrates in cells overexpressing MDR1 P-gp and MRP1, and, to a lesser extent, BCRP. Concurrently, however, PIs appeared to be relatively poor substrates for ABC transporters. Only a moderate level of resistance to atazanavir was observed in cells overexpressing MRP6 and MRP9 [resistance factor (RF): 2.0-2.6]. Cells overexpressing MDR1 P-gp, MRP3, MRP4 and MRP5 displayed low levels of resistance to atazanavir (RF: 1.3-1.7); MRP7- and MRP9-overexpressing cells to lopinavir (RF: 1.4-1.5); and MRP9-overexpressing cells to ritonavir (RF: 1.4).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPIs can act as potent blockers of MDR1 P-gp, MRP1 and BCRP, but they are poor substrates for 11 ABC transporters. Consequently, ABC transporters are unlikely to play a major role in PI failure, but still may contribute to drug-specific adverse events and drug-drug interactions.

The lopinavir/ritonavir-associated rise in lipids is not related to lopinavir or ritonavir plasma concentration

BACKGROUNDnThe relationship between lopinavir plasma concentration and the magnitude of lipid elevation after initiation of lopinavir/ritonavir-containing antiretroviral therapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between drug concentration and lipid changes in two patient cohorts.nnnMETHODSnFirst, we analysed, in an outpatient cohort, the correlation between percentage lipid changes and lopinavir concentration, measured at least 2 weeks or more after initiation of lopinavir/ritonavir. Second, we analysed the correlation between lipid changes and lopinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations in antiretroviral-naive patients enrolled in a trial comparing nevirapine plus lopinavir/ritonavir (533/133 mg twice daily) with zidovudine/lamivudine plus lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice daily).nnnRESULTSnIn 82 outpatients with 215 lopinavir plasma measurements, we found no significant correlations between lopinavir concentration and changes in lipids a median of 522 days after lopinavir/ritonavir initiation in univariable regression analyses, nor in multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders. In 40 trial samples collected 24 months after treatment initiation, the mean (95% CI) percentage increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) was significantly greater in the nevirapine/lopinavir/ritonavir group (29.4% [16.8-43.3]) than in the zidovudine/lamivudine/lopinavir/ritonavir group (6.8% [-7.3-23.1]; P=0.03). However, the percentage LDLc change did not correlate with lopinavir or ritonavir concentration ratios (r=-0.25; P=0.17 and r=-0.06; P=0.75). Adding lopinavir or ritonavir concentrations into the multivariable regression analyses did not change the relation between LDLc change and randomized treatment.nnnCONCLUSIONSnNeither in an HIV outpatient clinic cohort nor in a trial comparing two lopinavir/ritonavir-containing therapies did we find any relation between changes in lipids, and lopinavir and ritonavir concentration, after initiating lopinavir/ritonavir-containing treatment.