Takashi Takeshita

Clinical significance of monitoring ESR1 mutations in circulating cell-free DNA in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients

Background The measurement of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may transform the management of breast cancer patients. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of sequential measurements of ESR1 mutations in primary breast cancer (PBC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Results ESR1 mutations ratio in the PBC groups was used as the minimum cutoff for determining increases in cfDNA ESR1 mutation ratio. An increase in cfDNA ESR1 mutations was found in 13 samples of cfDNA from 12 (28.6%) out of 42 MBC patients. A total of 10 (83.3%) out of 12 MBC patients with increase cfDNA ESR1 mutations showed a poor response to treatment. In survival analysis, increase cfDNA ESR1 mutations may predict a shorter duration of post-endocrine-therapy effectiveness (P = 0.0033). Methods A total of 119 patients (253 plasma samples) with breast carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Cases were selected if archival plasma samples were available from PBC before and after treatment and from MBC gathered more than twice at the time of progression. cfDNA was isolated from the 77 PBC patients (154 plasma samples) and from the 42 MBC patients (99 plasma samples). To investigate any changes in each cfDNA ESR1 mutation before and after treatment, we analyzed the difference with cfDNA ESR1 mutations ratio in the first blood sample using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Conclusions We demonstrate that ddPCR monitoring of the recurrent ESR1 mutation in cfDNA of MBC patients is a feasible and useful method of providing relevant predictive information.

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assay for screening of ESR1 mutations in 325 breast cancer specimens

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), which could perform thousands of PCRs on a nanoliter scale simultaneously, would be an attractive method to massive parallel sequencing for identifying and studying the significance of low-frequency rare mutations. Recent evidence has shown that the key potential mechanisms of the failure of aromatase inhibitors-based therapy involve identifying activating mutations affecting the ligand-binding domain of the ESR1 gene. Therefore, the detection of ESR1 mutations may be useful as a biomarker predicting an effect of the treatment. We aimed to develop a ddPCR-based method for the sensitive detection of ESR1 mutations in 325 breast cancer specimens, in which 270 primary and 55 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) specimens. Our ddPCR assay could detect the ESR1 mutant molecules with low concentration of 0.25 copies/μL. According to the selected cutoff, ESR1 mutations occurred in 7 (2.5%) of 270 primary breast cancer specimens and in 11 (20%) of 55 ER+ MBC specimens. Among the 11 MBC specimens, 5 specimens (45.5%) had the most common ESR1 mutation, Y537S, 4 specimens (36.3%) each had D538G, Y537N, and Y537C. Interestingly, 2 patients had 2 ESR1 mutations, Y537N/D538G and Y537S/Y537C, and 2 patients had 3 ESR1 mutations, Y537S/Y537N/D538G. Biopsy was performed in heterochrony in 8 women twice. In 8 women, 4 women had primary breast cancer and MBC specimens and 4 women had 2 specimens when treatment was failure. Four of these 8 women acquired ESR1 mutation, whereas no ESR1 mutation could be identified at first biopsy. ddPCR technique could be a promising tool for the next-generation sequencing-free precise detection of ESR1 mutations in endocrine therapy resistant cases and may assist in determining the treatment strategy.

Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutations of cell-free DNA in early-stage triple negative breast cancer

PIK3CA is an oncogene that encodes the p110α component of phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K); it is the second most frequently mutated gene following the TP53 gene. In the clinical setting, PIK3CA mutations may have favorable prognostic value for hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer patients and, during the past few years, PIK3CA mutations of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) have attracted attention as a potential noninvasive biomarker of cancer. However, there are few reports on the clinical implications of PIK3CA mutations for TNBC patients. We investigated the PIK3CA major mutation status of cfDNA as a noninvasive biomarker of cancer using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), which has high level sensitivity and specificity for cancer mutation, in early‐stage 49 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. A total of 12 (24.4%) of 49 patients had PIK3CA mutations of cfDNA. In a median follow up of 54.4 months, the presence of PIK3CA mutations of cfDNA had significant impacts on relapse‐free survival (RFS; P = 0.0072) and breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS; P = 0.016), according to the log‐lank test. In a Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of PIK3CA mutations of cfDNA had significant prognostic value in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Additionally, the presence of PIK3CA mutations of cfDNA was significantly correlated with positive androgen receptor phosphorylated form depending on PI3K signaling pathway (pAR) which is independent favorable prognostic factors of TNBC. We demonstrated that the presence of PIK3CA major mutations of cfDNA could be a discriminatory predictor of RFS and BCSS in early‐stage TNBC patients and it was associated with PI3K pathway‐dependent AR phosphorylation.

