Takahiro Michiba

Prognostic significance of body mass index before treatment for head and neck cancer.

Patients with head and neck cancer frequently experience malnutrition. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of nutritional status on prognosis and its association with treatment modalities.

Factors associated with malnutrition in patients with head and neck cancer

Abstract Conclusions: Comorbidities as well as T classification were the primary determinants for the nutritional status of patients with head and neck cancer. Objectives: We aimed to elucidate the underlying conditions of malnutrition in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 726 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer between 2004 and 2013. Associations between malnutrition and clinical parameters were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Median body mass index was 21.5 (range 11.6–38.0). According to World Health Organization criteria, the nutritional status of these patients was classified into four groups: underweight (18%), normal (63%), overweight (17%), and obese (1%). Comorbidities were detected in 40% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors to be independent factors associated with malnutrition: advanced T stage, metachronous cancer, collagen disease, gastrointestinal disease, and pulmonary disease.

Transaminase Activity Predicts Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

Various serum biomarkers have been developed for predicting head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) prognosis. However, none of them have been proven to be clinically significant. A recent study reported that the ratio of aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) to alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) had a prognostic effect on non-metastatic cancers. This study aimed to examine the effect of the AST/ALT ratio on the survival of patients with HNSCC. Clinical data of 356 patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC were collected. The effect of the AST/ALT ratio on overall survival was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Moreover, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to divide the patients into groups on the basis of the clinical stage and AST/ALT ratio. The prognostic ability of this grouping was validated using an independent data set (N = 167). The AST/ALT ratio ranged from 0.42 to 4.30 (median, 1.42) and was a prognostic factor for overall survival that was independent of age, primary sites, and tumor stage (hazard ratio: 1.36, confidence interval: 1.08−1.68, P = 0.010). RPA divided patients with stage IVA into the following two subgroups: high AST/ALT (≥2.3) and low AST/ALT (<2.3) subgroups. The 5-year survival rate for patients with stage III, stage IVA with a low AST/ALT ratio, stage IVA with a high AST/ALT ratio, and stage IVB were 64.8%, 49.2%, 28.6%, and 33.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared with the low AST/ALT group, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 2.17 for high AST/ALT group (confidence interval: 1.02–.22 P = 0.045). The AST/ALT ratio was demonstrated to be a prognostic factor of HNSCC. The ratio subdivided patients with stage IVA into low- and high-risk groups. Moreover, intensified treatment for the high-risk group may be considered.

Metabolic tumor volume of primary tumor predicts survival better than T classification in the larynx preservation approach

We aimed to determine whether pretreatment metabolic tumor volume of the primary tumor (T‐MTV) or T classification would be a better predictor of laryngectomy‐free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer requiring total laryngectomy. We analyzed 85 patients using a Cox proportional hazards model and evaluated its usefulness by Akaikes information criterion. A T‐MTV cut‐off value was determined by time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Interobserver reliability for measuring T‐MTV was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). After adjustment for covariables, T‐MTV, irrespective of whether a continuous or dichotomized variable, and T classification remained independent predictors of LFS and OS. Large T‐MTV (>28.7 mL) was associated with inferior LFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97–8.70; P = 0.0003) and inferior OS (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.47–6.69; P = 0.004) compared with small T‐MTV (≤28.7 mL). The T‐MTV model outperformed the T classification model in predicting LFS and OS (P = 0.007 and 0.01, respectively). Three‐year LFS and OS rates for patients with small versus large T‐MTV were 68% vs 9% (P < 0.0001) and 77% vs 25% (P < 0.0001), respectively, whereas those for patients with T2‐T3 versus T4a were 61% vs 31% (P = 0.003) and 71% vs 48% (P = 0.10), respectively. ICC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00). Given the excellent interobserver reliability, T‐MTV is better than T classification to identify patients who would benefit from the larynx preservation approach.

Development and validation of a new comorbidity index for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Japan

Due to habitual drinking and smoking and advanced age at diagnosis, patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) frequently present with comorbidities. Several comorbidity indices have been developed and validated for HNSCC. However, none have become the standard method. In this study, we developed a new comorbidity index for Japanese patients with HNSCC, which was validated against an independent data set. A Cox proportional hazards analysis of 698 patients identified dementia, connective tissue diseases, and second primary malignancies in the oesophagus, head and neck, lungs, and stomach as prognostic comorbidities for overall survival. The Osaka head and neck comorbidity index (OHNCI) was generated from the weighted points of these comorbidities. In the independent data set, the 5-year overall survival rates for the low, moderate, and high scoring OHNCI groups were 62.1%, 64.3%, and 37.7%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the high scoring OHNCI group was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–3.13; P = 0.031). The model including the OHNCI exhibited a higher prognostic capability compared to those including other commonly used comorbidity indices. The OHNCI could become the primary choice for comorbidity assessment in patients with HNSCC in Japan.

Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as a prognostic factor of hypopharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy

Abstract Conclusion: The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) was associated with overall survival, disease-specific survival, and non-cancer death in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC). Further studies using other CRT regimens are required. Objective: To investigate the impact of the ACCI on survival in patients with HPC. Methods: This study reviewed 128 patients with HPC who received CRT between 2004–2012. The survival rates and the cumulative incidence of non-cancer death according to the ACCI were estimated. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) of the ACCI. Results: The disease-specific survival rates at 3 years for the low ACCI group, moderate group, and high group were 80.1%, 45.8%, and 54.8%, respectively (p = 0.007). The laryngectomy-free survival rates at 3 years were 61%, 39.7%, and 37.1%, respectively (p = 0.137). The cumulative incidences of non-HPC death were 5% for the low/moderate ACCI group and 15.5% for the high ACCI group (p = 0.031). The HRs compared to the low ACCI group for overall survival, disease-specific survival, and laryngectomy-free survival were 2.61 and 2.74, 2.55 and 2.27, and 1.75 and 1.97 in the moderate and high ACCI groups, respectively.

Efficacy and safety of management by only falecalcitriol for patients with postoperative hypoparathyroidism

Efficacy and safety of management by only falecalcitriol for patients with postoperative hypoparathyroidism: Susumu Nakahara1), Atsushi Hanamoto1), Toshimichi Yasui2), Yukinori Takenaka2), Yoshifumi Yamamoto2), Takahito Fukusumi1), Takahiro Michiba1) and Hidenori Inohara1). 1)Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2)Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center