T. van Hertem
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T. van Hertem.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2013
T. van Hertem; E. Maltz; Aharon Antler; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; Stefano Viazzi; Claudia Bahr; A. Schlageter-Tello; C. Lokhorst; D. Berckmans; Ilan Halachmi
The objective of this study was to develop and validate a mathematical model to detect clinical lameness based on existing sensor data that relate to the behavior and performance of cows in a commercial dairy farm. Identification of lame (44) and not lame (74) cows in the database was done based on the farms daily herd health reports. All cows were equipped with a behavior sensor that measured neck activity and ruminating time. The cows performance was measured with a milk yield meter in the milking parlor. In total, 38 model input variables were constructed from the sensor data comprising absolute values, relative values, daily standard deviations, slope coefficients, daytime and nighttime periods, variables related to individual temperament, and milk session-related variables. A lame group, cows recognized and treated for lameness, to not lame group comparison of daily data was done. Correlations between the dichotomous output variable (lame or not lame) and the model input variables were made. The highest correlation coefficient was obtained for the milk yield variable (rMY=0.45). In addition, a logistic regression model was developed based on the 7 highest correlated model input variables (the daily milk yield 4d before diagnosis; the slope coefficient of the daily milk yield 4d before diagnosis; the nighttime to daytime neck activity ratio 6d before diagnosis; the milk yield week difference ratio 4d before diagnosis; the milk yield week difference 4d before diagnosis; the neck activity level during the daytime 7d before diagnosis; the ruminating time during nighttime 6d before diagnosis). After a 10-fold cross-validation, the model obtained a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.85, with a correct classification rate of 0.86 when based on the averaged 10-fold model coefficients. This study demonstrates that existing farm data initially used for other purposes, such as heat detection, can be exploited for the automated detection of clinically lame animals on a daily basis as well.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2014
T. van Hertem; Yisrael Parmet; Machteld Steensels; E. Maltz; Aharon Antler; A. Schlageter-Tello; C. Lokhorst; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; Stefano Viazzi; Claudia Bahr; D. Berckmans; Ilan Halachmi
The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of hoof trimming on cow behavior (ruminating time, activity, and locomotion score) and performance (milk yield) over time. Data were gathered from a commercial dairy farm in Israel where routine hoof trimming is done by a trained hoof trimmer twice per year on the entire herd. In total, 288 cows spread over 6 groups with varying production levels were used for the analysis. Cow behavior was measured continuously with a commercial neck activity logger and a ruminating time logger (HR-Tag, SCR Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel). Milk yield was recorded during each milking session with a commercial milk flow sensor (Free Flow, SCR Engineers Ltd.). A trained observer assigned on the spot 5-point locomotion scores during 19 nighttime milking occasions between 22 October 2012 and 4 February 2013. Behavioral and performance data were gathered from 1wk before hoof trimming until 1wk after hoof trimming. A generalized linear mixed model was used to statistically test all main and interactive effects of hoof trimming, parity, lactation stage, and hoof lesion presence on ruminating time, neck activity, milk yield, and locomotion score. The results on locomotion scores show that the proportional distribution of cows in the different locomotion score classes changes significantly after trimming. The proportion of cows with a locomotion score ≥3 increases from 14% before to 34% directly after the hoof trimming. Two months after the trimming, the number of cows with a locomotion score ≥3 reduced to 20%, which was still higher than the baseline values 2wk before the trimming. The neck activity level was significantly reduced 1d after trimming (380±6 bits/d) compared with before trimming (389±6 bits/d). Each one-unit increase in locomotion score reduced cow activity level by 4.488 bits/d. The effect of hoof trimming on ruminating time was affected by an interaction effect with parity. The effect of hoof trimming on locomotion scores was affected by an interaction effect with lactation stage and tended to be affected by interaction effects with hoof lesion presence, indicating that cows with a lesion reacted different to the trimming than cows without a lesion did. The results show that the routine hoof trimming affected dairy cow behavior and performance in this farm.
