T. Anderson
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. Anderson.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
M. G. Aartsen; K. Abraham; M. Ackermann; J. Adams; J. A. Aguilar; M. Ahlers; M. Ahrens; D. Altmann; K. Andeen; T. Anderson; I. Ansseau; G. Anton; M. Archinger; C. Argüelles; T. C. Arlen; J. Auffenberg; S. Axani; X. Bai; S. W. Barwick; V. Baum; R. Bay; J. J. Beatty; J. Becker Tjus; K. Becker; S. BenZvi; P. Berghaus; D. Berley; E. Bernardini; A. Bernhard; David Z. Besson
Observation of a point source of astrophysical neutrinos would be a smoking gun signature of a cosmic-ray accelerator. While IceCube has recently discovered a diffuse flux of astrophysical neutrinos, no localized point source has been observed. Previous IceCube searches for point sources in the southern sky were restricted by either an energy threshold above a few hundred TeV or poor neutrino angular resolution. Here we present a search for southern sky point sources with greatly improved sensitivities to neutrinos with energies below 100 TeV. By selecting charged-current ν μ interacting inside the detector, we reduce the atmospheric background while retaining efficiency for astrophysical neutrino-induced events reconstructed with sub-degree angular resolution. The new event sample covers three years of detector data and leads to a factor of 10 improvement in sensitivity to point sources emitting below 100 TeV in the southern sky. No statistically significant evidence of point sources was found, and upper limits are set on neutrino emission from individual sources. A posteriori analysis of the highest-energy (∼100 TeV) starting event in the sample found that this event alone represents a 2.8σ deviation from the hypothesis that the data consists only of atmospheric background.
Nature | 2017
M. G. Aartsen; G. C. Hill; A. Kyriacou; S. Robertson; A. Wallace; B. J. Whelan; M. Ackermann; E. Bernardini; Stijn Blot; F. Bradascio; H.-P. Bretz; J. Brostean-Kaiser; A. Franckowiak; E. Jacobi; T. Karg; T. Kintscher; S. Kunwar; R. Nahnhauer; K. Satalecka; C. Spiering; J. Stachurska; A. Stasik; N. L. Strotjohann; A. Terliuk; M. Usner; Van Santen J; J. Adams; H. Bagherpour; J. A. Aguilar; I. Ansseau
Neutrinos interact only very weakly, so they are extremely penetrating. The theoretical neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section, however, increases with increasing neutrino energy, and neutrinos with energies above 40 teraelectronvolts (TeV) are expected to be absorbed as they pass through the Earth. Experimentally, the cross-section has been determined only at the relatively low energies (below 0.4u2009TeV) that are available at neutrino beams from accelerators. Here we report a measurement of neutrino absorption by the Earth using a sample of 10,784 energetic upward-going neutrino-induced muons. The flux of high-energy neutrinos transiting long paths through the Earth is attenuated compared to a reference sample that follows shorter trajectories. Using a fit to the two-dimensional distribution of muon energy and zenith angle, we determine the neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section for neutrino energies 6.3–980u2009TeV, more than an order of magnitude higher than previous measurements. The measured cross-section is about 1.3 times the prediction of the standard model, consistent with the expectations for charged- and neutral-current interactions. We do not observe a large increase in the cross-section with neutrino energy, in contrast with the predictions of some theoretical models, including those invoking more compact spatial dimensions or the production of leptoquarks. This cross-section measurement can be used to set limits on the existence of some hypothesized beyond-standard-model particles, including leptoquarks.
Journal of Instrumentation | 2015
Y.S. Hwang; H. J. Kim; T. Anderson; D. Angelaszek; M. Copley; S. Coutu; J. H. Han; H.G. Huh; D.H. Kah; K. C. Kim; K. Kwashnak; M.H. Lee; J. T. Link; L. Lutz; A. Malinin; J. W. Mitchell; S. Nutter; O. Ofoha; H.B. Jeon; H.J. Hyun; H. Park; J.M. Park; P. Patterson; E. S. Seo; J. Wu; Y.S. Yoon
The Cosmic Ray Energetics And Mass (CREAM) mission is planned for launch in 2015 to the International Space Station (ISS) to research high-energy cosmic rays. Its aim is to understand the acceleration and propagation mechanism of high-energy cosmic rays by measuring their compositions. The Top Counting Detector and Bottom Counting Detector (T/BCD) were built to discriminate electrons from protons by using the difference in cascade shapes between electromagnetic and hadronic showers. The T/BCD provides a redundant instrument trigger in flight as well as a low-energy calibration trigger for ground testing. Each detector consists of a plastic scintillator and two-dimensional silicon photodiode array with readout electronics. The TCD is located between the carbon target and the calorimeter, and the BCD is located below the calorimeter. In this paper, we present the design, assembly, and performance of the T/BCD.
