T Ganesh

Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance based target volume in brain tumors

PURPOSE This study was mainly framed to study the difference in tumor volumes as seen on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) and their significance in planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with brain tumor of different diagnoses who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy were included in this study. CT and MR imaging was done for all the patients with 2.5 mm slice thickness. The CT tumor volume and MR tumor volume were measured and compared with each other. The center of mass (CM) of the tumor volume delineated on CT and MR were computed and the shift between the two CMs was determined. RESULTS The mean and median volume of the tumor as measured from MR scans was 19.67 cc +/- 13.73 and 16.13 cc (range: 3.25 cc-50.37 cc). Similarly, the mean and median volume of the tumor as measured from CT scans was 15.05 cc +/- 10.13 and 11.63 cc (range: 3.0 cc-36.25 cc) respectively. The mean and median CM shift between CT and MR was 5.47 mm and 5.21 mm respectively. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that MR is an indispensable imaging modality in radiotherapy for planning brain tumors.

Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning and to correlate with breast parameters. Also, the number of slices required for treatment planning in breast cancer by tangential field technique has been assessed by comparing the treatment plans according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) 50 guidelines (1993) for single-slice, three-slice, and multi-slice (3D) planning . Sixty women who underwent isocentric tangential field breast radiotherapy were included in this study. The plans were optimized and analyzed with dose volume histograms. Sixty-three percent of the single-slice plans and 26.7% of the three-slice plans showed poor dose homogeneity as compared to the 3D plans. Dose inhomogeneity correlated better with breast volume (r2 = 0.43) than the chest wall separation (r2 = 0.37) and breast area product (r2 = 0.36). Similarly, breast volume correlated better with breast area product (r2 = 0.80) than with chest wall separation (r2 = 0.56). Breast volume can be approximated to breast area product from the relation, breast volume = [(breast area product × 8.85) − 120.05]. The results of this study showed that most of the cases require 3D planning for breast cancer. It also showed that patients with large breast are prone to have more dose inhomogeneity with standard tangential field radiotherapy. In centers where 3D planning is not possible due to lack of facilities or workload, three slices–based planning can be performed to approximate the dosimetric advantage of 3D planning.

Comparison of Contralateral Breast Dose for Various Tangential Field Techniques in Clinical Radiotherapy

Contralateral breast (CLB) cancer is a rare but serious concern in radiotherapy. In this study, the CLB dose was measured using MOSFET dosimeter in 49 patients who underwent breast conservation surgery treated by different radiotherapy tangential field techniques, which included enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW), physical wedge, and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The mean percent of the prescribed dose received by the contralateral areola in treatment technique using physical wedge (Cobalt), physical wedge (Linac), EDW, and IMRT were 4.27% (SD: 0.65), 3.61% (SD: 0.60), 3.38% (SD: 0.58), and 1.65% (SD: 0.24), respectively. There was a 29% CLB dose reduction at 3 cm from the medial tangential field border with IMRT compared to other wedged tangential field techniques. The study shows that the CLB dose could be reduced with IMRT or reducing or avoiding the medial wedge in conventional tangential field planning for breast cancer.

A study on contralateral breast surface dose for various tangential field techniques and the impact of set-up error on this dose

The risk of inducing contralateral breast (CLB) cancer in patients undergoing tangential field irradiation for the treatment of breast cancer is a serious concern in radiation oncology. A bilateral breast phantom made of wax attached onto the Alderson Rando phantom was used for studying the CLB dose for techniques using physical wedges, EDWs, IMRT and open fields. The skin dose to the CLB was measured at four different points (3 cm from the medial border of the tangential field (P1), nipple (P3), axilla (P4), midpoint between P3 and P1 (P2)). The highest measured dose occurred at P1 with the 60° physical wedges; it was 15.3 % of the dose at isocentre. Similarly, the dose measured at P3 (nipple) with 60° physical wedges was 1.90 times higher than the dose with 60° EDWs. The dose at P1 for IMRT (7.8%) was almost the same as that for the open field (8.7%). The skin dose measured at the nipple was 2.1 – 10.9 % of the isocentre dose. The highest CLB doses were contributed by medial wedged fields. The dose to the CLB can be reduced by using IMRT or avoiding wedging the medial tangential fields. A set-up error in the longitudinal direction has little impact on the CLB dose. Set-up errors >1 cm in the vertical and lateral directions have significant impact on the CLB dose.

