Takao Ayabe

One-year effectiveness and safety of open-label losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in Japanese patients with hypertension uncontrolled with ARBs or ACE inhibitors

The long-term antihypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations have not been appropriately evaluated in Japan. In this study, treated hypertensive patients taking angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) regimens not at blood pressure (BP) goals proposed by the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) were switched to losartan/HCTZ combinations and followed for 1 year. Data analysis included 244 patients aged 64.5±10.7 years, 56% male, 27% with diabetes mellitus and 36% with dyslipidemia. Pre-switching BP 157±16/88±10 mm Hg promptly decreased and maintained a steady state, reaching 132±15/77±9 mm Hg (P<0.001) 1 year later. After 1 year of treatment, 50% of patients cleared the goals of the JSH guideline for systolic BP and 79% for diastolic BP. Patients with maximal doses of ARBs tended to show larger decreases in BP (159±11/90±10 to 128±10/75±8 mm Hg, P<0.001, n=32). Clinical and laboratory adverse events were reported for 29 patients (11%), but serious abnormalities were not observed. In particular, plasma levels of uric acid (UA) were well-maintained for 1 year, and significant decreases in UA were observed in patients with higher levels of UA (⩾7.0 mg dl−1). Losartan/HCTZ combinations showed strong and steady hypotensive abilities and acceptable safety and tolerability in patients currently not at BP goals with regimens including ARBs or ACEIs in Japan.

Comparison of combination therapies, including the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan and either a calcium channel blocker or a thiazide diuretic, in elderly patients with hypertension

The blood pressure goals set for the treatment of hypertensive patients have been lowered in recent guidelines. To reduce blood pressure levels sufficiently, combination therapies are often needed, but there is little evidence about which combination should be chosen. The present study was carried out to compare the effects of combination therapies, including the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan and either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a thiazide diuretic, in elderly patients with hypertension. A total of 65 patients aged 65–85 years, with blood pressures of 140/90 mm Hg or higher for those taking antihypertensive medication or 160/100 mm Hg or higher for those not on medication, were randomly assigned to either the group treated with olmesartan plus a dihydropyridine CCB or the group treated with olmesartan plus a thiazide diuretic; 58 patients completed the treatment for 6 months. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were reduced during the treatment period in both the groups. The reductions in SBP at 1 and 6 months were significantly (P<0.05) greater in the CCB combination group than in the diuretic group (−29 vs. −18 mm Hg, respectively, at 1 month; −32 vs. −23 mm Hg, respectively, at 6 months). Despite greater reduction in SBP in the CCB group, the serum creatinine level and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained unchanged, whereas in the diuretic group, creatinine was elevated (+0.06 mg per 100 ml, P<0.05) and eGFR was reduced (−4.5 ml min−1 per 1.73 m2). In addition, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were reduced in the diuretic group (−5.0 mg per 100 ml, P<0.01). These results suggest that olmesartan plus a CCB is the preferable combination therapy in comparison with olmesartan plus a thiazide diuretic for elderly patients with hypertension.

Three-Year Safety and Effectiveness of Fixed-Dose Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination Therapy in Japanese Patients with Hypertension Under Clinical Setting (PALM-1 Extension Study)

Concerns about metabolic complications often disturb prolonged use of diuretics in Japan. We investigated 3-year safety and efficacy in Japanese patients with hypertension who were uncontrolled with angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor regimens and then switched to losartan (50 mg)/hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg; HCTZ) combinations. Blood pressure decreased favorably and maintained a steady state for 3 years (157 ± 16/88 ± 11 mm Hg to 132 ± 13/75 ± 9 mm Hg, P < .0001). Metabolic parameters maintained a limited range of changes after 3 years, and adverse events were markedly decreased after 1-year treatment. The losartan/HCTZ combination minimized diuretic-related adverse effects and thus may be useful for the treatment of Japanese patients with hypertension.

Differential blood pressure reductions by angiotensin receptor blocker plus calcium channel blocker or diuretic in elderly hypertension with or without obesity

We conducted the Miyazaki Olmesartan Therapy for Hypertension in the EldeRly (MOTHER) study, which suggested that there are preferable effects of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), olmesartan, plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB) over the ARB plus a diuretic, in elderly patients with hypertension. In this subanalysis, we examined whether obesity influences the efficacies of these combination therapies. The study subjects were 58 hypertensive patients ages 65 to 85, who had been randomly assigned to either group treated with olmesartan plus a CCB or a diuretic and completed the treatment for 6 months. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced following these combination treatments in nonobese and obese patients. In the CCB combination, blood pressure reductions in nonobese patients were larger than in obese patients at 1 and 3 months, and serum creatinine remained unchanged despite the greater reduction of blood pressure. Meanwhile, such differences were not noted in the diuretic groups. Plasma aldosterone was significantly reduced in nonobese patients of two combination groups, but not in those with obesity. ARB plus CCB combination therapy might be preferably chosen for nonobese elderly patients, whereas the influence of obesity seems smaller in the efficacy of ARB plus a diuretic.