T. S. Metcalfe
Space Science Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. S. Metcalfe.
Science | 2012
Joshua A. Carter; Eric Agol; W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Katherine M. Deck; Y. Elsworth; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; S. J. Hale; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Matthew J. Holman; Daniel Huber; Christopher Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; Jack J. Lissauer; Eric D. Lopez; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; T. S. Metcalfe; A. Miglio; Leslie A. Rogers; D. Stello; William J. Borucki; Steve Bryson
So Close and So Different In our solar system, the rocky planets have very distinct orbits from those of the gas giants. Carter et al. (p. 556, published online 21 June) report on a planetary system where this pattern does not apply, posing a challenge to theories of planet formation. Data from the Kepler space telescope reveal two planets with radically different densities orbiting the same star with very similar orbital periods. One planet has a rocky Earth-like composition and the other is akin to Neptune. The Kepler spacecraft detected a super-Earth and a Neptune-like planet in very tightly spaced orbits around the same star. In the solar system, the planets’ compositions vary with orbital distance, with rocky planets in close orbits and lower-density gas giants in wider orbits. The detection of close-in giant planets around other stars was the first clue that this pattern is not universal and that planets’ orbits can change substantially after their formation. Here, we report another violation of the orbit-composition pattern: two planets orbiting the same star with orbital distances differing by only 10% and densities differing by a factor of 8. One planet is likely a rocky “super-Earth,” whereas the other is more akin to Neptune. These planets are 20 times more closely spaced and have a larger density contrast than any adjacent pair of planets in the solar system.
Science | 2011
W. J. Chaplin; Hans Kjeldsen; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Sarbani Basu; A. Miglio; T. Appourchaux; Timothy R. Bedding; Y. Elsworth; R. A. García; R. L. Gilliland; Léo Girardi; G. Houdek; C. Karoff; S. D. Kawaler; T. S. Metcalfe; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; M. J. Thompson; G. A. Verner; J. Ballot; Alfio Bonanno; I. M. Brandão; Anne-Marie Broomhall; H. Bruntt; T. L. Campante; E. Corsaro; O. L. Creevey; G. Doğan; Lisa Esch; Ning Gai
Measurements of 500 Sun-like stars show that their properties differ from those predicted by stellar population models. In addition to its search for extrasolar planets, the NASA Kepler mission provides exquisite data on stellar oscillations. We report the detections of oscillations in 500 solar-type stars in the Kepler field of view, an ensemble that is large enough to allow statistical studies of intrinsic stellar properties (such as mass, radius, and age) and to test theories of stellar evolution. We find that the distribution of observed masses of these stars shows intriguing differences to predictions from models of synthetic stellar populations in the Galaxy.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jason F. Rowe; Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Lisa Kaltenegger; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman
A search of the time-series photometry from NASAs Kepler spacecraft reveals a transiting planet candidate orbiting the 11th magnitude G5 dwarf KIC 10593626 with a period of 290 days. The characteristics of the host star are well constrained by high-resolution spectroscopy combined with an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry, leading to an estimated mass and radius of 0.970 ± 0.060 M ☉ and 0.979 ± 0.020 R ☉. The depth of 492 ± 10 ppm for the three observed transits yields a radius of 2.38 ± 0.13 Re for the planet. The system passes a battery of tests for false positives, including reconnaissance spectroscopy, high-resolution imaging, and centroid motion. A full BLENDER analysis provides further validation of the planet interpretation by showing that contamination of the target by an eclipsing system would rarely mimic the observed shape of the transits. The final validation of the planet is provided by 16 radial velocities (RVs) obtained with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on Keck I over a one-year span. Although the velocities do not lead to a reliable orbit and mass determination, they are able to constrain the mass to a 3σ upper limit of 124 M ⊕, safely in the regime of planetary masses, thus earning the designation Kepler-22b. The radiative equilibrium temperature is 262 K for a planet in Kepler-22bs orbit. Although there is no evidence that Kepler-22b is a rocky planet, it is the first confirmed planet with a measured radius to orbit in the habitable zone of any star other than the Sun.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2012