Clinical significance of androgen receptor and its phosphorylated form in breast cancer

Attention to hormone receptor (HR) function in breast cancer has largely focused on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), andhuman epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2). The success of therapies targeted at these receptors has led to interest in androgen receptor (AR), a member of the steroid receptor (SR) subfamily, as another possible target in breast cancer therapy. Immunohistochemical studies have revealed an independent prognostic value of AR in ERa-positive breast cancer (Castellano et al. 2010), and the prognosis of AR-positive/ERa-negative tumors has been reported to be better than that of AR-negative one (Kuenen-Boumeester et al. 1996). These studies have revealed that AR plays an inherent role in breast cancer cell signaling. Much effort has been invested in elucidating the mechanism of action of AR in human epithelial cells. This includes research on posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, and sumoylation (Ward & Weigel 2009). Among these, AR phosphorylation has been shown to play a critical role in signal transduction (Lin et al. 2001), and a large number of phosphorylation sites have been identified, with the majority near the N-terminus. AR is phosphorylated at serine-213/210 (pAR) by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway (Wen et al. 2000), which modulates AR transcriptional activity (Lin et al. 2001, 2003). The objectives of the current study were to examine AR and pAR levels in a large series of breast cancers and to assess the impactofARandpAR expressiononrelapsefree survival (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in all breast cancers. A total of 379 consecutive patients (median age 58 years (range 21–93)) with invasive breast cancer were enrolled from a database that included patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the pathology findings at the initial and relapse diagnoses. All patients signed informed consent forms and were treated at the Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery of our center in the period between 2001 and 2009. Patients were periodically examined at the Kumamoto University Hospital or affiliated hospitals. The median follow-up period was 66.1 months (range 0.23–145.1 months). AR was detected with mouse monoclonal AR-318 from Leica Biosystems (Newcastle, UK). Phospho-AR was detected with mouse monoclonal 156C135.2 from Abcam plc (Cambridge, UK). The levels of AR nuclear protein expression were determined in tissue samples of 379 consecutive female patients. In samples that showed detectable AR, the levels of pAR nuclear and cytoplasmic expression were determined because pAR may be strongly stained even if AR staining is weak (Fig. 1A). All samples were scored using a histoscore (HS), multiplying the percentage (0–100) of cells stained at a given intensity by the staining intensity score (IS) (0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, intense). AR and nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of pAR were observed in benign breast tissue. However, the patterns of both AR and phosphorylated AR expression were increased in breast cancers compared with benign controls (Ren et al. 2013). Compared with other studies in which AR expression was dichotomized as having positive cells or not, we used a HS (O10) for AR and a IS (R2) for pAR as a cutoff point, which we believe more accurately reflects the expression of AR and its phosphorylation status in breast cancer (Fig. 1A). The median HS was 126 in nuclear AR, 112 in nuclear pAR, and zero in cytoplasmic pAR (Fig. 1B). Nuclear staining of AR was observed in 76% of the samples. The correlation of AR expression and patient characteristics is summarized in Table 1. Positive ARs were found in the groups of patients with lower nuclear grade (PZ0.0008), positive ERa (P!0.0001), positive PgR E n d o cr in e -R e la te d C a n ce r Letter to the editor T Takeshita et al. AR and AR phosphorylation in breast cancer 20 :5 L15–L21

Fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 protein expression is associated with prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative primary breast cancer

Recently, research into the development of new targeted therapies has focused on specific genetic alterations to create advanced, more personalized treatment. One of the target genes, fibroblast growth factor receptor‐1 (FGFR1), has been reported to be amplified in estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive subtype breast cancer, and is considered one possible mechanism of endocrine resistance through cross‐talk between ER and growth factor receptor signaling. We performed a comprehensive analysis of FGFR1 at the levels of gene copy number, transcript and protein expression, and examined the relationships between FGFR1 status and clinicopathological parameters, including prognosis in 307 ER‐positive/HER2‐negative primary breast cancer patients treated with standard care at our institute. Most notably, a high level of FGFR1 protein expression was observed in 85 patients (27.7%), and was positively associated with invasive tumor size (P = 0.039). Furthermore, univariate analysis revealed that high FGFR1 protein expression was significantly correlated with poor relapse‐free survival rate (P = 0.0019, HR: 2.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.17–5.98), and showed a tendency towards an increase in recurrent events if the observation period extended beyond the 5 years of the standard endocrine treatment term. FGFR1 gain/amplification was found in 43 (14.0%) patients, which was only associated with higher nuclear grade (P = 0.010). No correlation was found between FGFR1 mRNA expression levels and any clinicopathological factors. Overall, the level of FGFR1 protein expression may be a biomarker of ER‐positive/HER2‐negative primary breast cancer with possible resistance to standard treatment, and may be a useful tool to identify more specific patients who would benefit from FGFR‐1 targeted therapy.

