Taki Galanis

Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: Report of 2 Cases and Review of the Literature

Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is an idiopathic noninflammatory vasculopathy involving small to medium arteries, usually in the abdomen, although arteries in the cerebral and coronary circulations also may be affected. Some cases present as abdominal apoplexy due to aneurysmal rupture, but ischemia and infarction also occur. Not uncommonly, SAM may be misdiagnosed as a systemic necrotizing vasculitis. We present 2 patients with bilateral renal infarctions, cerebral arterial dissections, and visceral artery microaneurysms. Both were diagnosed initially as polyarteritis nodosa. The diagnosis was changed to SAM, in one case based on clinical and radiologic features, and in the other, on an open wedge kidney biopsy. We discuss the differential diagnosis and review the literature on SAM.

Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in cancer patients. This review summarizes some of the most current knowledge of the epidemiology, risk factors, risk models, prophylaxis, and treatment of VTE in cancer patients. METHODS A literature search was conducted using PubMed; the search terms were venous thromboembolism, anticoagulation, and cancer. The bibliographies of pertinent studies and review articles were reviewed for additional references. RESULTS Venous thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer. Cancer patients with VTE have poorer outcomes compared with noncancer patients with VTE. Many risk factors have been identified for VTE in patients with cancer that are patient-related, cancer-related, or treatment-related. Several biomarkers have been identified as potentially predictive of VTE risk. Risk assessment models such as the Khorana Risk Score stratify cancer patients with low, intermediate, and high risk of developing VTE based on baseline clinical and laboratory variables. Currently, enoxaparin is the preferred anticoagulant for initial VTE treatment in cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended for both initial and long-term management of cancer-related VTE. Because the optimal duration of anticoagulation in cancer patients with VTE is unknown, the decision to extend anticoagulation requires weighing the risk of recurrent thrombosis against the risk of major bleeding. Patients with recurrent VTE can be bridged with LMWH, transitioned to full-dose LMWH or treated with LMWH dose escalation. While there is insufficient data to determine whether anticoagulation should be held in the setting of thrombocytopenia, full-dose anticoagulation is typically considered unsafe when platelets are < 50 000/μL. Inferior vena cava filters are currently recommended only for patients with acute VTE and contraindications to anticoagulation. Although management of catheter-associated thrombosis has not been well studied in cancer patients, it is recommended that cancer patients with catheter-associated thrombosis be treated with therapeutic anticoagulation for ≥ 3 months. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with UFH, LMWH, or fondaparinux is recommended in all hospitalized nonsurgical cancer patients and cancer patients undergoing major cancer surgery. Primary thromboprophylaxis is only currently recommended in high-risk ambulatory cancer patients such as multiple myeloma patients receiving thalidomide- or lenalidomide- based therapy. CONCLUSION Cancer-associated thrombosis is a common problem. As we begin to better understand the risk factors and biomarkers for cancer-associated VTE, we can further refine and develop risk-assessment models to determine those patients who would most likely benefit from anticoagulation. While LMWH products are generally preferred in cancer-related VTE, more research will continue to evolve our understanding of treatment and thrombopprophylaxis in cancer-associated VTE.

The New Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A New Paradigm Shift in Antithrombotic Therapy

Background Several novel oral anticoagulants have been studied for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in different patient populations. Clinicians will increasingly encounter scenarios in which they must choose among these and conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of this potentially fatal condition. Objective To review the results of Phase III clinical trials that investigated the novel oral anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Potential advantages and disadvantages of these anticoagulant agents with respect to each other and conventional therapy will also be explored through a case-based approach. Methods A literature search in PubMed was conducted that identified Phase III clinical trials investigating the novel oral anticoagulant agents for the treatment of VTE. Results The new oral anticoagulant agents have been shown to be as safe and effective for the treatment of VTE as conventional therapies. Conclusions These novel, oral anticoagulant agents are legitimate options for the treatment of VTE. A careful assessment of a patient׳s comorbidities, medication use, and laboratory results should be undertaken before prescribing the new oral anticoagulant agents for patients with VTE.

Contemporary Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal condition and includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The novel oral anticoagulants, which include the direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors, have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of VTE. Additional interventions include thrombolysis and the use of inferior vena cava filters. The purpose of this article is to provide a contemporary review of the treatment of VTE.

Facilitating Anticoagulation for Safer Transitions: Preliminary Outcomes from an Emergency Department Deep Vein Thrombosis Discharge Program

Abstract Introduction: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with an acute uncomplicated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) may be eligible for outpatient treatment. This study aims to establish a transition of care program in the ED for patients with DVT presenting with an acute uncomplicated DVT. Methods: This article specifies the transition of care program for DVT patients in the ED. Data was collected on patients admitted and discharged from the ED who had an acute DVT both prior to the initiation of facilitating anticoagulation for safer transitions (FAST) and after initiation of FAST. Follow-up phone calls were made to patients discharged from the ED after the initiation of FAST, and data were collected on follow-up appointments, anticoagulation adherence, readmission rates, and patient satisfaction. Results: The FAST program has been successfully implemented. By the 30-day follow-up phone call, 100% of patients had attended a follow-up appointment. The average time to the follow-up appointment post-discharge was 4.4 days (range, 1–7 days). None of the patients at the 3- to 5-day follow-up phone call and 30-day phone call had any issues taking their anticoagulant, and none reported side effects of significant bleeding. One patient was re-admitted after discharge with a pulmonary embolism. Patient satisfaction has also been very high with the program, with all patients indicating at the 30-day phone call that they would recommend the program to a friend or family member. The educational components of this program also improved the discharge process for this population compared with patients discharged prior to the initiation of FAST. Conclusion: The FAST program is an example of a successful transition-of-care program for discharging DVT patients from the ED. Reassessment and improvements to the program are underway to ensure it remains current, sustainable, and provider friendly.

New oral anticoagulants: prevention of VTE in phase III studies in total joint replacement surgery and the hospitalized medically-ill patients

Effective venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medically-ill patients and those undergoing orthopaedic surgery remains a challenge for clinicians in the United States. Several new oral anticoagulants, which either directly inhibit the activity of thrombin or factor Xa have been developed and studied for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in phase III trials in these patient populations. These new medications demonstrate several advantages over traditional anticoagulants, including their administration at fixed doses with no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. Such advantages may potentially be offset by the lack of well-studied methods to reverse their anticoagulant effects and the potential need for standardized testing to monitor their activity in certain situations. This review will provide an overview of the clinical trial results of dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban for VTE prevention in the orthopaedic and medically-ill hospitalized patients.

Cost of Purchased Versus Produced Plasma from Donor Recruitment Through Transfusion

BackgroundPlasma is used to treat acquired coagulopathy or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, or to reverse warfarin effect. Scant data are available, however, about its costs.ObjectiveTo estimate total costs of plasma from production through administration, from the perspective of a US hospital blood donor center (BDC).Study Design and MethodsSix sequential decision analytic models were constructed and informed by primary and secondary data on time, tasks, personnel, and supplies for donation, processing, and administration. Expected values of the models were summed to yield the BDC’s total cost of producing, preparing, and transfusing plasma. Costs (

Direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibition for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

US 2015) are reported for a typical patient using three units of plasma. Models assume plasma was obtained from whole blood donation and transfused in an inpatient setting. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed to test the impact of changing inputs for personnel costs and adverse event (AE) rates and costs.ResultsBDC production cost of plasma was

New oral anticoagulants

91.24/patient (

The incidence of deep vein thrombosis detected by routine surveillance ultrasound in neurosurgery patients receiving dual modality prophylaxis.

30.41/unit), a