Marc H. Pinsonneault; Deokkeun An; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; W. J. Chaplin; T. S. Metcalfe; H. Bruntt
We present a catalog of revised effective temperatures for stars observed in long-cadence mode in the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). We use Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) griz filters tied to the fundamental temperature scale. Polynomials for griz color-temperature relations are presented, along with correction terms for surface gravity effects, metallicity, and statistical corrections for binary companions or blending. We compare our temperature scale to the published infrared flux method (IRFM) scale for VTJKs in both open clusters and the Kepler fields. We find good agreement overall, with some deviations between (J ? Ks )-based temperatures from the IRFM and both SDSS filter and other diagnostic IRFM color-temperature relationships above 6000?K. For field dwarfs, we find a mean shift toward hotter temperatures relative to the KIC, of order 215?K, in the regime where the IRFM scale is well defined (4000?K to 6500?K). This change is of comparable magnitude in both color systems and in spectroscopy for stars with T eff below 6000?K. Systematic differences between temperature estimators appear for hotter stars, and we define corrections to put the SDSS temperatures on the IRFM scale for them. When the theoretical dependence on gravity is accounted for, we find a similar temperature scale offset between the fundamental and KIC scales for giants. We demonstrate that statistical corrections to color-based temperatures from binaries are significant. Typical errors, mostly from uncertainties in extinction, are of order 100?K. Implications for other applications of the KIC are discussed.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Daniel Huber; W. J. Chaplin; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Ronald L. Gilliland; Hans Kjeldsen; Lars A. Buchhave; Debra A. Fischer; Jack J. Lissauer; Jason F. Rowe; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; C. Karoff; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; Geoffrey W. Marcy; A. Miglio; Victor Silva Aguirre; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Timothy R. Bedding; Christopher J. Burke; Jessie L. Christiansen; Y. Elsworth; Michael R. Haas; Steven D. Kawaler
We have used asteroseismology to determine fundamental properties for 66 Kepler planet-candidate host stars, with typical uncertainties of 3% and 7% in radius and mass, respectively. The results include new asteroseismic solutions for four host stars with confirmed planets (Kepler-4, Kepler-14, Kepler-23 and Kepler-25) and increase the total number of Kepler host stars with asteroseismic solutions to 77. A comparison with stellar properties in the planet-candidate catalog by Batalha et al. shows that radii for subgiants and giants obtained from spectroscopic follow-up are systematically too low by up to a factor of 1.5, while the properties for unevolved stars are in good agreement. We furthermore apply asteroseismology to confirm that a large majority of cool main-sequence hosts are indeed dwarfs and not misclassified giants. Using the revised stellar properties, we recalculate the radii for 107 planet candidates in our sample, and comment on candidates for which the radii change from a previously giant-planet/brown-dwarf/stellar regime to a sub-Jupiter size or vice versa. A comparison of stellar densities from asteroseismology with densities derived from transit models in Batalha et al. assuming circular orbits shows significant disagreement for more than half of the sample due to systematics in the modeled impact parameters or due to planet candidates that may be in eccentric orbits. Finally, we investigate tentative correlations between host-star masses and planet-candidate radii, orbital periods, and multiplicity, but caution that these results may be influenced by the small sample size and detection biases.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013
