T. Girinsky

Modern Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Field and Dose Guidelines From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG)

Radiation therapy (RT) is the most effective single modality for local control of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and an important component of therapy for many patients. These guidelines have been developed to address the use of RT in HL in the modern era of combined modality treatment. The role of reduced volumes and doses is addressed, integrating modern imaging with 3-dimensional (3D) planning and advanced techniques of treatment delivery. The previously applied extended field (EF) and original involved field (IF) techniques, which treated larger volumes based on nodal stations, have now been replaced by the use of limited volumes, based solely on detectable nodal (and extranodal extension) involvement at presentation, using contrast-enhanced computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or a combination of these techniques. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements concepts of gross tumor volume, clinical target volume, internal target volume, and planning target volume are used for defining the targeted volumes. Newer treatment techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy, breath-hold, image guided radiation therapy, and 4-dimensional imaging, should be implemented when their use is expected to decrease significantly the risk for normal tissue damage while still achieving the primary goal of local tumor control. The highly conformal involved node radiation therapy (INRT), recently introduced for patients for whom optimal imaging is available, is explained. A new concept, involved site radiation therapy (ISRT), is introduced as the standard conformal therapy for the scenario, commonly encountered, wherein optimal imaging is not available. There is increasing evidence that RT doses used in the past are higher than necessary for disease control in this era of combined modality therapy. The use of INRT and of lower doses in early-stage HL is supported by available data. Although the use of ISRT has not yet been validated in a formal study, it is more conservative than INRT, accounting for suboptimal information and appropriately designed for safe local disease control. The goal of modern smaller field radiation therapy is to reduce both treatment volume and treatment dose while maintaining efficacy and minimizing acute and late sequelae. This review is a consensus of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) Steering Committee regarding the modern approach to RT in the treatment of HL, outlining a new concept of ISRT in which reduced treatment volumes are planned for the effective control of involved sites of HL. Nodal and extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are covered separately by ILROG guidelines.

Omitting Radiotherapy in Early Positron Emission Tomography–Negative Stage I/II Hodgkin Lymphoma Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Early Relapse: Clinical Results of the Preplanned Interim Analysis of the Randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial

PURPOSE Combined-modality treatment is standard treatment for patients with clinical stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We hypothesized that an early positron emission tomography (PET) scan could be used to adapt treatment. Therefore, we started the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL Intergroup H10 trial evaluating whether involved-node radiotherapy (IN-RT) could be omitted without compromising progression-free survival in patients attaining a negative early PET scan after two cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) as compared with standard combined-modality treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 15 to 70 years with untreated clinical stage I/II HL were eligible. Here we report the clinical outcome of the preplanned interim futility analysis scheduled to occur after documentation of 34 events in the early PET-negative group. Because testing for futility in this noninferiority trial corresponds to testing the hypothesis of no difference, a one-sided superiority test was conducted. RESULTS The analysis included 1,137 patients. In the favorable subgroup, 85.8% had a negative early PET scan (standard arm, one event v experimental arm, nine events). In the unfavorable subgroup, 74.8% had a negative early PET scan (standard arm, seven events v experimental arm, 16 events). The independent data monitoring committee concluded it was unlikely that we would show noninferiority in the final results for the experimental arm and advised stopping random assignment for early PET-negative patients. CONCLUSION On the basis of this analysis, combined-modality treatment resulted in fewer early progressions in clinical stage I/II HL, although early outcome was excellent in both arms. The final analysis will reveal whether this finding is maintained over time.

Overall treatment time in advanced cervical carcinomas : a critical parameter in treatment outcome

PURPOSE To search for possible influence of overall treatment time on the clinical outcome of advanced cervical carcinomas treated with radiation alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS Three hundred and eighty-six patients with Stage IIB and III cervical carcinomas treated with external radiation and intracavitary curietherapy between 1973 and 1983 were entered in the study. A multivariate analysis was carried out on data concerning these patients to determine whether overall treatment time was a prognostic factor. RESULTS Overall treatment time and blood transfusions during treatment were the two most highly significant factors in the multivariate analysis. Loss of local control and overall survival, when treatment exceeded 52 days, was approximately 1% per day in both cases. CONCLUSION These results suggest that overall treatment time might be a highly significant prognostic factor in the treatment outcome of advanced cervical carcinomas. Prospective randomized studies are strongly warranted to confirm this hypothesis.