Animal | 2016
T. van Hertem; Claudia Bahr; A. Schlageter Tello; Stefano Viazzi; Machteld Steensels; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; C. Lokhorst; E. Maltz; Ilan Halachmi; D. Berckmans
The objective of this study was to evaluate if a multi-sensor system (milk, activity, body posture) was a better classifier for lameness than the single-sensor-based detection models. Between September 2013 and August 2014, 3629 cow observations were collected on a commercial dairy farm in Belgium. Human locomotion scoring was used as reference for the model development and evaluation. Cow behaviour and performance was measured with existing sensors that were already present at the farm. A prototype of three-dimensional-based video recording system was used to quantify automatically the back posture of a cow. For the single predictor comparisons, a receiver operating characteristics curve was made. For the multivariate detection models, logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were developed. The best lameness classification model was obtained by the multi-sensor analysis (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)=0.757±0.029), containing a combination of milk and milking variables, activity and gait and posture variables from videos. Second, the multivariate video-based system (AUC=0.732±0.011) performed better than the multivariate milk sensors (AUC=0.604±0.026) and the multivariate behaviour sensors (AUC=0.633±0.018). The video-based system performed better than the combined behaviour and performance-based detection model (AUC=0.669±0.028), indicating that it is worthwhile to consider a video-based lameness detection system, regardless the presence of other existing sensors in the farm. The results suggest that Θ2, the feature variable for the back curvature around the hip joints, with an AUC of 0.719 is the best single predictor variable for lameness detection based on locomotion scoring. In general, this study showed that the video-based back posture monitoring system is outperforming the behaviour and performance sensing techniques for locomotion scoring-based lameness detection. A GLMM with seven specific variables (walking speed, back posture measurement, daytime activity, milk yield, lactation stage, milk peak flow rate and milk peak conductivity) is the best combination of variables for lameness classification. The accuracy on four-level lameness classification was 60.3%. The accuracy improved to 79.8% for binary lameness classification. The binary GLMM obtained a sensitivity of 68.5% and a specificity of 87.6%, which both exceed the sensitivity (52.1%±4.7%) and specificity (83.2%±2.3%) of the multi-sensor logistic regression model. This shows that the repeated measures analysis in the GLMM, taking into account the individual history of the animal, outperforms the classification when thresholds based on herd level (a statistical population) are used.
Proceedings of the XVth international congress of the International society for animal hygiene, 03-07 july 2011, Vienna, Austria | 2011
A. Schlageter Tello; C. Lokhorst; T. van Hertem; Ilan Halachmi; E. Maltz; A. Vörös; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; Stefano Viazzi; M. Bahr; P.W.G. Groot Koerkamp; D. Berckmans
Archive | 2015
Ilan Halachmi; A. Schlageter Tello; A. Peña Fernández; T. van Hertem; V. Sibony; S. Weyl-Feinstein; A. Verbrugge; M. Bonneau; R. Neilson
Precision Livestock Farming '13, 6th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, Leuven, Belgium, 10 - 12 September, 2013 | 2013
A. Schlageter Tello; E.A.M. Bokkers; P.W.G. Groot Koerkamp; T. van Hertem; Stefano Viazzi; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; Ilan Halachmi; Claudia Bahr; D. Berckmans; C. Lokhorst
Precision Livestock Farming '13, 6th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, Leuven, Belgium, 10 - 12 September, 2013 | 2013
T. van Hertem; E. Maltz; Aharon Antler; Victor Alchanatis; A. Schlageter Tello; C. Lokhorst; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; Stefano Viazzi; Claudia Bahr; D. Berckmans; Ilan Halachmi
Precision Livestock Farming '13, 6th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, Leuven, Belgium, 10 - 12 September, 2013 | 2013
Stefano Viazzi; T. van Hertem; Carlos Eduardo Bites Romanini; Claudia Bahr; Ilan Halachmi; A. Schlageter Tello; C. Lokhorst; D. Rozen; D. Berckmans
Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, Prague Czech Republic, 11 - 14 July, 2011 | 2011
T. van Hertem; Victor Alchanatis; Aharon Antler; E. Maltz; Ilan Halachmi; A. Schlageter Tello; C. Lokhorst; A. Vörös; E. Romanini Bites; M. Bahr; D. Berckmans
Archive | 2015
Ilan Halachmi; A. Schlageter Tello; A. Peña Fernández; T. van Hertem; V. Sibony; S. Weyl-Feinstein; A. Verbrugge; M. Bonneau; R. Neilson