Sylvia J. Petrone
Saint Barnabas Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sylvia J. Petrone.
Burns | 2013
Zachary Kimball; S. Patil; Hani Mansour; Michael A. Marano; Sylvia J. Petrone; Ronald S. Chamberlain
INTRODUCTION The incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the United States is expected to increase from 8 per 1000 in 2008 to 15 per 1000 by 2050 [20]. As a result, DM patients will constitute a large proportion of Burn Center admissions, with burns typically due to contact burn or scalding. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and peripheral neuropathy (PN) are far more common in DM patients, particularly in those with poorly controlled disease, and are often associated with worse outcomes than non-diabetic (nDM) burn patients. This study sought to analyze whether the outcome of isolated leg and foot burns among DM and nDM individuals differed significantly. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data on 207 consecutive patients (>18 years old) admitted to a Burn Center with isolated leg or foot burns between 1999 and 2009 was collected and analyzed for this study. Age, gender, ethnicity, total body surface area (TBSA), degree of burn, etiology, hospital and burn intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay (LOS), and status at discharge were reviewed. Patients were grouped as diabetic (DM) or non-diabetic (nDM). Differences were analyzed using either the Students t-test or Chi-square. RESULTS 43 DM and 164 nDM patients with isolated lower extremity or foot burns were treated during the study period (1999-2009). The mean age of DM and nDM patients was 54.6 and 43.7 years, respectively (p<0.001). The most common burn etiology was scalding, flame, or contact burn. Percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) burn in DM patients averaged±standard deviation 1.8±1.3% compared to 1.8±1.6% in nDM (p<0.9). Among DM patients, 86% (N=37) of patients suffered third degree burns and 14% (N=6) of patients had second degree burns compared to 76% (N=125) of patients and 24% (N=39) of patients among nDM patients, respectively (p<0.16). The DM group had significantly higher burn ICU admission rates, 16.3% of patients versus 8.5% of patients (p<0.001), total length of hospital stay (mean±standard deviation), 14.1±10 versus 9.8±9.3 days (p<0.01) and renal failure, 4.7% of patients versus 0.6% of patients (p<0.05) compared to the nDM group. 93% of DM patients were discharged to home without further medical attention while 4.7% of patients underwent further treatment. In comparison, 85.4% of the nDM patients were discharged home with no further treatment while 8.5% of patients received home care (p<0.01). CONCLUSION DM patients who suffer isolated burns to the feet or lower extremities have poorer clinical outcomes and more complicated and protracted hospital courses when compared to nDM patients with similar burns. Although diabetics in the current study did not experience larger or more severe burns than nDM patients, they were nearly twice as likely to be admitted to the ICU, spent an average of four days longer in the hospital, and had a higher likelihood of developing renal failure compared to nDM patients.
International Journal of Urology | 2012
Nicole J Abel; Zachary Klaassen; E. Hani Mansour; Michael A. Marano; Sylvia J. Petrone; Abraham Houng; Ronald S. Chamberlain
Objectives: The American Burn Association classifies a burn to the genitalia as a major injury. Isolated burns to the penis, scrotum or vulva are rare as a result of protection provided by the thighs and abdomen. Thus, burned genitalia represent an ominous sign of a more extensive total body surface area burn.
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2014
Kathe M. Conlon; Chris Ruhren; Sandra Johansen; Margaret Dimler; Barbara Frischman; Eileen Gehringer; Abraham Houng; Michael Marano; Sylvia J. Petrone; E. Hani Mansour
For the first time in modern history burn centers must face the reality of having to potentially care for a staggering number of injured patients. Factors such as staffing, patient acuity and bed availability compel medical professionals to regularly examine various aspects of their respective healthcare delivery systems, especially with regards to how these systems should function for mass casualty response. The majority of burn care in New Jersey is provided by one designated burn treatment facility. A planning group was formed to identify additional hospital support systems capable of providing short-term patient care during a disaster. Focus was on three key areas: identifying actual versus potential nonburn center resources, ascertaining the number and level of burn expertise at these facilities, and assessing the capacities of any available resources and personnel. Retrospective review of discharge data highlighted which of the more than seventy New Jersey hospitals besides The Burn Center were treating and releasing burn injures. In a disaster The Burn Center designates these hospitals as Tier Facilities to serve as additional resources until patients may be transferred to other recognized regional and national burn centers. Triage is conducted in accordance with the American Burn Association Benefit-to-Ratio Triage grid, matching patient acuity with each hospitals tier designation. A secondary triage, conducted 24 hours after the initial incident, identifies which patients require transport for more specialized burn care. Twenty-seven burn centers from Maine through Maryland and the District of Columbia, who have joined together as a Consortium, agree to support one another for optimal patient distribution and management in accordance with accepted national standards of care. State Medical Coordination Centers equipped to coordinate and track transport of large numbers of injured personnel are able to facilitate this collaborative, multiagency response throughout the northeast region. Burn centers share many issues common to emergency preparedness. Paramount among them is an ability to provide quality burn care for the greatest number of patients at a time when staff and resources will be severely limited. It is incumbent upon burn centers to explore opportunities extending beyond individual state and regional resources in order for centers to continually maintain this standard of care, particularly in a disaster.
