Swana Van Acker
Free University of Brussels
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Swana Van Acker.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2003
D. Verellen; Guy Soete; N Linthout; Swana Van Acker; Patsy De Roover; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Jan Van de Steene; Guy Storme
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study is to investigate the positional accuracy of a prototype X-ray imaging tool in combination with a real-time infrared tracking device allowing automated patient set-up in three dimensions. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prototype X-ray imaging tool has been integrated with a commercially released real-time infrared tracking device. The system, consisting of two X-ray tubes mounted to the ceiling and a centrally located amorphous silicon detector has been developed for automated patient positioning from outside the treatment room prior to treatment. Two major functions are supported: (a) automated fusion of the actual treatment images with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) representing the desired position; (b) matching of implanted radio opaque markers. Measurements of known translational (up to 30.0mm) and rotational (up to 4.0 degrees ) set-up errors in three dimensions as well as hidden target tests have been performed on anthropomorphic phantoms. RESULTS The systems accuracy can be represented with the mean three-dimensional displacement vector, which yielded 0.6mm (with an overall SD of 0.9mm) for the fusion of DRRs and X-ray images. Average deviations between known translational errors and calculations varied from -0.3 to 0.6mm with a standard deviation in the range of 0.6-1.2mm. The marker matching algorithm yielded a three-dimensional uncertainty of 0.3mm (overall SD: 0.4mm), with averages ranging from 0.0 to 0.3mm and a standard deviation in the range between 0.3 and 0.4mm. CONCLUSIONS The stereoscopic X-ray imaging device integrated with the real-time infrared tracking device represents a positioning tool allowing for the geometrical accuracy that is required for conformal radiation therapy of abdominal and pelvic lesions, within an acceptable time-frame.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2002
D. Verellen; N Linthout; Guy Soete; Swana Van Acker; Patsy De Roover; Guy Storme
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the treatment efficiency of different conformal radiation therapy techniques in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three major classes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery as well as a conformal rotation technique have been evaluated: sequential tomotherapy, dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) with conventional MLC, DMLC with miniMLC and dynamic field shaping arc. Treatment planning for the IMRT techniques has been performed with inverse planning. Forward planning was used for the dynamic arc technique. The four techniques have been compared to treat two different prostate cases with a conservative target dose of 70 Gy: a convex shaped target volume and one containing concavities formed by the bladder and rectum. Cumulative dose volume histograms, tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability, conformity index and dose heterogeneity, and finally efficiency of treatment delivery have been evaluated. RESULTS For the convex shaped target, all treatment modalities met the desired treatment goals, although the conventional MLC delivered more dose to the bladder. Compared to the dynamic arc modality, both tomotherapy and the conventional MLC technique needed a tenfold higher number of monitor units per target dose, and the miniMLC a twofold higher number. The same trend has been observed for the concave target, yet the dynamic arc did not meet the desired dose reduction for the rectum. The miniMLC configuration represented the best compromise for both targets with respect to treatment goals and delivery efficiency. Sequential tomotherapy performed adequately with respect to conformity at the cost of efficiency. CONCLUSIONS Together with conformity and delivery efficiency the shape of the target should be considered as an important parameter in the selection of the treatment modality.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2002
Nadine Linthout; D. Verellen; Swana Van Acker; Mia Voordeckers; Anette Bretz; Guy Storme
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To investigate if the Pencil Beam (PB) algorithm takes the disturbance of the dose distribution due to tissue inhomogeneities sufficiently into account in dynamic field shaping rotation therapy (called the dynamic arc treatment modality) for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS A treatment plan using the dynamic arc treatment modality of an oropharynx lesion on a humanoid phantom was evaluated. The same plan was calculated with three different calculation algorithms: the Clarkson and the PB algorithm (both available on the planning system of the Novalis system used for dynamic arc treatments), and the Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition (CC) algorithm (used by the Pinnacle planning system). The three resulting plans are compared using isodose distributions and cumulative dose volume histograms (CDVHs). An intercomparison of the results of the three algorithms was performed to investigate how accurately each of them takes the influence of tissue inhomogeneities into account such as bony structures and air cavities often appearing in the head and neck region. Additionally, the resulting plans were compared with absolute and relative dosimetric measurements of the treatment plan on the humanoid phantom with thermoluminescent detectors and radiographic film, respectively. RESULTS All calculated dose distributions show a good agreement with the measured distribution except in the planning target volume (PTV) in and at the border of the air cavity. All three algorithms overestimate the dose in the PTV at the boundary with the low-density tissue, with 12, 10 and 7% for the Clarkson, the PB and the CC algorithm, respectively. The correspondence between the calculated dose distributions is reflected in the graphs of the CDVHs. They show similar curves for the PTV and the structures except for the left parotic gland and the myelum. CONCLUSIONS The PB algorithm of the Novalis system calculates a treatment plan for the dynamic arc treatment modality adequately for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors, except in the PTV in and at the border of the air cavity where the actual dose is overestimated. Care needs to be taken in clinical cases where it is critical to irradiate the air-tissue boundary to a sufficient dose.
