Tâm Mignot

Bacterial SLH domain proteins are non‐covalently anchored to the cell surface via a conserved mechanism involving wall polysaccharide pyruvylation

Several bacterial proteins are non‐covalently anchored to the cell surface via an S‐layer homology (SLH) domain. Previous studies have suggested that this cell surface display mechanism involves a non‐covalent interaction between the SLH domain and peptidoglycan‐associated polymers. Here we report the characterization of a two‐gene operon, csaAB, for cell surface anchoring, in Bacillus anthracis. Its distal open reading frame (csaB) is required for the retention of SLH‐containing proteins on the cell wall. Biochemical analysis of cell wall components showed that CsaB was involved in the addition of a pyruvyl group to a peptidoglycan‐associated polysaccharide fraction, and that this modification was necessary for binding of the SLH domain. The csaAB operon is present in several bacterial species that synthesize SLH‐containing proteins. This observation and the presence of pyruvate in the cell wall of the corresponding bacteria suggest that the mechanism described in this study is widespread among bacteria.

The incompatibility between the PlcR- and AtxA-controlled regulons may have selected a nonsense mutation in Bacillus anthracis

Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus are members of the Bacillus cereus group. These bacteria express virulence in diverse ways in mammals and insects. The pathogenic properties of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis in mammals results largely from the secretion of non‐specific toxins, including haemolysins, the production of which depends upon a pleiotropic activator PlcR. In B. anthracis, PlcR is inactive because of a nonsense mutation in the plcR gene. This suggests that the phenotypic differences between B. anthracis on the one hand and B. thuringiensis and B. cereus on the other could result at least partly from loss of the PlcR regulon. We expressed a functional PlcR in B. anthracis. This resulted in the transcriptional activation of genes weakly expressed in the absence of PlcR. The transcriptional activation correlated with the induction of enzymatic activities and toxins including haemolysins. The toxicity of a B. anthracis PlcR+ strain was assayed in the mouse subcutaneous and nasal models of infection. It was no greater than that of the parental strain, suggesting that the PlcR regulon has no influence on B. anthracis virulence. The PlcR regulon had dramatic effects on the sporulation of a B. anthracis strain containing the virulence plasmid pXO1. This resulted from incompatible interactions with the major AtxA‐controlled virulence regulon. We propose that the PlcR‐controlled regulon in B. anthracis has been counterselected on account of its disadvantageous effects.

Anthrax toxins and the host: a story of intimacy

Although the dramatic events of the year 2001 have revitalized the interest in anthrax, research on Bacillus anthracis and its major virulence factors is one of the oldest theme in microbiology and started with the early works of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. The anthrax toxins are central to anthrax pathogenesis. They were discovered in the mid‐1950s and since then there has been an enormous amount of work to elucidate both the molecular and physiopathological details of their mode of action. In this review, after a brief introduction of B. anthracis, we will focus on the latest findings that concern two aspects of anthrax toxin research: the environmental signals and the molecular mechanisms that regulate toxin synthesis, and the mechanisms of intoxication. We hope to convince the reader that the anthrax toxins are highly specialized determinants of B. anthracis pathogenicity: their synthesis is integrated within a global virulence programme and they target key eukaryotic cell proteins. We conclude with a consideration of the therapeutic perspectives arising from our current knowledge of how the toxins work.

Bacterial motility complexes require the actin-like protein, MreB and the Ras homologue, MglA.

Gliding motility in the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus uses two motility engines: S‐motility powered by type‐IV pili and A‐motility powered by uncharacterized motor proteins and focal adhesion complexes. In this paper, we identified MreB, an actin‐like protein, and MglA, a small GTPase of the Ras superfamily, as essential for both motility systems. A22, an inhibitor of MreB cytoskeleton assembly, reversibly inhibited S‐ and A‐motility, causing rapid dispersal of S‐ and A‐motility protein clusters, FrzS and AglZ. This suggests that the MreB cytoskeleton is involved in directing the positioning of these proteins. We also found that a ΔmglA motility mutant showed defective localization of AglZ and FrzS clusters. Interestingly, MglA–YFP localization mimicked both FrzS and AglZ patterns and was perturbed by A22 treatment, consistent with results indicating that both MglA and MreB bind to motility complexes. We propose that MglA and the MreB cytoskeleton act together in a pathway to localize motility proteins such as AglZ and FrzS to assemble the A‐motility machineries. Interestingly, M. xanthus motility systems, like eukaryotic systems, use an actin‐like protein and a small GTPase spatial regulator.

Motor-driven intracellular transport powers bacterial gliding motility

Protein-directed intracellular transport has not been observed in bacteria despite the existence of dynamic protein localization and a complex cytoskeleton. However, protein trafficking has clear potential uses for important cellular processes such as growth, development, chromosome segregation, and motility. Conflicting models have been proposed to explain Myxococcus xanthus motility on solid surfaces, some favoring secretion engines at the rear of cells and others evoking an unknown class of molecular motors distributed along the cell body. Through a combination of fluorescence imaging, force microscopy, and genetic manipulation, we show that membrane-bound cytoplasmic complexes consisting of motor and regulatory proteins are directionally transported down the axis of a cell at constant velocity. This intracellular motion is transmitted to the exterior of the cell and converted to traction forces on the substrate. Thus, this study demonstrates the existence of a conserved class of processive intracellular motors in bacteria and shows how these motors have been adapted to produce cell motility.

