Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where T. Holland is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by T. Holland.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2016

Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements : A consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group

S. Guerriero; G. Condous; T. Van den Bosch; Lil Valentin; F. Leone; D. Van Schoubroeck; C. Exacoustos; A. Installe; Wellington P. Martins; Mauricio Simões Abrão; G. Hudelist; M. Bazot; Juan Luis Alcázar; M.O. Gonçalves; M. Pascual; Silvia Ajossa; L. Savelli; R. Dunham; S. Reid; Uche Menakaya; Tom Bourne; Simone Ferrero; M. León; T. Bignardi; T. Holland; D. Jurkovic; Beryl R. Benacerraf; Yutaka Osuga; Edgardo Somigliana; D. Timmerman

The IDEA (International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group) statement is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe the sonographic features of the different phenotypes of endometriosis. Currently, it is difficult to compare results between published studies because authors use different terms when describing the same structures and anatomical locations. We hope that the terms and definitions suggested herein will be adopted in centers around the world. This would result in consistent use of nomenclature when describing the ultrasound location and extent of endometriosis. We believe that the standardization of terminology will allow meaningful comparisons between future studies in women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and should facilitate multicenter research. Copyright


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010

Value of transvaginal ultrasound in assessing severity of pelvic endometriosis

T. Holland; J. Yazbek; Alfred Cutner; E. Saridogan; W. Hoo; D. Jurkovic

The objective of this study was to examine the ability of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) scanning to assess the severity of pelvic endometriosis.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Accuracy of ultrasound subjective ‘pattern recognition’ for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors

J. Yazbek; K. S. Raju; J. Ben‐Nagi; T. Holland; K. Hillaby; D. Jurkovic

To assess the value of pattern recognition for the preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs).


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the non‐communicating horn of a unicornuate uterus (cornual pregnancy)

D. Mavrelos; Elinor Sawyer; S. Helmy; T. Holland; J. Ben‐Nagi; D. Jurkovic

To prospectively evaluate ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of pregnancy in the rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus (cornual pregnancy).


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008

Imaging of gynecological disease (3): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary

C. Van Holsbeke; E Domali; T. Holland; Ruth Achten; Antonia Carla Testa; Lil Valentin; D. Jurkovic; Philippe Moerman; Dirk Timmerman

To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary, and to define the ultrasound appearance of GCTs based on pattern recognition.


BMC Women's Health | 2013

Ultrasound mapping of pelvic endometriosis: does the location and number of lesions affect the diagnostic accuracy? A multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

T. Holland; Alfred Cutner; E. Saridogan; D. Mavrelos; Kate Pateman; D. Jurkovic

BackgroundEndometriosis is a common condition which causes pain and reduced fertility. Treatment can be difficult, especially for severe disease, and an accurate preoperative assessment would greatly help in the managment of these patients. The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of pre-operative transvaginal ultrasound scanning (TVS) in identifying the specific features of pelvic endometriosis and pelvic adhesions in comparison with laparoscopy.MethodsConsecutive women with clinically suspected or proven pelvic endometriosis, who were booked for laparoscopy, were invited to join the study. They all underwent a systematic transvaginal ultrasound examination in order to identify discrete endometriotic lesions and pelvic adhesions. The accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis was determined by comparing pre-operative ultrasound to laparoscopy findings.Results198 women who underwent preoperative TVS and laparoscopy were included in the final analysis. At laparoscopy 126/198 (63.6%) women had evidence of pelvic endometriosis. 28/126 (22.8%) of them had endometriosis in a single location whilst the remaining 98/126 (77.2%) had endometriosis in two or more locations. Positive likelihood ratios (LR+) for the ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas, moderate or severe ovarian adhesions, pouch of Douglas adhesions, and bladder deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), recto-sigmoid colon DIE, rectovaginal DIE, uterovesical fold DIE and uterosacral ligament DIE were >10, whilst for pelvic side wall DIE and any ovarian adhesions the + LH was 8.421 and 9.81 respectively.The negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was: <0.1 for bladder DIE; 0.1-0.2 for ovarian endometriomas, moderate or severe ovarian adhesions, and pouch of Douglas adhesions; 0.5-1 for rectovaginal, uterovesical fold, pelvic side wall and uterosacral ligament DIE. The accuracy of TVS for the diagnosis of both total number of endometriotic lesions and DIE lesions significantly improved with increasing total number of lesions.ConclusionsOur study has shown that the TVS diagnosis of endometriotic lesion is very specific and false positive results are rare. Negative findings are less reliable and women with significant symptoms may still benefit from further investigation even if TVS findings are normal. The accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis is significantly affected by the location and number of endometriotic lesions.


Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation | 2010

Ultrasound Experience Substantially Impacts on Diagnostic Performance and Confidence when Adnexal Masses Are Classified Using Pattern Recognition

Caroline Van Holsbeke; Anneleen Daemen; J. Yazbek; T. Holland; Tom Bourne; Tinne Mesens; Lore Lannoo; Anne-Sophie Boes; Annelies Joos; Arne Van De Vijver; Nele Roggen; Bart De Moor; Eric de Jonge; Antonia Carla Testa; Lil Valentin; D. Jurkovic; Dirk Timmerman

Aim: To determine how accurately and confidently examiners with different levels of ultrasound experience can classify adnexal masses as benign or malignant and suggest a specific histological diagnosis when evaluating ultrasound images using pattern recognition. Methods: Ultrasound images of selected adnexal masses were evaluated by 3 expert sonologists, 2 senior and 4 junior trainees. They were instructed to classify the masses using pattern recognition as benign or malignant, to state the level of confidence with which this classification was made and to suggest a specific histological diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR–) with regard to malignancy were calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of pattern recognition was calculated by using six levels of diagnostic confidence. Results: 166 masses were examined, of which 42% were malignant. Sensitivity with regard to malignancy ranged from 80 to 86% for the experts, was 70 and 84% for the 2 senior trainees and ranged from 70 to 86% for the junior trainees. The specificity of the experts ranged from 79 to 91%, was 77 and 89% for the senior trainees and ranged from 59 to 83% for the junior trainees. The experts were uncertain about their diagnosis in 4–13% of the cases, the senior trainees in 15–20% and the junior trainees in 67–100% of the cases. The AUCs ranged from 0.861 to 0.922 for the experts, were 0.842 and 0.855 for the senior trainees, and ranged from 0.726 to 0.795 for the junior trainees. The experts suggested a correct specific histological diagnosis in 69–77% of the cases. All 6 trainees did so significantly less often (22–42% of the cases). Conclusion: Expert sonologists can accurately classify adnexal masses as benign or malignant and can successfully predict the specific histological diagnosis in many cases. Whilst less experienced operators perform reasonably well when predicting the benign or malignant nature of the mass, they do so with a very low level of diagnostic confidence and are unable to state the likely histology of a mass in most cases.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2013

Visualization of ureters on standard gynecological transvaginal scan: a feasibility study.

K. Pateman; D. Mavrelos; W. Hoo; T. Holland; J. Naftalin; D. Jurkovic

To investigate the feasibility of identifying pelvic segments of normal ureters and measuring their size on standard transvaginal ultrasound examination.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010

Expectant management of ultrasonically diagnosed ovarian dermoid cysts: is it possible to predict outcome?

W. Hoo; J. Yazbek; T. Holland; D. Mavrelos; E. N. C. Tong; D. Jurkovic

The aim of this study was to assess the natural history of ultrasonically diagnosed ovarian dermoid cysts in a large group of women who were managed expectantly, and to assess the factors that were associated with failure of expectant management.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Value of preoperative ultrasound examination in the selection of women with adnexal masses for laparoscopic surgery

J. Yazbek; S. Helmy; J. Ben‐Nagi; T. Holland; Elinor Sawyer; D. Jurkovic

To assess the value of preoperative ultrasound examination in predicting the feasibility of intermediate‐level laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal masses.

Collaboration


Dive into the T. Holland's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Jurkovic

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Mavrelos

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Yazbek

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Hoo

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alfred Cutner

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Pateman

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Saridogan

University College Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonia Carla Testa

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge