T.B. Icenogle

Long-term follow-up of Thoratec ventricular assist device bridge-to-recovery patients successfully removed from support after recovery of ventricular function.

BACKGROUND In certain forms of severe heart failure there is sufficient improvement in cardiac function during ventricular assist device (VAD) support to allow removal of the device. However, it is critical to know whether there is sustained recovery of the heart and long-term patient survival if VAD bridging to recovery is to be considered over the option of transplantation. METHODS To determine long-term outcome of survivors of VAD bridge-to-recovery procedures, we retrospectively evaluated 22 patients with non-ischemic heart failure successfully weaned from the Thoratec left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or biventricular assist device (BVAD) after recovery of ventricular function at 14 medical centers. All patients were in imminent risk of dying and were selected for VAD support using standard bridge-to-transplant requirements. There were 12 females and 10 males with an average age of 32 (range, 12-49). The etiologies were 12 with myocarditis, 7 with cardiomyopathies (4 post-partum [PPCM], 1 viral [VCM], and 2 idiopathic [IDCM]), and 3 with a combination of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. BVADs were used in 13 patients and isolated LVADs in 9 patients, for an average duration of 57 days (range, 11-190 days), before return of ventricular function and successful weaning from the device. Post-VAD survival was compared with 43 VAD bridge-to-transplant patients with the same etiologies who underwent cardiac transplantation instead of device weaning. RESULTS Nineteen of the 22 patients are currently alive. Three patients required heart transplantation, 1 within 1 day, 2 at 12 and 13 months post-weaning, and 2 died at 2.5 and 6 months. The remaining 17 patients are alive with their native hearts after an average of 3.2 years (range, 1.2-10 years). The actuarial survival of native hearts (transplant-free survival) post-VAD support is 86% at 1 year and 77% at 5 years, which was not significantly different (p = 0.94) from that of post-VAD transplanted patients, also at 86% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival for bridge-to-recovery with VADs for acute cardiomyopathies and myocarditis is equivalent to that for cardiac transplantation. Recovery of the native heart, which can take weeks to months of VAD support, is the most desirable clinical outcome and should be actively sought, with transplantation used only after recovery of ventricular function has been ruled out.

HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: Combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial

BACKGROUND The HeartWare Ventricular Assist System (HeartWare Inc, Framingmam, MA) is a miniaturized implantable, centrifugal design, continuous-flow blood pump. The pivotal bridge to transplant and continued access protocols trials have enrolled patients with advanced heart failure in a bridge-to-transplant indication. METHODS The primary outcome, success, was defined as survival on the originally implanted device, transplant, or explant for ventricular recovery at 180 days. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of survival, functional and quality of life outcomes, and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 332 patients in the pivotal bridge to transplant and continued access protocols trial have completed their 180-day primary end-point assessment. Survival in patients receiving the HeartWare pump was 91% at 180 days and 84% at 360 days. Quality of life scores improved significantly, and adverse event rates remain low. CONCLUSIONS The use of the HeartWare pump as a bridge to transplant continues to demonstrate a high 180-day survival rate despite a low rate of transplant. Adverse event rates are similar or better than those observed in historical bridge-to-transplant trials, despite longer exposure times due to longer survival and lower transplant rates.

Comparison of functional capacity in patients with end-stage heart failure following implantation of a left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation: results of the experience with left ventricular assist device with exercise trial.

BACKGROUND Use of a permanent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been proposed as an alternate treatment of patients with end-stage heart failure. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional capacity of patients following implantation of a LVAD vs heart transplant (HTx). METHODS Eighteen patients from 6 centers who received an intracorporeal LVAD as a bridge to HTx underwent treadmill testing 1 to 3 months post-LVAD and again post-HTx. Baseline and peak measurements, including oxygen consumption, blood pressures, and respiratory rate were made during each treadmill test. RESULTS Peak oxygen consumption was 14.5+/-3.9 ml/kg/minute post-LVAD and 17.5+/-5.0 ml/kg/minute post-HTx (p < .005). The percentage of the predicted peak oxygen consumption based on gender, weight, and age was 39.5%+/-5.5% post-LVAD and 47.7%+/-10.9% post-HTx (p < .005). Exercise duration was lower post-LVAD than post-HTx (10.3+/-4.2 minute vs 12.5+/-5.4 minute, p < .05). After LVAD implantation, peak total oxygen consumption correlated with peak LVAD rate and output. Eight patients reached an LVAD rate of 120 beats per minute (bpm) before the conclusion of exercise, the maximum rate for the outpatient electric device. The peak respiratory exchange ratio post-LVAD was 1.15+/-0.22 and post-HTx was 1.15+/-0.18, consistent with a good effort in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients demonstrated a lower functional capacity post-LVAD than post-HTx. For some patients functional capacity post-LVAD may be improved by a higher maximum LVAD rate and output.

