T. Öresland

The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Current management

This paper is the second in a series of three publications relating to the European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohns disease and concerns the management of active disease, maintenance of medically induced remission and surgery. The aims and methods of the ECCO Consensus, as well as sections on diagnosis and classification are covered in the first paper [van Assche et al. JCC 2009a]. The final paper covers post-operative recurrence, fistulating disease, the management of paediatric and adolescent IBD, pregnancy, psychosomatics, extraintestinal manifestations and complementary or alternative therapy for Crohns disease [Van Assche et al JCC 2009b]. #### Principal changes with respect to the 2006 ECCO guidelines The early use of azathioprine/mercaptopurine or methotrexate in combination with steroids is an appropriate option in moderately active localised ileocaecal CD. Anti-TNF therapy should be considered as an alternative for patients with objective evidence of active disease who have previously been steroid-refractory, steroid-dependent, or steroid-intolerant (based on Statement 5B). For those patients with severely active localised ileocaecal Crohns disease and objective evidence of active disease who have relapsed, anti-TNF therapy with or without an immunomodulator is an appropriate option [EL1a, RG B for infliximab]. For some patients who have infrequently relapsing disease, restarting steroids with an immunomodulator may be appropriate (based on Statement 5C). All currently available anti-TNF therapies appear to have generally similar efficacy and adverse-event profiles for inflammatory (‘luminal’) Crohns disease, so the choice depends on availability, route of delivery, patient preference, cost and national guidelines \[EL5, RG D\] (Statement 5I). Patients receiving azathioprine or mercaptopurine who relapse should be evaluated for adherence to therapy and have their dose optimised. Changing their maintenance therapy to methotrexate [EL1b RG B] or anti-TNF therapy [EL1a RGB] should be considered. Surgery should always be considered as an option in localised disease [EL4, …

Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis Part 2: Current management

### 5.1 General When deciding the appropriate treatment strategy for active ulcerative colitis one should consider the activity, distribution (proctitis, left-sided, extensive1), and pattern of disease. The disease pattern includes relapse frequency, course of disease, response to previous medications, side-effect profile of medication and extra-intestinal manifestations. The age at onset and disease duration may also be important factors. #### 5.1.1 Disease activity The principal disease activity scoring systems used in clinical trials are covered in Section 1.2 and have been comprehensively reviewed.2 However there are some practical points that are relevant for routine clinical use. For example, it is most important to distinguish patients with severe ulcerative colitis necessitating hospital admission from those with mild or moderately active disease who can generally be managed as outpatients. The simplest, best validated and most widely used index for identifying severe UC remains that of Truelove and Witts3: any patient who has a bloody stool frequency ≥ 6/day and a tachycardia (> 90 bpm), or temperature > 37.8 °C, or anaemia (haemoglobin 30 mm/h) has severe ulcerative colitis (Table 1.3). Only one additional criterion in addition to the bloody stool frequency ≥ 6/day is needed to define a severe attack.4,5 It should be standard practice to confirm the presence of active colitis by sigmoidoscopy before starting treatment. Flexible sigmoidoscopy and biopsy may exclude unexpected causes of symptoms that mimic active disease such as cytomegalovirus colitis, rectal mucosal prolapse, Crohns disease, malignancy, or even irritable bowel syndrome and haemorrhoidal bleeding. There may be a significant overlap between other diseases that mimic ulcerative colitis and the broad spectrum of UC damage.6,7 In addition, all patients with active disease require stool cultures with Clostridium difficile toxin assay to exclude enteric infection. Patients with an appropriate …

European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: current management.

This second section of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) Consensus on the management of Crohn’s disease concerns treatment of active disease, maintenance of medically induced remission, and surgery. The first section on definitions and diagnosis includes the aims and methods of the consensus, as well as sections on diagnosis, pathology, and classification of Crohn’s disease. The third section on special situations in Crohn’s disease includes postoperative recurrence, fistulating disease, paediatrics, pregnancy, psychosomatics, extraintestinal manifestations, and alternative therapy for Crohn’s disease.

European evidence-based Consensus on the management of ulcerative colitis: Current management

### 5.1 General The general principles for treating active ulcerative colitis are to consider the activity, distribution (proctitis, left-sided, extensive,1 and pattern of disease (relapse frequency, course of disease, response to previous medications, side-effect profile of medication, extra-intestinal manifestation), before treatment decisions are made in conjunction with the patient. #### 5.1.1 Disease activity The principal scoring systems used for clinical trials are covered in Section 5.1.2 and have been comprehensively reviewed.2 Some additional points are clinically relevant. In clinical practice it matters most to distinguish severe ulcerative colitis necessitating hospital admission from those with mild or moderate disease who can generally be treated as outpatients. The simplest, best validated and most widely used index for identifying acute severe UC remains that of Truelove & Wi_tts 3: any patient who has a bloody stool frequency ≥ 6/day and a tachycardia (> 90 bpm), or temperature > 37.8 °C, or anaemia (haemoglobin 30 mm/h) has severe ulcerative colitis (Table 1.3). This index has been used in 20/32 studies of intensive intravenous treatment for severe UC.4 Only one additional criterion in addition to the bloody stool frequency ≥ 6/day is needed to define a severe attack.5 While these criteria have the major limitation of being unresponsive and cannot track the course of disease, they do distinguish the severe from the moderate or mild and have value in everyday practice because they are easy to use, which no other index achieves. It should be standard practice to confirm active colitis by sigmoidoscopy or proctoscopy before starting treatment. Rectal mucosal biopsy helps exclude unexpected causes of symptoms similar to active disease (such as cytomegalovirus, amoebic, or other infection, rectal mucosal prolapse, Crohns disease, or even irritable bowel syndrome and haemorrhoidal bleeding). #### 5.1.2 Approach Patients should be encouraged to participate actively in …

