Sylvie Rottey

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND Cetuximab is effective in platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS We randomly assigned 220 of 442 eligible patients with untreated recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck to receive cisplatin (at a dose of 100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 1) or carboplatin (at an area under the curve of 5 mg per milliliter per minute, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on day 1) plus fluorouracil (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter per day for 4 days) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles and 222 patients to receive the same chemotherapy plus cetuximab (at a dose of 400 mg per square meter initially, as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, then 250 mg per square meter, as a 1-hour intravenous infusion per week) for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients with stable disease who received chemotherapy plus cetuximab continued to receive cetuximab until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects, whichever occurred first. RESULTS Adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy with fluorouracil (platinum-fluorouracil) significantly prolonged the median overall survival from 7.4 months in the chemotherapy-alone group to 10.1 months in the group that received chemotherapy plus cetuximab (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.99; P=0.04). The addition of cetuximab prolonged the median progression-free survival time from 3.3 to 5.6 months (hazard ratio for progression, 0.54; P<0.001) and increased the response rate from 20% to 36% (P<0.001). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the chemotherapy-alone and cetuximab groups were anemia (19% and 13%, respectively), neutropenia (23% and 22%), and thrombocytopenia (11% in both groups). Sepsis occurred in 9 patients in the cetuximab group and in 1 patient in the chemotherapy-alone group (P=0.02). Of 219 patients receiving cetuximab, 9% had grade 3 skin reactions and 3% had grade 3 or 4 infusion-related reactions. There were no cetuximab-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS As compared with platinum-based chemotherapy plus fluorouracil alone, cetuximab plus platinum-fluorouracil chemotherapy improved overall survival when given as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00122460.)

Cisplatin and fluorouracil with or without panitumumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SPECTRUM) : an open-label phase 3 randomised trial

BACKGROUND Previous trials have shown that anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies can improve clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We assessed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab combined with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line treatment for these patients. METHODS This open-label phase 3 randomised trial was done at 126 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years; had histologically or cytologically confirmed SCCHN; had distant metastatic or locoregionally recurrent disease, or both, that was deemed to be incurable by surgery or radiotherapy; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less; and had adequate haematological, renal, hepatic, and cardiac function. Patients were randomly assigned according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence (1:1; stratified by previous treatment, primary tumour site, and performance status) to one of two groups. Patients in both groups received up to six 3-week cycles of intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) on days 1-4 of each cycle); those in the experimental group also received intravenous panitumumab (9 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle). Patients in the experimental group could choose to continue maintenance panitumumab every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was analysed by intention to treat. In a prospectively defined retrospective analysis, we assessed tumour human papillomavirus (HPV) status as a potential predictive biomarker of outcomes with a validated p16-INK4A (henceforth, p16) immunohistochemical assay. Patients and investigators were aware of group assignment; study statisticians were masked until primary analysis; and the central laboratory assessing p16 status was masked to identification of patients and treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00460265. FINDINGS Between May 15, 2007, and March 10, 2009, we randomly assigned 657 patients: 327 to the panitumumab group and 330 to the control group. Median overall survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 9·8-12·2) in the panitumumab group and 9·0 months (8·1-11·2) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·873, 95% CI 0·729-1·046; p=0·1403). Median progression-free survival was 5·8 months (95% CI 5·6-6·6) in the panitumumab group and 4·6 months (4·1-5·4) in the control group (HR 0·780, 95% CI 0·659-0·922; p=0·0036). Several grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent in the panitumumab group than in the control group: skin or eye toxicity (62 [19%] of 325 included in safety analyses vs six [2%] of 325), diarrhoea (15 [5%] vs four [1%]), hypomagnesaemia (40 [12%] vs 12 [4%]), hypokalaemia (33 [10%] vs 23 [7%]), and dehydration (16 [5%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 14 patients (4%) in the panitumumab group and eight (2%) in the control group. Five (2%) of the fatal adverse events in the panitumumab group were attributed to the experimental agent. We had appropriate samples to assess p16 status for 443 (67%) patients, of whom 99 (22%) were p16 positive. Median overall survival in patients with p16-negative tumours was longer in the panitumumab group than in the control group (11·7 months [95% CI 9·7-13·7] vs 8·6 months [6·9-11·1]; HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·58-0·93]; p=0·0115), but this difference was not shown for p16-positive patients (11·0 months [7·3-12·9] vs 12·6 months [7·7-17·4]; 1·00 [0·62-1·61]; p=0·998). In the control group, p16-positive patients had numerically, but not statistically, longer overall survival than did p16-negative patients (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·47-1·04]). INTERPRETATION Although the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy did not improve overall survival in an unselected population of patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, it improved progression-free survival and had an acceptable toxicity profile. p16 status could be a prognostic and predictive marker in patients treated with panitumumab and chemotherapy. Prospective assessment will be necessary to validate our biomarker findings. FUNDING Amgen Inc.

Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE Inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau gene in clear-cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) leads to overexpression of hypoxia inducible factor, a transcription factor regulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) gene expression. Pazopanib, an angiogenesis inhibitor targeting VEGF receptor, PDGF receptor, and c-KIT, was evaluated in patients with RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II study was designed as a randomized discontinuation study but was revised to an open-label study on the recommendation of the data monitoring committee (based on week 12 response rate [RR] of 38% in the first 60 patients). The primary end point was changed from progressive disease rate at 16 weeks postrandomization to RR. Pazopanib 800 mg was administered orally once daily. Pazopanib 800 mg was administered orally once daily. RESULTS The study enrolled 225 patients with metastatic RCC; 155 patients (69%) were treatment naïve, and 70 patients (31%) had received one prior cytokine- or bevacizumab-containing regimen. Overall RR was 35%; median duration of response was 68 weeks. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52 weeks. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 and time from diagnosis to treatment of more than 1 year were correlated with prolonged PFS. Pazopanib was generally well tolerated. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, and hair depigmentation. The most common laboratory abnormalities were elevated AST and ALT. CONCLUSION Pazopanib demonstrated durable activity in patients with advanced RCC and was generally well tolerated in this population. These findings support the further development of pazopanib in advanced RCC.

Evaluation of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EXTREME study

BACKGROUND The phase III EXTREME study demonstrated that combining cetuximab with platinum/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) significantly improved overall survival in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) compared with platinum/5-FU alone. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate elevated tumor EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker in EXTREME study patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Dual-color FISH was used to determine absolute and relative EGFR copy number. Models of differing stringencies were used to score and investigate whether increased copy number was predictive for the activity of cetuximab plus platinum/5-FU. RESULTS Tumors from 312 of 442 patients (71%) were evaluable by FISH and met the criteria for statistical analysis. A moderate increase in EGFR copy number was common, with high-level amplification of the gene occurring in a small fraction of tumors (∼11%). Considering each of the models tested, no association of EGFR copy number with overall survival, progression-free survival or best overall response was found for patients treated with cetuximab plus platinum/5-FU. CONCLUSION Tumor EGFR copy number is not a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab plus platinum/5-FU as first-line therapy for patients with R/M SCCHN.

Quality of life of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab first line for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: A phase III trial demonstrated that cetuximab is the first agent in 30 years to improve survival when added to platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-fluorouracil) first line for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). This analysis of the trial assessed the impact of treatment on quality of life (QoL). Patients and methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-Head and Neck 35 (QLQ-H&N35) module were used to assess QoL. Results: Of 442 patients randomly assigned, 291 (QLQ-C30) and 289 (QLQ-H&N35) patients completed at least one evaluable questionnaire. For QLQ-C30, cycle 3 and month 6 mean scores for platinum–fluorouracil plus cetuximab were not significantly worse than those for platinum–fluorouracil. Pattern-mixture analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the global health status/QoL score in the cetuximab arm (P = 0.0415) but no treatment differences in the social functioning scale. For QLQ-H&N35, the mean score for the cetuximab arm was not significantly worse than that for the chemotherapy arm for all symptom scales at all post-baseline visits. At cycle 3, some symptom scores significantly favored the cetuximab arm (pain, swallowing, speech problems, and social eating). Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to platinum–fluorouracil does not adversely affect the QoL of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN.

Glycosylation of prostate specific antigen and its potential diagnostic applications

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) assays are widely used for early detection of prostate cancer. However, those analyses are associated with considerable sensitivity and specificity problems. Several approaches have been developed to tackle this issue. PSA is a glycoprotein, which is primarily produced by the prostatic epithelial cells. Aberrant glycosylation modification of proteins is a fundamental characteristic of tumorigenesis. Study of PSA glycoforms offers interesting diagnostic perspectives. Modern technology allows us to analyze PSA glycoforms in a variety of clinical samples (serum or plasma, urine, seminal fluid, tissue). A number of novel techniques, such as lectin-based detection methods, mass spectrometry, 2-dimensional electrophoresis and capillary electrophoresis have been developed to analyze PSA glycosylation. This article reviews the technical and diagnostic aspects of PSA glycoforms.

