Svetlana Ignatova

The SOLUTIONS project: Challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management

SOLUTIONS (2013 to 2018) is a European Union Seventh Framework Programme Project (EU-FP7). The project aims to deliver a conceptual framework to support the evidence-based development of environmental policies with regard to water quality. SOLUTIONS will develop the tools for the identification, prioritisation and assessment of those water contaminants that may pose a risk to ecosystems and human health. To this end, a new generation of chemical and effect-based monitoring tools is developed and integrated with a full set of exposure, effect and risk assessment models. SOLUTIONS attempts to address legacy, present and future contamination by integrating monitoring and modelling based approaches with scenarios on future developments in society, economy and technology and thus in contamination. The project follows a solutions-oriented approach by addressing major problems of water and chemicals management and by assessing abatement options. SOLUTIONS takes advantage of the access to the infrastructure necessary to investigate the large basins of the Danube and Rhine as well as relevant Mediterranean basins as case studies, and puts major efforts on stakeholder dialogue and support. Particularly, the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) working groups, International River Commissions, and water works associations are directly supported with consistent guidance for the early detection, identification, prioritisation, and abatement of chemicals in the water cycle. SOLUTIONS will give a specific emphasis on concepts and tools for the impact and risk assessment of complex mixtures of emerging pollutants, their metabolites and transformation products. Analytical and effect-based screening tools will be applied together with ecological assessment tools for the identification of toxicants and their impacts. The SOLUTIONS approach is expected to provide transparent and evidence-based candidates or River Basin Specific Pollutants in the case study basins and to assist future review of priority pollutants under the WFD as well as potential abatement options.

Preparative isolation and purification of ginsenosides Rf, Re, Rd and Rb1 from the roots of Panax ginseng with a salt/containing solvent system and flow step-gradient by high performance counter-current chromatography coupled with an evaporative light scattering detector.

Ginseng is a popular herb worldwide and has had varied uses in traditional Asian medicine for thousands of years. There are several different species of the herb, but all share the same constituents. Ginsenosides, the most extensively studied chemical components of ginseng, are generally considered to be one of the most important active ingredients of the plant. In this study, we have developed fast and efficient methodology for isolation of four known ginsenosides Rf, Rd, Re and Rb1 from Ginseng by high performance counter-current chromatography (HPCCC) coupled with evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD). The crude sample for HPCCC was purified firstly from a ginseng extraction using macroporous resin. The enriched saponin fraction (480 mg) was separated by using methylene chloride-methanol-5 mM aqueous ammonium acetate-isopropanol (6:2:4:3, v/v,) as the two-phase solvent system and yielded 10.7 mg of Rf, 11.0 mg of Rd, 13.4 mg of Re and 13.9 mg of Rb1. The purity of these ginsenosides was 99.2%, 88.3%, 93.7% and 91.8%, respectively assessed by HPLC-DAD-ELSD, and their structures were characterized by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and compared with standards. Ammonium acetate was used to shorten the separation time and eliminate emulsification together with a flow step-gradient. The salt can be removed by re-dissolving the sample using acetone.

Intermittent counter-current extraction as an alternative approach to purification of Chinese herbal medicine

This paper describes intermittent counter-current extraction, a novel method of using a conventional twin column counter-current chromatograph to either split a sample into two groups of compounds or extract and enrich a target compound from a crude extract. The first method is demonstrated by splitting a model mixture of four compounds into two groups. The second method is demonstrated by the extraction and enrichment of a high value target compound, triptolide, from a Chinese herbal medicine crude extract of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f., where it is found at low concentration (2%). This was achieved by retaining and enriching the target compound within the column while washing away all other components of the crude material. The success of the first method allowed the second method to be carried out without the need for costly preliminary experiments with the high value sample. 188mg of triptolide at greater than 98% purity was separated from 9.2g of crude extract, using 10l of solvent in a 3-h separation.

Multiple dual-mode countercurrent chromatography applied to chiral separations using a (S)-naproxen derivative as chiral selector.

Countercurrent chromatography (CCC) is a liquid-liquid chromatographic technique without a solid support. Several alternative elution modes can be applied to take advantage of the special nature of the liquid stationary phase. Among these dual-mode (DM) and multiple dual-mode (MDM) consist of switching alternatively between Reversed and Normal Phase operation during the experiment (once for DM and several times for MDM). In this paper, MDM has been applied to the chiral CCC separations of two racemic mixtures, (+/-)-N-(3,4-cis-3-decyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthren-4-yl)-3,5-dinitrobenzamide and N-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl)-(+/-)-leucine, using (S)-naproxen N,N-diethylamide as chiral selector (CS). Although the behaviour of the two analytes differed, improved resolution factors were successfully obtained. Results are rationalized on the basis of the distinct partition behaviour of the CS/enantiomer complexes in the biphasic system.