Erratum to: Short tangential arcs in VMAT based breast and chest wall radiotherapy lead to conformity of the breast dose with lesser cardiac and lung doses: a prospective study of breast conservation and mastectomy patients

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is modern rotational intensity modulated therapy used for treatment of several sites. The study aimed to analyze partial tangential arc VMAT treatment planning and delivery, including analyzing the cardiac and contralateral breast doses resulting from this technique. A total of 153 consecutively treated breast cancer (conservation as well as mastectomy) patients were taken for this dosimetric study. All patients were planned using partial arc VMAT in the Monaco treatment planning system using two partial arc beams. All patients were divided into seven different categories: (1) all the patients in the study, (2) left sided whole breast and chest wall patients, (3) left Chest wall patients, (4) left whole breast patients, (5) right sided whole breast and chest wall patients, (6) right chest wall patients, and (7) right whole breast patients. We evaluated each treatment plan for PTV coverage and doses to OARs. SPSS version 16.0 software was used for statistical analysis. There were 91 left sided and 62 right sided breast cancer patients in the overall analysis. The percentage of PTV volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose (PTV V95%, mean ± SD) varied in the range of 91.2 ± 5.2–94.8 ± 2.1% with mean dose of 92.4 ± 5.2% for all cases. The (mean ± SD) cardiac dose for all the patients was 289 ± 23 cGy. The (mean ± SD) cardiac doses were higher for left sided patients (424 ± 33.8 cGy) as compared to right sided patients (123.9 ± 80 cGy) (p 30° versus 30° (324.5 ± 247.1 vs. 234.4 ± 188.4 cGy) (p = 0.001). Similarly contralateral breast mean dose was higher with arc angles >30° versus 30° (126 ± 115 vs. 88.6 ± 76.1 cGy) (p = 0.001). However cardiac V20, V30 and V40 Gy did not exhibit any statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.26, 0.057 and 0.054 respectively). This is the first large study of its kind that assesses the dosimetric outcome of tangential partial arc VMAT treatments in a large group of mastectomy and breast conservation patients. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of this technique in dose coverage of PTV as well as in minimizing dose to OARs. Further, based on our results, we conclude that the arc length for the bi-tangential arcs should be 30° since it helps to achieve the most optimal balance between target coverage and acceptable OAR doses.

Iridium-192 interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma of the tongue. The importance of various tumor and physical parameters.

A detailed analysis of host-tumor factors and interstitial physical factors influencing the disease-free control in carcinoma of the tongue was carried out. Twenty-eight cases of carcinoma of the tongue T1-3, NO-1, MO were treated radically with combined external irradiation and 192Iridium interstitial brachytherapy (one patient received brachytherapy only). The teletherapy dose ranged from 44 Gy to 56 Gy (average 48 Gy), the brachytherapy dose ranged from 16 Gy to 55 Gy (average 22 Gy). The interstitial practice involved loop technique in all the cases. Dose distribution analysis to assess factors influencing local control included indices of dose rate, source activity, inter-planar distance, and discontinuity in the prescribed isodose in other planes when compared to mid-plane. Two-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) was 46% with primary treatment and 63% when salvage treatment was also included. DFS was significantly poorer when the interplanar distance at mid-plane exceeded 10 mm (p < 0.05). Similarly, tumor control was poorer (p < 0.008) when there was discontinuity in the prescribed isodose in 1 or 2 planes (1 cm superior and inferior to mid-plane). Interplanar distance of around 10 mm, prescribed isodose continuity in all three planes and limiting the dose maximum within a factor of 2 will optimize the results of interstitial implants.

SU-F-T-414: Mathematical Formulation of Gantry Starting Angle for Right Medial Tangential Arc in Left Intact Partial Breast Irradiation Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)

PURPOSE To choose appropriate gantry starting angle for partial left breast irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS A random patient of left breast carcinoma was selected for this study. The slice which was selected for this mathematical formulation was having maximum breast thickness and maximum medial and lateral tangential distance. After this appropriate isocenter was chosen on that CT slice. The distances between various points were measured by the measuring tool in Monaco 5.00.04. Using the various trigonometric equations, a final equation was derived which shows the relationship between Gantry start angle, isocenter Location and tissue thickness. RESULTS The final equation for gantry start for right medial tangential arc is given asStarting angle = 270°+tan^(-1)(sin(θ)/(x_1/x_2 +cosθ))The above equation was tested for 10 cases and it was found to be appropriate for all the cases. CONCLUSION Gantry starting angle for partial arc irradiation depends upon Breast thickness, Distance between Medial and lateral tangent and isocenter location.

SU-F-T-422: Detection of Optimal Tangential Partial Arc Span for VMAT Planning in IntactLeft-Breast Treatment

