T. A. L. Woods

Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Thrombelastography and Rotational Thromboelastometry: The UK NEQAS for Blood Coagulation Experience

Global hemostasis devices are currently being employed in operating rooms to assess the bleeding risk and outcomes for patients undergoing surgery. Two devices currently available are the TEG (Thromboelastograph; Haemoscope Corp., Niles, IL) and the ROTEM (Rotation Thromboelastometer; Pentapharm GmbH, Munich, Germany). Both measure the speed of clot formation, the strength of the clot when formed, and clot fibrinolysis kinetics. The two devices use different parameters so no cross comparisons of results can be made. The devices are usually operated by a member of the operating team and not a laboratory scientist; thus their testing and performance is generally not laboratory controlled, despite quality control being required to ensure reliable results. The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation has undertaken a series of exercises evaluating the provision of External Quality Assessment (EQA) material for these devices. A series of four studies have taken place using lyophilized plasmas as the test material. Up to 18 TEG users and 10 ROTEM users have been involved in testing two samples per study, for a total of eight samples tested. The samples were normal plasmas, factor VIII or XI deficient samples, or normal plasmas spiked with heparin. The precision of the tests varied greatly for both devices, with coefficients of variances ranging from 7.1 to 39.9% for TEG and 7.0 to 83.6% for ROTEM. Some centers returned results that were sufficiently different from those obtained by other participants to predict alterations in patient management decisions. Our data indicate that regular EQA/proficiency testing is needed for these devices.

Wide variability in the sensitivity of APTT reagents for monitoring of heparin dosage.

AIM: To assess the sensitivity of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents for monitoring heparin dosage using data from the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for blood coagulation. METHODS: Data were reviewed from four surveys using samples prepared by addition of heparin to normal plasma in vitro and from two surveys in which samples were prepared using plasma from patients receiving heparin therapy (ex vivo samples). RESULTS: For both in vitro and ex vivo samples, notable differences between APTT reagents with respect to heparin sensitivity were noted. This indicates that a uniform therapeutic range of 1.5-2.5 calculated by the APTT ratio may not be appropriate for all reagents. Reagent sensitivity in ex vivo samples was substantially different to that in in vitro samples. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large series of laboratories clearly indicate that reagent specific therapeutic ranges may be necessary, and that samples prepared by the addition of heparin to normal plasma in vitro can be misleading and should not be used.

Problems relating to the laboratory diagnosis of factor XIII deficiency: a UK NEQAS study.

Summary.  Familial (F)XIII deficiency is an extremely rare bleeding disorder. In most laboratories the diagnosis is initially established through a clot‐solubility screening test. We report here results from a series of UK NEQAS (Blood Coagulation). Proficiency Testing investigations, in which laboratories were provided with samples from normal individuals and from various subjects with FXIII deficiency with a request to perform their usual test for this disorder and to provide an interpretation of their results. Over 95% of centers were able to diagnose severe familial FXIII deficiency in previously untreated patients and to identify samples from normal subjects. However, both quantitative and qualitative methods produced widely variable results on samples obtained from previously treated individuals with FXIII deficiency but having measurable levels of FXIII. Data generated by UK NEQAS investigations suggested that solubility tests employing thrombin show greater sensitivity to FXIII deficiency, and this was confirmed in a subsequent single‐center study. Our results lead us to recommend the use of thrombin and acetic acid in the clot‐solubility screening test. Use of sensitive screening tests, and improvement in the accuracy and precision of quantitative FXIII assays will aid study of the clinical importance of moderate FXIII deficiency.

Lupus anticoagulant testing: improvements in performance in a UK NEQAS proficiency testing exercise after dissemination of national guidelines on laboratory methods

Summary. Laboratory screening for lupus anticoagulant (LA) has been shown to be suboptimal in several studies. Guidelines have recently been published by an expert group for the British Committee for Standards in Haematology, in an attempt to standardize and improve screening procedures. The value of using screening tests conforming with these guidelines was investigated in a United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) proficiency testing exercise. The correct diagnosis was achieved by 97% of laboratories for a LA‐negative sample. However, 18·3% of centres reported a false‐negative result for a sample from a LA‐positive subject. A significantly higher proportion of centres that used methods conforming with the published guidelines achieved the correct diagnosis for this sample (P < 0·002, chi‐square test). A wide variety of screening tests were used by laboratories in this study. Within‐method agreement could be improved by the use of a common normal pooled plasma to determine ratios. However, between‐method agreement was not improved by this procedure. We conclude that adoption of methods compliant with national guidelines may improve the diagnosis of LA. There is a need, however, for reference and standardization materials to ensure further improvement in the accuracy of LA methods.