W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Daniel Huber; Aldo M. Serenelli; Luca Casagrande; V. Silva Aguirre; Warrick H. Ball; O. L. Creevey; Laurent Gizon; R. Handberg; C. Karoff; R. Lutz; J. P. Marques; A. Miglio; D. Stello; Marian Doru Suran; D. Pricopi; T. S. Metcalfe; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; T. Appourchaux; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard; Y. Elsworth; R. A. García; G. Houdek; Hans Kjeldsen; Alfio Bonanno; T. L. Campante; E. Corsaro; P. Gaulme
We use asteroseismic data obtained by the NASA Kepler mission to estimate the fundamental properties of more than 500 main-sequence and sub-giant stars. Data obtained during the first 10 months of Kepler science operations were used for this work, when these solar-type targets were observed for one month each in survey mode. Stellar properties have been estimated using two global asteroseismic parameters and complementary photometric and spectroscopic data. Homogeneous sets of effective temperatures, T eff, were available for the entire ensemble from complementary photometry; spectroscopic estimates of T eff and [Fe/H] were available from a homogeneous analysis of ground-based data on a subset of 87 stars. We adopt a grid-based analysis, coupling six pipeline codes to 11 stellar evolutionary grids. Through use of these different grid-pipeline combinations we allow implicitly for the impact on the results of stellar model dependencies from commonly used grids, and differences in adopted pipeline methodologies. By using just two global parameters as the seismic inputs we are able to perform a homogenous analysis of all solar-type stars in the asteroseismic cohort, including many targets for which it would not be possible to provide robust estimates of individual oscillation frequencies (due to a combination of low signal-to-noise ratio and short dataset lengths). The median final quoted uncertainties from consolidation of the grid-based analyses are for the full ensemble (spectroscopic subset) approximately 10.8% (5.4%) in mass, 4.4% (2.2%) in radius, 0.017 dex (0.010 dex) in log g, and 4.3% (2.8%) in mean density. Around 36% (57%) of the stars have final age uncertainties smaller than 1 Gyr. These ages will be useful for ensemble studies, but should be treated carefully on a star-by-star basis. Future analyses using individual oscillation frequencies will offer significant improvements on up to 150 stars, in particular for estimates of the ages, where having the individual frequency data is most important.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
D. Huber; Michael J. Ireland; Timothy R. Bedding; I. M. Brandão; L. Piau; V. Maestro; T. R. White; H. Bruntt; Luca Casagrande; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; V. Silva Aguirre; S. G. Sousa; Christopher J. Burke; W. J. Chaplin; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard; M. S. Cunha; J. De Ridder; C. Farrington; A. Frasca; R. A. García; R. L. Gilliland; P. J. Goldfinger; S. Hekker; S. D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; H. McAlister; T. S. Metcalfe; A. Miglio; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; Marc H. Pinsonneault
We present results of a long-baseline interferometry campaign using the PAVO beam combiner at the CHARA Array to measure the angular sizes of five main-sequence stars, one subgiant and four red giant stars for which solar-like oscillations have been detected by either Kepler or CoRoT. By combining interferometric angular diameters, Hipparcos parallaxes, asteroseismic densities, bolometric fluxes, and high-resolution spectroscopy, we derive a full set of near-model-independent fundamental properties for the sample. We first use these properties to test asteroseismic scaling relations for the frequency of maximum power (?max) and the large frequency separation (??). We find excellent agreement within the observational uncertainties, and empirically show that simple estimates of asteroseismic radii for main-sequence stars are accurate to 4%. We furthermore find good agreement of our measured effective temperatures with spectroscopic and photometric estimates with mean deviations for stars between T eff = 4600-6200 K of ?22 ? 32 K (with a scatter of 97?K) and ?58 ? 31 K (with a scatter of 93?K), respectively. Finally, we present a first comparison with evolutionary models, and find differences between observed and theoretical properties for the metal-rich main-sequence star HD?173701. We conclude that the constraints presented in this study will have strong potential for testing stellar model physics, in particular when combined with detailed modeling of individual oscillation frequencies.