C6ORF97-ESR1 breast cancer susceptibility locus: influence on progression and survival in breast cancer patients

Genome-wide association studies have identified a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) to be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The biology of one of the susceptibility locus C6ORF-ESR1 and whether it also contributes to progression of established disease has not yet been ascertained. We examined the association of rs2046210 and its six linkage disequilibrium SNPs with clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and gene expression levels of ESR1 and the C6ORFs (C6ORF97:CCDC170, C6ORF211, C6ORF96:RMND1) in 344 breast cancer tissue samples and 253 corresponding samples of adjacent normal tissue. Tumor genotypes with homozygous risk alleles were more frequent than normal tissues. The tumor genotypes of rs2046210 and rs6929137 with homozygous risk alleles showed worse relapse-free survival (RFS, P=0.038 and P=0.031, respectively), whereas no notable associations were observed with either clinicopathological characteristics or expression of the peripheral genes. Higher C6ORF97 expression correlated with ER negativity (P<0.0001), highly proliferative characteristics (P=0.0005 for Ki67, P<0.0001 for nuclear grade) and worse RFS in the ER+/HER2− cohort (P=0.013), whereas the other two C6ORFs showed the inverse associations. Furthermore, C6ORF97 showed significant worse prognostic values especially in luminal B subtype in the publically available data sets. rs2046210 and the upstream gene C6ORF97 might have substantial roles not only in carcinogenesis but also in progression toward a more aggressive phenotype in breast cancer patients, which suggests that functional studies of this locus are imperative.

Analysis of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in plasma cell-free DNA from ER-positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND The measurement of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been studied as a non-invasive method to quickly assess and monitor endocrine therapy (ET) resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. METHODS The subjects of this retrospective study were a total of 185 plasma samples from 86 estrogen receptor-positive BC patients, of which 151 plasma samples were from 69 MBC patients and 34 plasma samples were from 17 primary BC (PBC) patients. We developed multiplex droplet digital PCR assays to verify the clinical significance of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations both in a snapshot and serially in these patients. RESULTS cfDNA ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations were found in 28.9% and 24.6 % of MBC patients, respectively. The relation between ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations and clinical features showed that ESR1 mutations occurred mostly in patients previously treated by ET, which was not the case for PIK3CA mutations. The analysis of the clinical impact of those mutations on subsequent lines of treatment for the 69 MBC patients revealed that both ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations detection were related to a shorter duration of ET effectiveness in univariate analysis but only for ESR1 mutations in multivariate analysis. The monitoring of cfDNA in a subset of 52 patients showed that loss of ESR1 mutations was related to a longer duration of response, which was not the case for PIK3CA mutations. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated the clinical significance of on-treatment ESR1 mutations both in a snapshot and serially in comparison with PIK3CA mutations.Background The measurement of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been studied as a non-invasive method to quickly assess and monitor endocrine therapy (ET) resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods The subjects of this retrospective study were a total of 185 plasma samples from 86 estrogen receptor-positive BC patients, of which 151 plasma samples were from 69 MBC patients and 34 plasma samples were from 17 primary BC (PBC) patients. We developed multiplex droplet digital PCR assays to verify the clinical significance of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations both in a snapshot and serially in these patients. Results cfDNA ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations were found in 28.9% and 24.6 % of MBC patients, respectively. The relation between ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations and clinical features showed that ESR1 mutations occurred mostly in patients previously treated by ET, which was not the case for PIK3CA mutations. The analysis of the clinical impact of those mutations on subsequent lines of treatment for the 69 MBC patients revealed that both ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations detection were related to a shorter duration of ET effectiveness in univariate analysis but only for ESR1 mutations in multivariate analysis. The monitoring of cfDNA in a subset of 52 patients showed that loss of ESR1 mutations was related to a longer duration of response, which was not the case for PIK3CA mutations. Conclusions We have demonstrated the clinical significance of on-treatment ESR1 mutations both in a snapshot and serially in comparison with PIK3CA mutations.

