Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where T. Michael Toole is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by T. Michael Toole.


Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce | 2010

Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research

Deborah A. Abowitz; T. Michael Toole

The fact that people play key roles in nearly all aspects of construction suggests that effective construction research requires proper application of social science research methods. This is particularly true for researchers studying topics that involve human actions or behavior in construction processes, such as leadership, innovation, and planning. In social science research, no single method of data collection survey, experiment, participant observation, or unobtrusive research is ideal. Each method has inherent strengths and weak- nesses. Careful attention to the methodological ABCs of the design process, as discussed here, can enhance the validity and reliability of a given study. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in research design and data collection, however, should be considered whenever possible. Such mixed-methods research is more expensive than a single method approach, in terms of time, money, and energy, but improves the validity and reliability of the resulting data and strengthens causal inferences by providing the opportunity to observe data convergence or divergence in hypothesis testing. DOI: 10.1061/ASCECO.1943-7862.0000026 CE Database subject headings: Research; Methodology; Measurement; Data analysis; Construction management. Author keywords: Research methods; Mixed methods; Social science; Concept measurement; Data analysis.


Journal of Safety Research | 2008

The Trajectories of Prevention through Design in Construction

T. Michael Toole; John A. Gambatese

INTRODUCTION Construction Hazards Prevention through Design (CHPtD) is a process in which engineers and architects explicitly consider the safety of construction workers during the design process. Although articles on CHPtD have appeared in top construction journals, the literature has not addressed technical principles underlying CHPtD to help designers better perform CHPtD, to facilitate the development of additional CHPtD tools, and to predict the future path of CHPtD. METHOD This theoretical paper uses the existing literature on CHPtD and current action research associated with several CHPtD workgroups to analyze how CHPtD will likely evolve over the coming decades. RESULTS There are four trajectories along which CHPtD will progress. (a) Designs will increasingly facilitate prefabricated construction; (b) designers will increasingly choose materials and systems that are inherently safer than alternatives; (c) designers will increasingly perform construction engineering; and (d) designers will increasingly apply spatial considerations to reduce worker hazards. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY By understanding how CHPtD may be manifested in the engineering-procurement-construction (EPC) industry, practitioners can better prepare for adopting CHPtD within their organizations and construction and engineering educators can better prepare their graduates to perform CHPtD.


Engineering Project Organization Journal | 2013

A tool for enhancing innovation in construction organizations

T. Michael Toole; Matthew R. Hallowell; Paul Chinowsky

A 12-person-sponsored research team consisting of three academic researchers and nine experienced practitioners conducted a three-year investigation into ways to enhance innovation within engineering-procurement-construction organizations. Data from the literature combined with over 150 surveys of active practitioners were used to identify and classify factors that influence an organizations ability to generate and implement new ideas that improve business performance. The salient factors were then identified and their relative impact was rated using the nominal group technique. Finally, these data were organized into a maturity model tool that was pilot tested on four active construction organizations. The results of this study can be used by construction organizations to identify and respond to their innovation-related weaknesses. The hundreds of hours of discussions of the 12-member research team and the fairly large set of empirical data collected by the team confirm the value of the existing constru...


Construction Research Congress 2010. Innovation for Reshaping Construction PracticeAmerican Society of Civil Engineers | 2010

A Tool for Improving Construction Organizations' Innovation Capabilities

T. Michael Toole; Paul Chinowsky; Matthew R. Hallowell

Nearly 200 interviews and surveys collected by a Construction Industry Institute research indicate that innovation is valued within large engineering-procurementconstruction (EPC) organizations but is hindered by organizational factors such as lack of resources allocated to innovation efforts; low risk tolerance; and a failure to establish innovation-enhancing processes. To enable EPC organizations to evaluate and improve their innovation capabilities, the team created an Innovation Maturity Model (IMM) that evaluates an organization in each of 61 innovation-related attributes. The IMM, which is based on the data collected and a review of relevant innovation literature, includes a macro-enabled spreadsheet that aggregates the individual survey data, identifies the ten attributes offering the greatest opportunity for improvement, and provides the recommendations for improving these ten attributes. The IMM was pilot tested using six large EPC organizations and will be available through the Web.


Construction Research Congress 2005 | 2005

BUILDING PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION

T. Michael Toole; Matthew R. Hallowell

Exploratory research was performed into the hypothesis that a substantial number of building performance engineering tasks on design-bid-build projects are typically provided by entities associated with the construction phase, not with the AE of Record. The project specifications, drawings, and submittals were analyzed and employees from key project participants were interviewed for five


Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce | 2017

Owner Perceptions of Barriers to Prevention through Design Diffusion

John A. Gambatese; T. Michael Toole; Deborah A. Abowitz

5-45M building construction projects. Twenty four building performance engineering tasks were required by the project specifications to be performed by entities associated with the construction of the buildings. Many of these tasks had to be completed by a licensed engineer retained by subcontractors or material suppliers. This large number of delegated design tasks indicates the increasing fragmentation of the design and construction process, which has implications for design-bid-build, design-build and lean construction processes. The shift in engineering from AEs to construction entities is proposed to result from decreased design time and profit margins, attempts to minimize liability, increased specialization and increased prefabrication. The compelling preliminary findings suggest additional research is warranted.


Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce | 2002

Construction Site Safety Roles

T. Michael Toole

AbstractPrevention through design (PtD) is an emerging concept for reducing safety hazards and preventing worker injuries and fatalities. Existing literature suggests that diffusion of PtD faces se...


Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce | 1998

Uncertainty and home builders' adoption of technological innovations

T. Michael Toole


Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice | 2005

Increasing Engineers' Role in Construction Safety: Opportunities and Barriers

T. Michael Toole


Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce | 2009

Contemporary Design-Bid-Build Model

Matthew R. Hallowell; T. Michael Toole

Collaboration


Dive into the T. Michael Toole's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew R. Hallowell

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Chinowsky

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela Heckel

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge