Takayuki Kosuge

Etiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest diagnosed via detailed examinations including perimortem computed tomography

Context: The spectrum of the etiology of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCPA) has not been established. We have performed perimortem computed tomography (CT) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Aims: To clarify the incidence of non-cardiac etiology (NCE), actual distribution of the causes of OHCPA via perimortem CT and its usefulness. Settings and Design: Population-based observational case series study. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 1846 consecutive OHCPA cases and divided them into two groups: 370 showing an obvious cause of OHCPA with NCE (trauma, neck hanging, terminal stage of malignancy, and gastrointestinal bleeding) and others. Results: Of a total OHCPA, perimortem CT was performed in 57.5% and 62.5% were finally diagnosed as NCE: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) 8.07%, pulmonary thrombo-embolization (PTE) 1.46%, hypoxia due to pneumonia 5.25%, asthma and acute worsening of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2.06%, cerebrovascular disorder (CVD) 4.48%, airway obstruction 7.64%, and submersion 5.63%. The rates of patients who survived to hospital discharge were 6-14% in patients with NCE. Out of the 1476 cases excluding obvious NCE of OHCPA, 66.3% underwent perimortem CT, 14.6% of cases without obvious NCE and 22.1% of cases with perimortem CT were confirmed as having some NCE. Conclusions: Of the total OHCPA the incidences of NCE was 62.5%; the leading etiologies were AAD, airway obstruction, submersion, hypoxia and CVD. The rates of cases converted from cardiac etiology to NCE using perimortem CT were 14.6% of cases without an obvious NCE.

Complications of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for unconscious patients without cardiopulmonary arrest.

Background: Insufficient knowledge of the risks and complications of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be an obstructive factor for CPR, however, particularly for patients who are not clearly suffering out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OH-CPA). The object of this study was to clarify the potential complication, the safety of bystander CPR in such cases. Materials and Methods: This study was a population-based observational case series. To be enrolled, patients had to have undergone CPR with chest compressions performed by lay persons, had to be confirmed not to have suffered OHCPA. Complications of bystander CPR were identified from the patients’ medical records and included rib fracture, lung injury, abdominal organ injury, and chest and/or abdominal pain requiring analgesics. In our emergency department, one doctor gathered information while others performed X-ray and blood examinations, electrocardiograms, and chest and abdominal ultrasonography. Results: A total of 26 cases were the subjects. The mean duration of bystander CPR was 6.5 minutes (ranging from 1 to 26). Nine patients died of a causative pathological condition and pneumonia, and the remaining 17 survived to discharge. Three patients suffered from complications (tracheal bleeding, minor gastric mucosal laceration, and chest pain), all of which were minimal and easily treated. No case required special examination or treatment for the complication itself. Conclusion: The risk and frequency of complications due to bystander CPR is thought to be very low. It is reasonable to perform immediate CPR for unconscious victims with inadequate respiration, and to help bystanders perform CPR using the T-CPR system.

Risky locations for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in a typical urban city.

Background: The aim of this study is to clarify the circumstances including the locations where critical events resulting in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCPA) occur. Materials and Methods: Subjects of this population-based observational case series study were the clinical records of patients with nontraumatic and nonneck-hanging OHCPA. Results: Of all 1546 cases, 10.3% occurred in a public place (shop, restaurant, workplace, stations, public house, sports venue, and bus), 8.3% on the street, 73.4% in a private location (victims home, the homes of the victims’ relatives or friends or cheap bedrooms, where poor homeless people live), and 4.1% in residential institutions. In OHCPA occurring in private locations, the frequency of asystole was higher and the outcome was poorer than in other locations. A total of 181 OHCPA cases (11.7%) took place in the lavatory and 166 (10.7%) in the bathroom; of these, only 7 (3.9% of OHCPA in the lavatory) and none in the bath room achieved good outcomes. The frequencies of shockable initial rhythm occurring in the lavatory and in bath room were 3.7% and 1.1% (lower than in other locations, P = 0.011 and 0.002), and cardiac etiology in OHCPA occurring in these locations were 46.7% and 78.4% (the latter higher than in other locations, P < 0.001). Conclusions: An unignorable population suffered from OHCPA in private locations, particularly in the lavatory and bathroom; their initial rhythm was usually asystole and their outcomes were poor, despite the high frequency of cardiac etiology in the bathroom. We should try to treat OHCPA victims and to prevent occurrence of OHCPA in these risky spaces by considering their specific conditions.

