T P Millard

Photosensitivity disorders: cause, effect and management

Abnormal photosensitivity syndromes form a significant and common group of skin diseases. They include primary (idiopathic) photodermatoses such as polymorphic light eruption (PLE), chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD), actinic prurigo, hydroa vacciniforme and solar urticaria, in addition to drug- and chemical-induced photosensitivity and photo-exacerbated dermatoses. They can be extremely disabling and difficult to diagnose.PLE, characterized by a recurrent pruritic papulo-vesicular eruption of affected skin within hours of sun exposure, is best managed by restriction of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and the use of high sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens. If these measures are insufficient, prophylactic phototherapy with PUVA, broadband UVB or narrowband UVB (TL-01) for several weeks during spring may be necessary. CAD manifests as a dermatitis of chronically sun-exposed skin. Again, UVR exposure needs to be restricted; cyclosporine, azathioprine or PUVA may also be necessary. Actinic prurigo is characterized by the presence of excoriated papules and nodules on the face and limbs, most prominent and numerous distally. Actinic prurigo is managed again by restriction of UVR and the use of high SPF sunscreens; PUVA or broadband UVB therapy, or low doses of thalidomide may be necessary. Hydroa vacciniforme causes crops of discrete erythematous macules, 2 to 3mm in size, that evolve into blisters within a couple of days of sun exposure. Treatment for this rare disease is difficult; absorbent sunscreens and restricted UVR exposure may help. Solar urticaria is characterized by acute erythema and urticarial wealing after exposure to UVR. Treatment options for solar urticaria include non-sedating antihistamines such as fexofenadine and cetirizine; other options include absorbent sunscreens, restriction of UVR at the relevant wavelength, maintenance of a non-responsive state with natural or artificial light exposure and plasmapheresis.Industrial, cosmetic and therapeutic agents can induce exogenous drug- or chemical-induced photosensitivity. The clinical pattern is highly varied, depending on the agent; treatment is based on removal of the photosensitizer along with restriction of UVR exposure.Predominantly non-photosensitive dermatoses may also be exacerbated or precipitated by UVR; exposure to UVR should be reduced and sunscreens should be advocated, along with appropriate treatment of the underlying disease.

A candidate gene analysis of three related photosensitivity disorders: cutaneous lupus erythematosus, polymorphic light eruption and actinic prurigo

Background Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a common inherited photosensitivity disorder, which may predispose to several related but distinct conditions, including subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and actinic prurigo (AP).

Familial clustering of polymorphic light eruption in relatives of patients with lupus erythematosus: evidence of a shared pathogenesis

Background Abnormal photosensitivity is a common feature of many forms of lupus erythematosus (LE).

Molecular genetics of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

The cutaneous forms of lupus erythematosus (LE) are true complex traits, susceptibility to which is determined by multiple factors. Good evidence exists for both genetic and environmental components to this complexity. Several different experimental techniques have found the strongest genetic associations with cutaneous LE to include sequence polymorphisms of genes encoding HLA, TNF‐α and complement molecules, particularly in anti‐Ro‐positive patients. Abnormal expression of multiple other cytokines, adhesion molecules and cellular proteins (such as Ro and La) points towards a range of candidate genes that are currently being examined in cutaneous LE. Combinations of specific polymorphisms of genes encoding these immunoregulatory molecules may determine individual susceptibility to LE.

Acute infantile hemorrhagic oedema.

Acute infantile hemorrhagic oedema (AIHO) was first described in 1913 but, despite frequent reports in the European literature, it is not well recognized in the English language literature. It is considered by many to be a variant of Henoch Schonlein Purpura (HSP) because of similarities in cause and histopathology. However, because of the benign nature of this condition and frequent absence of IgA associated with HSP, it may be sensible to consider this as a distinct variety of cutaneous small vessel vasculitis (CSVV). We report this case to highlight the condition and emphasize its benign nature.

