Syed Mahmood Shah

Two-year outcomes of the ranibizumab for edema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study.

OBJECTIVES To determine the long-term effects of ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS One hundred twenty-six patients with DME. METHODS Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 0.5 mg RBZ at baseline and months 1, 3, and 5 (group 1), focal or grid laser photocoagulation at baseline and month 3 if needed (group 2), or a combination of 0.5 mg RBZ and focal or grid laser at baseline and month 3 (group 3). Starting at month 6, if retreatment criteria were met, all subjects could be treated with RBZ. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 24. RESULTS After the primary end point at month 6, most patients in all groups were treated only with RBZ, and the mean number of injections was 5.3, 4.4, and 2.9 during the 18-month follow-up period in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the 33 patients in group 1, 34 patients in group 2, and 34 patients in group 3 who remained in the study through 24 months, the mean improvement in BCVA was 7.4, 0.5, and 3.8 letters at the 6-month primary end point, compared with 7.7, 5.1, and 6.8 letters at month 24, and the percentage of patients who gained 3 lines or more of BCVA was 21, 0, and 6 at month 6, compared with 24, 18, and 26 at month 24. The percentage of patients with 20/40 or better Snellen equivalent at month 24 was 45% in group 1, 44% in group 2, and 35% in group 3. Mean foveal thickness (FTH), defined as center subfield thickness, at month 24 was 340 μm, 286 μm, and 258 μm for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the percentage of patients with center subfield thickness of 250 μm or less was 36%, 47%, and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intraocular injections of RBZ provided benefit for patients with DME for at least 2 years, and when combined with focal or grid laser treatments, the amount of residual edema was reduced, as were the frequency of injections needed to control edema. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Primary End Point (Six Months) Results of the Ranibizumab for Edema of the mAcula in Diabetes (READ-2) Study

OBJECTIVES To compare ranibizumab with focal/grid laser or a combination of both in diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS A total of 126 patients with DME. METHODS Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 0.5 mg of ranibizumab at baseline and months 1, 3, and 5 (group 1, 42 patients), focal/grid laser photocoagulation at baseline and month 3 if needed (group 2, 42 patients), or a combination of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab and focal/grid laser at baseline and month 3 (group 3, 42 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 6. RESULTS At month 6, the mean gain in BCVA was significantly greater in group 1 (+7.24 letters, P = 0.01, analysis of variance) compared with group 2 (-0.43 letters), and group 3 (+3.80 letters) was not statistically different from groups 1 or 2. For patients with data available at 6 months, improvement of 3 lines or more occurred in 8 of 37 (22%) in group 1 compared with 0 of 38 (0%) in group 2 (P = 0.002, Fisher exact test) and 3 of 40 (8%) in group 3. Excess foveal thickness was reduced by 50%, 33%, and 45% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS During a span of 6 months, ranibizumab injections by the current protocol had a significantly better visual outcome than focal/grid laser treatment in patients with DME.

Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: implication of VEGF as a critical stimulator.

Macular edema is a major cause of vision loss in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). It is not clear how much of the edema is due to hydrodynamic changes from the obstruction and how much is due to chemical mediators. Patients with macular edema due to CRVO (n = 20) or BRVO (n = 20) were randomized to receive three monthly injections of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab. At the primary endpoint, month 3, the median improvement in letters read at 4 m was 17 in the 0.3-mg group and 14 in the 0.5-mg group for CRVO, and 10 and 18, respectively for the BRVO group. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed that compared to injections of 0.3 mg, injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab tended to cause more rapid reductions of central retinal thickening that lasted longer between injections, but in 3 months, excess central retinal thickening which is a quantitative assessment of the macular edema, was reduced by approximately 90% in all four treatment groups. There was no correlation between the amount of improvement and duration of disease or patient age at baseline, but there was some correlation between the aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level at baseline and amount of improvement. These data indicate that excess production of VEGF in the retinas of patients with CRVO or BRVO is a major contributor to macular edema and suggest that additional studies investigating the efficacy of intraocular injections of ranibizumab are needed.

Bevacizumab suppresses choroidal neovascularisation caused by pathological myopia

Bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) is a recombinant humanised, full length, anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that binds all isoforms of VEGF-A. It has been shown to prolong survival of patients with advanced colon cancer when combined with 5-fluorouracil.1 In this report, we describe the effect of bevacizumab in two patients with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia, which was refractory to other treatment. ### Patient 1 AM is a 36 year old white man who was diagnosed with subfoveal CNV caused by pathological myopia (right eye  =  −11.50 D, left eye  =  −11.50 D) in his left eye in September 2002 for which he received three photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatments. He developed subfoveal CNV in his right eye in June 2003 and received one PDT treatment combined with an intravitreous injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. In May 2004, he presented with recurrent subfoveal CNV in his right eye and refused PDT. Off-label use of bevacizumab was discussed and after informed consent, the patient decided to proceed. Just before treatment in July 2004, best corrected visual acuity (VA) was 20/40 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left eye. There was a ring of hyperpigmentation centred on the fovea with a surrounding ring of subretinal blood and substantial subretinal fluid in the right eye (fig 1A). An optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan through the centre of the fovea confirmed the presence of extensive subretinal fluid (fig 1B, asterisks) with subretinal tissue in the centre of the fovea (arrowheads). An OCT map showed severe thickening and subretinal fluid throughout the centre of the macula (foveal thickness 510 μm, macular volume 9.29 mm3). In the left eye, there were pigmentary changes and no subretinal blood or fluid (foveal thickness, 201 μm). In the right eye, the early phase of a fluorescein angiography (FA) …

