Syrek M

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thioridazine during co-administration of tricyclic antidepressants

Because of serious side‐effects of thioridazine and tricyclic antidepressants (cardiotoxicity), a possible influence of imipramine and amitriptyline on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thioridazine was investigated in a steady state (2‐week treatment) in rats. Imipramine and amitriptyline (5 and 10 mg kg−1 i.p., respectively) elevated 30 and 20 fold, respectively, the concentration of thioridazine (10 mg kg−1 i.p.) and its metabolites (N‐desmethylthioridazine, 2‐sulphoxide, 2‐sulphone, 5‐sulphoxide) in blood plasma. Similar, yet weaker increases in the thioridazine concentration were found in the brain. Moreover, an elevation of thioridazine/metabolite ratios was observed. Imipramine and amitriptyline added to control liver microsomes in vitro inhibited the metabolism of thioridazine via N‐demethylation (an increase in Km), mono‐2‐sulphoxidation (an increase in Km and a decrease in Vmax) and 5‐sulphoxidation (mainly a decrease in Vmax). Amitriptyline was a more potent inhibitor than imipramine of the thioridazine metabolism. The varying concentration ratios of antidepressant/thioridazine in vivo appear to be more important to the final result of the pharmacokinetic interactions than are relative direct inhibitory effects of the antidepressants on thioridazine metabolism observed in vitro. Besides direct inhibition of the thioridazine metabolism, the decreased activity of cytochrome P‐450 towards 5‐sulphoxidation, produced by chronic joint administration of thioridazine and the antidepressants, seems to be relevant to the observed in vivo interaction. The obtained results may also point to inhibition of another, not yet investigated, metabolic pathway of thioridazine, which may be inferred from the simultaneous elevation of concentrations of both thioridazine and the measured metabolites.

Direct and indirect interactions between antidepressant drugs and CYP2C6 in the rat liver during long-term treatment

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of tricyclic antidepressants (TADs: imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: fluoxetine, sertraline) and novel antidepressant drugs (mirtazapine, nefazodone) on the activity of CYP2C6 measured as a rate of warfarin 7-hydroxylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of the antidepressants, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) for one day or two weeks with pharmacological doses of the drugs (imipramine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, nefazodone at 10 mg/kg i.p.; desipramine, fluoxetine, sertraline at 5mg/kg i.p.; mirtazapine at 3mg/kg i.p.), in the absence of the antidepressants in vitro. Some of the investigated antidepressant drugs added to liver microsomes of control rats inhibited the rate of 7-hydroxylation of warfarin. The obtained K(i) values indicated that nefazodone and fluoxetine were the most potent inhibitors of the studied reaction (K(i)=13 and 23microM, respectively), while tricyclic antidepressants and sertraline were weak in this respect (K(i)=70-127microM). A one-day (i.e. 24h) exposure to fluoxetine and mirtazapine resulted in a significant increase in the rate of the 7-hydroxylation of warfarin in rat liver microsomes. The other studied antidepressants did not significantly affect the rate of the CYP2C6-specific reaction. After two-week treatment with the investigated antidepressants, the increase in CYP2C6 activity observed after 24-h exposure to fluoxetine and mirtazapine was more pronounced. Moreover, unlike after one-day exposure, imipramine and sertraline significantly increased the activity of the enzyme. The other tricyclic antidepressants or nefazodone did not produce any significant effect when administered in vivo. The above-described enhancement of CYP2C6 activity correlated positively with the simultaneously observed increases in the enzyme protein level, which indicates the enzyme induction. The studied antidepressants increased the CYP2C6 protein level in the liver microsomes of rats after chronic treatment: imipramine to 174.6+/-18.3%, fluoxetine to 159.1+/-13.7%, sertraline to 135.3+/-11.2% and mirtazapine to 138.4+/-10.2% of the control. In summary, two different mechanisms of the antidepressant-CYP2C6 interaction have been found to operate in the rat liver: 1) direct inhibition of CYP2C6 shown in vitro mainly for nefazodone and fluoxetine, with their inhibitory effects being somewhat more potent than their action on human CYP2C9; 2) the in vivo induction of CYP2C6 by imipramine, fluoxetine, sertraline and mirtazapine.

