T. M. Johnson
University of Arkansas
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. M. Johnson.
Journal of Animal Science | 2013
N. A. Browne; J. K. Apple; C. V. Maxwell; J. W. S. Yancey; T. M. Johnson; D. L. Galloway; B. E. Bass
Crossbred pigs (n = 216) were used to test the effects of phase-feeding beef tallow (BT) and yellow grease (YGr) on fresh belly and bacon quality characteristics of growing-finishing swine fed dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS). Pigs were blocked by initial BW (26.0 ± 5.3 kg) before allotment to pens (6 pigs/pen), and pens (6 pens/block) were assigned randomly to 1 of 6 dietary treatments: 1) corn-soybean meal-based grower and finisher diets formulated with 4.7% YGr fed during all 5 feeding phases (YG15); 2) corn-soybean meal-based diets formulated with 5.0% BT fed during all 5 phases (BT15); 3) diets containing 5.0% BT fed during the first 2 phases and diets with 4.7% YGr fed the last 3 phases (YG345); 4) diets formulated with 5.0% BT fed during first 3 phases and diets containing 4.7% YGr fed during the last 2 phases (YG45); 5) diets containing 4.7% YGr fed during the first 3 phases and diets with 5.0% BT fed during the last 2 feeding phases (BT45); or 6) diets formulated with 4.7% YGr fed during the first 2 phases and diets with 5.0% BT fed during the last 3 phases (BT345). All dietary treatments were formulated with 30% dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) during the first 3 phases, 15% DDGS in the fourth phase, and no DDGS during the last phase. Fresh belly quality data were collected on the left-side bellies, whereas bacon from the right-side bellies was prepared under commercial processing conditions. Additionally, USDA-certified No. 1 slices were collected for cooking characteristics and sensory panel evaluations. Bellies from the YG15-fed pigs were softer (P ≤ 0.05) than bellies from BT15-fed pigs; however, instrumentally measured belly firmness was not (P ≥ 0.06) different among treatments. Concentrations of palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids, as well as all SFA and all MUFA, were greater (P < 0.01) in bellies from BT15- than YG15-fed pigs. In contrast, proportions of linoleic acid, all PUFA, and iodine value were greater (P < 0.01) in belly fat from YG15-fed pigs in comparison with BT15-fed pigs. Yield of commercially processed bacon (P ≥ 0.06), mechanical bacon tenderness (P ≥ 0.69), and bacon palatability attributes (P ≥ 0.55) were not affected by the dietary treatments. Thus, results of this study indicated that phase-feeding BT to pigs fed diets formulated with DDGS produced minor improvements in fresh belly firmness due to greater proportions of SFA but had no effect on yields of commercially processed bacon or bacon quality characteristics.
Meat Science | 2014
J. K. Apple; James B. Machete; Ryan J. Stackhouse; T. M. Johnson; Cari A. Keys; J. W. S. Yancey
Beef top sirloin butts (n=48) from USDA quality grade (QG; upper 2/3 US Choice vs. US Select) and yield grade categories (YG; 1 and 2 vs. 4 and 5) were aged 14 days, GM steaks were cut, with 2 steaks removed from the anterior (ANT), middle (MID) and posterior (POST) sections of the GM. One steak from each section was cut into lateral (LAT), central (CENT) and medial (MED) portions, packaged aerobically, and displayed for 7 days, whereas the second steaks were cooked to 71°C for WBSF. Top Choice-steaks were redder and more yellow (P<0.05) than Select steaks during display. Cooking losses were greatest (P<0.05) in the MED, and least (P<0.05) in the CENT, portions of GM steaks. Neither QG nor YG category affected WBSF, but differences within the GM were found for (P<0.05) WBSF. Results of this experiment indicate tenderness and color stability gradients exist within the GM.