RNAi-Based Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration by Sirna-027

PURPOSE To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and dose-limiting toxicity of single intravitreal injection of Sirna-027, a small interfering RNA targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Secondary objectives included assessment of anatomic changes in retinal thickness, size of CNV, and changes in visual acuity. DESIGN Prospective, open-label, single-dose, dose-escalation phase 1 study. METHODS Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with a median age of 82 years and CNV resulting from AMD who had previous treatments with other therapies were treated at 2 academic retinal practices. Patients received a single dose of Sirna-027 (100, 200, 400, 800, 1200, or 1600 microg/eye). Blood was sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis at 1, 4, and 24 hours after injection and on day 7. Patients underwent ophthalmic examinations including visual acuity, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography at screening and days 7, 14, 28, and 84. The main outcome measures were adverse reactions and dose-limiting toxicities. RESULTS Intravitreal injection of a single dose of Sirna-027 from 100 to 1600 microg was well tolerated in patients with AMD, with no dose-limiting toxicity found. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Adjusted mean foveal thickness decreased within 2 weeks after study treatment. The decrease was most pronounced in the 100- and 200-microg doses. CONCLUSIONS A single intravitreal dose of Sirna-027 up to 1600 microg/eye was well tolerated in patients with CNV resulting from neovascular AMD that had been refractory to other therapies. Stabilization or improvement in visual acuity and foveal thickness was observed. No dose-response or dose-limiting effects were noted.

Sustained Ocular Delivery of Fluocinolone Acetonide by an Intravitreal Insert

PURPOSE To compare Iluvien intravitreal inserts that release 0.2 or 0.5 microg/day of fluocinolone acetonide (FA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS We included 37 patients with DME. METHODS Subjects with persistent DME despite > or = 1 focal/grid laser therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive an intravitreal insertion of a 0.2- or a 0.5-microg/day insert. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was aqueous levels of FA throughout the study with an important secondary outcome of the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12. RESULTS The mean aqueous level of FA peaked at 3.8 ng/ml at 1 week and 1 month after administration of a 0.5-microg/day insert and was 3.4 and 2.7 ng/ml 1 week and 1 month after administration of a 0.2-microg/day insert. For both inserts, FA levels decreased slowly thereafter and were approximately 1.5 ng/ml for each at month 12. The mean change from baseline in BCVA was 7.5, 6.9, and 5.7 letters at months 3, 6, and 12, respectively, after administration of a 0.5 microg/day-insert and was 5.1, 2.7, and 1.3 letters at months 3, 6, and 12, respectively, after administration of a 0.2-microg/day insert. There was a mild increase in mean intraocular pressure after administration of 0.5-microg/day inserts, but not after administration of 0.2-microg/day inserts. CONCLUSIONS The FA intravitreal inserts provide excellent sustained intraocular release of FA for > or = 1 year. Although the number of patients in this trial was small, the data suggest that the inserts provide reduction of edema and improvement in BCVA in patients with DME with mild effects on intraocular pressure over the span of 1 year. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Comparison Between Retinal Thickness Analyzer and Optical Coherence Tomography for Assessment of Foveal Thickness in Eyes With Macular Disease

PURPOSE To use the retinal thickness analyzer (RTA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanners for quantitative measurement of retinal thickness in eyes with macular disease. DESIGN In a cross-sectional study, 44 patients (55 eyes) with macular disease and sufficient media clarity to visualize the fundus using clinical biomicroscopy underwent an ophthalmologic examination, fluorescein angiography, RTA, and OCT during the same visit. METHODS Foveal and foveal center (foveolar) retinal thickness measurements were obtained by RTA and by OCT. RESULTS Retinal thickness measurements were obtained by OCT in all 55 eyes and by RTA in 34 eyes (62%, primarily due to interference from media opacities). In the 34 eyes in which measurements were obtained by both instruments, mean foveal thickness was 291 and 269 microm for OCT and RTA, respectively; foveolar thickness was 277 and 265 microm, respectively. OCT and RTA measurements of foveal thickness were strongly correlated (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89), as were measurements of the foveolar thickness (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94). Topographic maps generated by the two techniques yielded qualitatively similar information. CONCLUSIONS Overall, there was excellent agreement between RTA and OCT measurements. Each technique has advantages that may make its use preferable in a particular subgroup of eyes or to describe a particular disease process. An important consideration is that media opacities create less interference for OCT than for RTA, so that in study populations with a moderate-to-high prevalence of media opacity, images can be obtained in a greater percentage of eyes by OCT than by RTA.

