Talita Mota Gonçalves

Simultaneous determination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim in biological fluids for high-throughput analysis: comparison of HPLC with ultraviolet and tandem mass spectrometric detection.

The comparison of two methods based on online solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography with UV (SPE-LC-UV) or mass spectrometry detection (SPE-LC-MS/MS) for the simultaneous quantification of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) and trimethoprim (TMP) is presented. The methods were validated and proved to be accurate. The analysis of standard samples for SMZ at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5, 25 and 50microg/mL demonstrated a relative standard deviation of less than 6% for both methods (n=18), while TMP samples at concentrations of 0.05, 0.15, 1.5 and 5.0microg/mL were analyzed with R.S.D. of less than 4% (n=18). The method with mass spectrometric detection was approximately six times more sensitive than the method with ultraviolet detection. The total run time for the SPE-LC-MS/MS was 2.5min per sample as opposed to 18.0min for the SPE-LC-UV method. The method with MS detection in comparison with UV detection proved to be more rugged and was successfully applied to pharmacokinetics studies.

Comparative In Vitro Performance of Three Small-Volume Valved Holding Chambers with Beclomethasone/Formoterol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler

BACKGROUND The use of valved holding chambers (VHCs) with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is reported to reduce the oral deposition of inhaled drugs and to facilitate the handling of these devices by patients, especially children. Although the number of commercially available VHCs is increasing, the correct choice of VHC in clinical practice is important, because VHCs are not equally effective regarding medication delivery. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the use of three small-volume VHCs-Vortex(®), AeroChamber(®) Plus (ACP), and Able Spacer™ (AS)-along with a commercial pMDI containing a combination of beclomethasone and formoterol (Innovair(®)) frequently used by asthma patients. METHODS Evaluation of the delivered dose of both drugs and analysis of particle size distribution of aerosols emitted for the inhaler were performed using the Next Generation Impactor with and without the tested VHCs. RESULTS The VHCs retained significant quantities of both drugs and dramatically reduced the quantity of drugs deposited in the throat of the impactor, indicating that particles with large size were preferably retained in the VHCs. Interestingly, although the delivered dose of both drugs was reduced by the use of VHCs, the use of the Vortex and the ACP resulted in comparable fine particle doses (FPDs) to that obtained when the pMDI was used alone, whereas the AS VHC significantly reduced the FPDs of both drugs. This may be due to the fact that, unlike the AS VHC, the Vortex and the ACP VHCs are made of antistatic materials that minimize the electrostatic interaction with emitted aerosols, enhancing medication delivery. CONCLUSION The Vortex and the ACP VHCs present interesting advantages over the AS VHC to be used with Innovair pMDI. However, these results are based on an in vitro evaluation and need to be validated in an in vivo study in order to clinically assess the performance of these VHCs.

Relative bioavailability of two formulations of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules in healthy brazilian male volunteers: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in the fasting and fed states

BACKGROUND The oral antidepressant venlafaxine hydrochloride is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to comply with regulatory criteria for marketing of the test product in Brazil. METHODS This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male volunteers and consisted of separate fast- ing and fed phases. A single oral dose of the test or reference formulation was followed by a 7-day washout period, after which subjects received the alternative formulation. There was a 3-month interval between the fasting and fed portions of the study. There was no standardization of race because of the difficulty of achieving standardization in the Brazilian population. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after dosing. Venlafaxine concentrations were determined using an HPLC-MS/MS method. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (test:reference) for C(max) and AUC(0-t) were within the regulatory range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events were monitored through-out the study based on vital signs, laboratory tests, interviews, and spontaneous patient reports. RESULTS Forty-eight subjects were enrolled in both phases of the study; all 48 subjects completed the fasting phase, and 1 subject withdrew during the fed phase. The mean (SD) age of participants in the fasting and fed phases was 24.96 (5.5) and 24.90 (4.7) years, respectively; their mean weight was 69.65 (9.6) and 71.00 (10.6) kg and their mean height was 172.0 (6.9) and 173.0 (6.6) cm. Under fasting conditions, the arithmetic mean venlafaxine C(max) was 35.705 (23.946) ng/mL for the test formulation and 34.470 (20.639) ng/mL for the reference formulation, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.04. The arithmetic mean AUC(0-t) for the respective formulations was 562.015 (481.875) and 508.509 (439.456) ng · h/mL, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.11. The arithmetic mean T(max) was 6.188 (1.560) and 5.885 (1.648) hours. Under fed conditions, the arithmetic mean venlafaxine C(max) was 42.892 (24.348) ng/mL for the test formulation and 46.275 (23.011) ng/mL for the reference formulation, with a geometric mean ratio of 0.93. The arithmetic mean AUC(0-t) for the respective formulations was 737.218 (603.998) and 682.124 (524.713) ng · h/mL, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.08. The arithmetic mean T(max) was 6.787 (1.769) and 5.957 (1.661) hours. There were no significant increases in venlafaxine C(max), AUC(0-t), or T(max) for either formulation in the fed phase compared with the fasting phase. In both the fasting and fed portions of the study, the 90% CIs for the ratio (test:reference) of log-transformed C(max) (fasting: 93.24-105.93; fed: 84.67-97.85) and AUC(0-t) (fasting: 102.90-116.71; fed: 98.19-114.41) were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence. The most common adverse events (≥ 5% of subjects) in the fasting phase were nausea (46%), diarrhea (29%), headache (29%), vomiting (15%), and colic (6%); the most common adverse events in the fed phase were nausea (15%), headache (13%), and dizziness (9%). CONCLUSION In this single-dose study in healthy fasting and fed volunteers, the test formulation of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules met Brazilian regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.