Duodenal perforation due to compression necrosis by the tip of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a common and safe procedure for enteral nutrition. There are few reports concerning its complications. We managed a 31-y-old bedridden case with punched out duodenal perforation without inflammation, from which the tip of the PEG tube protruded. Simple x-ray and computed tomography showed incarceration of the balloon in the duodenal bulb and extravasation of the tip of the tube. We performed simple closure with omental patching for duodenal perforation. Postoperative gastrointestinal fiberscopy on the 11th day revealed scar phase. Some PEG tubes have a balloon, which can prevent the removal of the tube, fix the position of the tube, and prevent the leakage of gastric contents from fistula. However, in our case, the inflated balloon was transferred into the duodenal bulb according to gastric strong peristalsis. This pathophysiologic mechanism is the same as ball bulb syndrome, which is known as gastroduodenal obstruction by incarceration of the gastric submucosal tumor. There is a risk of wedging of the inflated balloon of the PEG tube and perforation of the duodenum. We must not insert the tube too deeply, must not continue to inflate the balloon for a long time, and must check its position using a stethoscope, simple x-ray examination, or ultrasound.

Blood transfusion therapy for traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest

Background: Blood transfusion therapy (BTT), which represents transplantation of living cells, poses several risks. Although BTT is necessary for trauma victims with hemorrhagic shock, it may be futile for patients with blunt traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest (BT-CPA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively examined the medical records of consecutive patients with T-CPA. The study period was divided into two periods: The first from 1995-1998, when we used packed red cells (PRC) regardless of the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the second from 1999-2004, when we did not use PRC before ROSC. The rates of ROSC, admission to the ICU, and survival-to-discharge were compared between these two periods. Results: We studied the records of 464 patients with BT-CPA (175 in the first period and 289 in the second period). Although the rates of ROSC and admission to the ICU were statistically higher in the first period, there was no statistical difference in the rate of survival-to-discharge between these two periods. In the first period, the rate of ROSC was statistically higher in the non-BTT group than the BTT group. However, for cases in which ROSC was performed and was successful, there were no statistical differences in the rate of admission and survival-to-discharge between the first and second group, and between the BTT and non-BTT group. Conclusion: Our retrospective consecutive study shows the possibility that BTT before ROSC for BT-CPA and a treatment strategy that includes this treatment improves the success rate of ROSC, but not the survival rate. BTT is thought to be futile as a treatment for BT-CPA before ROSC.

Securing of tracheostomy tube using detachable clip in patients requiring neck wound management after esophageal, pharyngeal, and supinal surgery

To the Editors: We read with great interest the article by DeBosch et al examining the ethical dilemma posed when a pregnant patient refuses Caesarian section in the face of impending fetal demise. Although an exceedingly complex scenario, the authors provide a comprehensive and helpful discussion of its various components. We wish to draw further attention to one aspect of the authors analysis, specifically the role that surrogate decision making might have in achieving an ethically justifiable resolution. We believe that the authors application of the ‘‘substituted judgment’’ standard for surrogate decision making to this scenario is inadequate. Although we agree that seeking a psychiatric evaluation of the patient’s decision-making capacity is likely to be time-consuming and impractical, particularly given the urgency of the clinical situation, it should be noted that all physicians should have the basic skills needed to evaluate a patient’s decision-making capacity. The scenario as presented does not contain enough information to establish that the patient lacks decision-making capacity; however, if the patient were judged to lack decisionmaking capacity, it does not necessarily follow that the patient’s designated surrogate decision maker would be ‘‘ethically obliged’’ to also refuse the Caesarian section. The authors acknowledge that, when appropriately executing substituted judgment, surrogate decision makers are instructed to arrive at the decision that most approximates what the patient would have wanted under the circumstances if she had decision-making capacity. The clinical scenario suggests that the patient currently does not want a Caesarian section; however, if the physicians determined that the patient did not have decision-making capacity, it would be inappropriate for a surrogate decision maker to choose a course of action based solely on these expressed wishes, because they are being voiced by a patient who has been found to lack decision-making capacity. More information would be needed to better predict how the patient’s surrogate might best approximate her autonomy. To do this, the patient s surrogate would have to either supply background information regarding the patient’s previously held wishes or values or provide previous statements the patient might have made when she did have decision-making capacity. With that evidence in hand, the patient’s surrogate could come to a decision contrary to the patient’s currently expressed desires that is a more faithful representation of what she would have wanted. This outcome would be ethically justified. In conclusion, if the patient in this scenario lacks decision-making capacity, we cannot say what the ethically appropriate course of action is until the surrogate decision maker gives voice to the patient’s preferences based on the values that she held prior to losing decisional capacity. This additional insight is precisely the benefit---and responsibility---of a surrogate decision maker.