PURPOSE This study was designed to investigate an appropriate arc span for intact partial Left breast irradiation by VMAT planning. METHODS Four cases of carcinoma left intact breast was chosen randomly for this study. Both medial tangential and left-lateral tangential arc (G20°, G25°, G30°, G35°, G40°) were used having the same length and bilaterally symmetric. For each patient base plan was generated for 30° arc and rest of other arc plans were generated by keeping all plan parameters same, only arc span were changed. All patient plans were generated on treatment planning system Monaco (V 5.00.02) for 50 Gy dose in 25 fractions. PTV contours were clipped 3 mm from skin (patient). All plans were normalized in such a way that 95 % of prescription dose would cover 96 % of PTV volume. RESULTS Mean MU for 20°, 25°, 30°, 35° and 40° were 509 ± 18.8, 529.1 ± 20.2, 544.4 ± 20.8, 579.1 ±51.8, 607.2 ± 40.2 similarly mean hot spot (volume covered by 105% of prescription dose) were 2.9 ± 1.2, 3.7 ± 3.0, 1.5 ± 1.7, 1.3±0.6, 0.4 ± 0.4, mean contralateral breast dose (cGy) were 180.4 ± 242.3, 71.5 ± 52.7, 76.2 ± 58.8, 85.9 ± 70.5, 90.7 ± 70.1, mean heart dose (cGy) were 285.8 ± 87.2, 221.2 ± 62.8, 274.5 ± 95.5, 234.8 ± 73.8, 263.2 ± 81.6, V20 for ipsilateral lung were 15.4 ± 5.3, 14.3 ± 3.6, 15.3 ± 2.9, 14.2 ± 3.9, 14.7 ± 3.2 and V5 for ipsilateral lung were 33.9 ± 8.2, 31.0 ± 3.5, 42.6 ±15.6, 36.4 ± 12.9, 37.0 ± 7.5. CONCLUSION The study concluded that appropriate arc span used for tangential intact breast treatment was optimally 30° because larger arc span were giving lower isodose spill in ipsilateral lung and smaller arc were giving heterogeneous dose distribution in PTV.

SU-F-J-47: Inherent Uncertainty in the Positional Shifts Determined by a Volumetric Cone Beam Imaging System

PURPOSE To quantify inherent uncertainty associated with a volumetric imaging system in its determination of positional shifts. METHODS The study was performed on an Elekta Axesse™ linacs XVI cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system. A CT image data set of a Penta- Guide phantom was used as reference image by placing isocenter at the center of the phantom.The phantom was placed arbitrarily on the couch close to isocenter and CBCT images were obtained. The CBCT dataset was matched with the reference image using XVI software and the shifts were determined in 6-dimensions. Without moving the phantom, this process was repeated 20 times consecutively within 30 minutes on a single day. Mean shifts and their standard deviations in all 6-dimensions were determined for all the 20 instances of imaging. For any given day, the first set of shifts obtained was kept as reference and the deviations of the subsequent 19 sets from the reference set were scored. Mean differences and their standard deviations were determined. In this way, data were obtained for 30 consecutive working days. RESULTS Tabulating the mean deviations and their standard deviations observed on each day for the 30 measurement days, systematic and random errors in the determination of shifts by XVI software were calculated. The systematic errors were found to be 0.03, 0.04 and 0.03 mm while random errors were 0.05, 0.06 and 0.06 mm in lateral, craniocaudal and anterio-posterior directions respectively. For rotational shifts, the systematic errors were 0.02°, 0.03° and 0.03° and random errors were 0.06°, 0.05° and 0.05° in pitch, roll and yaw directions respectively. CONCLUSION The inherent uncertainties in every image guidance system should be assessed and baseline values established at the time of its commissioning. These shall be periodically tested as part of the QA protocol.

SU-F-T-327: Total Body Irradiation In-Vivo Dose Measurements Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) NanoDots and Farmer Type Ion Chamber.

PURPOSE This study was performed to analyze the agreement between optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) nanoDots measured doses and 0.6 cc Farmer type ionization chamber measured doses during total body irradiation (TBI). METHODS In-vivo dose measurements using OSL nanoDots and Farmer chamber were done in a total of twelve patients who received TBI at our center by bilateral parallel-opposed beams technique. In this technique, the patient is kept inside the TBI box which is filled with rice bags and irradiated using two bilateral parallel opposed beams of 40×40 cm2 size with 45° collimator rotation at an SSD of 333.5 cm in an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator. All patients received a dose of 2 Gy in single fraction as conditioning regimen. The beams were equally weighted at the midplane of the box. The nanoDots were placed over forehead, right and left neck, right and left lung, umbilicus, right and left abdomen, medial part of thigh, knee and toe. A 0.6 cc Farmer chamber was placed in between the thighs of the patient. Measured doses are reported along with the statistical comparisons using paired sample t-test. RESULTS For the above sites the mean doses were 212.2±21.1, 218.2±7.6, 218.7±9.3, 215.6±9.5, 217.5±11.5, 214.5±7.7, 218.3±6.8, 221.5±15, 229.1±11.0, 220.5±7.7 and 223.3±5.1 cGy respectively. For all OSL measurements the mean dose was 218.6±11.8 cGy. Farmer chamber measurements yielded a mean dose of 208.8±15.6 cGy. Statistical analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between OSL measured doses in forehead, right and left neck, right and left lung, umbilicus, right and left abdomen and toe and Farmer chamber measured doses (0.72≤p≤0.06). However the mean OSL doses at thigh and knee were statistically different (p<0.05) from the Farmer chamber measurements. CONCLUSION OSL measurements were found to be in agreement with Farmer type ionization chamber measurements in in-vivo dosimetry of TBI.