Modern treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current status and prospects

Purpose of review In this article, we focus on the role of Epstein–Barr virus in the management of nasopharyngeal cancer, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Recent findings Epstein–Barr virus DNA clearance has recently been studied for prediction of tumor response and survival. Patients with a short t1/2 of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA clearance had significantly higher responses and survival than those with long t1/2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, delivering higher doses to the tumor, results in improved local control and overall survival at lower treatment-induced toxicity. Recent reports show that re-planning during the course of radiotherapy could influence outcome and toxicity. The use of newer platinum compounds and combinations with taxanes in adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting have been investigated in phase II trials. They demonstrate acceptable toxicity profiles and promising treatment outcomes. However, antiepidermal growth factor receptor and antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor agents do not show important responses in metastatic disease and when combined with radiotherapy, toxicity is of concern. Summary Epstein–Barr virus DNA has a potential as a risk stratification marker. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is standard treatment and adaptive radiotherapy with re-planning has to be considered. Uncertainties on adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be addressed in well designed randomized trials. Currently, the role of targeted agents is not well defined.

Nephrotoxicity of anticancer drugs--an underestimated problem?

Abstract Nephrotoxicity is an inherent adverse effect of certain anticancer drugs and may result in a variety of functional consequences that include any combination of glomerular or tubular dysfunction, hypertension and disturbance of the renal endocrine function. The nephrotoxic potential of most anticancer agents dramatically increases in the presence of borderline or overt pre-existing chronic kidney disease and measurement of renal function is therefore of utmost importance in the cancer patient before any treatment is initiated. This review summarizes some clinical nephrotoxic side effects of a selection of the most frequently used anticancer drugs. The drugs discussed are cisplatin, methotrexate, ifosfamide, citumixab and panitumumab, mitocin C and gemcitabine and antiangiogenesis drugs.

PARP INHIBITORS IN ONCOLOGY: A NEW SYNTHETIC LETHAL APPROACH TO CANCER THERAPY

Abstract Damage to DNA has emerged as a major culprit in cancer. Mammalian cells are continuously exposed to DNA damage, caused by exogenous toxins as well as endogenous activities such as DNA replication and cellular free radical generation. It is therefore essential that cells have DNA repair mechanisms in place to preserve its genomic integrity. Interestingly, cancer cells frequently harbour defects in DNA repair pathways, leading to genomic instability. This can foster tumorigenesis, but also provides a weakness in the tumour that can be exploited therapeutically. In this context, it has been shown that homologous recombination (HR)- deficient tumour cells – including those with defects in BRCA1/2 – are highly sensitive to blockade of the base excision repair (BER) pathway via inhibition of the poly (ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme. This provides the basis for a novel ‘synthetic lethal’ approach to cancer therapy. Recent clinical trials have shown an enhancement of the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy by adding a PARP inhibitor to the standard treatment. Still, clinical outcome may be even further improved if these drugs would be used as firstline therapy. In conclusion, it can be stated that an exciting new class of drugs has entered the arena of cancer therapy. However, additional clinical studies are needed before PARP inhibitors can definitely enter daily clinical practice.

A phase Ib, open-label study to assess the safety of continuous oral treatment with afatinib in combination with two chemotherapy regimens: cisplatin plus paclitaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil, in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND In this phase Ib, dose-escalation study, the oral irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib (BIBW 2992) was combined with cisplatin (Cadila Healthcare Ltd, Ahmedabad, India) 50 or 75 mg/m(2)/paclitaxel (Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, New York, USA) (Taxol)175 mg/m(2) (regimen A) or cisplatin 75-100 mg/m(2)/5-fluorouracil 750-1000 mg/m(2) (regimen B) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS The primary objective was to assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1 for each regimen, from which the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Patients received once daily oral afatinib 20, 30, 40 or 50 mg in 21-day cycles (3 + 3 design). RESULTS The MTD for afatinib in regimens A (n = 26) and B (n = 21) was determined as 20 mg and 30 mg following DLTs in five and four patients in cycle 1, respectively. Most frequent adverse events (AEs, any grade) were diarrhea and nausea. Disease control was observed in 54% and 29% of patients in regimens A and B, respectively. Plasma sampling suggested no relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between afatinib and the chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of afatinib was 20 mg with cisplatin-paclitaxel and 30 mg with cisplatin-5-fluorouracil. Pre-emptive management of side-effects is important to maintain adequate safety and tolerability. Both combinations showed antitumor activity across tumor types and lines of prior treatment.