T Y Cheng
National Health Research Institutes
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by T Y Cheng.
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; S P Tsai; T Y Cheng; Chien-Jen Chen; David T. Levy; Yang Hj; Michael P. Eriksen
Objective: To describe the characteristics of betel quid chewers and to investigate the behavioural and mortality relations between betel quid chewing and cigarette smoking. Method: Prevalence and mortality risks of betel quid chewers by smoking status were calculated, based on the National Health Interview Survey in 2001 and a community based cohort, respectively. Cox’s proportional hazards model was used to adjust mortality risks for age, alcohol use, and education. Results: Almost all betel quid chewers were smokers, and most started chewing after smoking. Chewers were predominantly male, mostly in their 30s and 40s, more likely being among the lowest educational or income group, and residing in the eastern regions of Taiwan. On average, betel quid chewers who smoked consumed 18 pieces of betel quid a day, and smoked more cigarettes per day. Far more smokers use betel quid than non-smokers (27.5% v 2.5%), but ex-smokers quit betel quid more than smokers (15.1% v 6.8%). The significantly increased mortality of betel quid users who also smoked, for all causes, all cancer, oral cancer, and cancer of the nasopharynx, lung, and liver, was the result of the combined effects of chewing and smoking. Smokers who chewed betel quid nearly tripled their oral cancer risks from a relative risk of 2.1 to 5.9. Increasing the number of cigarettes smoked among betel quid chewers was associated with a synergistic effect, reflective of the significant interaction between the two. Conclusion: To a large extent, the serious health consequences suffered by betel quid chewers were the result of the combined effects of smoking and chewing. Betel quid chewing should not be considered as an isolated issue, but should be viewed conjointly with cigarette smoking. Reducing cigarette smoking serves as an important first step in reducing betel quid chewing, and incorporating betel quid control into tobacco control may provide a new paradigm to attenuate the explosive increase in betel quid use in Taiwan.
Tobacco Control | 2005
S P Tsai; C P Wen; Susan C. Hu; T Y Cheng; S J Huang
Objective: To estimate productivity losses and financial costs to employers caused by cigarette smoking in the Taiwan workplace. Methods: The human capital approach was used to calculate lost productivity. Assuming the value of lost productivity was equal to the wage/salary rate and basing the calculations on smoking rate in the workforce, average days of absenteeism, average wage/salary rate, and increased risk and absenteeism among smokers obtained from earlier research, costs due to smoker absenteeism were estimated. Financial losses caused by passive smoking, smoking breaks, and occupational injuries were calculated. Results: Using a conservative estimate of excess absenteeism from work, male smokers took off an average of 4.36 sick days and male non-smokers took off an average of 3.30 sick days. Female smokers took off an average of 4.96 sick days and non-smoking females took off an average of 3.75 sick days. Excess absenteeism caused by employee smoking was estimated to cost US
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; S P Tsai; T Y Cheng; Chih Cheng Hsu; Ted Chen; H S Lin
178 million per annum for males and US
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; S P Tsai; Chien-Hung Chen; T Y Cheng; Tsai Mc; David T. Levy
6 million for females at a total cost of US
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; S P Tsai; T Y Cheng; Hui Ting Chan; Wen Shen Isabella Chung; Chien-Jen Chen
184 million per annum. The time men and women spent taking smoking breaks amounted to nine days per year and six days per year, respectively, resulting in reduced output productivity losses of US
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; Ted Chen; Y.-Y. Tsai; S P Tsai; Wen Shen Isabella Chung; T Y Cheng; David T. Levy; Chih Cheng Hsu; R. Peterson; W.-Y. Liu
733 million. Increased sick leave costs due to passive smoking were approximately US
Tobacco Control | 2005
Ming-Chin Yang; C Y Fann; Chi Pang Wen; T Y Cheng
81 million. Potential costs incurred from occupational injuries among smoking employees were estimated to be US
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; T Y Cheng; Michael P. Eriksen; S P Tsai; Chih Cheng Hsu
34 million. Conclusions: Financial costs caused by increased absenteeism and reduced productivity from employees who smoke are significant in Taiwan. Based on conservative estimates, total costs attributed to smoking in the workforce were approximately US
Tobacco Control | 2005
C P Wen; T Y Cheng; Lin Cl; Wu Hn; David T. Levy; Chen Lk; Chih Cheng Hsu; Michael P. Eriksen; Yang Hj; S P Tsai
1032 million.
Tobacco Control | 2005
T Y Cheng; C P Wen; S P Tsai; Wen Shen Isabella Chung; Chih Cheng Hsu
Objectives: To assess parental influence on smoking behaviour by high school students in an Asian culture and to compare the relative importance of parental and peer influence. Methods: A 5% nationally representative sample, including 44 976 high school students in 10th to 12th grade (aged 15–18 years) in Taiwan, were surveyed in 1995. Each completed a long self administered questionnaire. Parental influence was measured by examining both parental behaviour (smoking status) and attitudes (perceived “tender loving care” (TLC) by adolescents). Changes in smoking status were used to determine peer influence, defined as the increase in the likelihood of smoking from grade 10 to 12 in a steady state environment. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for parental and peer influence, using logistic regression. Results: Adolescents of smoking parents with low TLC had the highest smoking rates and those of non-smoking parents with high TLC had the lowest. The difference was more than twofold in boys and more than fourfold in girls. When either parental smoking status or TLC alone was considered, parental influence was similar to peer influence in boys, but larger than peer influence in girls. However, when smoking status and TLC were considered jointly, it became larger than peer influence for both groups (OR 2.8 v 1.8 for boys and OR 3.9 v 1.3 for girls). Conclusion: When parental influence is taken as parental behaviour and attitude together, it plays a more important role than peer influence in smoking among high school students in Taiwan. This study, characterising such relationships among Asian populations for the first time, implies that future prevention programmes should direct more efforts toward the parental smoking and parent–child relationships, and not aim exclusively at adolescents in schools.