A sensitive and robust lc-ms/ms method with monolithic column and electrospray ionization for the quantitation of efavirenz in human plasma: application to a bioequivalence study

An LC-MS/MS method has been developed for the determination of efavirenz (EFZ) in human plasma using hydrochlorothiazide as internal standard (I.S.). An ESI negative mode with multiple reaction-monitoring was used monitoring the transitions m/z 313.88→69.24 (EFZ) and 296.02→204.76 (I.S.). Samples were extracted using liquid-liquid extraction. The total run time was 2.0 min. The separation was achieved with HPLC-RP using a monolithic column. The assay was linear in the concentration range of 100 - 5000 ng mL-1. The mean recovery was 83%. Intra- and inter-day precision were < 9.5% and < 8.9%, respectively and accuracy was in the range ± 8.33%. The method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study.

Determination of Ampicillin in Human Plasma by Solid-phase Extraction -Liquid Chromatography -Tandem Mass Spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) and its Use in Bioequivalence Studies

A simple, fast, sensitive and selective solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) method for the quantitative analysis of ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4) in human plasma was developed using amoxicillin as internal standard, and sample extraction by solid-phase extraction (SPE). Extracts were separated by reversed-phase C18 with aqueous mobile phase (acetonitrile, 80:20, v/v) with 0.1% formic acid. The method was validated and successfully applied in a bioequivalence study of capsules 500 mg of ampicillin. Using a short running time of 2.5 min, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for obtained ampicillin was 0.1 microg/ml for a plasma sample of 250 microl and a recovery of 94.38% +/- 4.05. Bioequivalence between the products was determined by calculating 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf values for the test and reference products, which were within the 0.80-1.25 interval proposed by FDA and EMEA. It is concluded that the two formulations are bioequivalent in their rate and extent of absorption, and thus, may be used interchangeably.

Determination of indinavir in human plasma and its use in pharmacokinetic study

We report the development and validation of a new sensitive, accurate and precise HPLC method with ultraviolet detection for the determination of indinavir sulfate (IND) in human plasma and its application to a bioequivalence study of a new generic formulation. The extraction of IND from plasma samples was achieved by using liquid-liquid extraction with a mean recovery of 73.9%. The lower limit of quantification was 0.05 µg/mL. Bioequivalence between the products was determined by calculating 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf values for the test and reference products, within the 0.80-1.25 interval proposed by ANVISA and FDA. Therefore the medications are bioequivalent and inter-exchangeable.

PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NANOEMULSION CONTAINING A NATURAL NAPHTHOQUINONE

Fernando V. S. Rodriguesa,#, Laerte S. Dinizb, Rosa M. G. Sousab, Thalita D. Honoratob, Daniele O. Simãoa,#, Cleônia R. M. Araújob, Talita M. Gonçalvesb, Larissa A. Rolima,b,#, Patrícia L. Gotoc, Antonio C. Tedescoc and Marigilson P. SiqueiraMouraa,b,*,# Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, 56300-000 Petrolina – PE, Brasil Colegiado Acadêmico de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, 56300-000 Petrolina – PE, Brasil Departamento de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto – SP, Brasil