Takuya Numata

Detectability of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma With High-resolution Perimetry.

Purpose:To extrapolate the optimal test point resolution for assessment of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects including subtle functional defects, we performed high-resolution perimetry with the 0.5 degrees test point resolution. Subjects and Methods:Subjects were 11 eyes of 11 normal volunteers and 16 eyes of 16 glaucomatous patients. Octopus 900 custom test was used to measure 61 points with the test point resolution of 0.5 degrees on the temporal meridian of 45 degrees within the eccentricity of 30 degrees. In the glaucoma cases, VF profiles were extracted in 17 patterns of the test point resolutions that ranged from 0.5 to 8.5 degrees and the mean defect (MD), square root of loss variance (sLV), and maximum sensitivity loss (Max loss) were calculated. The influence of the test point resolution on MD, sLV, and Max loss was examined. In addition, the test range from the fixation point to the eccentricity of 30 degrees was divided into 3 zones. Similarly, each zone was investigated if the test point resolution exerted influence on the MD, sLV, and Max loss. Results:Our glaucoma cases did not show any significant differences in MD and sLV regardless of the resolution. Max loss showed significant difference at resolution ≥1.0 degree. MD and sLV did not show significant differences by the change of resolution in each zone. Max loss showed significant differences at resolution ≥1.5 degrees within the central 10 degrees. Conclusions:To detect subtle VF defects within the eccentricity of 10 degrees, high-resolution perimetry with the test point resolution of <1.5 degrees is necessary.

Exploring Test–Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry

Purpose Test–retest variability (TRV) of visual field (VF) data seriously degrades our capacity to recognize true VF progression. We conducted repeated high-resolution perimetry with a test interval of 0.5° to investigate the sources of TRV. In particular, we examined whether the spatial variance of the observed sensitivity changes or if their absolute magnitude was of more importance. Methods Sixteen eyes of 16 glaucoma patients were each tested three times at 61 VF locations along the superior-temporal 45° meridian using a modified protocol of the Octopus 900 perimeter. TRV was quantified as the standard deviation of the repeats at each point (retest-SD). We also computed the mean sensitivity at each point (retest-MS) and the running spatial-SD along the tested meridian. Multiple regression models investigated whether any of those variables (and also age, sex, and VF eccentricity) were significant independent determinants of TRV. Results The main independent determinants of TRV were the retest-MS at −0.04 dB TRV/dB loss (P < 0.0001, t-statistic 5.05), and the retest-SD at 0.47 dB spatial variance/dB loss (P < 0.0001, t-statistic 12.5). Conclusions The larger effect for the spatial-SD suggested that it was perhaps a stronger determinant of TRV than scotoma depth per se. This might support the hypothesis that interactions between small perimetric stimuli, rapidly varying sensitivity across the field, and normal fixational jitter are strong determinants of TRV. Translational Relevance Our study indicates that methods that might reduce the effects of jagged sensitivity changes, such as increasing stimulus size or better gaze tracking, could reduce TRV.

Effects of head tilt on visual field testing with a head-mounted perimeter imo

Purpose A newly developed head-mounted perimeter termed “imo” enables visual field (VF) testing without a fixed head position. Because the positional relationship between the subject’s head and the imo is fixed, the effects of head position changes on the test results are small compared with those obtained using a stationary perimeter. However, only ocular counter-roll (OCR) induced by head tilt might affect VF testing. To quantitatively reveal the effects of head tilt and OCR on the VF test results, we investigated the associations among the head-tilt angle, OCR amplitude and VF testing results. Subjects and methods For 20 healthy subjects, we binocularly recorded static OCR (s-OCR) while tilting the subject’s head at an arbitrary angle ranging from 0° to 60° rightward or leftward in 10° increments. By monitoring iris patterns, we evaluated the s-OCR amplitude. We also performed blind spot detection while tilting the subject’s head by an arbitrary angle ranging from 0° to 50° rightward or leftward in 10° increments to calculate the angle by which the blind spot rotates because of head tilt. Results The association between s-OCR amplitude and head-tilt angle showed a sinusoidal relationship. In blind spot detection, the blind spot rotated to the opposite direction of the head tilt, and the association between the rotation angle of the blind spot and the head-tilt angle also showed a sinusoidal relationship. The rotation angle of the blind spot was strongly correlated with the s-OCR amplitude (R2≥0.94, p<0.0001). A head tilt greater than 20° with imo causes interference between adjacent test areas. Conclusions Both the s-OCR amplitude and the rotation angle of the blind spot were correlated with the head-tilt angle by sinusoidal regression. The rotated VF was correlated with the s-OCR amplitude. During perimetry using imo, the change in the subject’s head tilt should be limited to 20°.