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
Ryan J. Stackhouse; J. K. Apple; J. W. S. Yancey; C. A. Keys; T. M. Johnson; L. N. Mehall
In 2 experiments, dark-cutting (DC) beef strip loins were used to test the effects of citric acid-enhancement pH on visual and instrumental color of fresh and cooked steaks. In Exp. 1 and 2, each DC (mean pH = 6.57 and 6.65, respectively) and normal-pH, low USDA Choice (CH; mean pH = 5.48 and 5.51, respectively) strip loin was cut into 2 equal-length sections, and DC sections were injected to 111% of raw section weight with pH 3.5 to 5.0 (Exp. 1) or pH 2.0 to 3.5 (Exp. 2) solutions made by mixing citric acid in either 0.05% orthophosphate (PO) solution or tap water (HO) base solutions (Exp. 1) and 0.5% PO or 0.5% tripolyphosphate solution base solutions (Exp. 2). After enhancement, sections were cut into steaks, which were assigned to either 5 d of simulated retail display or cooked to 71°C for cooked color measurement. Postenhancement pH of DC steaks enhanced with pH 3.5 to 5.0 solutions did not ( ≥ 0.180) differ from that of nonenhanced DC steaks (Exp. 1) but linearly decreased ( < 0.001) as solution pH decreased from 3.5 to 2.0 (Exp. 2). Even though fresh color scores were increased ( < 0.001) by citric acid enhancement over untreated DC steaks during the first 3 d of display, fresh steak color never ( < 0.001) approached that of nonenhanced CH steaks. When compared with nonenhanced DC steaks, enhancement with pH 3.5 to 5.0 solutions received lower cooked color scores, whereas enhancing DC sections with pH 2.5 solutions produced cooked color and degree-of-doneness scores similar ( ≥ 0.113) to those of nonenhanced CH steaks (Exp. 2). Results indicated that the pH of citric acid enhancement solutions, regardless of base solution, were insufficient to improve the fresh color of DC beef; however, enhancement with pH 2.5 citric acid solutions effectively eliminated the persistent red cooked color typically associated with DC beef comparable with that of normal-pH beef.
Meat Science | 2019
Jace J. Hollenbeck; J. K. Apple; J. W. S. Yancey; T. M. Johnson; Kaleigh N. Kerns; A.N. Young
Lean (80%) ground beef was formulated with 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100% mature bull trimmings, formed into patties, cooked to 71 °C in an air-impingement oven, and stored at -20 °C until reheating to 71 °C either in a microwave oven or on a gas-fired chargrill. Instrumental color of raw patties was not (P ≥ .080) affected by levels of bull trim. After initial cooking, internal cooked redness values were not affected (P ≥ .202) by the proportion of bull trim; however, the internal reheated patty redness increased (greater a* values and lesser HA; P ≤ .001) with increasing proportions of bull trimmings. Formulating ground beef with high levels (>50%) of mature, bull trimmings had minimal effects on raw ground beef color, but patties formulated with the highest proportions of bull trimmings appeared undercooked even after cooking twice to 71 °C.
Meat Science | 2019
Kelsey L. Basinger; Bruce C. Shanks; J. K. Apple; James D. Caldwell; J. W. S. Yancey; Elizabeth A. Backes; Luke Wilbers; T. M. Johnson; Amy L. Bax
In two separate experiments, carcasses of intact Kiko × Boer male kids were assigned randomly to tension treatments applied 30 min postmortem: 1) suspended by the Achilles tendon (AT); 2) suspended from the pelvic bone with front and hind legs tied together (TS); or 3) suspended by the Achilles tendon, and the fore- and hindsaddle were separated at the 12th/13th thoracic intervertebral disk, external fat, accessory muscles and epimysium surrounding the longissimus muscle (LM) were cut (TC), and a 2.3-kg weight attached to the neck (TC + W). Warner-Bratzler shear force values for the LM were reduced (P < 0.05) 24.4 to 35.9 N in TS carcasses compared to AT carcasses, and WBSF values of SM from TS carcasses were 25.0 and 20.3 N less (P < 0.05) than those for AT and TC + W carcasses, respectively. Results indicated that cooked goat meat tenderness, particularly the LM and SM, may be improved greatly by suspending goat carcasses by the pelvic bone.
Journal of Animal Science | 2018
Z. M. Hicks; J. W. S. Yancey; J A Apple; T. M. Johnson; B E Jenschke
Journal of Animal Science | 2018
T W Glascock; J A Apple; J. G. Powell; P. A. Beck; J. J. Ball; T. M. Johnson; J.T. Sawyer
Journal of Animal Science | 2018
C A Althaber; J A Apple; J. W. S. Yancey; T. M. Johnson; T W Glascock
Journal of Animal Science | 2017
Z. M. Hicks; J. W. S. Yancey; J A Apple; T. M. Johnson
Journal of Food Quality | 2016
Courtney T. Moon; J. W. S. Yancey; J. K. Apple; Jace J. Hollenbeck; T. M. Johnson; Ashley R. Winters