Mechanical Support as Failure Intervention in Patients with Cavopulmonary Shunts (MFICS): Rationale and Aims of a New Registry of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Single Ventricle Patients

It is now recognized that a majority of single ventricle patients, those with functionally univentricular hearts, who have survived palliative cavopulmonary connection will experience circulatory failure and end-organ dysfunction due to intrinsic inadequacies of a circulation supported by a single ventricle. Thus, there are an increasing number of patients with functional single ventricles presenting with failing circulations that may benefit from mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The paucity of experience with MCS in this population, even at high volume cardiac centers, contributes to limited available data to guide MCS device selection and management. Thus, a registry of MCS in this population would be beneficial to the field. A conference was convened in January 2012 of pediatric and adult cardiologists, pediatric cardiac intensivists, congenital heart surgeons, and adult cardiothoracic surgeons to discuss the current state of MCS, ventricular assist device, and total artificial heart therapy for patients who have undergone cavopulmonary connection, either superior cavopulmonary connection or total cavopulmonary connection. Specifically, individual experience and challenges with VAD therapy in this population was reviewed and creation of a multiinstitutional registry of MCS/ventricular assist device in this population was proposed. This document reflects the consensus from the meeting and provides a descriptive overview of the registry referred to as Mechanical Support as Failure Intervention in Patients with Cavopulmonary Shunts.

A technique to simplify and improve exposure in heart-lung transplantation☆☆☆★★★

Heart-lung transplantation is associated with high perioperative mortality rates. A modified operative technique was used by one surgeon operating on 17 patients at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and the Inland Northwest Thoracic Organ Transplant Program, Spokane, Washington. This technique gives greater exposure to the area of dissection behind the heart-lung block after implantation and makes maintaining hemostasis easier. No deaths from bleeding complications occurred and no reoperations for bleeding were required with this technique. The Kaplan-Meier survival was 82% at 1 year. This technique simplifies a difficult technical procedure and may reduce mortality rate.

Bridge to transplantation indications for Symbion TAH, Symbion AVAD, and Novacor LVAS

A retrospective review of our circulatory support device experience since February 1985 includes: 8 total artificial hearts (TAH), 5 Symbion left ventricular assist devices (Symbion LVAD), 10 Symbion biventricular assist devices (Symbion BIVAD), and 4 Novacor left ventricular assist systems (Novacor LVAS).

Thrombolytics in VAD management — A single-center experience

Background With continued increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support, the incidence of device thrombus remains a challenge. This study is a retrospective analysis of data at a single center to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic use in durable mechanical assist devices. Methods Data was analyzed retrospectively from 154 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation from 1/1/2005 to 6/30/2014. The HMII device was implanted in 131 patients while 23 received the HVAD. LVAD thrombus was diagnosed when lactate dehydrogenase levels exceeded 1000 units/l accompanied by clinical signs of hemolysis and heart failure, echocardiographic data and surges in pump power. TPA (tissue plasminogen activator) protocol consisted of a 5 mg intravenous bolus followed by 3 mg/h infusion in normal saline for 10 h. If symptoms persisted another cycle of TPA at 1 mg/h was continued up to 48 h. Results The TPA group had a 70% success rate. Success was defined as complete resolution of hemolysis and clinical symptoms with no requirement for LVAD exchange at 30 days. 95% survival was noted at 30 days and 90% were free of a hemorrhagic stroke in the TPA group. The rates of hemorrhagic strokes in the TPA group and the control group were not different (OR = 0.92). Conclusion The TPA protocol described here was successful consistently. Though this study is limited by its size and retrospective nature it leads the way for larger studies to generate more robust comparisons between different types of mechanical assist devices as well as the tailored use of thrombolytics in this patient population.