Takashi Hamamura

Subchronic cocaine treatment enhances cocaine-induced dopamine efflux, studied by in vivo intracerebral dialysis.

Repeated administration of cocaine in animals results in behavioral sensitization. In order to investigate the neurochemical mechanism underlying such behavioral sensitization, we designed the following two experiments. In both experiments, rats were pretreated with cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p.) or saline, once daily for 14 consecutive days. Exp. 1: 7 days after withdrawal from the drug, the stereotyped behavioral response to a challenge of cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p.) was measured. Exp. 2: 7 days after withdrawal from the drug, we measured extracellular dopamine (DA), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) after the challenge administration of cocaine using an in vivo intracerebral dialysis technique. The rats pretreated with cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p.) exhibited behavioral augmentation in response to a challenge of cocaine. The challenge administration of cocaine caused an increase in DA and a decrease in DOPAC. The DA level in the striatal perfusates of the cocaine-pretreated rats was significantly greater than that in the saline-pretreated rats. These results suggest that the increased extracellular DA concentration in the striatum plays an important role in the cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization.

Association study of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene with bipolar disorder.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) belongs to a family of neurotrophic factors and has been demonstrated to promote the survival, differentiation, and maintenance of a broad variety of central nervous system neurons. Several reports have suggested that the BDNF gene is a plausible functional candidate gene underlying the predisposition for developing bipolar disorder (BPD). In the present study, we investigated the possible role of the BDNF gene in the etiology of BPD using a matched case-control association design in a Japanese population. There was no evidence for an allelic or genotypic association of two polymorphisms (-1360C>T and 196G>A) of the BDNF gene with BPD. Furthermore, no significant association was observed between these polymorphisms and either of two diagnostic subtypes (bipolars I and II disorder). The results suggest that the BDNF gene is unlikely to confer susceptibility to BPD.

Effects of selective D-1 and D-2 dopamine antagonists on development of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization

The present study examined effects of selective antagonists of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors on the development of behavioral sensitization produced by repeated methamphetamine (MAP) administration. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups. Each group received a daily injection of saline (control group), 4 mg/kg MAP (MAP group), 1 mg/kg YM-09151-2 plus 4 mg/kg MAP (YM+MAP group) or 0.5 mg/kg SCH 23390 plus 4 mg/kg MAP (SCH+MAP group) for 14 days. During daily injection for 14 days, the MAP group exhibited a progressive augmentation in locomotor and stereotyped behavior, whereas the progression of such behaviors in the YM+MAP and SCH+MAP group was completely prevented. After an abstinence period of 7 days, all groups received a challenge of 2 mg/kg MAP. The MAP challenge reproduced hyperlocomotion and intense stereotyped behavior only in the MAP group. However, neither the YM+MAP group nor the SCH+MAP group showed sterotypy. The manner in which both groups showed only hyperlocomotion was similar to that observed in the control group. These results indicate that both selective D-1 antagonists and selective D-2 antagonists not only reverse MAP-induced motor effects at each injection but also prevent the development of behavioral sensitization induced by repeated MAP administration.

Enhanced extracellular dopamine level may be the fundamental neuropharmacological basis of cross-behavioral sensitization between methamphetamine and cocaine — an in vivo dialysis study in freely moving rats

Intracerebral dialysis was used to study the mechanism underlying cross-behavioral sensitization between methamphetamine (MAP) and cocaine. The challenge injection of cocaine caused a significantly greater increase in striatal perfusate dopamine (DA) levels in MAP-pretreated rats than in saline-pretreated rats. Similarly, the challenge injection of MAP caused a significantly greater increase in extracellular DA levels in cocaine-pretreated rats than in control rats. These results suggest that an enhancement in striatal DA efflux may play an important role in cross-behavioral sensitization between MAP and cocaine.

Co-administration of either a selective D1 or D2 dopamine antagonist with methamphetamine prevents methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and neurochemical change, studied by in vivo intracerebral dialysis

Repeated administration of amphetamine or methamphetamine (MAP) causes behavioral sensitization in animals. Recently, several studies have revealed that in vivo release of dopamine from presynaptic nerve terminals of mesotelencephalic dopamine neurons is enhanced when sensitized animals are rechallenged with a psychostimulant. The present study investigated the effect of co-administration of SCH 23390 (a selective D1 dopamine receptor antagonist) or YM-09151-2 (a selective D2 dopamine receptor antagonist) prior to each MAP injection for 14 days on dopamine efflux in the striatal perfusates using in vivo dialysis. After 3 months drug abstinence, MAP challenge alone produced augmented stereotypy in the MAP group, but not in the control, the SCH 23390 + MAP or the YM-09151-2 + MAP group. In parallel with this behavioral observation, the degree to which dopamine efflux increased following the MAP challenge was significantly greater in the MAP group than that in the control, SCH 23390 + MAP group and the YM-09151-2 + MAP groups. While dopamine efflux after MAP challenge did not differ between the control and the YM-09151-2 + MAP group, it was greater in the SCH 23390 + MAP group than the control group. These results indicate that both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors play a role in the formation of behavioral sensitization, but with different mechanisms.