Combined-Modality Therapy for Clinical Stage I or II Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Long-Term Results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H7 Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE In early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma (HL), subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI) and combined chemotherapy/radiotherapy produce high disease control rates but also considerable late toxicity. The aim of this study was to reduce this toxicity using a combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) without jeopardizing disease control. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage I or II HL were stratified into two groups, favorable and unfavorable, based on the following four prognostic factors: age, symptoms, number of involved areas, and mediastinal-thoracic ratio. The experimental therapy consisted of six cycles of epirubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and prednisone (EBVP) followed by IF-RT. It was randomly compared, in favorable patients, to STNI and, in unfavorable patients, to six cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (MOPP/ABV hybrid) and IF-RT. RESULTS Median follow-up time of the 722 patients included was 9 years. In 333 favorable patients, the 10-year event-free survival rates (EFS) were 88% in the EBVP arm and 78% in the STNI arm (P = .0113), with similar 10-year overall survival (OS) rates (92% v 92%, respectively; P = .79). In 389 unfavorable patients, the 10-year EFS rate was 88% in the MOPP/ABV arm compared with 68% in the EBVP arm (P < .001), leading to 10-year OS rates of 87% and 79%, respectively (P = .0175). CONCLUSION A treatment strategy for early-stage HL based on prognostic factors leads to high OS rates in both favorable and unfavorable patients. In favorable patients, the combination of EBVP and IF-RT can replace STNI as standard treatment. In unfavorable patients, EBVP is significantly less efficient than MOPP/ABV.

Predictive value of in vitro radiosensitivity parameters in head and neck cancers and cervical carcinomas: Preliminary correlations with local control and overall survival

PURPOSE To determine whether in vitro radiosensitivity parameters are predictive of treatment outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS Biopsies were obtained from patients with head and neck cancers (57) and cervical carcinomas (20) and in vitro radiosensitivity parameters were obtained using the CAM plate assay. RESULTS In most cases (75%) patients were treated with radiation alone. The median follow up was 461 days. When the whole group of head and neck cancers and cervical carcinomas was considered, patients with a SF2 value below 0.36 had a higher 2-year local control rate (93% versus 68%) and a higher 2-year survival rate (71% vs. 62%) than those with SF2 values above that threshold, but differences were not significant. These trends persisted when head and neck cancers were considered alone with a higher local control rate (86% vs. 67%) and a higher survival rate (75% vs. 52.5%) obtained for patients with a SF2 value below 0.36. When the alpha value was evaluated for the whole group of patients a significantly higher local control rate (80.5% vs. 40.5%) and overall survival rate (71% versus 37.5%) at 2 years were obtained for patients with alpha values above 0.07 Gy-1. When only the group of head and neck cancers was considered, local control rate was significantly higher (79% vs. 33%) but overall survival rate (65.5% vs. 33%) was not significantly higher for alpha values above 0.07 Gy-1. CONCLUSION These results are encouraging but need to be confirmed with a larger number of patients with a longer follow-up.

The conundrum of hodgkin lymphoma nodes: To be or not to be included in the involved node radiation fields. The EORTC-GELA lymphoma group guidelines

PURPOSE To develop easily applicable guidelines for the determination of initially involved lymph nodes to be included in the radiation fields. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma. All the imaging procedures were carried out with patients in the treatment position. The prechemotherapy PET/CT was coregistered with the postchemotherapy CT simulation for planning purposes. Initially involved lymph nodes were determined on fused prechemotherapy CT and FDG-PET imaging data. The initial assessment was verified with the postchemotherapy CT scan. RESULTS The classic guidelines for determining the involvement of lymph nodes were not easily applicable and did not seem to reflect the exact extent of Hodgkin lymphoma. Three simple steps were used to pinpoint involved lymph nodes. First, FDG-PET scans were meticulously analysed to detect lymph nodes that were overlooked on CT imaging. Second, any morphological and/or functional asymmetry was sought on CT and FDG-PET scans. Third, a decrease in size or the disappearance of initially visible lymph nodes on the prechemotherapy CT scan as compared to the postchemotherapy CT scan was considered as surrogate proof of initial involvement. CONCLUSIONS All the radiological procedures should be performed on patients in the treatment position for proper coregistration. It is highly advisable that all CT and/or CT/PET scans be performed with IV contrast. Using the above-mentioned three simple guidelines, initially involved lymph nodes can be detected with very satisfactory accuracy. It is also emphasized that the classic guidelines (2, 3, 4) can always be used when deemed necessary.

Early Positron Emission Tomography Response-Adapted Treatment in Stage I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the Randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial.