The contribution of cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes to the metabolism of phenothiazine neuroleptics.

The aim of the present study was to determine optimum conditions for studying promazine and perazine metabolism in rat liver microsomes, and to investigate the influence of specific cytochrome P-450 inhibitors on 5-sulfoxidation and N-demethylation of these neuroleptics. Based on the developed method, the metabolism of neuroleptics in liver microsomes was studied at linear dependence of product formation on time, and protein and substrate concentrations (incubation time: 10 min; concentration of microsomal proteins: promazine-0.7 mg ml(-1), perazine-0.5 mg ml(-1); substrate concentrations: promazine-25, 40 and 75 nmol ml(-1), perazine-20, 35, 50 nmol ml(-1)). A Dixon analysis of the metabolism of neuroleptics showed that quinine (a CYP2D1 inhibitor), metyrapone (a CYP2B1/B2 inhibitor) and alpha-naphthoflavone (a CYP1A1/2 inhibitor) affected, whereas erythromycin (a CYP3A inhibitor) and sulfaphenazole (a CYP2C inhibitor) did not change the neuroleptic biotransformation. N-Demethylation of promazine was competitively inhibited by quinine (K(i)=20 microM) and metyrapone (K(i)=83 microM), while that of perazine-by quinine (K(i)=46.5 microM), metyrapone (K(i)=46 microM) and alpha-naphthoflavone (K(i)=78.8 microM). 5-Sulfoxidation of promazine was inhibited only by quinine (K(i)=28.6 microM), whereas that of perazine-by quinine (K(i)=10 microM) and metyrapone (K(i)=96 microM). The results obtained are compared with our previous findings of analogous experiments concerning thioridazine, and with the data on other phenothiazines and species. In summary, it is proposed that N-demethylation of the mentioned phenothiazine neuroleptics in the rat is catalyzed by the isoenzymes CYP2D1, CYP2B2 and CYP1A2 (CYP1A2 does not refer to promazine). 5-Sulfoxidation of these drugs may be mediated by different isoenzymes, e.g. CYP2D1 (promazine and perazine), CYP2B2 (perazine) and CYP1A2 (thioridazine). Isoenzymes belonging to subfamilies CYP2C and CYP3A do not seem to be involved in the metabolism of the investigated neuroleptics in the rat. The results obtained point to the drug structure and species differences in the contribution of cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes to the metabolism of phenothiazines.

The influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the pharmacokinetics of thioridazine and its metabolites: in vivo and in vitro studies.

Due to its psychotropic profile, thioridazine is a neuroleptic suitable for a combination with antidepressants in a number of complex psychiatric illnesses. However, because of its serious side-effects, such a combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) which inhibit cytochrome P-450 may be dangerous. The aim of the present study was to investigate a possible impact of SSRIs on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of thioridazine in a steady state in rats. Thioridazine (10 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally, twice a day, for two weeks, alone or jointly with one of the antidepressants (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine or sertraline). Concentrations of thioridazine and its main metabolites (2-sulfoxide = mesoridazine; 2-sulfone = sulforidazine; 5-sulfoxide = ring sulfoxide and N-desmethylthiorid-azine) were assessed in the blood plasma and brain at 30 min, 6 and 12 h after the last dose of the drugs using an HPLC method. Fluoxetine potently increased (up to 13 times!) the concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites in the plasma, especially after 6 and 12 h. Moreover, an increase in the sum of concentrations of tioridazine + metabolites and thioridazine/metabolite ratios was observed. In vitro studies with control liver microsomes, as well as with microsomes of rats treated chronically with fluoxetine show that the changes in the thioridazine pharmacokinetics may be attributed to the competitive (N-demethylation, Ki = 23 microM) and mixed inhibition (2- and 5-sulfoxidation, Ki = 60 microM and 34 microM, respectively) of thioridazine metabolism by fluoxetine, and to the adaptive changes produced by chronic administration of fluoxetine, as reflected by inhibition of N-demethylation and formation of sulforidazine. Sertraline seemed to have a tendency to decrease thioridazine concentration in vivo, though in vitro studies showed that - like fluoxetine - it competitively or via mixed mechanism inhibited the three metabolic pathways of thioridazine (Ki = 41 microM, 64 microM and 47 microM, respectively). Chronic treatment with sertraline stimulated thioridazine 2- and 5-sulfoxidation, which may be responsible for the observed tendency of sertraline to decrease concentrations of the neuroleptic. In the case of fluvoxamine, a tendency to increase the thioridazine level was observed, which may be connected with the competitive or mixed inhibition of thioridazine N-demethylation and 2-sulfoxidation by the antidepressant (Ki = 17 microM and 167 microM, respectively). Repeated administration of fluvoxamine did not produce any changes in the activity of thioridazine-metabolizing enzymes. In conclusion, of the SSRIs studied, only fluoxetine produces a substantial increase in the thioridazine level in the plasma and brain. In the case of fluvoxamine, a tendency to increase the thioridazine level should be considered. Coadministration of thioridazine and sertraline seems to be safe, though a tendency to decrease the thioridazine level may be expected.

The effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine in the rat

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline, on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine in a steady state in rats. Perazine (10 mg kg−1, i.p.) was administered twice daily for two weeks, alone or jointly with one of the SSRIs. Concentrations of perazine and its two main metabolites (N‐desmethylperazine and 5‐sulfoxide) in the plasma and brain were measured 30 min and 6 and 12 h after the last dose of the drugs. Of the investigated SSRIs, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine significantly increased plasma and brain concentrations of perazine (up to 900% and 760% of the control value, respectively), their effect being most pronounced after 30 min and 6 h. Moreover, simultaneous increases in perazine metabolites concentrations and in the perazine/metabolite concentration ratios were observed. Sertraline elevated plasma and brain concentrations of perazine after 30 min. In‐vitro studies with liver microsomes of rats treated chronically with perazine, SSRIs or their combinations showed decreased concentrations of cytochrome P‐450 after perazine and a combination of perazine and fluvoxamine (vs control), and increased concentration after a combination of perazine and fluoxetine (vs perazine‐treated group). Prolonged treatment with perazine did not significantly change the rate of its own metabolism. Chronic administration of fluoxetine or sertraline, alone or in a combination with perazine, accelerated perazine N‐demethylation (vs control or perazine group, respectively). Fluvoxamine had a similar effect. The 5‐sulfoxidation of perazine was accelerated by fluvoxamine and sertraline treatment, but the process was inhibited by administration of a combination of perazine and fluoxetine or fluvoxamine (vs control). Kinetic studies using control liver microsomes, in the absence or presence of SSRIs added in‐vitro, demonstrated competitive inhibition of both N‐demethylation and sulfoxidation by the investigated SSRIs. Sertraline was the most potent inhibitor of perazine N‐demethylation but the weakest inhibitor of sulfoxidation. Results of in‐vivo and in‐vitro studies indicate that the observed interaction between perazine and SSRIs mainly involves competition for an active site of perazine N‐demethylase and sulfoxidase. Moreover, increases in the concentrations of both perazine and metabolites measured, produced by the investigated drug combinations in‐vivo, suggest simultaneous inhibition of another, yet to be investigated, metabolic pathway of perazine (e.g. aromatic hydroxylation).

Different effects of amitriptyline and imipramine on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine in rats.

The aim of this study was to search for possible effects of imipramine and amitriptyline on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of perazine at steady state in rats. Perazine (10 mg kg−1, i.p.) was administered to rats twice daily for two weeks, alone or jointly with imipramine or amitriptyline (10 mg kg−1 i.p.). Concentrations of perazine and its two main metabolites (5‐sulphoxide and N‐desmethylperazine) in the plasma and brain were measured at 30 min (Cmax), 6h and 12h (slow disposition phase) after the last dose of the drugs. Liver microsomes were prepared 24 h after withdrawal of the drugs.