Takeshi Seta

Treatment of acute pancreatitis with protease inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Objectives Protease inhibitors are used to treat acute pancreatitis, but their effectiveness remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether treatment with protease inhibitors reduces overall mortality or morbidity from acute pancreatitis. Methods Articles of randomized controlled trials evaluating effects of protease inhibitors for acute pancreatitis were retrieved by systematically searching Medline, the Cochrane Library and Journal@ovid databases published from January 1966 through December 2003. References of review articles were also searched manually. The main outcome in interest was the overall mortality rate from acute pancreatitis. Results Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Treatment with protease inhibitors did not significantly reduce the mortality rate from acute pancreatitis (pooled risk difference, −0.03; 95% confidence interval, −0.07 to 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that treatment with protease inhibitors significantly reduced the mortality rate in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis (pooled risk difference, −0.07; 95% confidence interval, −0.13 to −0.01) as defined by mortality rate in the control group (control mortality rate > 0.10). The decrease in mortality rate was not significant in mild pancreatitis (pooled risk difference, 0.00; 95% confidence interval, −0.04 to 0.05). Conclusions Treatment with protease inhibitors does not significantly reduce the mortality in patients with acute or mild pancreatitis, but may reduce the mortality in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis.

Protease inhibitors for preventing complications associated with ERCP: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The prophylactic use of protease inhibitors in patients undergoing ERCP is still controversial. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of protease inhibitors in preventing ERCP-associated complications. DESIGN AND SETTING Meta-analysis; randomized trials that evaluated the efficacy of protease inhibitors were identified. PATIENTS A total of 4966 patients were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS ERCP-associated pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia, abdominal pain, and death. RESULTS Eighteen studies (19 cohorts) met the inclusion criteria. Overall results for protease inhibitors showed a significant but small risk reduction in ERCP-associated pancreatitis (pooled risk difference [RD]: -0.029; 95% CI, -0.051 to -0.008 and the number needed to treat, 34.5; 95% CI, 19.6-125). Subgroup analysis in 8 high-quality studies showed a borderline significant efficacy (pooled RD, -0.027; 95% CI, -0.051 to -0.004). Subgroup analysis in 8 gabexate studies did not show significant efficacy (pooled RD, -0.030; 95% CI, -0.062 to 0.003). Subgroup analysis in 5 ulinastatin studies was significant (pooled RD, -0.035; 95% CI, -0.063 to -0.006). Two high-quality studies on ulinastatin yielded nonsignificant results. Analyses for the other outcomes were all nonsignificant. Sensitivity analysis showed that the effect size and level of statistical significance were decreased with increasing study quality. CONCLUSIONS At present, there is no solid evidence to support the use of protease inhibitors to prevent ERCP-associated complications. Although overall and ulinastatin subgroup analyses showed a small risk reduction for pancreatitis, it seems very possible that low-quality primary studies produced a veneer of efficacy.

Treatment of acute pancreatitis with protease inhibitors administered through intravenous infusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe intravenous use of protease inhibitors in patients with acute pancreatitis is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of protease inhibitors intravenously administered to prevent pancreatitis-associated complications.MethodsWe updated our previous meta-analysis with articles of randomized controlled trials published from January 1965 to March 2013 on the effectiveness of protease inhibitors for acute pancreatitis. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Japana Centra Revuo Medicina was conducted. In addition, Internet-based registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, controlled-trials.com, UMIN, JMACCT, and JAPIC) were used to search for on-going clinical trials. Furthermore, references of review articles and previously published meta-analyses were handsearched. The main outcome of interest was the overall mortality rate from acute pancreatitis.ResultsSeventeen trials were selected for analysis. Overall, protease inhibitors did not achieve a significant risk reduction in mortality (pooled risk difference [RD], -0.02; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -0.05 to 0.01; number needed to treat [NNT], 74.8) with low heterogeneity. A subgroup analysis in moderate to severe pancreatitis (defined by control mortality rate [CMR] >0.10) did not show a significant effect of protease inhibitors to prevent death (pooled RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; NNT, 1603.9) with low heterogeneity. An additional subgroup analysis of two trials with CMR >0.20 (i.e., low quality) revealed a significant risk reduction.ConclusionThe present meta-analysis re-confirmed that there is no solid evidence that supports the intravenous use of protease inhibitors to prevent death due to acute pancreatitis.

Pulmonary embolism after arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: an autopsy case report.

We report an extremely rare case of pulmonary lipiodol embolism with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A 77-year-old man who was diagnosed with a huge HCC was admitted for TACE. Immediately after the procedure, this patient experienced severe dyspnea. We suspected that his symptoms were associated with a pulmonary lipiodol embolism after TACE, and we began intensive treatment. However, his condition did not improve, and he died on the following day. A subsequent autopsy revealed that the cause of death was ARDS due to pulmonary lipiodol embolism. No cases have been previously reported for which an autopsy was performed to explain the most probable mechanism of pulmonary lipiodol embolism; thus, ours is the first report for such a rare case.

Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of primary gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic people: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing risk ratio with risk difference.

Background Helicobacter pylori infection is strongly associated with gastric cancer occurrence. However, it is unclear whether eradication therapy reduces the risk of gastric cancer occurrence. We evaluated whether H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of primary gastric cancer by using both risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD). Methods Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society as well as those registered in databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, metaRegister of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, controlled-trials.com, UMIN-CTR, JMACCT-CTR, and JAPIC-CTI between January 1965 and March 2017, supplemented with manual screening. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which eradication therapy were implemented for the interventional group but not for the control group, and assessed the subsequent occurrence of primary gastric cancer as the main outcome. Two authors independently reviewed articles and extracted data. Integrated results for all data were presented as RR and RD. Results Seven studies met inclusion criteria. The reductions in risk of primary gastric cancer occurrence in terms of overall RR and RD were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.95) and -0.00 ([95% CI: -0.01 to 0.00]; number needed to treat: 125.5 [95% CI: 70.0 to 800.9]), respectively. Conclusions The effectiveness of H. pylori eradication therapy in suppressing the occurrence of primary gastric cancer was significant and comparable to that of previous studies in terms of the estimated RR. However, the estimated RD was slight and not statistically significant.

Ileus caused by cholesterol crystal embolization: A case report

Cholesterol crystal embolization (CCE) is a rare systemic embolism caused by formation of cholesterol crystals from atherosclerotic plaques. CCE usually occurs during vascular manipulation, such as vascular surgery or endovascular catheter manipulation, or due to anticoagulation or thrombolytic therapy. We report a rare case of intestinal obstruction caused by spontaneous CCE. An 81-year-old man with a history of hypertension was admitted for complaints of abdominal pain, bloating, and anorexia persisting for 4 mo. An abdominal computed tomography revealed intestinal ileus. His symptoms were immediately relieved by an ileus tube insertion, and he was discharged 6 d later. However, these symptoms immediately reappeared and persisted, and partial resection of the small intestine was performed. A histopathological examination indicated that small intestine obstruction was caused by CCE. At the 12-mo follow-up, the patient showed no evidence of CCE recurrence. Thus, in cases of intestinal obstruction, CCE should also be considered.

Effectiveness and safety of metallic stent for ileocecal obstructive colon cancer: a report of 4 cases

Background and study aims  Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been widely used for left-sided colorectal obstruction. Few studies on SEMS placement for right-sided colonic obstructions have been reported because stenting in the right colon is technically difficult, particularly in the ileocecal region. We present 4 cases of successful bridge-to-surgery stenting for ileocecal cancer. Using an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter with a movable tip and a decompression tube was effective for stenting. No adverse events occurred during or after SEMS placement in any of these cases. Short-term stenting for ileocecal cancer seems to be effective and safe.

The Feasibility of 18-mm-Diameter Colonic Stents for Obstructive Colorectal Cancers

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and the feasibility of 18-mm-diameter stents for obstructive colorectal cancer, comparing the clinical courses with 22- mm-diameter stents. Methods: We retrospectively compared 33 consecutive cases treated with 18-mm-diameter stents (bridge to surgery [BTS] in 25, palliative therapy [PAL] in 8) with 27 consecutive cases treated with 22-mm-diameter stents (BTS in 21, PAL in 6) for obstructive colorectal cancer between May 2013 and November 2015 in our institution. Results: There were no significant differences between the 18-mm and 22-mm groups in technical success rates (97 and 96%, respectively) and clinical success rates (100 and 100%, respectively). As a BTS, the rates of complications and stoma formation were not significantly different between groups. For PAL, although the rates of complications and stent patency were similar, stent occlusion occurred in 1 patient (12.5%) in the 18-mm group. Conclusions: The 18-mm-diameter stents were similarly effective when compared with 22-mm-diameter stents. Because 18-mm-diameter stents are easy to handle and produce less mechanical stress, they have the potential to decrease the perforation rate and mitigate the stents impact on the tumors. 18-mm-diameter stents can be useful and safe, especially as a BTS.

A case of transcatheter arterial embolization for reduction of a hemorrhagic rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor

A 91-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a primary complaint of hematochezia. A rectal submucosal tumor and an acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer were noted on colonoscopy. After hemostasis was achieved with APC, the patient was diagnosed with a GIST by EUS-FNA. We performed TAE of the middle and inferior rectal artery to secure hemostasis, because these arteries were also observed to be bleeding during hospitalization. A CT scan and colonoscopy revealed that the rectal GIST had reduced and that the acute rectal ulcer had been successfully treated. We report a case in which TAE was used to achieve tumor reduction of a hemorrhagic rectal GIST.