Science | 2013
Daniel Huber; Joshua A. Carter; Mauro Barbieri; A. Miglio; Katherine M. Deck; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Benjamin T. Montet; Lars A. Buchhave; W. J. Chaplin; S. Hekker; Josefina Montalban; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; T. L. Campante; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Y. Elsworth; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Eric B. Ford; Ronald L. Gilliland; R. Handberg; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; John Asher Johnson; C. Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund
Misaligned Planets Stars with multiple coplanar planets have not been seen to show misalignments between the equatorial plane of the star and the orbital plane of the planets—a diagnostic of the dynamical history of planetary systems. Huber et al. (p. 331) analyzed the Kepler 56 planetary system, which contains a giant-sized and an intermediate-sized planet. The planets have orbits that are close to coplanar, but the planetary orbits are misaligned with the stellar equator. A third companion in a wide orbit, which could be another star or a planet, could explain the misaligned configuration. Kepler observations show that stellar spin-orbit misalignments are not confined to planetary systems with hot Jupiters. Stars hosting hot Jupiters are often observed to have high obliquities, whereas stars with multiple coplanar planets have been seen to have low obliquities. This has been interpreted as evidence that hot-Jupiter formation is linked to dynamical disruption, as opposed to planet migration through a protoplanetary disk. We used asteroseismology to measure a large obliquity for Kepler-56, a red giant star hosting two transiting coplanar planets. These observations show that spin-orbit misalignments are not confined to hot-Jupiter systems. Misalignments in a broader class of systems had been predicted as a consequence of torques from wide-orbiting companions, and indeed radial velocity measurements revealed a third companion in a wide orbit in the Kepler-56 system.
Nature | 2013
Jason F. Rowe; Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel Huber; Francois Fressin; Steve B. Howell; Stephen T. Bryson; W. J. Chaplin; J.-M. Desert; Eric D. Lopez; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Fergal Mullally; Darin Ragozzine; Guillermo Torres; Elisabeth R. Adams; Eric Agol; D. Barrado; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Andrea K. Dupree; Y. Elsworth; Mark E. Everett; Debra A. Fischer; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney
Since the discovery of the first exoplanets, it has been known that other planetary systems can look quite unlike our own. Until fairly recently, we have been able to probe only the upper range of the planet size distribution, and, since last year, to detect planets that are the size of Earth or somewhat smaller. Hitherto, no planets have been found that are smaller than those we see in the Solar System. Here we report a planet significantly smaller than Mercury. This tiny planet is the innermost of three that orbit the Sun-like host star, which we have designated Kepler-37. Owing to its extremely small size, similar to that of the Moon, and highly irradiated surface, the planet, Kepler-37b, is probably rocky with no atmosphere or water, similar to Mercury.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
S. Mathur; T. S. Metcalfe; M. Woitaszek; H. Bruntt; G. A. Verner; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; O. L. Creevey; G. Doğan; Sarbani Basu; C. Karoff; D. Stello; T. Appourchaux; T. L. Campante; W. J. Chaplin; R. A. García; Timothy R. Bedding; O. Benomar; Alfio Bonanno; S. Deheuvels; Y. Elsworth; P. Gaulme; Joyce Ann Guzik; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; W. Herzberg; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; L. Piau; P.-O. Quirion; C. Regulo; Mary Tork Roth
Asteroseismology with the Kepler space telescope is providing not only an improved characterization of exoplanets and their host stars, but also a new window on stellar structure and evolution for the large sample of solar-type stars in the field. We perform a uniform analysis of 22 of the brightest asteroseismic targets with the highest signal-to-noise ratio observed for 1 month each during the first year of the mission, and we quantify the precision and relative accuracy of asteroseismic determinations of the stellar radius, mass, and age that are possible using various methods. We present the properties of each star in the sample derived from an automated analysis of the individual oscillation frequencies and other observational constraints using the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal (AMP), and we compare them to the results of model-grid-based methods that fit the global oscillation properties. We find that fitting the individual frequencies typically yields asteroseismic radii and masses to ~1% precision, and ages to ~2.5% precision (respectively, 2, 5, and 8 times better than fitting the global oscillation properties). The absolute level of agreement between the results from different approaches is also encouraging, with model-grid-based methods yielding slightly smaller estimates of the radius and mass and slightly older values for the stellar age relative to AMP, which computes a large number of dedicated models for each star. The sample of targets for which this type of analysis is possible will grow as longer data sets are obtained during the remainder of the mission.