T. Szücs
ATOMKI
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. Szücs.
Physical Review Letters | 2016
C. G. Bruno; D. A. Scott; M. Aliotta; A. Formicola; A. Best; A. Boeltzig; D. Bemmerer; C. Broggini; A. Caciolli; F. Cavanna; G. F. Ciani; P. Corvisiero; Thomas Davinson; R. Depalo; A. Di Leva; Z. Elekes; F. Ferraro; Zs. Fülöp; G. Gervino; A. Guglielmetti; C. Gustavino; Gy. Gyürky; G. Imbriani; M. Junker; R. Menegazzo; V. Mossa; F. R. Pantaleo; D. Piatti; P. Prati; E. Somorjai
The ^{17}O(p,α)^{14}N reaction plays a key role in various astrophysical scenarios, from asymptotic giant branch stars to classical novae. It affects the synthesis of rare isotopes such as ^{17}O and ^{18}F, which can provide constraints on astrophysical models. A new direct determination of the E_{R}=64.5 keV resonance strength performed at the Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics (LUNA) accelerator has led to the most accurate value to date ωγ=10.0±1.4_{stat}±0.7_{syst} neV, thanks to a significant background reduction underground and generally improved experimental conditions. The (bare) proton partial width of the corresponding state at E_{x}=5672 keV in ^{18}F is Γ_{p}=35±5_{stat}±3_{syst} neV. This width is about a factor of 2 higher than previously estimated, thus leading to a factor of 2 increase in the ^{17}O(p, α)^{14}N reaction rate at astrophysical temperatures relevant to shell hydrogen burning in red giant and asymptotic giant branch stars. The new rate implies lower ^{17}O/^{16}O ratios, with important implications on the interpretation of astrophysical observables from these stars.
J.Phys. | 2010
Gy. Gyürky; T. Szücs; G. Kiss; C. Yalçin; N. Özkan; Z. Elekes; Zs. Fülöp; J. Farkas; E. Somorjai; Z. Halász; T. Rauscher; R. T. Güray
In order to extend the experimental database relevant for the astrophysical -process towards the unexplored heavier mass region, the cross sections of the 151 Eu(�,) 155 Tb and 151 Eu(�,n) 154 Tb reactions have been measured at low energies between 12 and 17MeV using the activation technique. The results are compared with the predictions of statistical model calculations and it is found that the calculations overestimate the cross sections by about a factor of two. A sensitivity analysis shows that this discrepancy is caused by the inadequate description of the �+nucleus channel. A factor of two reduction of the reaction rate of 151 Eu(�,) 155 Tb in -process network calculations with respect to theoretical rates using the optical potential by McFadden and Satchler (1966) is recommended.
Nuclear Physics | 2013
Gy. Gyürky; M. Vakulenko; Zs. Fülöp; Z. Halász; G. Kiss; E. Somorjai; T. Szücs
For the better understanding of the astrophysical gamma-process the experimental determination of low energy proton- and alpha-capture cross sections on heavy isotopes is required. The existing data for the 92Mo(p,gamma)93Tc reaction are contradictory and strong fluctuation of the cross section is observed which cannot be explained by the statistical model. In this paper a new determination of the 92Mo(p,gamma)93Tc and 98Mo(p,gamma)99mTc cross sections based on thick target yield measurements are presented and the results are compared with existing data and model calculations. Reaction rates of 92Mo(p,gamma)93Tc at temperatures relevant for the gamma-process are derived directly from the measured thick target yields. The obtained rates are a factor of 2 lower than the ones used in astrophysical network calculations. It is argued that in the case of fluctuating cross sections the thick target yield measurement can be more suited for a reliable reaction rate determination.
EPL | 2018
D. Bemmerer; F. Cavanna; R. Depalo; M. Aliotta; M. Anders; A. Boeltzig; C. Broggini; C. G. Bruno; A. Caciolli; T. Chillery; P. Corvisiero; T. Davinson; Z. Elekes; F. Ferraro; A. Formicola; Zs. Fülöp; G. Gervino; A. Guglielmetti; C. Gustavino; Gy. Gyürky; R. Menegazzo; V. Mossa; F. R. Pantaleo; P. Prati; D. A. Scott; K. Stöcker; O. Straniero; T. Szücs; M. P. Takács; D. Trezzi
When deriving resonance strengths using the thick-target yield approximation, for very narrow resonances it may be necessary to take beam energy straggling into account. This applies to gas targets of a few keV width, especially if there is some additional structure in target stoichiometry or detection efficiency. The correction for this effect is shown and tested on recent studies of narrow resonances in the and reactions.
Physical Review C | 2015
T. Szücs; D. Bemmerer; A. Caciolli; Zs. Fülöp; R. Massarczyk; C. Michelagnoli; T. P. Reinhardt; R. Schwengner; M. P. Takács; C. A. Ur; A. Wagner; L. Wagner
The stable nucleus
arXiv: Nuclear Experiment | 2018
Gy. Gyürky; Zs. Fülöp; Z. Halász; G. Kiss; T. Szücs
^{15}
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2017
O. Straniero; C. G. Bruno; M. Aliotta; A. Best; A. Boeltzig; D. Bemmerer; C. Broggini; A. Caciolli; F. Cavanna; G. F. Ciani; P. Corvisiero; S. Cristallo; T. Davinson; R. Depalo; A. Di Leva; Z. Elekes; F. Ferraro; A. Formicola; Zs. Fülöp; G. Gervino; A. Guglielmetti; C. Gustavino; G. Gyürky; G. Imbriani; M. Junker; R. Menegazzo; V. Mossa; F. R. Pantaleo; D. Piatti; Luciano Piersanti
N is the mirror of
Physical Review C | 2016
R. Depalo; F. Cavanna; M. Aliotta; M. Anders; D. Bemmerer; A. Best; A. Boeltzig; C. Broggini; C. G. Bruno; A. Caciolli; G. F. Ciani; P. Corvisiero; T. Davinson; A. Di Leva; Z. Elekes; F. Ferraro; A. Formicola; Zs. Fülöp; G. Gervino; A. Guglielmetti; C. Gustavino; Gy. Gyürky; G. Imbriani; M. Junker; R. Menegazzo; V. Mossa; F. R. Pantaleo; D. Piatti; P. Prati; O. Straniero
^{15}
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2016
O. Straniero C.G.Bruno; M. Aliotta; A. Best; A. Boeltzig; D. Bemmerer; C. Broggini; A. Caciolli; F. Cavanna; G. F. Ciani; P. Corvisiero; S. Cristallo; T. Davinson; R. Depalo; A. Di Leva; Z. Elekes; F. Ferraro; A. Formicola; Z. S. Fulop; G. Gervino; A. Guglielmetti; C. Gustavino; G. Gyürky; G. Imbriani; M. Junker; R. Menegazzo; V. Mossa; F. R. Pantaleo; D. Piatti; Luciano Piersanti; P. Prati
O, the bottleneck in the hydrogen burning CNO cycle. Most of the
Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2015
C. Yalçin; Gy. Gyürky; Z. Halász; T. Szücs; R. T. Güray; G. Kiss; Zs. Fülöp; N. Özkan; E. Somorjai
^{15}