Advances in Space Research | 2014
E. S. Seo; T. Anderson; D. Angelaszek; S.J. Baek; J. Baylon; M. Buénerd; M. Copley; S. Coutu; L. Derome; B. Fields; M. Gupta; J. H. Han; I.J. Howley; H.G. Huh; Y.S. Hwang; H.J. Hyun; I.S. Jeong; D.H. Kah; K.H. Kang; D.Y. Kim; H. J. Kim; K. C. Kim; M.H. Kim; K. Kwashnak; Jik Lee; M.H. Lee; J. T. Link; L. Lutz; A. Malinin; A. Menchaca-Rocha
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2015
H.J. Hyun; T. Anderson; D. Angelaszek; S.J. Baek; M. Copley; S. Coutu; J. H. Han; H.G. Huh; Y.S. Hwang; S. Im; H. B. Jeon; D.H. Kah; K. H. Kang; H.J. Kim; K. C. Kim; K. Kwashnak; J. Lee; M.H. Lee; J. T. Link; L. Lutz; J. W. Mitchell; S. Nutter; O. Ofoha; H. Park; I.H. Park; J.M. Park; P. Patterson; E. S. Seo; J. Wu; Y.S. Yoon
arXiv: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena | 2018
M. G. Aartsen; M. Ackermann; J. Adams; J. A. Aguilar; M. Ahlers; M. Ahrens; I. Al Samarai; D. Altmann; K. Andeen; T. Anderson; I. Ansseau; G. Anton; C. Argüelles; J. Auffenberg; S. Axani; P. Backes; H. Bagherpour; X. Bai; A. Barbano; J. P. Barron; S. W. Barwick; V. Baum; R. Bay; J. J. Beatty; J. Becker Tjus; K. Becker; S. BenZvi; D. Berley; E. Bernardini; David Z. Besson
Archive | 2017
T. Anderson
Advances in Space Research | 2017
J.M. Park; Y. Amare; T. Anderson; D. Angelaszek; N. Anthony; H. Arnold; G.H. Choi; M. Copley; S. Coutu; L. Derome; C. Ebongue; L. Eraud; I. Faddis; J. H. Han; I.J. Howley; H.G. Huh; Y.S. Hwang; H.J. Hyun; S. Im; H. B. Jeon; J. A. Jeon; S. Jeong; S. C. Kang; D.Y. Kim; H.J. Kim; K. C. Kim; M.H. Kim; P. King; Hye Young Lee; J. Lee
34th International International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC) | 2015
J.M. Park; Y. Amare; T. Anderson; D. Angelaszek; M. Buénerd; M. Copley; S. Coutu; L. Derome; C. Ebongue; L. Eraud; I. Faddis; B. Rields; M. Gupta; J. H. Han; I.J. Howley; H.G. Huh; Y.S. Hwang; H. J. Hyun; S. Im; H.B. Jeon; Jongbum Jeon; D.Y. Kim; Hwan Kim; K. C. Kim; M.H. Kim; K. Kwashnak; H.Y. Lee; Jik Lee; M.H. Lee; J. Liang
Proceedings of the 12th ICATPP Conference | 2011
E. S. Seo; H. S. Ahn; P. Bhoyar; J. Eaton; O. Ganel; J. H. Han; A. Haque; K. C. Kim; M.H. Kim; M.H. Lee; S. E. Lee; L. Lutz; A. Malinin; O. Ofoha; S. S. Ryu; B. P. Smith; A. Vartanyan; P. Walpole; J. Wu; J. H. Yoo; Y.S. Yoon; T. Anderson; N. B. Conklin; S. Coutu; M. Geske; S. I. Mognet; Loius M. Barbier; J. T. Link; J. W. Mitchell; A. Barrau