Tadamichi Denda

Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study)

BACKGROUNDnFluorouracil and folinic acid with either oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) are widely used as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, infusional fluorouracil-based regimens, requiring continuous infusion and implantation of an intravenous port system, are inconvenient. We therefore planned an open-label randomised controlled trial to verify the non-inferiority of irinotecan plus oral S-1 (a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate; IRIS) to FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.nnnMETHODSnBetween Jan 30, 2006, and Jan 29, 2008, 426 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer needing second-line chemotherapy from 40 institutions in Japan were randomly assigned by a computer-based minimisation method to receive either FOLFIRI (n=213) or IRIS (n=213). In the FOLFIRI group, patients received folinic acid (200 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) and then a bolus injection of fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2)) over 46 h, repeated every 2 weeks. In the IRIS group, patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 1.333. Statistical analysis was on the basis of initially randomised participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00284258.nnnFINDINGSnAll randomised patients were included in the primary analysis. After a median follow-up of 12.9 months (IQR 11.5-18.2), median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the FOLFIRI group and 5.8 months in the IRIS group (hazard ratio 1.077, 95% CI 0.879-1.319, non-inferiority test p=0.039). The most common grade three or four adverse drug reactions were neutropenia (110 [52.1%] of 211 patients in the FOLFIRI group and 76 [36.2%] of 210 patients in the IRIS group; p=0.0012), leucopenia (33 [15.6%] in the FOLFIRI group and 38 [18.1%] in the IRIS group; p=0.5178), and diarrhoea (ten [4.7%] in the FOLFIRI group and 43 [20.5%] in the IRIS group; p<0.0001). One treatment-related death from hypotension due to shock was reported in the FOLFIRI group within 28 days after the end of treatment; no treatment-related deaths were reported in the IRIS group.nnnINTERPRETATIONnProgression-free survival with IRIS is not inferior to that with FOLFIRI in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment with IRIS could be an additional therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.nnnFUNDINGnTaiho Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd.

Randomized Phase III Study of 5-Fluorouracil Continuous Infusion vs. Sequential Methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil Therapy in Far Advanced Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis (JCOG0106)

OBJECTIVEnOwing to the risks of serious and sustained toxicity, anticancer drugs such as cisplatin and irinotecan cannot be readily administered to patients with gastric cancer and severe peritoneal metastasis. Therefore, a standard chemotherapy regimen has yet to be established for these types of patients. This randomized study investigated the utility of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy vs. 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.nnnMETHODSnEligible patients had radiologically confirmed peritoneal metastasis with intestinal stenosis, peritoneal tumor or ascites. Treatment with 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (800 mg/m(2)/day, ci, d1-5, q4w) or methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy (methotrexate, 100 mg/m(2), bolus infusion, followed 3 h later by 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m(2), bolus infusion, with leucovorin rescue, q1w) was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The projected sample size was 236, providing 80% power to detect a 40% increase in median overall survival in methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy with a one-sided α of 0.05.nnnRESULTSnAll 237 randomized patients were included in the primary analysis. The methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy arm was not superior to the 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion arm (median survival time, 9.4 months in the 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion arm, 10.6 months in the methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy arm; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.22; one-sided P = 0.31). Frequencies of Grade 3 or higher neutropenia, Grade 3 or higher anorexia and treatment-related deaths were 0.9, 27.4 and 1.7%, respectively, in the 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion arm, and 31.9, 33.6 and 0.9%, respectively, in the methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy arm.nnnCONCLUSIONSnMethotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy is not suitable for use as standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G)

