Takayasu Kurata

Randomized Phase III Trial of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Followed by Gefitinib Compared With Continued Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG0203)

PURPOSE Gefitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. We conducted a phase III trial to evaluate whether gefitinib improves survival as sequential therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced stage (IIIB/IV) NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to either platinum-doublet chemotherapy up to six cycles (arm A) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for three cycles followed by gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily, until disease progression (arm B). Patients were stratified by disease stage, sex, histology, and chemotherapy regimens. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included progression-free survival, tumor response, safety, and quality of life. Results Between March 2003 and May 2005, 604 patients were randomly assigned. There was a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80; P < .001); however, overall survival results did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.03; P = .11). In an exploratory subset analysis of overall survival by histologic group, patients in arm B with adenocarcinoma did significantly better than patients in arm A with adenocarcinoma (n = 467; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98; P = .03). CONCLUSION This trial failed to meet the primary end point of OS in patients with NSCLC. The exploratory subset analyses demonstrate a possible survival prolongation for sequential therapy of gefitinib, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma.

Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background Osimertinib is an oral, third‐generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR‐TKI–sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. We compared osimertinib with standard EGFR‐TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation–positive advanced non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In this double‐blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation–positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or a standard EGFR‐TKI (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival. Results The median progression‐free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with standard EGFR‐TKIs (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.57; P<0.001). The objective response rate was similar in the two groups: 80% with osimertinib and 76% with standard EGFR‐TKIs (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.90; P=0.24). The median duration of response was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 22.0) with osimertinib versus 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.8) with standard EGFR‐TKIs. Data on overall survival were immature at the interim analysis (25% maturity). The survival rate at 18 months was 83% (95% CI, 78 to 87) with osimertinib and 71% (95% CI, 65 to 76) with standard EGFR‐TKIs (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P=0.007 [nonsignificant in the interim analysis]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were less frequent with osimertinib than with standard EGFR‐TKIs (34% vs. 45%). Conclusions Osimertinib showed efficacy superior to that of standard EGFR‐TKIs in the first‐line treatment of EGFR mutation–positive advanced NSCLC, with a similar safety profile and lower rates of serious adverse events. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125.)

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND First‐line therapy for advanced non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that lacks targetable mutations is platinum‐based chemotherapy. Among patients with a tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) of 50% or greater, pembrolizumab has replaced cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first‐line treatment of choice. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher rates of response and longer progression‐free survival than chemotherapy alone in a phase 2 trial. METHODS In this double‐blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) 616 patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK mutations who had received no previous treatment for metastatic disease to receive pemetrexed and a platinum‐based drug plus either 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for up to a total of 35 cycles plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy. Crossover to pembrolizumab monotherapy was permitted among the patients in the placebo‐combination group who had verified disease progression. The primary end points were overall survival and progression‐free survival, as assessed by blinded, independent central radiologic review. RESULTS After a median follow‐up of 10.5 months, the estimated rate of overall survival at 12 months was 69.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.1 to 73.8) in the pembrolizumab‐combination group versus 49.4% (95% CI, 42.1 to 56.2) in the placebo‐combination group (hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P<0.001). Improvement in overall survival was seen across all PD‐L1 categories that were evaluated. Median progression‐free survival was 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.2) in the pembrolizumab‐combination group and 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 5.5) in the placebo‐combination group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 67.2% of the patients in the pembrolizumab‐combination group and in 65.8% of those in the placebo‐combination group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy of pemetrexed and a platinum‐based drug resulted in significantly longer overall survival and progression‐free survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Merck; KEYNOTE‐189 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02578680.)

