Takeo Kasuya

Postoperative radiation therapy for extramammary Paget's disease

Extramammary Pagets disease (EMPD) is a rare cutaneous malignancy that is usually treated with surgery. Patients with positive surgical margins require adjuvant therapy, but there have been few reports on the use of radiation therapy.

Role of respiratory-gated PET/CT for pancreatic tumors: A preliminary result

PURPOSE The aim of this study is to ascertain role of respiratory-gated PET/CT for accurate diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prior to clinical study, the phantom study was performed to evaluate the impact of respiratory motion on lesion quantification. Twenty-two patients (mean age 65 years) with pancreatic tumors were enrolled. Pathological diagnoses by surgical specimens consisted of pancreatic cancer (n=15) and benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN, n=7). Whole-body scan of non-respiratory-gated PET/CT was performed at first, and subsequent respiratory-gated PET/CT for one bed position was performed. All PET/CT studies were performed prior to surgery. The SUV max obtained by non-respiratory-gated PET/CT and respiratory-gated PET/CT, and percent difference in SUVmax (%SUVmax) were compared. RESULTS The profile curve of 5 respiratory bin image was most similar to that of static image. The third bin of 5 respiratory bin image showed highest FWHM (24.0mm) and FWTM (32.7 mm). The mean SUVmax of pancreatic cancer was similar to that of benign IPMN on non-respiratory-gated PET/CT (p=0.05), whereas significant difference was found between two groups on respiratory-gated PET/CT (p=0.016). The mean %SUV of pancreatic cancer was greater than that of benign IPMN (p<0.0001). Identification of the primary tumor in pancreatic head (n=13, 59%) was improved by using respiratory-gated PET/CT because of minimal affection of physiological accumulation in duodenum. CONCLUSION Respiratory-gated PET/CT is a feasible technique for evaluation of pancreatic tumors and allows more accurate identification of pancreatic tumors compared with non-respiratory-gated PET/CT.

Radiation therapy for lymph node metastasis from extramammary Paget's disease

Inoperable patients with lymph node metastasis from extramammary Pagets disease (EMPD) have limited curative treatment options.

Radiation therapy for extramammary Paget's disease: treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND Extramammary Pagets disease (EMPD) is a relatively rare malignancy, and there are few reports related to radiation therapy. In the present study, we investigated the outcome of radiation therapy for EMPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-one patients with EMPD in the genitalia underwent radiation therapy with curative intent. Fifteen patients had regional lymph node metastases before radiation therapy, but none had distant metastasis. Total doses of 45-80.2 Gy (median, 60 Gy) were delivered to tumor sites in 23-43 fractions (median, 33 fractions). RESULTS At a median follow-up period of 41 months, 16 patients had developed recurrences, including 5 with local progression within the radiation field and 12 with lymph node or/and distant metastases outside the radiation field. The local progression-free and disease-free rates were 88% and 55% at 3 years, and 82% and 46% at 5 years, respectively. Nine patients died at 6-73 months after irradiation; the causes of death were tumor progression in five patients, infectious pneumonia in two, renal failure in one and old age in one. The overall and cause-specific survival rates were 93% and 96% at 3 years, and 68% and 84% at 5 years, respectively. Tumor invasion into the dermis and regional lymph node metastasis were significant prognostic factors for both distant metastasis and survival. No therapy-related toxicities of grade ≥3 were observed. CONCLUSIONS Radiation therapy is safe and effective for patients with EMPD. It appeared to contribute to prolonged survival owing to good tumor control, and to be a promising curative treatment option.

Radiation therapy for pelvic lymph node metastasis from uterine cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy for pelvic lymph node metastasis from uterine cervical cancer and identify an optimal radiation regimen. METHODS A total of 111 metastatic pelvic lymph nodes, ranging from 11 to 56 mm (median, 25 mm) on CT/MRI, in 62 patients with uterine cervical cancer were treated initially with curative radiation therapy, with 46 patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Total radiation doses ranged from 45 to 61.2 Gy (median, 50.4 Gy) in 1.8-2 Gy (median, 1.8 Gy) fractions. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 33 months, 46 of the 62 patients survived. Only 2 irradiated lymph nodes, 24 and 28 mm in diameter, in 1 patient progressed after irradiation alone with 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. All 33 metastatic lymph nodes ≥ 30 mm in diameter were controlled by irradiation at a median dose of 55.8 Gy. The 3-year lymph node-progression free rates were 98.2% in all 62 patients and 98.0% in all 111 metastatic lymph nodes. Except for transient hematologic reactions, 2 patients developed grade ≥ 3 therapy-related toxicities, 1 with an ulcer and the other with perforation of the sigmoid colon. In addition, 2 patients experienced ileus after irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Radiation therapy effectively controlled pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical cancer, with most nodes <24 mm in diameter controlled by total doses of 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions and larger nodes controlled by 55.8 Gy, particularly with concurrent chemotherapy. Higher doses to metastatic lymph nodes may increase intestinal toxicities.

Radiation Therapy for Very Elderly Patients Aged 80 Years and Older With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Objectives: We carried out a retrospective review to determine the role played by radiation therapy in the treatment of very elderly patients with uterine cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Thirty elderly patients aged 80 years and older with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, at clinical stages IB-IVA, underwent radiation therapy. Of these 30 patients, 6 received external irradiation alone and 24 received external irradiation and intracavitary brachytherapy. A total median dose of 69.0 Gy (range, 45.6 to 75.4 Gy) was delivered to the cervical tumors. No patients underwent chemotherapy. Results: At a median follow-up time of 24 months, 7 patients had developed recurrences, including local recurrences in 3 and distant metastases in 5. The local control and distant metastasis-free rates were 88% and 79%, respectively, at 2 years. The disease-free, cause-specific, and overall survival rates were 69%, 77%, and 75%, respectively, at 2 years. Primary tumor size, T category, and clinical stage were found to be significant prognostic factors for distant metastasis. Age and primary tumor size were considered as being significant variables that affected survival. With the exception of a transient hematologic reaction, there were no therapy-related toxicities of grade ≥3. Conclusions: Radiation therapy was safe and effective regarding local control of uterine cervical cancer in elderly patients aged 80 years and older, and appeared to contribute to their prolonged survival. Curative radiation therapy should be considered as a viable treatment option, even in very elderly patients.

MP05-19 OUTCOMES OF TREATMENT FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER IN A SINGLE INSTITUTION; COMPARISON OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VS RADIATION THERAPY ~PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS~

Effient (1,) All patients received 4 fiducial markers placed under Transrectal ultrasound guidance (TRUS.) EMLA Cream and lidocaine gel were used to numb the perineum and rectum. 2 needles each double loaded with 2 gold fiducial markers with a spacer in between were placed transperineally into the prostate. 2 fiducial markers were placed at the right and left base and 2 fiducial markers were placed at the right and left apex. Patients had a CT scan after procedure to confirm ideal geometry of the marker placement. The needles were withdrawn as was the ultrasound transducer. Gentle pressure was applied by the nursing staff. All patients were monitored for bleeding afterwards by a registered nurse. RESULTS: All 23 patients who were on anticoagulation and underwent fiducial marker placement were discharged home the same day of the procedure. No patient experienced significant bleeding in the peri-procedural window and no patient had any untoward cardiovascular event. CONCLUSIONS: This series suggests active anticoagulation is not an absolute contraindication to fiducial marker placement in patients undergoing SBRT or IGRT for prostate cancer. Transperineal fiducial marker placement appears to be safe in patients on active anticoagulation medication. These patients should be closely monitored after the procedure for bleeding complications.