T. Kesmala
Khon Kaen University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. Kesmala.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | 2010
N. Singkham; S. Jogloy; T. Kesmala; Prasan Swatsitang; Prasit Jaisil; Naveen Puppala
Variability of genotype and genotype x environment (G x E) interactions for fatty acids are important to develop high-oleic types in peanut varietal improvement programs. The objective of this study was to determine the variation in fatty acid composition among peanut genotypes and G x E interactions of fatty acids in three groups of genotypes with high, intermediate, and low-oleic acid. Twenty-one genotypes were tested in three environments consisting of two rainy seasons and one dry season. The results indicated that G x E interactions were significant for biomass, pod yield, and harvest index and also for oleic, linoleic acids, and O/L ratio. G x E interactions were less important than genotypic main effect. For oleic acid, significant interactions were found in the intermediate and low-oleic groups only. Therefore, selection for high-oleic trait in peanut breeding programs should be effective.
Euphytica | 2013
Rattikarn Sennoi; S. Jogloy; Weerasak Saksirirat; T. Kesmala; A. Patanothai
Southern stem rot caused by Sclerotium rolfsii is a significant problem of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) production in Thailand. Resistant varieties are not available. The objective of this study was to investigate genetic variability of Jerusalem artichoke genotypes for resistance to stem rot caused by S. rolfsii. Ninety-one Jerusalem artichoke genotypes were evaluated under greenhouse conditions. Traits evaluated included disease score, lesion length, days to permanent wilting, plant height, shoot dry weight, and root dry weight index. Number of days from inoculation until permanent wilting was the only trait with statistically significant differences among genotypes. Based on this trait, genotypes were categorized into two distinct groups: resistant and susceptible. Genotypes that consistently expressed relative resistance to S. rolfsii included HEL 280, HEL 278, HEL 293 and JA 98. These genotypes may be useful to plant breeders as sources of germplasm for incorporating resistance to S. rolfsii into Jerusalem artichoke.
African Journal of Biotechnology | 2012
N. Singkham; S. Jogloy; Bhalang Suriharn; T. Kesmala; Prasan Swatsitang; Prasit Jaisil; Naveen Puppala; A. Patanothai
Oleic and linoleic acids are major fatty acids in peanut determining the quality and shelf-life of peanut products. A better understanding on the inheritance of these characters is an important for high-oleic breeding programs. The objective of this research was to determine the gene actions for oleic acid, linoleic acid, the ratio of oleic to linoleic acids (O/L ratio) and percentage oil (% oil) in peanut. Georgia-02C, SunOleic 97R (high-oleic genotypes) and KKU 1 (low-oleic genotypes) were used as parents to generate P 1 , P 2 , F 2 , F 3 , BC 11 S and BC 12 S. The entries were planted in a randomized complete block design with four replications in the rainy season (2008) and the dry season (2008/2009). Gas liquid chromatography (GLC) was used to analyze fatty acid compositions. The data were used in generation means analysis to understand gene effects. The differences in season, generation and generation X season interactions were significant for oleic acid in the crosses Georgia-02C X KKU 1 and SunOleic 97R X KKU 1. Additive, dominance and epistasis gene effects were significant for oleic acid, linoleic acid, O/L ratio and % oil. Initial selection can be carried out in early segregating population, and final selection in late generations. Keywords: Breeding, gene actions, generation mean analysis, groundnut, oil quality
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science | 2008
A. Arunyanark; S. Jogloy; C. Akkasaeng; N. Vorasoot; T. Kesmala; R. C. Nageswara Rao; G. C. Wright; A. Patanothai
Agricultural Water Management | 2009
Patcharin Songsri; S. Jogloy; C. Corley Holbrook; T. Kesmala; N. Vorasoot; C. Akkasaeng; A. Patanothai
Crop Science | 2008
Patcharin Songsri; S. Jogloy; T. Kesmala; N. Vorasoot; C. Akkasaeng; A. Patanothai; C. Corley Holbrook
Agricultural Water Management | 2009
Darunee Puangbut; S. Jogloy; N. Vorasoot; C. Akkasaeng; T. Kesmala; Rao C.N. Rachaputi; Graeme Wright; A. Patanothai
Asian Journal of Plant Sciences | 2008
N. Jongrungklang; B. Toomsan; N. Vorasoot; S. Jogloy; T. Kesmala; A. Patanothai
Asian Journal of Plant Sciences | 2010
W. Pimsaen; S. Jogloy; Bhalang Suriharn; T. Kesmala; V. Pensuk; A. Patanothai
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry | 2014
Ruttanachira Ruttanaprasert; Poramate Banterng; S. Jogloy; N. Vorasoot; T. Kesmala; Rameshwar S. Kanwar; Carl C. Holbrook; A. Patanothai