T. Mulder

Coordination Between Arm and Leg Movements During Locomotion

Abstract To evaluate the contrasting dynamical and biomechanical interpretations of the 2:1 frequency coordination between arm and leg movements that occurs at low walking velocities and the 1:1 frequency coordination that occurs at higher walking velocities, the authors conducted an experiment in which they quantified the effect of walking velocity on the stability of the frequency and phase coordination between the individual limb movements. Spectral analyses revealed the presence of 2:1 frequency coordination as a consistent feature of the data in only 3 out of 8 participants at walking velocities ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 km/h, in spite of the fact that the eigenfrequencies of the arms were rather similar across participants. The degree of interlimb coupling, as indexed by weighted coherence and variability of relative phase, was lower for the arm movements and for ipsilateral and diagonal combinations of arm and leg movements than for the leg movements. Furthermore, the coupling between all pairs of limb movements was found to increase with walking velocity, whereas no clear signs were observed that the switches from 2:1 to 1:1 frequency coordination and vice versa were preceded by loss of stability. Therefore, neither a purely biomechanical nor a purely dynamical model is optimally suited to explain these results. Instead, an integrative model involving elements of both approaches seems to be required.

Step characteristics during obstacle avoidance in hemiplegic stroke

Whereas several animal studies have indicated the important role of the motor cortex in the control of voluntary gait modifications, little is known about the effects of cortical lesions on gait adaptability in humans. Obstacle avoidance tasks provide an adequate paradigm to study the adaptability of the stepping pattern under controlled, experimental conditions. In the present study, an exploratory assessment was made of the failure rate, the preferred stepping strategies (step lengthening vs step shortening), and the spatiotemporal stride characteristics (percentage increases in stride length, duration, and velocity of the crossing and postcrossing strides) during obstacle avoidance in 11 hemiplegic stroke patients and seven healthy controls. Patients were less successful in avoiding obstacles than controls (14% failure rate vs 0.5% in controls), independent of whether the affected or the unaffected leg led the obstacle avoidance. The number of failed trials increased systematically when the available response time became shorter. During successful trials, lengthening of the step was generally preferred over shortening. This bias towards step lengthening was more pronounced in stroke patients (step lengthening in 91% of the trials vs 75% in controls), irrespective of the side of obstacle presentation. For both groups, overall strategy preference did not adhere to a principle of minimal foot displacement, since step lengthening was used even if it would be more spatially efficient to shorten the step. No statistically significant group differences were found for the increases in length, duration, and velocity of the crossing and postcrossing strides. However, for a subgroup of more slowly walking patients, large percentage increases were found in crossing stride length, duration, and velocity. Similar results were obtained for the postcrossing stride, indicating that, for this subgroup of patients, restoration of the normal walking cadence was more difficult. Overall, no systematic differences were found between the affected and the unaffected leg in stroke patients with respect to failure rates, stepping strategies, or spatiotemporal measures of obstacle avoidance. The present findings suggest that the ability to adequately modify the stepping pattern in response to imposed spatiotemporal constraints is impaired in persons with stroke, especially when modifications have to be performed under time pressure. In addition, the stepping strategies employed by subjects with stroke are different from those found in controls, possibly to reduce the complexity of the avoidance maneuver and to enhance safety. Finally, unilateral cortical damage results in an impaired ability to avoid obstacles on both sides of the body, suggesting that the reduced ability of stroke patients to negotiate obstacles may be related to problems of a more general coordinative nature.

Older women strongly prefer stride lengthening to shortening in avoiding obstacles.

In the present study the obstacle avoidance strategy during treadmill walking was investigated in ten young (aged 19–32) and ten older females (aged 65–78). Minimisation of displacement of the foot from its original landing position has been proposed to be the main criterion for the selection of alternate foot placement. Each participant performed 60 obstacle avoidance trials. Foot–obstacle configurations were varied in order to obtain both lengthening and shortening avoidance reactions. For each trial it was calculated how much lengthening and how much shortening of the stride was required minimally for successful avoidance. The difference between required lengthening and required shortening was expressed as a percentage of the control stride length and was used as a measure of minimal displacement. The behavior of young females was in agreement with the minimal displacement criterion. The older females, however, exhibited a strong preference for stride lengthening, even in situations in which stride shortening would be highly favorable. The explanation for the long step strategy preference of the older females is discussed in terms of age-related changes in decision-making, differences between young and older persons in the unobstructed gait pattern, and safety considerations.