Svetlana Saarela
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Svetlana Saarela.
Forest Ecosystems | 2016
Göran Ståhl; Svetlana Saarela; Sebastian Schnell; Sören Holm; Johannes Breidenbach; Sean P. Healey; Paul L. Patterson; Steen Magnussen; Erik Næsset; Ronald E. McRoberts; Timothy G. Gregoire
This paper focuses on the use of models for increasing the precision of estimators in large-area forest surveys. It is motivated by the increasing availability of remotely sensed data, which facilitates the development of models predicting the variables of interest in forest surveys. We present, review and compare three different estimation frameworks where models play a core role: model-assisted, model-based, and hybrid estimation. The first two are well known, whereas the third has only recently been introduced in forest surveys. Hybrid inference mixes design-based and model-based inference, since it relies on a probability sample of auxiliary data and a model predicting the target variable from the auxiliary data..We review studies on large-area forest surveys based on model-assisted, model-based, and hybrid estimation, and discuss advantages and disadvantages of the approaches. We conclude that no general recommendations can be made about whether model-assisted, model-based, or hybrid estimation should be preferred. The choice depends on the objective of the survey and the possibilities to acquire appropriate field and remotely sensed data. We also conclude that modelling approaches can only be successfully applied for estimating target variables such as growing stock volume or biomass, which are adequately related to commonly available remotely sensed data, and thus purely field based surveys remain important for several important forest parameters.
Annals of Forest Science | 2016
Svetlana Saarela; Sören Holm; Anton Grafström; Sebastian Schnell; Erik Næsset; Timothy G. Gregoire; Ross Nelson; Göran Ståhl
Abstract∙ Key messageThe study presents novel model-based estimators for growing stock volume and its uncertainty estimation, combining a sparse sample of field plots, a sample of laser data, and wall-to-wall Landsat data. On the basis of our detailed simulation, we show that when the uncertainty of estimating mean growing stock volume on the basis of an intermediate ALS model is not accounted for, the estimated variance of the estimator can be biased by as much as a factor of three or more, depending on the sample size at the various stages of the design.∙ ContextThis study concerns model-based inference for estimating growing stock volume in large-area forest inventories, combining wall-to-wall Landsat data, a sample of laser data, and a sparse subsample of field data.∙ AimsWe develop and evaluate novel estimators and variance estimators for the population mean volume, taking into account the uncertainty in two model steps.∙ Methods Estimators and variance estimators were derived for two main methodological approaches and evaluated through Monte Carlo simulation. The first approach is known as two-stage least squares regression, where Landsat data were used to predict laser predictor variables, thus emulating the use of wall-to-wall laser data. In the second approach laser data were used to predict field-recorded volumes, which were subsequently used as response variables in modeling the relationship between Landsat and field data.Results∙ The estimators and variance estimators are shown to be at least approximately unbiased. Under certain assumptions the two methods provide identical results with regard to estimators and similar results with regard to estimated variances.∙ Conclusion We show that ignoring the uncertainty due to one of the models leads to substantial underestimation of the variance, when two models are involved in the estimation procedure.
Remote Sensing | 2018
Sarah Ehlers; Svetlana Saarela; Nils Lindgren; Eva Lindberg; Mattias Nyström; Henrik J. Persson; Håkan Olsson; Göran Ståhl
Today, non-expensive remote sensing (RS) data from different sensors and platforms can be obtained at short intervals and be used for assessing several kinds of forest characteristics at the level of plots, stands and landscapes. Methods such as composite estimation and data assimilation can be used for combining the different sources of information to obtain up-to-date and precise estimates of the characteristics of interest. In composite estimation a standard procedure is to assign weights to the different individual estimates inversely proportional to their variance. However, in case the estimates are correlated, the correlations must be considered in assigning weights or otherwise a composite estimator may be inefficient and its variance be underestimated. In this study we assessed the correlation of plot level estimates of forest characteristics from different RS datasets, between assessments using the same type of sensor as well as across different sensors. The RS data evaluated were SPOT-5 multispectral data, 3D airborne laser scanning data, and TanDEM-X interferometric radar data. Studies were made for plot level mean diameter, mean height, and growing stock volume. All data were acquired from a test site dominated by coniferous forest in southern Sweden. We found that the correlation between plot level estimates based on the same type of RS data were positive and strong, whereas the correlations between estimates using different sources of RS data were not as strong, and weaker for mean height than for mean diameter and volume. The implications of such correlations in composite estimation are demonstrated and it is discussed how correlations may affect results from data assimilation procedures.
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2015
Svetlana Saarela; Anton Grafström; Göran Ståhl; Annika Kangas; Markus Holopainen; Sakari Tuominen; Karin Nordkvist; Juha Hyyppä
Forest Ecology and Management | 2016
Ronald E. McRoberts; Qi Chen; Grant M. Domke; Göran Ståhl; Svetlana Saarela; James A. Westfall
Canadian Journal of Forest Research | 2015
Svetlana Saarela; Sebastian Schnell; Anton Grafström; Sakari Tuominen; Karin Nordkvist; Juha Hyyppä; Annika Kangas; Göran Ståhl
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2016
Svetlana Saarela; Sebastian Schnell; Sakari Tuominen; Andras Balazs; Juha Hyyppä; Anton Grafström; Göran Ståhl
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2018
Stefano Puliti; Svetlana Saarela; Terje Gobakken; Göran Ståhl; Erik Næsset
Environmetrics | 2017
Anton Grafström; Sebastian Schnell; Svetlana Saarela; S. P. Hubbell; R. Condit
Canadian Journal of Forest Research | 2017
Svetlana Saarela; Johannes Breidenbach; Pasi Raumonen; Anton Grafström; Göran Ståhl; Mark J. Ducey; Rasmus Astrup