Polymorphic light eruption and the HLA DRB1*0301 extended haplotype are independent risk factors for cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Recent evidence suggests that polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is an inherited photosensitivity disorder which may predispose to cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE). In this study we examine the relative risk (RR) attributable to the presence of PLE, together with the effect of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in the development of cutaneous LE. Eighty-five Caucasian patients with annular subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and discoid LE (DLE) were recruited, together with 102 first degree relatives and 200 healthy local Caucasian controls. Symptoms suggestive of PLE were elicited in patients and relatives, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing determined by PCR-SSP. Standard association analysis and family transmission disequilibrium testing (TDT) were then used to compare the HLA frequencies between groups. We found a significant (P < 0.05) association of the HLA A*01, B*08, DRB1*0301 extended haplotype with both SCLE and DLE and also significant association of DLE with the HLA A*03, B*07, DRB1*15 haplotype, with a possible protective effect in SCLE for HLA B*44 and DRB1*04 (P=0.002 and 0.001 respectively). Association was observed between PLE and cutaneous LE (P < 0.001), but not between PLE and any HLA allele. From these figures we estimate, for the general population, that the RR of developing SCLE given the presence of (a) PLE, (b) DRB1*0301 and (c) both PLE and DRB1*0301 is 3.37, 5.45 and 12.03, respectively. For DLE, equivalent RRs are 3.11, 2.15 and 6.94. In conclusion, these data imply the involvement of both PLE and HLA DRB1*0301 in the development of SCLE and DLE. They form a basis for examining the genetic architecture of photosensitivity, some aspects of which may be common to both cutaneous LE and PLE.

Ultraviolet therapy in lupus.

This review examines the use of ultraviolet (UV) therapy in lupus erythematosus (LE), a disorder usually associated with abnormally increased photosensitivity. In addition to the abnormal cutaneous response to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, photo-aggravation of systemic disease activity in systemic LE (SLE) may also occur. However, courses of UVR exposure may also be used in the treatment or prophylaxis of various photodermatoses, and LE now appears to be included in that group. Thus, several studies have reported apparent benefits of phototherapy in both cutaneous and systemic LE, although the underlying mechanisms remain obscure and final confirmation of such efficacy is still awaited in continuing studies.

A protective effect of glutathione-S-transferase GSTP1*Val(105) against polymorphic light eruption.

Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a common skin disease, susceptibility to which is genetically determined. The prevalence of PLE is significantly increased in patients with lupus erythematosus (LE) including subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), which may reflect a common genetic background. Experimental evidence supports a role for reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the pathogenesis of PLE, and the family of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzymes exerts a critical physiological role in cellular protection against this oxidative damage. Our aim was to look for association between the functional GST gene polymorphisms and PLE, SCLE, and DLE in a case-control study. The carrier frequency of GSTP1 Val(105) in subjects with PLE was 40%, significantly lower than the carrier frequency in controls (54%, P=0.019), although significance was lost on correction for multiple testing. However, the carrier frequency of the GSTP1 Val(105) allele in combined cutaneous LE (SCLE and DLE) patients with PLE was 42%, significantly lower than in those without PLE (72%), which did survive correction (corrected P=0.043). We have identified evidence supporting a protective GSTP1 allele, the first genetic association to be reported for PLE. This supports a role for ROS in the pathogenesis of PLE and may provide a therapeutic target for future treatment of this common, often disabling, condition.

Atypical pigmented lesions following extensive PUVA therapy.

We report a 38‐year‐old woman with psoriasis who developed multiple atypical lentigines following psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA). The lentigines first appeared 12 years ago, 3 years after she commenced intermittent PUVA treatment. New lesions continued to develop over the subsequent years with further photochemotherapy. Clinically, the lentigines were strikingly atypical, deeply pigmented, dark brown or black, large stellate macules. Histology of a representative lesion was consistent with a PUVA lentigo and no atypical melanocytes were seen. At present, a link between malignant melanoma and PUVA lentigines has not been established. Instead, limited evidence suggests that PUVA lentigines may be more closely linked with the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Reactivation of cutaneous leishmaniasis after surgery

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is caused by a parasite from the genus Leishmania. Infection is transmitted to humans from the bite of sandflies. We describe an 85‐year‐old man who developed CL on his face after recent cutaneous surgery in that site. The case is also unusual because the most likely source of exposure to the infection occurred over 50 years previously. Polymerase chain reaction, slit‐skin smear, serology and the leishmanin test were not helpful in diagnosis, which was confirmed by histopathological demonstration of the parasite.