Sylvie Mazoyer

Unclassified variants identified in BRCA1 exon 11: Consequences on splicing.

Numerous mutations identified in breast/ovarian cancer families occur in splice sites of the BRCA1 gene. Splicing can also be disrupted by mutations occurring in exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) sequences. It is important to identify those mutations among the large number of nontruncating sequence variants that are identified during molecular diagnosis, as this could help to classify some of them as cancer predisposing. Several software programs have been designed to identify ESEs and can therefore be used to predict the outcome of genetic variation. However, it is not known whether these predictions are relevant in the case of BRCA1 exon 11 (3.4 kb). In this study, we assessed the consequences on splicing of 108 exon 11 variants identified in French breast/ovarian cancer families, most of them predicted to alter putative ESEs, and of nine variants located in the exon 11 alternative donor splice site. We employed a BRCA1 minigene consisting of exon 10 to 12, into which we introduced separately each of the variants to be tested. RNA was analyzed by RT‐PCR after transient transfection of the resulting minigenes. None of the tested variants was found to dramatically alter splicing through disruption of an ESE. However, we identified several variants in the alternative donor splice site that are likely to be of biological significance as they appear to favor the expression of BRCA1‐Δ11b over that of the full‐length transcript. The results of this study will be of value to classify BRCA1 exon 11 variants of unknown significance. This article contains Supplementary Material available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1045‐2257/suppmat.

Breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and polyglutamine repeat length in the AIB1 gene.

Marked variation in phenotypic expression among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers may be partly explained by modifier genes that influence mutation penetrance. Variation in CAG/CAA repeat lengths coding for stretches of glutamines in the C‐terminus of the AIB1 protein (amplified in breast cancer 1, a steroid receptor coactivator) has been proposed to modify the breast cancer risk in women carrying germline BRCA1 mutations. We genotyped the AIB1 repeat length polymorphism from the genomic DNA of a group of 851 BRCA1 and 324 BRCA2 female germline mutation carriers to estimate an association with breast cancer risk modification. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. For BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, analyzed separately and together, we found that women who carried alleles with 28 or more polyglutamine repeats had no increased risk of breast cancer compared to those who carried alleles with fewer repeats (HR for BRCA1/2 carriers = 0.88, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 0.75–1.04). Analyzing average repeat lengths as a continuous variable showed no excess risk of breast cancer (BC) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR for average repeat length in BRCA1/2 carriers = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92–1.11). These results strongly suggest that contrary to previous studies, there is no significant effect of AIB1 genetic variation on BC risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers and provide an indication that there is also no strong risk modification in BRCA2 carriers.

Differential expression and subcellular localization of murine BRCA1 and BRCA1-δ11 isoforms in murine and human cell lines

BRCA1 mutations are involved in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition in humans. The biological functions of the murine BRCA1 gene have been extensively studied but little is known about murine BRCA1 proteins. To better characterize these proteins, we have cloned the full‐length murine BRCA1 cDNA and a splice variant deleted of exon 11, BRCA1‐Δ11, by RT‐PCR method. Three polyclonal antibodies raised against various parts of murine BRCA1 were used in our study: D16, M20 and 5MO, which were generated in our laboratory. This allowed us to analyze the expression and subcellular localization of both isoforms in murine and human cell lines by immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, cell fractionation and immunofluorescence. Endogenous BRCA1 was detected in murine cell lines but not splice variant BRCA1‐Δ11, whereas both ectopically expressed murine isoforms were detected in transfected human Bosc 23 cells. Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence results showed that the BRCA1 protein was mainly located in the nucleus, whereas BRCA1‐Δ11 was preferentially cytoplasmic. The conservation of exon 11 splicing and the differential subcellular localization of BRCA1 and BRCA1‐Δ11 in human and mouse suggest that these proteins could play distinct roles and that they could differentially act in the pathological mechanisms leading to the development of breast and ovarian cancer. The characterization of the murine BRCA1 proteins and antibodies will be useful to further study BRCA1 functions in murine models. Int. J. Cancer 88:519–524, 2000.

Recent Advances in Understanding the Cellular Functions of BRCA2

The positional cloning of BRCA2 at the end of 1995 unravelled a new gene encoding a very large protein of 3,418 amino acids (390 kDa) with no similarity to any known protein [1]. The function of BRCA1, which had been cloned 15 months earlier, was unknown and thus did not provide any clues regarding function of the BRCA2 protein. One year later, BRCA1 was reported to localize and immunoprecipitate with RAD51 [2]. This discovery shed light on the function of BRCA2, as BRCA2 was shown shortly thereafter to also bind RAD51 [3,4]. Subsequent studies of the cellular functions of these proteins have been remarkably informative [reviewed in 5].