Prospective Evaluation of the Feasibility of Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Elderly Lung Cancer Patients with Normal Organ Functions

A study was conducted to examine the feasibility of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy in elderly patients (75 years old) with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thirty‐four patients were enrolled between September 1993 and December 1994. Patients with normal organ function and good performance status (PS) received cisplatin‐based chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and vindesine 3 mg/m2 on days 2 and 8 for NSCLC, or cisplatin 80 mg/ m2 on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 2 to 4 for SCLC). Ten patients (29%) were eligible for this study, 7 with NSCLC and 3 with SCLC. Reasons for exclusion were ischemic heart disease in 14, poor PS (2) in 11, reduced creatinine clearance (Ccr) in 10, abnormal electrocardiogram without ischemia in 9 and noncompliance with the protocol in 2 patients. Eight patients had two or more reasons. Nine of the 10 eligible patients were able to tolerate 2 or more courses of chemotherapy. All 3 patients with SCLC responded (1 complete response and 2 partial response), but only 1 of the patients with NSCLC achieved partial response. Toxicity was evaluated according to Japan Clinical Oncology Group criteria. All but one patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia, and 6 patients had infectious episodes requiring antibiotics. Grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Non‐hematological toxicities were mild. Only 10 of 34 patients (29%) satisfied our eligibility criteria and they experienced severe myelotoxicity. We conclude that chemotherapy should be given carefully to elderly patients even if they appear to have normal organ function.

Small interfering RNA targeting survivin sensitizes lung cancer cell with mutant p53 to adriamycin

Survivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family that is specifically overexpressed in cancer tissues. p53 is one of the tumor suppressor genes; its induction in response to DNA damage causes apoptosis and correlates with drug sensitivity. To investigate the possible regulation of survivin by p53, we examined the level of survivin expression in lung cancer cell lines in response to adriamycin. Levels of survivin mRNA and protein in cell lines with wild‐type p53 decreased dramatically after p53 induction, but no such reduction of survivin was observed in cell lines with mutated or null p53. Inhibition of wild‐type p53 in A549 cells by small interfering (si) RNA significantly upregulated the expression of survivin. Survivin inhibition by siRNA in PC9 cells with mutated p53 significantly depressed cell proliferation. To investigate the sensitivity of cancer cells to adriamycin after inhibition of survivin, we depressed survivin expression using siRNA, and then added adriamycin at an IC50 dose. After a further 48 hr incubation with adriamycin, proliferation was significantly depressed in the cells treated with siRNA targeting survivin, in comparison with siRNA targeting scramble. Furthermore, both TUNEL and pro‐caspase3 expression assay showed a significant increase in apoptosis after combined treatment with adriamycin and siRNA targeting survivin. Our results demonstrate that survivin is downregulated by p53, and that siRNA targeting of survivin increases cell sensitivity to adriamycin and promotes apoptosis. siRNA targeting of survivin could be potentially useful for increasing sensitivity to anticancer drugs, especially in drug‐resistant cells with mutated p53.

Osimertinib As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Mutation–Positive Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose The AURA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01802632) included two cohorts of treatment-naïve patients to examine clinical activity and safety of osimertinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] -tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitizing [ EGFRm] and EGFR T790M resistance mutations) as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Sixty treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC received osimertinib 80 or 160 mg once daily (30 patients per cohort). End points included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety evaluation. Plasma samples were collected at or after patients experienced disease progression, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to investigate osimertinib resistance mechanisms. Results At data cutoff (November 1, 2016), median follow-up was 19.1 months. Overall ORR was 67% (95% CI, 47% to 83%) in the 80-mg group, 87% (95% CI, 69% to 96%) in the 160-mg group, and 77% (95% CI, 64% to 87%) across doses. Median PFS time was 22.1 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 30.2 months) in the 80-mg group, 19.3 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 26.0 months) in the 160-mg group, and 20.5 months (95% CI, 15.0 to 26.1 months) across doses. Of 38 patients with postprogression plasma samples, 50% had no detectable circulating tumor DNA. Nine of 19 patients had putative resistance mechanisms, including amplification of MET (n = 1); amplification of EGFR and KRAS (n = 1); MEK1, KRAS, or PIK3CA mutation (n = 1 each); EGFR C797S mutation (n = 2); JAK2 mutation (n = 1); and HER2 exon 20 insertion (n = 1). Acquired EGFR T790M was not detected. Conclusion Osimertinib demonstrated a robust ORR and prolonged PFS in treatment-naïve patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. There was no evidence of acquired EGFR T790M mutation in postprogression plasma samples.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of a New Taxoid, RPR 109881A, Given as a 1-Hour Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE RPR 109881A is a new semisynthetic taxoid compound that has a similar mechanism of action to docetaxel. The purpose of this phase I study was to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects of this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen eligible patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. RPR 109881A was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 15 to 75 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at the first cycle. RESULTS Neutropenia (febrile neutropenia) and fatigue were dose-limiting toxicities at doses of 60 and 75 mg/m(2) and seemed to be dose-related. Both thrombocytopenia and anemia were infrequent. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that RPR 109881A plasma disposition was bi- or triphasic, with a high total plasma clearance, a large volume of distribution, and a long terminal half-life. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak concentration of RPR 109881A seemed to increase with increasing dose proportionally, suggesting linear pharmacokinetics. Urinary excretion over 48 hours was low, with a mean of 0.8 +/- 0.36% of the administered dose. A significant relationship existed between the percentage decrease of neutrophil counts and the AUC of RPR 109881A. Among 18 assessable patients, two partial and two minor responses were documented. CONCLUSION RPR 109881A was found to be a well-tolerated and promising taxoid agent. The MTD was 75 mg/m(2), and the recommended dose for phase II study was 60 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks.