Development of the Crohn's disease digestive damage score, the Lemann score.

Crohns disease (CD) is a chronic progressive destructive disease. Currently available instruments measure disease activity at a specific point in time. An instrument to measure cumulative structural damage to the bowel, which may predict long-term disability, is needed. The aim of this article is to outline the methods to develop an instrument that can measure cumulative bowel damage. The project is being conducted by the International Program to develop New Indexes in Crohns disease (IPNIC) group. This instrument, called the Crohns Disease Digestive Damage Score (the Lémann score), should take into account damage location, severity, extent, progression, and reversibility, as measured by diagnostic imaging modalities and the history of surgical resection. It should not be “diagnostic modality driven”: for each lesion and location, a modality appropriate for the anatomic site (for example: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging enterography, and colonoscopy) will be used. A total of 24 centers from 15 countries will be involved in a cross-sectional study, which will include up to 240 patients with stratification according to disease location and duration. At least 120 additional patients will be included in the study to validate the score. The Lémann score is expected to be able to portray a patients disease course on a double-axis graph, with time as the x-axis, bowel damage severity as the y-axis, and the slope of the line connecting data points as a measure of disease progression. This instrument could be used to assess the effect of various medical therapies on the progression of bowel damage. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011)

The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients

One hundred consecutive patients treated by restorative proctocolectomy with construction of an ileo-anal anastomosis and a J-shaped (n=90) or an S-shaped ileal reservoir were studied prospectively to evaluate postoperative complications and functional outcome and to search for factors that might influence results. There were no deaths. Postoperative complications requiring surgery were pelvic sepsis (3 patients), pouch-related fistula (2), peritonitis following ileostomy closure (3) and small bowel obstruction (6), with an overall relaparotomy rate of 14%. The cumulative risk of pouchitis was 30% at 2 years. The average stool frequency decreased gradually, stabilising at about five evacuations/24 h after 1 year. At that time 9% of patients still had ≥7 day-time evacuations and 40% had night evacuations (>1/week). These parameters did not improve further with time. Mucous soiling, a frequent problem initially, also diminished with time, occurring in 30% of patients at 1 year. At 2 years, however, this mucous leak occurred in only 20%, suggesting that improvement of continence can be expected to occur even beyond one year. Despite defects in function patient satisfaction was generally excellent. So far only three patients have preferred conversion to an ileostomy. To establish which factors might influence the functional results a specially designed scoring system, combining all functional variables, was used. It was shown that results deteriorated with increasing age and that elderly women tended to have a poorer result than elderly men. Sex, previous parity or postoperative complications appeared not to affect the functional outcome. Male sexual disturbances occurred in 8%. Three had erectile problems and one loss of ejaculation. Female sexual dysfunction was frequent; dyspareunia and/or leaks during intercourse occurred in about 30%. These results confirm that resorative proctocolectomy with construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis can be performed safely with a reasonable complication rate. Although patient satisfaction is often high, the functional results are not perfect, however, and further trials are in progress in this unit to determine whether results can be improved by altering the techniques for fashioning the pouch.

European evidenced-based consensus on reproduction in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) typically affect patients in their reproductive years. It has been shown that reproductive issues are of key concern to IBD patients,1 especially women.2 In this respect, it is important to note that IBD patients remain voluntary childless more frequently than non-IBD controls.1,3,4 A recent study reported that IBD patients refrain from having children due the concerns about the adverse reproductive outcome.1 Fear of side-effects of the medication on the child and medical advice given by physicians, were the most important reasons for voluntary childlessness in this study. The treatment of IBD patients wishing to conceive is surrounded with uncertainties both for the parents to be and the treating physician. This guideline is developed to address these uncertainties and to promote a European perspective on reproduction in inflammatory bowel disease patients. The strategy to reach consensus involved the following steps: 1. The development of questions that should be covered by these pregnancy guidelines. Participants were asked to review these questions and when necessary to adjust or add questions. 2. The participants met in London in November to agree on the questions 3. The participants performed a systematic literature search of their topic with the appropriate key words using Medline/Pubmed and the Cochrane database, as well as their own files. The evidence level was graded (Table 1) according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based medicine 5. 4. Provisional statements of the participants were written and the participants met in Prague in February 2010 to agree on the statements. This was done by projecting the statements and revising them on screen until a consensus was reached. Consensus was defined as agreement by > 80% of the participants. Each recommendation was graded as stated above. 5. The final document on each topic was written by the …

Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of surgical technique on functional and manovolumetric results in patients treated with Marlex® mesh abdominal rectopexy. METHODS: The lateral ligaments were completely divided (the Wells procedure) in 16 patients and preserved (the Ripstein procedure) in 16 patients. Clinical and physiologic assessment were performed before and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. RESULTS: Improvement of continence was similar. Bowel regulation problems which were unchanged after the Ripstein procedure increased significantly after the Wells procedure (P<0.01). Rectal volume became reduced in the group who received the Wells procedure (225 mlvs. 115 ml, P<0.05 at one year), but remained unchanged after receiving the Ripstein procedure. The pressure thresholds required to elicit sensation of rectal filling and defecation urge were increased after the Wells procedure (15 cm of H2Ovs. 25 cm of H2O, P<0.05 and 25 cm of H2O vs. 45 cm of H2O, P<0.05, respectively). In the Ripstein group there was only a slight increase of the threshold for urge (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The Wells procedure was followed by severe rectal dysfunction accompanied by increased constipation and evacuation problems. The Ripstein procedure, preserving the lateral ligaments, appears not to affect such symptoms adversely. On the other hand, improvement is not likely to occur.

Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: The SCANDIV Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, which is associated with significant morbidity. Cohort studies have suggested that laparoscopic lavage may treat perforated diverticulitis with less morbidity than resection procedures. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes from laparoscopic lavage with those for colon resection for perforated diverticulitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, randomized clinical superiority trial recruiting participants from 21 centers in Sweden and Norway from February 2010 to June 2014. The last patient follow-up was in December 2014 and final review and verification of the medical records was assessed in March 2015. Patients with suspected perforated diverticulitis, a clinical indication for emergency surgery, and free air on an abdominal computed tomography scan were eligible. Of 509 patients screened, 415 were eligible and 199 were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS Patients were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (n = 101) or colon resection (n = 98) based on a computer-generated, center-stratified block randomization. All patients with fecal peritonitis (15 patients in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group vs 13 in the colon resection group) underwent colon resection. Patients with a pathology requiring treatment beyond that necessary for perforated diverticulitis (12 in the laparoscopic lavage group vs 13 in the colon resection group) were also excluded from the protocol operations and treated as required for the pathology encountered. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo score >IIIa) within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included other postoperative complications, reoperations, length of operating time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and quality of life. RESULTS The primary outcome was observed in 31 of 101 patients (30.7%) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 25 of 96 patients (26.0%) in the colon resection group (difference, 4.7% [95% CI, -7.9% to 17.0%]; P = .53). Mortality at 90 days did not significantly differ between the laparoscopic lavage group (14 patients [13.9%]) and the colon resection group (11 patients [11.5%]; difference, 2.4% [95% CI, -7.2% to 11.9%]; P = .67). The reoperation rate was significantly higher in the laparoscopic lavage group (15 of 74 patients [20.3%]) than in the colon resection group (4 of 70 patients [5.7%]; difference, 14.6% [95% CI, 3.5% to 25.6%]; P = .01) for patients who did not have fecal peritonitis. The length of operating time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic lavage group; whereas, length of postoperative hospital stay and quality of life did not differ significantly between groups. Four sigmoid carcinomas were missed with laparoscopic lavage. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with likely perforated diverticulitis and undergoing emergency surgery, the use of laparoscopic lavage vs primary resection did not reduce severe postoperative complications and led to worse outcomes in secondary end points. These findings do not support laparoscopic lavage for treatment of perforated diverticulitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01047462.

Rectal reservoir and sensory function studied by graded isobaric distension in normal man.

The rectal expansion and concomitant sensory function on graded, isobaric, rectal distension within the interval 5-60 cm H2O was investigated in 36 healthy young volunteers. Anal pressure and electromyography (EMG) from the external anal sphincter were simultaneously recorded. Rectal distension caused an initial rapid expansion followed by transient, often repeated, reflex rectal contractions and a slow gradual increase of rectal volume. The maximal volume displaced by the first reflex rectal contraction was 18 (13) ml, which was less than 10% of the volume at 60 s. The pressure threshold for appreciation of rectal filling was 12 cm H2O (95% CL 5-15 cm H2O) and coincided with the threshold for rectoanal inhibition. Urge to defecate was experienced at 28 cm H2O (15-50 cm H2O) distension pressure, which was close to the threshold for maximal rectal contraction, also coinciding with the appearance of the external anal sphincter reflex. The interindividual variation of rectal volume on distension with defined pressures varied widely, indicating a considerable variation of rectal compliance in normal man. No correlation was found between rectal volume and sex or anthropometric variables. The relative variations in pressure thresholds for eliciting rectal sensation and rectoanal reflexes were less than the corresponding threshold volumes. It was concluded that the dynamic rectal response to distension reflects a well graded reflex adjustment ideal for a reservoir.