BACKGROUNDnFOLFIRI and FOLFOX have shown equivalent efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but their comparative effectiveness is unknown when combined with bevacizumab.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnWJOG4407G was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial conducted in Japan. Patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1 to receive either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI + Bev) or mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6 + Bev), stratified by institution, adjuvant chemotherapy, and liver-limited disease. The primary end point was non-inferiority of FOLFIRI + Bev to mFOLFOX6 + Bev in progression-free survival (PFS), with an expected hazard ratio (HR) of 0.9 and non-inferiority margin of 1.25 (power 0.85, one-sided α-error 0.025). The secondary end points were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL) during 18 months. This trial is registered to the University Hospital Medical Information Network, number UMIN000001396.nnnRESULTSnAmong 402 patients enrolled from September 2008 to January 2012, 395 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The median PFS for FOLFIRI + Bev (n = 197) and mFOLFOX6 + Bev (n = 198) were 12.1 and 10.7 months, respectively [HR, 0.905; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.723-1.133; P = 0.003 for non-inferiority]. The median OS for FOLFIRI + Bev and mFOLFOX6 + Bev were 31.4 and 30.1 months, respectively (HR, 0.990; 95% CI 0.785-1.249). The best overall RRs were 64% for FOLFIRI + Bev and 62% for mFOLFOX6 + Bev. The common grade 3 or higher adverse events were leukopenia (11% in FOLFIRI + Bev/5% in mFOLFOX6 + Bev), neutropenia (46%/35%), diarrhea (9%/5%), febrile neutropenia (5%/2%), peripheral neuropathy (0%/22%), and venous thromboembolism (6%/2%). The QoL assessed by FACT-C (TOI-PFC) and FACT/GOG-Ntx was favorable for FOLFIRI + Bev during 18 months.nnnCONCLUSIONnFOLFIRI plus bevacizumab was non-inferior for PFS, compared with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, as the first-line systemic treatment for mCRC.nnnCLINICAL TRIALS NUMBERnUMIN000001396.

Impact of excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) on the outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer: correlative study in Japan Clinical Oncology Group Trial JCOG9912

BACKGROUNDnSince the best chemotherapy regimen for each patient with advanced gastric cancer is uncertain, we aimed to identify molecular prognostic or predictive biomarkers from biopsy specimens in JCOG9912, a randomized phase III trial for advanced gastric cancer.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnEndoscopic biopsy specimens from primary lesions were collected in 445 of 704 randomized patients in JCOG9912. We measured the mRNA expression of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1), thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and five other genes, then, categorized them into low and high groups relative to the median, and examined whether gene expression was associated with efficacy end point.nnnRESULTSnMultivariate analyses showed that high ERCC1 expression [HR 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.75; P = 0.010], performance status ≥ 1 (HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.13-1.86; P = 0.004), and number of metastatic sites ≥ 2 (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.28-1.86; P < 0.001) were associated with a poor prognosis, and recurrent disease (versus unresectable; HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.56-1.00; P = 0.049) was associated with a favorable prognosis. None of these molecular factors were a predictive marker for choosing irinotecan plus cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil rather than S-1.nnnCONCLUSIONnThese correlative analyses suggest that ERCC1 is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in the first-line treatment of gastric cancer.nnnCLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERnC000000062, www.umin.ac.jp.

A Phase II Clinical Study of mFOLFOX6 Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy for Japanese Advanced/Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Patients

Objective In Japan, there had been no prospective clinical studies conducted in terms of modified FOLFOX6 + bevacizumab therapy. We performed a post-marketing Phase II multicenter clinical study to examine the efficacy and safety of this regimen as first-line therapy for Japanese patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. Methods Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously, and then oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and levofolinate calcium (200 mg/m2) were infused intravenously over 2 h. Subsequently, a bolus dose of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) was injected, followed by infusion of 5-fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2) for 46 h. This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks until 24 cycles unless there was disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. The primary end point was the response rate. Results Among the 70 patients enrolled, two patients withdrew the study before treatment, and 68 patients were eligible for analysis of efficacy and safety. The response rate was 51.5% (95% confidence interval: 39.0–63.8%). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were 12.6 months (95% confidence interval: 10.4–14.5 months) and 28.5 months [95% confidence interval: 23.1 months–(not applicable)], respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths observed. The most common Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included neutropenia in 35.3% of the patients, peripheral neuropathy in 16.2% and hypertension in 16.2%. All adverse events were manageable and tolerable. The exploratory analysis of polymorphisms of three genes, ERCC1, XPD and GSTP1, did not show any trends in terms of correlation with the efficacy or safety of modified FOLFOX6 + bevacizumab therapy. Conclusions Modified FOLFOX6 + bevacizumab therapy was manageable and tolerable in Japanese patients, achieving a high response rate.