Phase II Trial of Atezolizumab As First-Line or Subsequent Therapy for Patients With Programmed Death-Ligand 1–Selected Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (BIRCH)

Purpose BIRCH was designed to examine the efficacy of atezolizumab, a humanized anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across lines of therapy. Patients were selected on the basis of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) or tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had advanced-stage NSCLC, no CNS metastases, and zero to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy. Patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 using the SP142 immunohistochemistry assay on ≥ 5% of TC or IC (TC2/3 or IC2/3 [TC or IC ≥ 5% PD-L1-expressing cells, respectively]) were enrolled. Atezolizumab 1,200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Efficacy-evaluable patients (N = 659) comprised three cohorts: first line (cohort 1; n = 139); second line (cohort 2; n = 268); and third line or higher (cohort 3; n = 252). The primary end point was independent review facility-assessed objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1). Secondary end points included median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results BIRCH met its primary objective of demonstrating a significant ORR versus historical controls. With a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, the independent review facility-assessed ORR was 18% to 22% for the three cohorts, and 26% to 31% for the TC3 or IC3 subgroup; most responses are ongoing. Responses occurred regardless of EGFR or KRAS mutation status. The median OS from an updated survival analysis (minimum of 20 month follow up) for cohort 1 was 23.5 months (26.9 months for TC3 or IC3 patients); the median OS in cohorts 2 and 3 was 15.5 and 13.2 months, respectively. The safety profile was similar across cohorts and consistent with previous atezolizumab monotherapy trials. Conclusion BIRCH demonstrated responses with atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with PD-L1-selected advanced NSCLC, with good tolerability. PD-L1 status may serve as a predictive biomarker for identifying patients most likely to benefit from atezolizumab.

Is Consolidation Chemotherapy after Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy Beneficial for Patients with Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer?: A Pooled Analysis of the Literature

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is beneficial for patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed for phase II/III trials published before December 31, 2011, examining survival of LA-NSCLC treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Median overall survival and other study characteristics were collected from each study and pooled. We extracted log-transformed hazards and standard errors under the assumption that survival follows an exponential distribution, and computed a pooled median overall survival and a 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects model. Collected trial arms were categorized as having CCT or not having it, CCT+ and CCT−, respectively. Results: Forty-one studies were identified including seven phase III studies and 34 phase II studies with 45 arms (CCT+: 25; CCT−: 20). Clinical data were comparable for clinical stage, performance status, cancer histology, sex, and median age between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in pooled mOS between CCT+ (19.0 month; 95% CI, 17.3−21.0) and CCT− (17.9 month; 95% CI, 16.1−19.9). Predicted hazard ratio of CCT+ to CCT− was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81−1.09; p = 0.40). There were no differences between the two groups with regard to grade 3−5 toxicities in pneumonitis, esophagitis, and neutropenia. These models estimated that addition of CCT could not lead to significant survival prolongation or risk reduction in death for LA-NSCLC patients. Conclusion: The pooled analysis based on a publication basis failed to provide evidence that CCT yields significant survival benefit for LA-NSCLC.

A phase 3 study of induction treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy before surgery in patients with pathologically confirmed N2 stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (WJTOG9903).

This study sought to ascertain whether induction‐concurrent radiotherapy added to chemotherapy could improve the survival of patients undergoing surgery for stage IIIA N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).