A plasmid-encoded regulator couples the synthesis of toxins and surface structures in Bacillus anthracis

Transcription of the major Bacillus anthracis virulence genes is triggered by CO2, a signal believed to reflect the host environment. A 180 kb plasmid, pXO1, carries the anthrax toxin genes and the genes responsible for their regulation, pagR and atxA; the latter encodes a major trans‐activator. It has long been known that pXO1 genes have major effects on the physiology of B. anthracis, probably through regulatory cross‐talk between plasmid and chromosomal genes. Accordingly, we found that the chromosomal S‐layer genes, sap and eag, are regulated by pXO1 genes so that only eag is significantly expressed in the presence of CO2. This effect results from the product of pagR acting as the most downstream element of a signalling cascade initiated by AtxA. In vitro evidence showed that PagR is a transcription factor that controls the S‐layer genes by direct binding on their promoter regions. This work provides evidence that AtxA is a master regulator that co‐ordinates the response to host signals by orchestrating positive and negative controls over genes located on all genetic elements.

Gliding Motility Revisited: How Do the Myxobacteria Move without Flagella?

SUMMARY In bacteria, motility is important for a wide variety of biological functions such as virulence, fruiting body formation, and biofilm formation. While most bacteria move by using specialized appendages, usually external or periplasmic flagella, some bacteria use other mechanisms for their movements that are less well characterized. These mechanisms do not always exhibit obvious motility structures. Myxococcus xanthus is a motile bacterium that does not produce flagella but glides slowly over solid surfaces. How M. xanthus moves has remained a puzzle that has challenged microbiologists for over 50 years. Fortunately, recent advances in the analysis of motility mutants, bioinformatics, and protein localization have revealed likely mechanisms for the two M. xanthus motility systems. These results are summarized in this review.

Developmental switch of S-layer protein synthesis in Bacillus anthracis

Adjustment of the synthesis of abundant protein to the requirements of the cell involves processes critical to the minimization of energy expenditure. The regulation of S‐layer genes might be a good model for such processes because expression must be controlled, such that the encoded proteins exactly cover the surface of the bacterium. Bacillus anthracis has two S‐layer genes, sap and eag, encoding the S‐layer proteins Sap and EA1 respectively. We report that the production and surface localization of Sap and EA1 are under developmental control, suggesting that an exponential phase ‘Sap layer’ is subsequently replaced by a stationary phase ‘EA1 layer’. This switch is controlled at the transcriptional level: sap is most certainly transcribed by RNA polymerase containing σA, whereas eag expression depends on σH. More importantly, Sap is required for the temporal control of eag, and EA1 is involved in strict feedback regulation of eag. This control may be direct because both S‐layer proteins bind, in vitro, the eag promoter, specifically suggesting that they might act as transcriptional repressors.

Imaging Type VI Secretion-Mediated Bacterial Killing

In the environment, bacteria compete with each other for nutrient availability or to extend their ecological niche. The type VI secretion system contributes to bacterial competition by the translocation of antibacterial effectors from predators into prey cells. The T6SS assembles a dynamic structure-the sheath-wrapped around a tube constituted of the Hcp protein. It has been proposed that by cycling between extended and contracted conformations the sheath acts as a crossbow to propel the Hcp tube toward the target cell. While the sheath dynamics have been studied in monocultures, the activity of the T6SS has not been recorded in presence of the prey. Here, time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of cocultures demonstrates that prey cells are killed upon contact with predator cells. Additional experiments provide evidence that sheath contraction correlates with nearby cell fading and that prey lysis occurs within minutes after sheath contraction. The results support a model in which T6SS dynamics are responsible for T6SS effectors translocation into recipient cells.

From individual cell motility to collective behaviors: insights from a prokaryote, Myxococcus xanthus.

In bird flocks, fish schools, and many other living organisms, regrouping among individuals of the same kin is frequently an advantageous strategy to survive, forage, and face predators. However, these behaviors are costly because the community must develop regulatory mechanisms to coordinate and adapt its response to rapid environmental changes. In principle, these regulatory mechanisms, involving communication between individuals, may also apply to cellular systems which must respond collectively during multicellular development. Dissecting the mechanisms at work requires amenable experimental systems, for example, developing bacteria. Myxococcus xanthus, a Gram-negative delatproteobacterium, is able to coordinate its motility in space and time to swarm, predate, and grow millimeter-size spore-filled fruiting bodies. A thorough understanding of the regulatory mechanisms first requires studying how individual cells move across solid surfaces and control their direction of movement, which was recently boosted by new cell biology techniques. In this review, we describe current molecular knowledge of the motility mechanism and its regulation as a lead-in to discuss how multicellular cooperation may have emerged from several layers of regulation: chemotaxis, cell-cell signaling, and the extracellular matrix. We suggest that Myxococcus is a powerful system to investigate collective principles that may also be relevant to other cellular systems.