Purpose Patients who receive combined modality treatment for stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have an excellent outcome. Early response evaluation with positron emission tomography (PET) scan may improve selection of patients who need reduced or more intensive treatments. Methods We performed a randomized trial to evaluate treatment adaptation on the basis of early PET (ePET) after two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in previously untreated-according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria favorable (F) and unfavorable (U)-stage I and II HL. The standard arm consisted of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy (INRT), regardless of ePET result. In the experimental arm, ePET-negative patients received ABVD only (noninferiority design), whereas ePET-positive patients switched to two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) and INRT (superiority design). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Of 1,950 randomly assigned patients, 1,925 received an ePET-361 patients (18.8%) were positive. In ePET-positive patients, 5-year PFS improved from 77.4% for standard ABVD + INRT to 90.6% for intensification to BEACOPPesc + INRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.74; P = .002). In ePET-negative patients, 5-year PFS rates in the F group were 99.0% versus 87.1% (HR, 15.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 66.1) in favor of ABVD + INRT; the U group, 92.1% versus 89.6% (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.5) in favor of ABVD + INRT. For both F and U groups, noninferiority of ABVD only compared with combined modality treatment could not be demonstrated. Conclusion In stage I and II HL, PET response after two cycles of ABVD allows for early treatment adaptation. When ePET is positive after two cycles of ABVD, switching to BEACOPPesc + INRT significantly improved 5-year PFS. In ePET-negative patients, noninferiority of ABVD only could not be demonstrated: risk of relapse is increased when INRT is omitted, especially in patients in the F group.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Single-Dose Versus Hyperfractionated Total-Body Irradiation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

PURPOSE Fractionated total-body irradiation (HTBI) is considered to induce less toxicity to normal tissues and probably has the same efficacy as single-dose total-body irradiation (STBI) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. We decided to determine whether this concept can be applied to a large number of patients with various hematologic malignancies using two dissimilar fractionation schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1986 and October 1994, 160 patients with various hematologic malignancies were randomized to receive either a 10-Gy dose of STBI or 14.85-Gy dose of HTBI. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven patients were assessable. The 8-year overall survival rate and cause-specific survival rate in the STBI group was 38% and 63.5%, respectively. Overall survival rate and cause-specific survival rate in the HTBI group was 45% and 77%, respectively. The incidence of interstitial pneumonitis was similar in both groups. However, the incidence of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver was significantly higher in the STBI group. In the multivariate analysis with overall survival as the end point, the female sex was an independent favorable prognostic factor. On the other hand, when cause-specific survival was considered as the end point, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that sex and TBI were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION The efficacy of HTBI is probably higher than that of STBI. Both regimens induce similar toxicity with the exception of VOD of the liver, the incidence of which is significantly more pronounced in the STBI group.

Influence of the fractionation of total body irradiation on complications and relapse rate for chronic myelogenous leukemia

One hundred eighty patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, who received an unmanipulated marrow graft from an Human Leucocyte Antigen identical sibling donor, were reported to our group (G.E.G.M.O.) by 21 transplant teams. All were grafted after a total body irradiation-cytoxan conditioning regimen. Of these 180 patients, 126 were non-randomly assigned to single dose total body irradiation (STBI group) and, 54 to fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI group). With a median follow-up of 40 months, there is no statistically significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between the two groups (51% for the whole population). In a first step we demonstrate by multivariate analysis that total body irradiation fractionation can dramatically decrease the incidence of interstitial pneumonitis. However, a multivariate analysis of potent risk factors for relapse post-transplant strongly suggests that TBI fractionation is also linked to an increased relapse rate. So, a sparing effect of fractionation for lung tissue could be offset by a less effective leukemic stem cell kill. Those results from a retrospective, non-randomized, multi-institutional study clearly need additional clinical data, ideally from a randomized study.

Single dose versus fractionated total body irradiation before bone marrow transplantation: Radiobiological and clinical considerations☆

PURPOSE This present review is intended to evaluate the specific influence of fractionation of total body irradiation on the outcome of a subsequent bone marrow transplantation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Available experimental and clinical data on the influence of fractionation on leukemia cell killing, immunosuppression, and sparing of normal tissues were analyzed. RESULTS Review of available data shows: (a) The role of fractionation on leukemia cell killing may vary with the leukemia type. For acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia, a few experimental and several clinical studies show no or little fractionation effect; a 12-13 Gy fractionated scheme could, therefore, be more efficient than a conventional 10 Gy single dose total body irradiation. For chronic myelogenous leukemia, some sensitivity to fractionation is suggested, so that an increase in total or fractional dose may be necessary in fractionated schemes to equate the efficacy of a 10 Gy single dose. For acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a high fractionation sensitivity was observed for some leukemic cell lines in vitro, without undisputable clinical confirmation for the moment. (b) Numerous experimental studies have demonstrated that the immunosuppressive effect of total body irradiation, a major determinant of engraftment, is highly fractionation sensitive. In humans, high rates of graft failures have been reported when T-cell depletion of the graft was associated to fractionated total body irradiation schedules. (c) A large amount of radiobiological and clinical data have demonstrated that late radiation-induced injuries to normal tissues and organs are highly fractionation sensitive. However, in a context of total body irradiation for bone marrow transplantation, the number of other determinants of normal tissue damage makes it difficult to demonstrate a clear-cut advantage of fractionated over single dose scheme, with a possible exception for children. CONCLUSIONS In 1994, available data suggest that very cautious attempts could be made to adapt total body irradiation schedules to the potential normal tissue toxicity, T-cell depletion, and to the type of leukemia.