An exploratory study of the safety, tolerability and bioactivity of a single intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-Eye in patients with diabetic macular oedema

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and bioactivity of a single intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye in subjects with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Methods: Five subjects with DMO, foveal thickness ⩾250 μm measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 20/40 and 20/320, were enrolled. Each participant received a single intravitreal injection of 4.0 mg of VEGF Trap-Eye followed by a 6-week observation period. Outcome measures included safety and biological activity, including changes in BCVA and excess retinal thickness assessed by OCT. Results: Injections of VEGF Trap-Eye were well tolerated with no ocular toxicity. One patient had an unrelated serious adverse event: hospitalisation for cellulitis of the left foot 27 days after injection of VEGF Trap-Eye. Median baseline BCVA was 36 ETDRS letters read at 4 m (not ETDRS visual acuity score; Snellen equivalent: 20/50) and median baseline excess central 1 mm foveal thickness (FTH) was 108 μm. At 4 weeks after injection, the median excess FTH was 59 μm and the median improvement in BCVA was nine letters. At 6 weeks after injection, four of the five patients showed improvement in excess FTH (median 74 μm; 31% reduction from baseline, p = 0.0625) and four of the five showed improvement in BCVA (median improvement of three letters). Conclusions: A single intravitreal injection of 4.0 mg of VEGF Trap-Eye was well tolerated and preliminary evidence of bioactivity was detected. These findings support additional studies investigating multiple injections of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with DMO.

A phase I study of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor trap-eye in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE To determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and bioactivity of an intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye, a fusion protein of binding domains from human VEGF receptors 1 and 2 with human immunoglobulin-G Fc that binds VEGF family members, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN Dose-escalation, multicenter, interventional clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-one patients (13 female, 8 male) with neovascular AMD (NVAMD) and lesions <or=12 disc areas in size and >or=50% active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <or=20/40 received a single intraocular injection of 0.05 mg (n = 3), 0.15 mg (n = 3), 0.5 mg (n = 3), 1 mg (n = 6), 2 mg (n = 3), or 4 mg (n = 3) of VEGF Trap-Eye. METHODS Safety assessments included eye examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Measures of bioactivity included changes from baseline in BCVA, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography. The primary end point was 6 weeks and patients were followed up for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Safety assessments. RESULTS There were no serious adverse events and no identifiable intraocular inflammation. The mean decrease in excess foveal thickness for all patients was 104.5 mum at 6 weeks, and the mean increase in visual acuity was 4.43 letters. In the 2 highest dose groups combined (2 and 4 mg), the mean increase in BCVA was 13.5 letters, with 3 of 6 patients demonstrating improvement of >or=3 lines and 3 patients requiring no adjunctive treatment of any type for 12 weeks. Some showed elimination of fluorescein leakage and reduction in area of CNV. CONCLUSIONS Intravitreal injection of up to 4 mg of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with NVAMD was well tolerated with no evidence of ocular inflammation. Although the number of patients in each cohort was small, there was evidence of bioactivity, because several patients, especially those receiving 2 or 4 mg of VEGF Trap-Eye, showed substantial improvement in BCVA associated with reductions in foveal thickness. Phase III trials to investigate the efficacy of intraocular VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with NVAMD are under way.

Retinal Thickness Analysis by Race, Gender, and Age Using Stratus OCT

PURPOSE To detect differences in retinal thickness among patients of different race, gender, and age using Stratus OCT. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS In a multicenter, university-based study, 126 patients with no history of ocular disease were enrolled (78 diabetics without retinopathy and 48 nondiabetics). Optical coherence tomography measurements were performed using Stratus OCT. Statistical comparisons of center point foveal thickness and mean foveal thickness were made using generalized estimating equations adjusting for diabetic status, race, age, and gender. RESULTS The study population consisted of 36% male subjects, 39% Caucasian, 33% African-American, and 28% Hispanic. Mean foveal thickness was 191.6 +/- 2.7 microm and 194.5 +/- 2.7 microm for diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively (P = .49). Mean foveal thickness in male subjects was significantly larger than in female (201.8 +/- 2.7 microm and 186.9 +/- 2.6 microm, respectively; P < .001). Mean foveal thickness was 200.2 +/- 2.7 microm for Caucasian, 181.0 +/- 3.7 microm for African-American, and 194.7 +/- 3.9 microm for Hispanic subjects. Mean foveal thickness was significantly less for African-American than Caucasian (P < .0001) or Hispanic subjects (P = .005). Center point foveal thickness and mean foveal thickness showed a significant increase with age. CONCLUSIONS There are statistically significant differences in retinal thickness between subjects of different race, gender, and age. When compared to Caucasian and Hispanic subjects, African-American race is a predictor of decreased mean foveal thickness; and male sex (regardless of race) is a significant predictor of increased mean foveal thickness. Mean foveal thickness is similar among diabetics and nondiabetics when data are controlled for age, race, and sex. These results suggest that studies comparing OCT measurements should carefully control for age-based, race-based, and gender-based variations in retinal thickness.