New 18-l process-scale counter-current chromatography centrifuge

A new Dynamic Extractions Maxi-counter-current chromatography (CCC) centrifuge with a column volume of 18-l has been installed in the Advanced Bioprocessing Centre at Brunel. This instrument has four times the capacity of the 4.6-l Maxi-CCC centrifuge which has been operating robustly for 3 years. Tests using the model sample system benzyl alcohol and p-cresol with a heptane:ethyl acetate:methanol:water (HEMWat) phase system (1.4:0.1:0.5:1.0) show that resolution is almost double with this new high capacity device. Commissioning tests with a mixture of caffeine, K(D)=0.21; ferulic acid, K(D)=0.82; umbelliferone, K(D)=1.2 and vanillin, K(D)=1.49 using a HEMWat phase system of 1:1.5:1:1.5 on the 9-l column show that resolutions equivalent to analytical instruments will be possible using the full 18-l capacity. They also show that predictable scale-up from simple test tube tests is feasible with knowledge of the stationary phase retention for the planned process scale run.

Scale-up of counter-current chromatography: Demonstration of predictable isocratic and quasi-continuous operating modes from the test tube to pilot/process scale

Predictable scale-up from test tube derived distribution ratios and analytical-scale sample loading optimisation is demonstrated using a model sample system of benzyl alcohol and p-cresol in a heptane:ethyl acetate:methanol:water phase system with the new 18 L Maxi counter-current chromatography centrifuge. The versatility of having a liquid stationary phase with its high loading capacity and flexible operating modes is demonstrated at two different scales by separating and concentrating target compounds using a mixture of caffeine, vanillin, naringenin and carvone using a quasi-continuous technique called intermittent counter-current extraction.

Review of Progress Toward the Industrial Scale‐Up of CCC

Abstract Considerable advances have been made in the last two years on the industrial scale‐up of countercurrent chromatography. This paper briefly reviews the scale‐up progress being made by three groups, two in France and one in the UK before giving details of advances being made at Brunel Institute for Bioengineering, Brunel University in the UK on the scale‐up of their J‐type centrifuges.

Comparison of preparative reversed phase liquid chromatography and countercurrent chromatography for the kilogram scale purification of crude spinetoram insecticide

Reversed phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) and high performance countercurrent chromatography (HPCCC) were compared for the pilot scale purification of two semi-synthetic spinosyns, spinetoram-J and spinetoram-L, the major components of the commercial insecticide spinetoram. Two, independently performed, 1 kg, purification campaigns were compared. Each method resulted in the isolation of both components at a purity of >97% and yields for spinetoram-J and spinetoram-L of >93% and ≥ 63% of theoretical, respectively. The HPCCC process produced a 2-fold higher throughput and consumed approximately 70% less solvent than preparative scale RP-HPLC, the volume of product containing fractions from HPCCC amounted to 7% of that produced by HPLC and so required much less post-run processing.

Preparative separation of a terpenoid and alkaloids from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. using high-performance counter-current chromatography: Comparison of various elution and operating strategies

This paper describes how high-performance counter-current chromatography (HPCCC) was used strategically for the separation of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. Due to the complexity of Chinese herbal medicines, the initial ethanol crude extract was fractionated into seven fractions using medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC). One terpenoid (triptolide) and three alkaloids (peritassine A, wilforgine and wilforine) were further separated from one of the MPLC fractions. This fraction (1.25 g) yielded 8 mg of triptolide and 28 mg of peritassines A after one HPCCC column pass and 30 mg of wilforgine and 120 mg of wilforine after a second column pass with respective purities of 97%, 93.6%, 95.0% and 94.4%, which were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). This was a one-step HPCCC separation, using an n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (4:5:4:5, v/v) solvent system, where increases in theoretical plates have been sacrificed in favour of increasing throughput. Structures were identified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) and (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance ((13)C NMR). Comparison of three different modes of eluting compounds retained in the liquid stationary phase: elution extrusion; dual mode and simple pump-out showed that simply pumping out the column contents at high flow gave better resolution and was eight times faster than the other two well-utilised methods. Triptolide and peritassines A were isolated for the first time from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f.

Evaluation of dual flow counter-current chromatography and intermittent counter-current extraction.

The aim of this research is to compare two continuous extraction technologies, intermittent counter-current extraction (ICcE) and dual flow counter-current chromatography (DFCCC), in terms of loading and throughput using the GUESSmix, and show the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. A model sample containing caffeine, vanillin, naringenin and carvone, with a total load of 11.2 g, was employed with a hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (2:3:2:3) phase system to evaluate an ICcE method on a preparative (912 ml coil volume) DE-Midi instrument. While DFCCC was carried out on a specially designed preparative (561 ml coil volume) bobbin installed in a similar Midi instrument case. While similar throughputs of 7.8 g/h and 6.9 g/h were achieved for the ICcE and DFCCC methods respectively, ICcE was demonstrated to have a number of advantages over DFCCC.