Platelet function testing: practice among UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation participants, 2006.

Aims: Platelet function testing forms an important part of the laboratory investigation of a bleeding tendency; however, little standardisation and quality control is available for these tests. A UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation exercise sought to identify current practice among laboratories performing platelet function tests. Methods: A questionnaire was circulated in March 2006 to establish the current status of platelet function testing practice among participants of UK NEQAS. Participants were asked specifically about practice in bleeding time testing, PFA-100 analyser use, platelet aggregometry methodology and additional tests of platelet function. Results: 169 returned questionnaires revealed that 26 centres used bleeding time, the PFA-100 analyser and platelet aggregometry in their investigations; 13 used bleeding time and the PFA-100 only; 33 used bleeding time and platelet aggregometry; and 23 used the PFA-100 with platelet aggregometry. 58 centres reported that they performed only bleeding times in their investigations, 10 reported use of the PFA-100 only, and 6 reported use of aggregometry only. Marked variability was observed in methodology for each of these tests, and in many cases no form of quality control was employed. Conclusions: The data confirmed the lack of standardisation in methodology employed in different centres. Updated guidelines and standardisation of platelet function assessment are required to facilitate comparability between centres.

SSC/ISTH classification of hemophilia A: can hemophilia center laboratories achieve the new criteria?

Summary.  To assess the practicality of the recent Scientific and Standardization committee (SSC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommendations in respect of the classification of hemophilia we distributed samples from three untreated subjects with hemophilia A to 91 UK hemophilia centers (HCs), comprising 20 comprehensive care centers (CCCs) and 71 HCs. Laboratories were requested to perform their routine factor (F)VIII:C assays and to classify the severity of hemophilia. Median values of < 1 U dL−1 were obtained on two samples. However, for each of the two, approximately 30% of laboratories obtained results in the range 1–29 U dL−1 and 1–33 U dL−1 respectively. For one of these samples 17 laboratories diagnosed severe hemophilia despite obtaining FVIII:C levels in the range 1–5 U dL−1. The median FVIII:C for the third sample was 5.8 U dL−1 with a range of 1.5–36 U dL−1. For this sample eight centers diagnosed severe hemophilia. Fifty‐four laboratories obtained a result > 5 U dL−1; 21 of these diagnosed mild hemophilia, 31 moderate hemophilia and two severe hemophilia. Results from CCCs were more accurate and more precise than those from HCs. Our results indicate a need for improved standardization of FVIII assays. In the UK there remains a lack of consensus in respect of the laboratory diagnostic criteria for the classification of hemophilia A.

Lipid composition of seven APTT reagents in relation to heparin sensitivity.

The phospholipid content of different activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents was determined and compared to heparin sensitivity. The seven reagents included were those most widely used amongst participants of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) at the time of study. Heparin sensitivity was assessed using the APTT ratios obtained by more than 300 NEQAS participants on five plasmas prepared from patients receiving unfractionated heparin. The concentrations of three neutral lipids and six phospholipids present in the seven APTT reagents were determined by high‐performance thin‐layer chromatography (HPTLC) and densitometry. Both the concentrations and the relative percentages of individual phospholipid components varied markedly between reagents. The total phospholipid concentration included a 12‐fold range from 16 to 205 μg/ml. Phosphatidylserine (PS) was completely lacking from one reagent prepared from vegetable material and ranged from 3 to 22 μg/ml in the other six reagents containing extracts from animal tissue. The concentration of phosphatidylcholine ranged from 3 to 109 μg/ml. There was no demonstrable relationship between the concentration of any individual lipid components and heparin sensitivity. However, the relative percentage phospholipid composition was important since a lower % of PS or phosphatidylinositol (PI) correlated with increasing heparin sensitivity.

Point-of-care International Normalised Ratios: UK NEQAS experience demonstrates necessity for proficiency testing of three different monitors.

External quality assessment (EQA) or proficiency testing is widely considered to be necessary for International Normalised Ratio (INR) determinations performed in conventional laboratory settings. There is increasing use of near-patient-test (NPT) or point-of-care (POC) INR devices and it is not known whether EQA is also necessary for these monitors. We report here on six years experience of proficiency testing for POC monitors used by health care professionals. Three devices were used by >10 centres who participated in the programme, the CoaguChek (CUC), the CUC-S and the TAS or Rapidpoint Coag. Not all users of the same type of monitor obtained the same INR result when analysing the same plasma sample. For the three monitors the CV of results in different centres was 11-14%. The variation between results in different centres could relate to inappropriately handled proficiency testing material, inaccuracies in the calibration of the system by the manufacturer or deterioration during transport/storage of the test strips. In each survey 10-11% of centres using POC monitors obtained INR results which were >15% different from those in other centres using the same monitors. For hospital laboratories using conventional INR techniques this figure was 12%. The relationship between INR results obtained by users of the Rapidpoint Coag or TAS monitor and results obtained by conventional techniques was not constant over the period of study. During one period INRs with TAS were 13.7% greater than with conventional methods. For the remaining three time periods results were similar. Our data suggest that the variation between INR results determined with three POC monitors show similar variation to that observed in hospital laboratories using conventional methods. Based on our data we recommend that users of these POC monitors participate regularly in an independent external proficiency testing programme.

Interlaboratory Variation in Factor VIII:C Inhibitor Assay Results Is Sufficient to Influence Patient Management: Data from the UK National Quality External Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation

We report the results of external quality assessment exercises in which 60 to 120 centers performed factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor testing on a series of samples over a 13-year period. Samples from seven different subjects were distributed for analysis comprising the following: four different subjects with severe hemophilia A with antibodies following replacement therapy, one subject with acquired hemophilia A and antibodies to FVIII, one subject with normal FVIII and an easily detected lupus anticoagulant, and one subject with mild hemophilia A and a difficult-to-detect lupus anticoagulant but without antibodies to FVIII. In all of the surveys the results obtained in different centers analyzing the same sample varied to an extent that would influence patient management decisions. In the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme surveys reported here, there was considerable interlaboratory variation in the results of FVIII inhibitor testing that did not improve over the survey period. The coefficient of variation of results in different centers was between 33% and 106% in samples from patients with severe congenital hemophilia A. In some cases, results were affected by assay components. For one plasma, the mean FVIII inhibitor results in centers using one source of normal plasma was 3.9 Bethesda unit (BU)/mL compared with a mean of 5.7 BU/mL in centers using a different normal plasma source ( P = 0.04). Our data indicate that the detection of FVIII inhibitors is not the same in different centers, and the degree of variability noted makes it likely that assay variability has contributed to the lack of international consensus in relation to the real incidence of FVIII inhibitors in different clinical settings. Improvements in assay standardization are urgently needed.

Laboratory performance in the World Federation of Hemophilia EQA programme, 2003–2008

Summary.  External quality assessment (EQA) has been shown to improve laboratory performance and diagnosis in haemostasis. We report here findings from the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) EQA programme during the period 2004–2007. Samples for PT, APTT, FVIII:C, FIX:C and VWF assays were distributed to centres in both established and emerging countries, and results were compared with results obtained by United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) participants on the same samples. In general, good agreement was seen throughout between WFH and UK NEQAS for screening tests, and it was possible to identify an improvement in WFH centre agreement for results for VWF assays during the period of study. Agreement between emerging and established WFH centres was comparable for screening tests, possibly indicative of the relative simplicity of these tests and the degree of automation now employed in almost all haemostasis laboratories. However, CVs and performance compared with UK NEQAS participant results for factor assays amongst established centres was better than between emerging centres. Distribution of a questionnaire revealed different application of methodology for these assays, which may contribute to the observed difference in performance. Several centres participated in supplementary exercises, with comparable results obtained by emerging and established centres performing FVIII and fibrinogen measurement on cryoprecipitate, and all centres performing FVIII inhibitor assays correctly identifying the presence of an inhibitor. Participation in EQA programmes should continue to encourage improvement in laboratory performance and therefore improvements in the diagnosis and care of patients with haemophilia.