T.J. Bledsoe

It is not just IMRT: Human papillomavirus related oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma is associated with better swallowing outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES Long term swallowing dysfunction in patients with oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) is declining. While the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is commonly believed to be a potential cause, we hypothesize that the increasing incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) related disease may also favorably impact this outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed 130 HPV+ and 17 HPV- patients with stage III-IV OPSCC treated exclusively with conventional 3-field radiotherapy with chemotherapy between 2002 and 2010. The rates of normal diet, limited diet (significant restrictions in the types of foods eaten, and/or requiring nutritional supplementation for weight maintenance) and feeding tube dependence (FTD) were compared between HPV+ and HPV- patients. Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to perform univariate analysis (UVA) to examine predictors of a combined endpoint of dietary limitation, which included limited diet and/or FTD. These outcomes were also compared to our previously reported cohort of OPSCC patients treated between 1989 and 2002 to assess changes in toxicity over time given the changing disease epidemiology, in the setting of identical treatment regimens. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 55 months, HPV+ patients more frequently had resumed a normal diet (87% vs. 65%) at last follow up and had lower rates of limited diet (9% vs. 18%) and FTD (4% vs. 18%) compared to HPV- patients (p=0.02). HPV status was the only significant predictor of reduced swallowing dysfunction on UVA (HR 0.19; p=0.008). When compared to our 1989-2002 cohort, patients treated between 2002 and 2010 had less FTD (7.5% vs. 34%, p<0.001) and dietary limitations (26% vs.46%, p<0.001) at 6 months post treatment. CONCLUSIONS HPV+ patients with OPSCC have reduced late swallowing dysfunction after chemoradiation compared to HPV- patients. The changing epidemiology of OPSCC may play a role in toxicity reduction in these patients, independent of the increasing use of IMRT.

Cost-Effectiveness of Surgery, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, and Systemic Therapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases

INTRODUCTION Pulmonary oligometastases have conventionally been managed with surgery and/or systemic therapy. However, given concerns about the high cost of systemic therapy and improvements in local treatment of metastatic cancer, the optimal cost-effective management of these patients is unclear. Therefore, we sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of initial management strategies for pulmonary oligometastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov modeling approach was used to compare average cumulative costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) among 3 initial disease management strategies: video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) wedge resection, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and systemic therapy among 5 different cohorts of patient disease: (1) melanoma; (2) non-small cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma without an EGFR mutation (NSCLC AC); (3) NSCLC with an EGFR mutation (NSCLC EGFRm AC); (4) NSCLC squamous cell carcinoma (NSCLC SCC); and (5) colon cancer. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to analyze uncertainty with regard to model parameters. RESULTS In the base case, SBRT was cost effective for melanoma, with costs/net QALYs of

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Patients with Early-Stage Glottic Cancer: Patterns of Care and Survival

467,787/0.85. In patients with NSCLC, the most cost-effective strategies were SBRT for AC (

Split-Course Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (SCAHRT): A Safe and Effective Option for Head and Neck Cancer in the Elderly or Infirm

156,725/0.80), paclitaxel/carboplatin for SCC (

Radiation to Oligoprogessive Sites of Disease Can Prolong the Duration of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

123,799/0.48), and erlotinib for EGFRm AC (

Minimally Invasive Surgery and External Beam Radiation Therapy Selection for Prostate Cancer Varies Significantly by Health Insurance Status

147,091/1.90). Stereotactic body radiation therapy was marginally cost-effective for EGFRm AC compared to erlotinib with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of

Curative Intent Treatment of Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

126,303/QALY. For colon cancer, VATS wedge resection (

Impact of Health Insurance Status on Prostate Cancer Treatment Modality Selection in the United States

147,730/2.14) was the most cost-effective strategy. Variables with the greatest influence in the model were erlotinib-associated progression-free survival (EGFRm AC), toxicity (EGFRm AC), cost of SBRT (NSCLC SCC), and patient utilities (all histologies). CONCLUSIONS Video-assisted thoracic surgery wedge resection or SBRT can be cost-effective in select patients with pulmonary oligometastases, depending on histology, efficacy, and tolerability of treatment and patient preferences.

(S027) Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Is associated With Improved Overall Survival Among Patients With Early-Stage Glottic Cancer

Background: Radiotherapy alone is often used to treat early-stage glottic cancer (ESGC); however, the optimal radiation treatment schedule remains unknown. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend both hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFX) and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFX). We compared overall survival (OS) and treatment patterns among patients treated with HFX vs CFX for ESGC using a large national database. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with stage I–II (cT1-2N0M0) glottic cancer from 2004 to 2013 within the National Cancer Data Base who were treated with either HFX (2.25 Gy/fraction to 63–65.25 Gy) or CFX (2.0 Gy/fraction to 66–70 Gy). The overall survival of patients receiving HFX vs CFX was compared using the log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Among 10 212 included patients, 4030 patients (39.5%) received HFX and 6182 patients (60.5%) received CFX. Predictors for receipt of HFX included clinical T1 disease, recent year of diagnosis, and treatment at academic and higher-volume centers (all P < .001). Patients treated with HFX increased from 22.1% in 2004 to 58.0% in 2013. HFX was associated with improved OS compared with CFX on univariate (five-year OS = 77.1%, 95% CI = 75.2% to 78.8%, vs 73.5%, 95% CI = 72.1% to 74.8%, respectively, log-rank P < .001) and multivariable analysis (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98, P = .02), a finding confirmed on propensity score matching. Conclusions: HFX is associated with improved survival compared with CFX among patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for ESGC, particularly among patients with cT2 disease. HFX utilization increased over the study period; however, 40% of patients in our cohort did not receive HFX in the most recent year of our analysis.