T. C. Hender
University of Strathclyde
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. C. Hender.
Nuclear Fusion | 2011
P. de Vries; M.F. Johnson; B. Alper; P. Buratti; T. C. Hender; H. R. Koslowski; V. Riccardo
A survey has been carried out into the causes of all 2309 disruptions over the last decade of JET operations. The aim of this survey was to obtain a complete picture of all possible disruption causes, in order to devise better strategies to prevent or mitigate their impact. The analysis allows the effort to avoid or prevent JET disruptions to be more efficient and effective. As expected, a highly complex pattern of chain of events that led to disruptions emerged. It was found that the majority of disruptions had a technical root cause, for example due to control errors, or operator mistakes. These bring a random, non-physics, factor into the occurrence of disruptions and the disruption rate or disruptivity of a scenario may depend more on technical performance than on physics stability issues. The main root cause of JET disruptions was nevertheless due to neo-classical tearing modes that locked, closely followed in second place by disruptions due to human error. The development of more robust operational scenarios has reduced the JET disruption rate over the last decade from about 15% to below 4%. A fraction of all disruptions was caused by very fast, precursorless unpredictable events. The occurrence of these disruptions may set a lower limit of 0.4% to the disruption rate of JET. If one considers on top of that human error and all unforeseen failures of heating or control systems this lower limit may rise to 1.0% or 1.6%, respectively.
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2004
K.-D. Zastrow; J. M. Adams; Yu. Baranov; P. Belo; L. Bertalot; J. H. Brzozowski; C. D. Challis; S. Conroy; M. de Baar; P. de Vries; P. Dumortier; Jc Ferreira; L. Garzotti; T. C. Hender; E. Joffrin; V. Kiptily; J. Mailloux; D. C. McDonald; R. Neu; M. O'Mullane; M. F. F. Nave; J. Ongena; S. Popovichev; M. F. Stamp; J. Stober; D. Stork; I. Voitsekhovitch; M. Valovic; H. Weisen; A. D. Whiteford
An overview is given of the experimental method, the analysis technique and the results for trace tritium experiments conducted on the JET tokamak in 2003. Observations associated with events such as sawtooth collapses, neo-classical tearing modes and edge localized modes are described. Tritium transport is seen to approach neo-classical levels in the plasma core at high density and low q(95), and in the transport barrier region of internal transport barrier (ITB) discharges. Tritium transport remains well above neo-classical levels in all other cases. The correlation of the measured tritium diffusion coefficient and convection velocity for normalized minor radii r/a = [0.65, 0.80] with the controllable parameters q95 and plasma density are found to be consistent for all operational regimes (ELMy H-mode discharges with or without ion cyclotron frequency resonance heating, hybrid scenario and ITB discharges). Scaling with local physics parameters is best described by gyro-Bohm scaling with an additional inverse beta dependence.
Nuclear Fusion | 2016
T. C. Hender; P. Buratti; F. J. Casson; B. Alper; Y. Baranov; M. Baruzzo; C. Challis; F. Koechl; K. Lawson; C. Marchetto; M. F. F. Nave; T. Pütterich; S. Reyes Cortes; Jet Contributors
In hybrid plasma operation in JET with its ITER-like wall (JET-ILW) it is found that n > 1 tearing activity can significantly enhance the rate of on-axis peaking of high-Z impurities, which in t ...