Differential role of MACC1 expression and its regulation of the HGF/c‑Met pathway between breast and colorectal cancer

The newly identified gene, metastasis‑associated in colon cancer 1 (MACC1), is suggested to be a transcriptional regulator of c‑Met, leading to cancer progression in colorectal cancer. To date however, little is known of the role of MACC1 in breast cancer. In a series of 300 breast cancer patients, we analyzed the association of MACC1 mRNA and protein expression with breast cancer survival using Cox proportional hazard models. In an in vitro study, we evaluated activities of c‑Met protein after transfection with a MACC1‑harboring plasmid as well as the binding ability of MACC1 to the c‑Met promoter using a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. In survival analyses, reduced MACC1 expression was associated with patient mortality. MACC1 expression was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. In the cell lines tested, MACC1 expression was much higher in colorectal than in breast cancer cells. After cells were transfected with MACC1, c‑Met expression was not induced in MCF7 cells, whereas corresponding c‑Met expression was upregulated in SW480 cells. Further, SW480 cells transfected with MACC1 showed enhanced migratory ability, whereas in MDA‑MB‑231 cells, transfection of MACC1 had no impact on this ability. In ChIP assay, the binding of MACC1 to the c‑Met promoter was suggested in SW480 cells, but not in MCF7 cells. In conclusion, our findings provide some novel insights into the role of MACC1 in breast cancer, indicating that it plays different roles in breast and several other cancers. There is a possibility that MACC1 does not modulate the transcriptional role of c‑Met signaling in breast cancer.

Comparison of ESR1 Mutations in Tumor Tissue and Matched Plasma Samples from Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND: ESR1 mutation in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is emerging as a noninvasive biomarker of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy, but there is a paucity of data comparing the status of ESR1 gene in cfDNA with that in its corresponding tumor tissue. The objective of this study is to validate the degree of concordance of ESR1 mutations between plasma and tumor tissue. METHODS: ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, and D538G were analyzed using droplet digital PCR in 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (35 tumor tissue samples and 67 plasma samples). RESULTS: Of the 35 paired samples, 26 (74.3%) were concordant: one patient had detectable ESR1 mutations both plasma (ESR1 Y537S/Y537N) and tumor tissue (ESR1 Y537S/Y537C), and 25 had WT ESR1 alleles in both. Nine (25.7%) had discordance between the plasma and tissue results: five had mutations detected only in their tumor tissue (two Y537S, one Y537C, one D538G, and one Y537S/Y537N/D538G), and four had mutations detected only in their plasma (one Y537S, one Y537N, and two Y537S/Y537N/D538G). Furthermore, longitudinal plasma samples from 19 patients were used to assess changes in the presence of ESR1 mutations during treatment. Eleven patients had cfDNA ESR1 mutations over the course of treatment. A total of eight of 11 patients with MBC with cfDNA ESR1 mutations (72.7%) had the polyclonal mutations. CONCLUSION: We have shown the independent distribution of ESR1 mutations between plasma and tumor tissue in 35 patients with MBC.

Immunohistochemical analysis in ethinylestradiol-treated breast cancers after prior long-term estrogen-deprivation therapy

BackgroundEstrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer can often be treated by hormone therapy; however a certain population of ER-positive patients become resistant to hormone therapy after long-term hormone treatment. Ethinylestradiol (EE2) is a derivative of estrogen, which has shown promising effects in these patients.MethodsWe successfully obtained tissue samples from 6 patients undergoing EE2 treatment and examined 13 well-known breast cancer-related factors by immunohistochemistry. Of the 6 patients, 5 responded but one patient did not.ResultsBefore EE2 treatment, staining for both ER and androgen receptor (AR) was strong in the nucleus, and the progesterone receptor (PgR) was almost no staining. EE2 treatment significantly down-regulated ER and up-regulated PgR while nuclear and cytosolic AR were oppositely down- and up-regulated, respectively. Cytosolic staining of BRCA1 was significantly up-regulated by EE2 whereas nuclear staining tended to decrease. Individual comparisons suggested less induction of PgR and decreasing AKT but increasing pAKT in the non-responder following EE2 treatment.ConclusionsOur observations revealed that EE2 activated ER downstream genes; however it did not stimulate cell growth. This suggests that hormone resistant cells might receive growth signals from a non-genomic pathway and this may be reflected in their sensitivity to EE2 treatment.