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2016
Christina J. Lee; Krishnaraj Mahendraraj; Abraham Houng; Michael Marano; Sylvia J. Petrone; Robin Lee; Ronald S. Chamberlain
Unintentional burn injury is the third most common cause of death in the U.S. for children age 5 to 9, and accounts for major morbidity in the pediatric population. Pediatric burn admission data from U.S. institutions has not been reported recently. This study assesses all pediatric burn admissions to a State wide Certified Burn Treatment Center to evaluate trends in demographics, burn incidence, and cause across different age groups. Demographic and clinical data were collected on 2273 pediatric burn patients during an 18-year period (1995–2013). Pediatric patients were stratified by age into “age 0 to 6,” “age 7 to 12,” and “age 13 to 18.” Data were obtained from National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons and analyzed using standard statistical methodology. A total of 2273 burn patients under age 18 were treated between 1995 and 2013. A total of 1663 (73.2%) patients were ages 0 to 6, 294 (12.9%) were 7 to 12, and 316 (13.9%) were age 13 to 18. A total of 1400 (61.6%) were male and 873 (38.4%) were female (male:female ratio of 1.6:1). Caucasians had the highest burn incidence across all age groups (40.9%), followed by African-Americans (33.6%), P < .001. Caucasian teenagers formed 62.1% of patients age 13–18, P < .001. A total of 66.3% of all pediatric burns occurred at home, P < .001. Mean TBSA burned was 8.9%, with lower extremity being the most common site (38.5%). Scald burns constituted the majority of cases (71.1%, n = 1617), with 53% attributable to hot liquids related to cooking, including coffee or tea, P < .001. In the teenage group, flame burns were the dominant cause (53.8%). Overall mean length of stay was 10.5 ± 10.8 days for all patients, and15.5 ± 12 for those admitted to the intensive care unit, P < .005. One hundred (4.4%) patients required ventilator support (P = .02), and average duration of mechanical ventilation was 11.9 ± 14.5 days. Skin grafting was performed for 520 (22.9%) patients, P < .001. Overall mortality was 0.9% (n = 20), with mean TBSA involved of 61.5%. The majority of pediatric burn injuries are scald burns that occur at home and primarily affect the lower extremities in Caucasian and African-American males. Among Caucasian teenagers flame burns predominate. Mean length of stay was 10 days, 23% of patients required skin grafting surgery, and mortality was 0.9%. The results of this study highlight the need for primary prevention programs focusing on avoiding home scald injuries in the very young, as well as fire safety training for teenagers.
Burns | 2017
Gregg Dexter; S. Patil; Kanwardeep Singh; Michael A. Marano; Robin Lee; Sylvia J. Petrone; Ronald S. Chamberlain
INTRODUCTION In the United Stated population >70years is likely to double by the year 2050. Elderly population (>70years) are most vulnerable to burns and outcomes following such injuries in this special group is poorly studied. This study aimed to look at outcomes following burns in patients >70years over a period of 17 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data on 6512 patients admitted to a Level I Burn Center between 1995 and 2011 was analyzed. Age, gender, ethnicity, TBSA, burn etiology, hospital and burn intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and status at discharge were abstracted. Three broad categories were created based on presence or absence of smoke inhalation, No smoke inhalation (Group A), smoke inhalation only (Group B) and smoke inhalation with burn injury (Group C). Differences were analyzed using the students t-test for continuous variables and Chi-Square test for categorical variables. RESULTS The study group was comprised of 564 patients, 72.3% in group A, 4.8% in group B and 22.9% in group C formed the study population. The mean age of the patients studied was 80.4±6.7, with female patients being more common (58%). The number of Caucasians (72.9%) was highest in group C compared to other racial groups (p=0.047). Majority of patients in the group B (59.3%) were admitted directly compared to other two groups (group A=24.0%, group B=34.9%, p<0.001). Overall percent total body surface area (% TBSA) and % TBSA third degree burns were higher in group C, whereas % TBSA second degree burns were common in group B (p<0.05). The number ICU admissions, the mean length of ICU stay, mean duration of ventilator support and mean length of hospitalization were all highest in group C patients (p<0.001). The number of discharges to home without home health aide were higher in group A, whereas the number of discharges to nursing home/rehabilitation/extended care facility were higher in group B (p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality (58.1%, p<0.001) and overall burn related mortality (62.8%, p<0.001) were highest in group C. There was no significant difference between the groups for the number of patients converted to hospice care (p=0.21). On multivariate analysis ICU admission (Odds Ratio [OR]=3.7, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]=2.1-6.5), ventilator support (OR=7.1, 95% CI=4.1-12.0), and %TBSA >10% (OR=3.1, 95% CI=1.9-5.0) significantly increased mortality. In terms of complications, group C had a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia (18.6%, p<0.001), respiratory failure (17.1%, p=0.001), and sepsis (7.8%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS Patients >70 years constitute small (8.6%) but significant number among burn patients. The overall ICU admissions, number of days on ventilator, ICU stay, in-hospital mortality and overall mortality is higher in this group of population even for low % TBSA burns. Presence of smoke inhalation increases mortality.
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation | 2000
Kathy Weinberg; C. Birdsall; D. Vail; Michael A. Marano; Sylvia J. Petrone; E. Hani Mansour
Journal of Surgical Research | 2014
S. Patil; Michael A. Marano; Abraham Houng; H. Mansour; Sylvia J. Petrone; R. Lee; Ronald S. Chamberlain
Journal of Surgical Research | 2011
Z. Klaassen; H. Mansour; Michael A. Marano; Sylvia J. Petrone; Abraham Houng; Sandra Johansen; Ronald S. Chamberlain
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2006
M Dimler; R Bond; Sandra Johansen; S Rager; B Frischman; C Fahey; Sylvia J. Petrone; M Marano
Critical Care Medicine | 1999
E. Hani Mansour; Kathy Weinberg; Sylvia J. Petrone; Michael Marano; Michael Brick