Takuya Terahara
Waseda University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Takuya Terahara.
Archive | 2018
Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar; Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki
We present a heart valve flow computation with the Space–Time Slip Interface Topology Change (ST-SI-TC) method and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA). The computation is for a realistic heart valve model with actual contact between the valve leaflets. The ST-SI-TC method integrates the ST-SI and ST-TC methods in the framework of the ST Variational Multiscale (ST-VMS) method. The ST-VMS method functions as a moving-mesh method, which maintains high-resolution boundary layer representation near the solid surfaces. The ST-TC method was introduced for moving-mesh computation of flow problems with TC, such as contact between the leaflets of a heart valve. It deals with the contact while maintaining high-resolution representation near the leaflet surfaces. The ST-SI method was originally introduced to addresses the challenge involved in high-resolution representation of the boundary layers near spinning solid surfaces. The mesh covering a spinning solid surface spins with it, and the SI between that mesh and the rest of the mesh accurately connects the two sides. This maintains the high-resolution representation near solid surfaces. In the context of heart valves, the SI connects the sectors of meshes containing the leaflets, enabling a more effective mesh moving. In that context, the ST-SI-TC method enables high-resolution representation even when the contact is between leaflets that are covered by meshes with SI. It also enables dealing with contact location change or contact and sliding on the SI. With IGA, in addition to having a more accurate representation of the surfaces and increased accuracy in the flow solution, the element density in the narrow spaces near the contact areas is kept at a reasonable level. Furthermore, because the flow representation in the contact area has a wider support in IGA, the flow computation method becomes more robust. The computation we present for an aortic-valve model shows the effectiveness of the ST-SI-TC-IGA method.
Archive | 2018
Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar; Hiroaki Uchikawa; Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki; Kensuke Shiozaki; Ayaka Yoshida; Kenji Komiya; Gaku Inoue
We present our computational methods for and results from aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis. In flow analysis, the core method is the space–time Variational Multiscale (ST-VMS) method. The other key methods are the ST Slip Interface (ST-SI) and ST Topology Change (ST-TC) methods and the ST Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA). The ST framework, in a general context, provides higher-order accuracy. The VMS feature of the ST-VMS addresses the computational challenges associated with the multiscale nature of the unsteady flows in the aorta and heart valve. The moving-mesh feature of the ST framework enables high-resolution computation near the valve leaflets. The ST-SI connects the sectors of meshes containing the leaflets, enabling a more effective mesh moving. The ST-TC enables moving-mesh computation even with the TC created by the contact between the leaflets. It deals with the contact while maintaining high-resolution representation near the leaflets. Integration of the ST-SI and ST-TC enables high-resolution representation even though parts of the SI are coinciding with the leaflet surfaces. It also enables dealing with leaflet–leaflet contact location change and contact sliding. The ST-IGA provides smoother representation of aorta and valve surfaces and increased accuracy in the flow solution. With the integration of the ST-IGA with the ST-SI and ST-TC, the element density in the narrow spaces near the contact areas is kept at a reasonable level. In structure analysis, we use a Kirchhoff–Love shell model, where we take the stretch in the third direction into account in calculating the curvature term. The computations presented demonstrate the scope and effectiveness of the methods.
Computers & Fluids | 2017
Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar; Yuto Otoguro; Takuya Terahara; Takashi Kuraishi; Hitoshi Hattori
Computers & Fluids | 2016
Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar; Takuya Terahara
Computers & Fluids | 2017
Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar; Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki
Computers & Fluids | 2018
Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar; Hiroaki Uchikawa; Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki; Ayaka Yoshida
The Proceedings of the JSME Conference on Frontiers in Bioengineering | 2017
Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki; Kensuke Shiozaki; Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar
The Proceedings of the JSME Conference on Frontiers in Bioengineering | 2017
Kensuke Shiozaki; Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki; Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar
The Proceedings of the Bioengineering Conference Annual Meeting of BED/JSME | 2017
Kensuke Shiozaki; Takuya Terahara; Takafumi Sasaki; Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar
The Proceedings of the Bioengineering Conference Annual Meeting of BED/JSME | 2017
Ayaka Yoshida; Takafumi Sasaki; Takuya Terahara; Kenji Takizawa; Tayfun E. Tezduyar