Chronic lithium treatment decreases tau lesions by promoting ubiquitination in a mouse model of tauopathies

Lithium, a widely used drug for treating affective disorders, is known to inhibit glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), which is one of the major tau kinases. Thus, lithium could have therapeutic benefit in neurodegenerative tauopathies by reducing tau hyperphosphorylation. We tested this hypothesis and showed that long-term administration of lithium at relatively low therapeutic concentrations to transgenic mice that recapitulate Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-like tau pathologies reduces tau lesions, primarily by promoting their ubiquitination rather than by inhibiting tau phosphorylation. These findings suggest novel mechanisms whereby lithium treatment could ameliorate tauopathies including AD. Because lithium also has been shown to reduce the burden of amyloid-β pathologies, it is plausible that lithium could reduce the formation of both amyloid plaques and tau tangles, the two pathological hallmarks of AD, and thereby ameliorate the behavioral deficits in AD.

Effect of MK-801 on endogenous dopamine release in vivo

The effect of MK-801 on striatal dopamine (DA) release was investigated by using an in vivo microdialysis technique in the freely moving rat. Systemic injection of MK-801 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced the extracellular level of DA significantly and produced no change in the level of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. The behavioral observation, recorded simultaneously, revealed that MK-801, with smaller doses, produced ipsilateral circling toward the side with the dialysis probe. At larger doses, MK-801 predominantly evoked ataxia. These findings indicate that the behavioral effect of MK-801 may not be mediated via the release of DA.

Ceruletide suppresses endogenous dopamine release via vagal afferent system, studied by in vivo intracerebral dialysis

Ceruletide, a cholecystokinin-related decapeptide, has been reported to have some therapeutic effects on tardive dyskinesia and other involuntary movement disorders. In order to clarify the effects of ceruletide on dopaminergic activity in the rat striatum, we measured the release of endogenous dopamine (DA), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) after intraperitoneal administration of ceruletide (2, 20, 200 micrograms/kg) using in vivo intracerebral dialysis techniques. After administration of ceruletide (200 micrograms/kg), extracellular DA decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) for 0.5-3 h. The maximal reduction of extracellular DA (by 29%) was observed for 2-2.5 h. Extracellular DA was reduced (21%) by 20 but not by 2 micrograms/kg ceruletide. DOPAC and HVA did not change at any dose of ceruletide. We also demonstrated that bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy blocked this inhibitory effect of ceruletide on DA release. These findings indicate that peripherally administered ceruletide suppresses endogenous DA release via the vagal afferent system.

Clozapine- and Olanzapine-induced Fos Expression in the Rat Medial Prefrontal Cortex is Mediated by β-Adrenoceptors

The atypical neuroleptics, clozapine and olanzapine, have superior therapeutic efficacy against the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, compared with the typical neuroleptics. Recently, it has been suggested that the ability of clozapine and olanzapine to induce Fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), contribute to their therapeutic efficacy. However, the mechanisms underlying the neuropharmacological effects of clozapine and olanzapine in the mPFC remain elusive. In the present study, we demonstrate that clozapine- and olanzapine-induced Fos expression in the mPFC are inhibited by propranolol. We also show that clozapine and olanzapine induce Fos expression in the locus coeruleus. These results suggest that clozapine and olanzapine increase noradrenaline release by stimulating noradrenergic neuronal activity in the locus coeruleus and, consequently, increased noradrenaline induce Fos expression in the mPFC via β-adrenergic receptors. This postulated sequence may be one of mechanisms by which clozapine-like atypical neuroleptics are more effective for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Unique pharmacological profile of aripiprazole as the phasic component buster

RationaleAripiprazole is a recently introduced antipsychotic with a unique pharmacological profile, a dopamine partial agonist. Dopaminergic neural transmission has two different components, tonic and phasic, which have different physiological functions, but the effects of aripiprazole on tonic and phasic components are not reported.ObjectiveStudies on antipsychotics including aripiprazole and tonic/phasic dopamine transmission are summarized.ResultsAntipsychotics exert efficacy without extrapyramidal side effects (EPS’s) when their occupation of dopamine D2 receptors reaches 65–80%. When a “tightly binding” antipsychotic binds 70% of D2 receptors, the remaining 30% are available for endogenous dopamine to bind. These tight antipsychotics suppress dopamine transmission in both tonic/phasic components equally so that similar proportions are kept. Aripiprazole is effective when >90% of D2 receptors are occupied. In this condition, less than 10% of D2 receptors are available for endogenous dopamine to bind; however, EPS’s do not occur because aripiprazole exerts partial dopaminergic agonistic activity. Because the concentration of aripiprazole in the brain is relatively constant and it binds to D2 receptors tightly, the added dopaminergic agonism may show a tonic nature. Thus, aripiprazole suppresses the phasic component relatively more than the tonic component. In contrast, under treatment with “loosely binding” antipsychotics, phasic dopaminergic transmission is relatively preserved.ConclusionsTight antipsychotics suppress both tonic and phasic components equally. Aripiprazole suppresses the phasic component relatively more than the tonic; that is, aripiprazole is a tonic component buster. By contrast, suppression of the phasic component by loosely binding antipsychotics may be relatively weak.