Medical Physics | 2003
Nadine Linthout; D. Verellen; Swana Van Acker; Mieke De Cock; Guy Storme
The dose distribution resulting from partially overlapping intensity modulated beams (IMBs) assigned to different isocenters for the treatment of the same planning target volume (PTV) was evaluated. These partially overlapping IMBs are used in static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments with the Novalis system using the mini-MultiLeaf Collimator (mini-MLC) in Dynamic MultiLeaf Collimation (DMLC) mode. The resultant dose distribution was verified dosimetrically for a cylindrical target defined in a homogeneous cubic phantom. The phantom positioning can introduce dose nonuniformities in the resultant dose distribution by nonperfect positioning of the isocenters in accordance with each other. The dose inhomogeneities are quantified mathematically by summation of the dose profiles of the used IMBs and experimentally by measurement of the resulting dose profiles with radiographic film and thermoluminescent detectors (TLD). The mathematical estimation of the resulting dose profile of the treatment with a perfect positioning of the isocenters showed a good agreement with the planned dose profile. The magnitude of the maximum dose inhomogeneities introduced by the simulated supplementary shifts between the isocenters decreases by -8.54% mm(-1) as the shift changes from -0.30 +/- 0.10 cm to +0.30 +/- 0.10 cm. The TLD measurements showed a similar variation of the magnitude of the maximum dose inhomogeneities: -8.77% mm(-1). The amount of dose variation was underestimated with the radiographic film measurements, which showed a variation of -7.17% mm(-1). The film measurements demonstrated that the magnitude of the introduced maximum dose inhomogeneities did not alter significantly throughout the PTV. The approach of using partially overlapping IMBs assigned to different isocenters to enlarge the treatment region introduces smaller dose inhomogeneities in the resultant dose distribution than when abutting treatment fields are used. The resultant dose distribution of this treatment technique is less sensitive to positioning errors of the used treatment isocenters.
Medical Physics | 2001
Iwein Van de Vondel; Luc Coppens; D. Verellen; Nadine Linthout; Swana Van Acker; Guy Storme
One of our linear accelerators is equipped with a free-movable treatment couch. An additional projects was to develop a system that first protects the free-movable couch against collisions, secondly build a remote control for moving the couch from outside the treatment room and finally implement this remote control/limitation system in an automatic position algorithm using an electronic portal image. The latter has been the subject of an on-going departmental investigation on intra-fractional correction of set-up errors. A few years ago, we developed a limitation system to protect both the table and the accelerator against collisions. In this paper we describe the second part of this project, the remote control system.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2002
Nadine Linthout; D. Verellen; Swana Van Acker; Iwein Van de Vondel; Luc Coppens; Guy Storme
The sliding window technique used for static and dynamic segmentation of intensity modulated beams is evaluated. Dynamic delivery is preferred since the resulting distributions correspond better with the calculated distributions, the treatment beam is used more efficiently and the delivery is less sensitive to small variations in the accuracy of the multileaf collimator (MLC).
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2004
Nadine Linthout; D. Verellen; Swana Van Acker; Guy Storme
Archive | 2012
Leo Van Echelpoel; Mieke De Cock; Mathieu Dejaeger; Gilles Mertens; Swana Van Acker
Archive | 2003
Dirk Verellen; Guy Soete; Mieke De Cock; Swana Van Acker; Nadine Linthout; Guy Storme
Archive | 2003
Dirk Verellen; Nadine Linthout; Mieke De Cock; Swana Van Acker; Guy Storme