A phase II study of biweekly mitomycin C and irinotecan combination therapy in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer: a report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG0109-DI Trial)

BackgroundPreclinical studies have shown that mitomycin C (MMC) acts synergistically with irinotecan (CPT-11). In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of MMC/CPT-11 therapy as second-line chemotherapy for patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer.MethodsEligible patients had evidence of tumor progression despite prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens or had relapsed within 6xa0months after completion of therapy with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines. Treatment consisted of MMC (5xa0mg/m2) and CPT-11 (150xa0mg/m2) administered i.v. every 2xa0weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). Our hypothesis was that this combination therapy was efficacious when the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the RR exceeded 20% of the threshold RR.ResultsBetween April 2002 and July 2003, 45 eligible patients were registered and analyzed. Among the 45 patients, 40 (89%) had previously received chemotherapy for metastasis and 24 (53%) had a performance status (PS) of 0. Thirteen partial responses were obtained among the 45 patients, resulting in an overall RR of 29% (95% CI, 16–42%). The median time to progression was 4.1xa0months, and the median survival time was 10xa0months, with a 1-year survival rate of 36%. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 29% of the patients, whereas febrile neutropenia occurred in 9%. The incidence rates of grade 3 nausea and diarrhea were 13 and 2%, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough this study did not achieve the per-protocol definition of activity, the progression-free survival and overall survival appeared to be promising, with acceptable tolerability. Thus, MMC/CPT-11 therapy as second-line chemotherapy for fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced gastric cancer presents a potential treatment option in patients with a good PS.

Randomized study of FOLFIRI plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab for wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer-WJOG 6210G

This randomized phase II trial compared panitumumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI as second‐line chemotherapy for wild‐type (WT) KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and to explore the values of oncogenes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and serum proteins as predictive biomarkers. Patients with WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC refractory to first‐line chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin and bevacizumab were randomly assigned to panitumumab plus FOLFIRI or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. Of 121 randomly assigned patients, 117 were eligible. Median overall survival (OS) for panitumumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI were 16.2 and 13.4 months [hazard ratio (HR), 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76–1.77], respectively. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was also similar (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.78–1.66). KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF status using ctDNA was successfully examined in 109 patients, and mutations were identified in 19 patients (17.4%). Panitumumab plus FOLFIRI showed favorable survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in WT patients and unfavorable survival in those with mutations (P for interaction = 0.026 in OS and 0.054 in PFS). OS with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI was better than panitumumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with high serum vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A) levels and worse in those with low levels (P for interaction = 0.016). Second‐line FOLFIRI plus panitumumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab showed a similar efficacy in patients with WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC. RAS and BRAF mutation in ctDNA could be a negative predictive marker for panitumumab.

A phase 3 non-inferiority study of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results of the FIRIS study.

PurposeThe FIRIS study previously demonstrated non-inferiority of IRIS (irinotecan plus S-1) to FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan) for progression-free survival as the second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as the primary endpoint. The overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of the primary analysis.MethodsBetween 30 January 2006 and 29 January 2008, 426 patients with mCRC who failed in first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either FOLFIRI or IRIS. After the primary analysis, the follow-up survey was cut off on 29 July 2010, and the final OS data were analysed.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 39.2xa0months, the median OS was 17.4xa0months in the FOLFIRI group and 17.8xa0months in the IRIS group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.900; 95xa0% confidence interval (CI) 0.728–1.112]. In the pre-planned subgroup of patients who received prior chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin, the median OS was 12.7xa0months in the FOLFIRI group and 15.3xa0months in the IRIS group (HR 0.755; 95xa0% CI 0.580–0.983).ConclusionsIRIS is non-inferior to FOLFIRI for OS as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC. IRIS can be an option for second-line chemotherapy of mCRC. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00284258).

Phase II study of biweekly irinotecan and mitomycin C combination therapy in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer

PurposeExperimental studies have shown that mitomycin C (MMC) acts synergistically with irinotecan. We evaluated the antitumor activity and toxicity of a combination of irinotecan and MMC in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to fluoropyrimidines.MethodsEligible patients had evidence of tumor progression while receiving fluoropyrimidine-based regimens or had disease recurrence within 6xa0months after the completion of adjuvant treatment with fluoropyrimidines. Irinotecan (150xa0mg/m2) and MMC (5xa0mg/m2) were administered on daysxa01 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was repeated every 4xa0weeks.ResultsAmong the 41 patients enrolled, 37 (90%) had received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and 4 had received adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Objective responses were observed in 14 patients (34%, 95% confidence interval 20–49%). The median time to progression was 4.2xa0months, and the median survival time was 11.9xa0months. The study treatment was well tolerated; the median number of cycles received was four. Gradexa03 or 4 neutropenia, the most common toxic effect, occurred in 20 patients (49%). Gradexa03 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in four patients (10%) and gradexa03 diarrhea in one patient.ConclusionsOur results suggest that irinotecan and MMC combination therapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Further clinical investigation of this regimen is warranted.

Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study

This article compares the efficacy between regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy, who had access to both drugs, to determine whether a further prospective comparative trial should be conducted.