Tamar E. Bacon

Prevalence of multiple sclerosis symptoms across lifespan: data from the NARCOMS Registry

The North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis is a voluntary patient registry with more than 38,000 registrants as of 2015. In a recent collaborative project, longitudinal data on patient-perceived impairment in 11 domains commonly affected by multiple sclerosis were examined and tabulated as a function of disease duration. The patterns of disability accumulation differed by domain. Certain symptoms (sensory, fatigue) were particularly prevalent early in the disease. Other symptoms (mobility, hand function, fatigue, bowel/bladder dysfunction, spasticity) were progressively more common with longer disease duration. Some symptoms (vision, cognition, sensory, pain, depression) were relatively common early on in multiple sclerosis, but did not appear to be more frequent with longer disease duration. Ongoing research includes studies of the impact of disease-modifying therapy and symptomatic treatment on patient-perceived impairment over the disease course.

Hispanic Americans and African Americans with multiple sclerosis have more severe disease course than Caucasian Americans.

Whether disease course in Hispanic Americans (HA) with multiple sclerosis (MS) is different from Caucasian Americans (CA) or African Americans (AA) is unknown. We compared MS severity in the three main ethnic populations in our tertiary MS clinics using disease duration–adjusted rank score of disability: Patient-Derived Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (P-MSSS). The age- and gender-adjusted P-MSSS was significantly higher in HA (3.9 ± 2.6) and AA (4.5 ± 3.0) compared to CA (3.4 ± 2.6; p < 0.0001 for both). Adjusting for insurance did not change these results. These findings suggest that HA, as AA, have more rapid disability accumulation than CA.

Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis.

Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) based on two phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). There were not enough non-White patients enrolled in these RCTs to allow for subgroup analysis based on race. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF therapy across various racial groups is unknown. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with RRMS who were started on DMF in two tertiary multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics. Efficacy and tolerability of DMF was compared across three self-identified racial groups: White-American (WA), African-American (AA) and Hispanic-American (HA). Results: A total of 390 RRMS patients were included in the study: 261 (66.9%) WA, 69 (17.7%) AA and 52 (13.3%) HA. When comparing ‘pre-DMF’ (1 year) and ‘on DMF’ (mean follow up of 14 months) periods, statistically significant reduction in rates of annualized relapses (WA from 0.44 to 0.19, AA from 0.39 to 0.15, and HA from 0.39 to 0.14; no differences between groups), new T2 lesions (WA from 45% to 23%, AA from 39% to 23%, HA from 52% to 26%; no difference between groups), and Gd+ lesions (WA from 25% to 13%, AA from 24% to 7%, HA from 23% to 12%; no difference between groups) were seen. DMF was relatively well tolerated across all groups, with an overall discontinuation rate of 20% (no difference between the three groups). Conclusion: Efficacy of DMF in our clinic population did not differ across three major ethnic groups, WA, AA and HA, and was comparable with results observed in the pivotal studies. These ‘real-life’ data suggest that race is not a factor that needs to be taken into account when initiating DMF.

Short-term disability progression in two multiethnic multiple sclerosis centers in the treatment era

Background: Short-term disease progression is well documented in clinical trials, but there are limited published data on disease course in real-life practice. Methods: Patient-derived Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (PMSSS), a disease severity rank score, was computed at each visit for consecutive MS patients attending two large, ethnically diverse MS centers in New York metropolitan area. Disability was assessed via Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Clinicians recorded disease subtype and relapse status at each visit, but did not rate disability. PMSSS change from the first to the last visit was calculated for the cohort as a whole and for subgroups of interest. Multivariable regression models were constructed for predicting final PMSSS based on readily available predictor variables collected at the initial visit and relapse history during follow up. Results: A total of 1740 consecutive patients from New York University (n = 1079) and Barnabas (n = 661) MS Care Centers were included. During follow up (mean 2.4 ± 0.82 years, range 1–4 years), mean PDDS score increased from 1.9 ± 2.2 to 2.3 ± 2.2 (p < 0.0001), while PMSSS remained roughly unchanged (initial PMSSS = 3.71 ± 2.73, last PMSSS = 3.81 ± 2.76, paired t test, p = 0.28). The only major predictor of final PMSSS was the initial PMSSS. Demographic variables (age, sex, race) or relapse status did not predict final severity score. Conclusions: Baseline disability in two MS clinics was much lower than in the reference population from which PMSSS was derived. We observed no discernable slowing of disability accumulation during the short-term follow up in our cohort compared with the reference cohort. Overwhelmingly the most important predictor of final disease severity rank score was the initial disease severity rank score.

Effectiveness of alternative dose fingolimod for multiple sclerosis

Background Fingolimod is a daily oral medication used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinicians often adopt less frequent dosing for patients with profound drug-induced lymphopenia or other adverse events. Data on the effectiveness of alternate dose fingolimod are limited. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study at 14 sites and identified 170 patients with MS taking alternate doses of fingolimod for ≥1 month. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were collected and compared during daily and alternate fingolimod dosing. Results Profound lymphopenia (77%), liver function abnormalities (9%), and infections (7%) were the most common reasons for patients to switch to alternate fingolimod dosing. The median follow-up was 12 months on daily dose and 14 months on alternate dose. Most patients (64%) took fingolimod every other day during alternate dosing. Disease activity was similar on alternate dose compared to daily dose: annualized relapse rate was 0.1 on daily dose vs 0.2 on alternate dose (p = 0.25); proportion of patients with contrast-enhancing MRI lesions was 7.6% on daily vs 9.4% on alternate (p = 0.55); proportion of patients with cumulative MS activity (clinical and radiologic disease) was 13.5% on daily vs 18.2% on alternate (p = 0.337). Patients who developed contrast-enhancing lesions while on daily dose were at higher risk for breakthrough disease while on alternate dose fingolimod (odds ratio 11.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions These data support the clinical strategy of alternate dosing of fingolimod in patients with good disease control but profound lymphopenia or other adverse events while on daily dose. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with MS on daily dose fingolimod with adverse events, alternate dose fingolimod is associated with disease activity similar to daily dose fingolimod.

Sound Lateralization Test Distinguishes Unimpaired MS Patients from Healthy Controls

There is an urgent need to develop a practical and reliable clinical measure of disease progression in early and mild MS. We hypothesized that a test of sound lateralization, which is exquisitely sensitive to transmission delays in auditory brainstem, could be more useful for detecting processing speed deficits in mildly impaired MS subjects than standard cognitive tasks. Objective. To develop a practical test of sound lateralization for the clinic and to compare performance of MS subjects with variable disability and healthy subjects on Sound Lateralization Test (SLT) and two speed-of-processing tasks. Design. 42 healthy controls and 90 subjects with clinically definite MS, divided into no, mild, and moderate disability strata, were administered the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and 3-second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). Results. All of the tests showed an overall difference in performance between controls and the three MS groups, but only the SLT measured a significant difference between controls and the no disability group. Conclusion. SLT is rapidly applied, technically simple, and superior to standard processing speed tests for discriminating between healthy controls and nondisabled MS subjects. SLT should be investigated as an outcome measure in early-phase trials and for monitoring early disease progression in the clinic.