Nuclear Fusion | 2016
P. de Vries; G. Pautasso; E. Nardon; P. Cahyna; S. Gerasimov; J. Havlicek; T. C. Hender; Gta Guido Huijsmans; M. Lehnen; M. Maraschek; T. Markovic; J. A. Snipes
The amplitude of locked instabilities, likely magnetic islands, seen as precursors to disruptions has been studied using data from the JET, ASDEX Upgrade and COMPASS tokamaks. It was found that the thermal quench, that often initiates the disruption, is triggered when the amplitude has reached a distinct level. This information can be used to determine thresholds for simple disruption prediction schemes. The measured amplitude in part depends on the distance of the perturbation to the measurement coils. Hence the threshold for the measured amplitude depends on the mode location (i.e. the rational q-surface) and thus indirectly on parameters such as the edge safety factor, q 95, and the internal inductance, li(3), that determine the shape of the q-profile. These dependencies can be used to set the disruption thresholds more precisely. For the ITER baseline scenario, with typically q 95 = 3.2, li(3) = 0.9 and taking into account the position of the measurement coils on ITER, the maximum allowable measured locked mode amplitude normalized to engineering parameters was estimated to be aB ML(r c)/I p = 0.92 m mT/MA, or directly as a fraction edge poloidal magnetic field: B ML(r c)/B θ (a) = 5 10−3. But these values decrease for operation at higher q 95 or lower li(3). The analysis found furthermore that the above empirical criterion to trigger a thermal quench is more consistent with a criterion derived with the concept of a critical island size, i.e. the thermal quench seemed to be triggered at a distinct island width.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2016
S. Reyes Cortes; B. Alper; D. Alves; M. Baruzzo; J. Bernardo; P. Buratti; R. Coelho; C. Challis; I. T. Chapman; N. Hawkes; T. C. Hender; J. Hobirk; E. Joffrin; Jet Contributors
In this communication we propose a novel diagnostic technique, which uses the collection optics of the JET Motional Stark Effect (MSE) diagnostic, to perform polarimetry marking of observed MHD in high temperature plasma regimes. To introduce the technique, first we will present measurements of the coherence between MSE polarimeter, electron cyclotron emission, and Mirnov coil signals aiming to show the feasibility of the method. The next step consists of measuring the amplitude fluctuation of the raw MSE polarimeter signals, for each MSE channel, following carefully the MHD frequency on Mirnov coil data spectrograms. A variety of experimental examples in JET ITER-Like Wall (ILW) plasmas are presented, providing an adequate picture and interpretation for the MSE optics polarimeter technique.
Archive | 2013
M. Baruzzo; J. Hobirk; M. Valisa; I. T. Chapman; I. Lupelli; G. Pucella; J. Mailloux; D. Dodt; T. Bolzonella; C. Bourdelle; C. Giroud; E. Joffrin; B. Alper; O. Tudisco; S. Sharapov; P. Buratti; A. Botrugno; C. Challis; Jet Efda contributors; R. Coelho; P. de Vries; Yu. Baranov; F. Orsitto; M. Gelfusa; T. C. Hender; N. Hawkes
1Consorzio RFX, EURATOM-ENEA Association, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova, Italy 2Euratom/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK 3Associazione EURATOM-ENEA sulla Fusione, C.R. Frascati, Roma, Italy 4Association EURATOM-CEA, CEA/DSM/IRFM, Cadarache 13108 Saint Paul Lez Durance, France 5Associacao EURATOM/IST, Instituto de Plasmas e Fusao Nuclear, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Av Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal 6FOM institute DIFFER, EURATOM association, P.O. Box 1207, Nieuwegein, Netherlands 7Max-Planck-Institut fur Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Assoziation, D-85748 Garching, Germany 8Associazione EURATOM-ENEA sulla Fusione, Universita di Roma, Italy
34th European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics 2007, EPS 2007, 2 July 2007 through 6 July 2007, Warsaw, Poland | 2007
C. Challis; E. Joffrin; T.C. Luce; P. Buratti; P. de Vries; J. Hobirk; B. Alper; M. Brix; R. Felton; J.R. Ferron; C. Giroud; M. Gryaznevich; N. Hawkes; T. C. Hender; D. Howell; J. Menard; M. Murakami; Elisabeth Rachlew; S. Saarelma; S. E. Sharapov; O. Tudisco; I. Voitsekhovitch; O. Zimmermann
Archive | 2005
R.J. Buttery; R. J. La Haye; T. C. Hender; D. Howell; J. T. Scoville
Proc. 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference | 2002
T. C. Hender; O. Sauter; B. Alper; C. Angioni; M.R. de Baar; M. De' Benedetti; P. Belo; M. Bigi; D. Borba; T. Bolzonella; R.V. Budny; R.J. Buttery; A. Gondhalekar; N. N. Gorelenkov; A. Gude; S. Günter; T. Hellsten; D. Howell; R. Koslowski; R.J. La Haye; A.W. Hyatt; P. Lamalle; E. Lazzaro; M. Mantsinen; M. Maraschek; M.-L. Mayoral; K. G. McClements; F. Milani; F. Nabais; M. F. F. Nave
26th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics | 1999
S. Medvedev; T. C. Hender; S.J. Allfrey; H. R. Wilson; O. Sauter; L. Villard