Sven Bjarke Gudnason
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sven Bjarke Gudnason.
Physical Review D | 2007
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Thomas A. Ryttov; Francesco Sannino
We show that the recently proposed minimal walking technicolor theory together with a small modification of the standard model fermionic matter content leads to an excellent degree of unification of the gauge couplings. We compare the degree of unification with various time-honored technicolor models and the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model. We find that, at the one-loop level, the new theory provides a degree of unification higher than any of the other extensions above. The phenomenology of the present model is very rich with various potential dark matter candidates.
Journal of High Energy Physics | 2016
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Muneto Nitta; Shin Sasaki
A bstractConstruction of a supersymmetric extension of the Skyrme term was a long-standing problem because of the auxiliary field problem; that is, the auxiliary field may propagate and cannot be eliminated, and the problem of having fourth-order time derivative terms. In this paper, we construct for the first time a supersymmetric extension of the Skyrme term in four spacetime dimensions, in the manifestly supersymmetric superfield formalism that does not suffer from the auxiliary field problem. Chiral symmetry breaking in supersymmetric theories results not only in Nambu-Goldstone (NG) bosons (pions) but also in the same number of quasi-NG bosons so that the low-energy theory is described by an SL(N, ℂ
Physical Review D | 2011
Mattia Cipriani; Daniele Dorigoni; Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Kenichi Konishi; Alberto Michelini
Physical Review D | 2015
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Muneto Nitta
mathrm{mathbb{C}}
Journal of High Energy Physics | 2016
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Muneto Nitta; Nobuyuki Sawado
Physical Review D | 2016
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Muneto Nitta
)-valued matrix field instead of SU(N) for NG bosons. The solution of auxiliary fields is trivial on the canonical branch of the auxiliary field equation, in which case our model results in a fourth-order derivative term that is not the Skyrme term. For the case of SL(2, ℂ
Physical Review D | 2016
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Nana Ma; Baiyang Zhang
Physics Letters B | 2015
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Muneto Nitta
mathrm{mathbb{C}}
Journal of High Energy Physics | 2015
Sven Bjarke Gudnason; Muneto Nitta; Nobuyuki Sawado
Physical Review D | 2016
Sven Bjarke Gudnason
), we find explicitly a nontrivial solution to the algebraic auxiliary field equations that we call a non-canonical branch, which when substituted back into the Lagrangian gives a Skyrme-like model. If we restrict to a submanifold, where quasi-NG bosons are turned off, which is tantamount to restricting the Skyrme field to SU(2), then the fourth-order derivative term reduces exactly to the standard Skyrme term. Our model is the first example of a nontrivial auxiliary field solution in a multi-component model.