Tamar Safra

Olaparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND Olaparib (AZD2281) is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study to evaluate maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and had had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive olaparib, at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines. RESULTS Of 265 patients who underwent randomization, 136 were assigned to the olaparib group and 129 to the placebo group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with olaparib than with placebo (median, 8.4 months vs. 4.8 months from randomization on completion of chemotherapy; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses of progression-free survival showed that, regardless of subgroup, patients in the olaparib group had a lower risk of progression. Adverse events more commonly reported in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (by more than 10% of patients) were nausea (68% vs. 35%), fatigue (49% vs. 38%), vomiting (32% vs. 14%), and anemia (17% vs. 5%); the majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. An interim analysis of overall survival (38% maturity, meaning that 38% of the patients had died) showed no significant difference between groups (hazard ratio with olaparib, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.39; P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS Olaparib as maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival among patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Interim analysis showed no overall survival benefit. The toxicity profile of olaparib in this population was consistent with that in previous studies. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00753545.).

Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Maintenance monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer. We aimed to explore the hypothesis that olaparib is most likely to benefit patients with a BRCA mutation. METHODS We present data from the second interim analysis of overall survival and a retrospective, preplanned analysis of data by BRCA mutation status from our randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study that assessed maintenance treatment with olaparib 400 mg twice daily (capsules) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and who had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Randomisation was by an interactive voice response system, stratified by time to progression on penultimate platinum-based regimen, response to the most recent platinum-based regimen before randomisation, and ethnic descent. The primary endpoint was PFS, analysed for the overall population and by BRCA status. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00753545. FINDINGS Between Aug 28, 2008, and Feb 9, 2010, 136 patients were assigned to olaparib and 129 to placebo. BRCA status was known for 131 (96%) patients in the olaparib group versus 123 (95%) in the placebo group, of whom 74 (56%) versus 62 (50%) had a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or tumour BRCA mutation. Of patients with a BRCA mutation, median PFS was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (11·2 months [95% CI 8·3-not calculable] vs 4·3 months [3·0-5·4]; HR 0·18 [0·10-0·31]; p<0·0001); similar findings were noted for patients with wild-type BRCA, although the difference between groups was lower (7·4 months [5·5-10·3] vs 5·5 months [3·7-5·6]; HR 0·54 [0·34-0·85]; p=0·0075). At the second interim analysis of overall survival (58% maturity), overall survival did not significantly differ between the groups (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·64-1·21]; p=0·44); similar findings were noted for patients with mutated BRCA (HR 0·73 [0·45-1·17]; p=0·19) and wild-type BRCA (HR 0·99 [0·63-1·55]; p=0·96). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the olaparib group were fatigue (in ten [7%] patients in the olaparib group vs four [3%] in the placebo group) and anaemia (seven [5%] vs one [<1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 25 (18%) patients who received olaparib and 11 (9%) who received placebo. Tolerability was similar in patients with mutated BRCA and the overall population. INTERPRETATION These results support the hypothesis that patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA mutation have the greatest likelihood of benefiting from olaparib treatment. FUNDING AstraZeneca.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil): reduced clinical cardiotoxicity in patients reaching or exceeding cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2.

BACKGROUND The indications for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) are expanding. We, therefore, wished to assess the safety of delivering doses exceeding 500 mg/m2 of doxil to patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Subjects accrued to eight phase I and II protocol studies conducted at two institutions, were assessed for cardiac function at baseline and at specified intervals by MUGA scans. In this retrospective analysis, the findings of 42 patients, from the total of 237 entered, who had reached or exceeded cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2 (range 500-1500 mg/m2) were reviewed. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and in clinical cardiac status were analyzed. Six patients, three who had received prior doxorubicin, also underwent endomyocardial biopsies after cumulative doses of 490-1320 mg/m2. RESULTS None of the 42 patients had clinical congestive heart failure (CHF) secondary to cardiomyopathy. Post doxil MUGA scans were available for 41 of the 42 patients. Five had a drop of 10% or more in LVEF; three of these had received prior doxorubicin. Billingham endomyocardial biopsy scores ranged from 0-1 in five patients, while the sixth had a score of 1.5 after both 900 mg/m2 and 1320 mg/m2 doxil. Of a remaining 195 patients, 1 episode of CHF was recorded in a patient who had received 312 mg/m2 doxil over 120 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone and chest radiation. CONCLUSIONS Cumulative doses in excess of 500 mg/m2 of doxil appear to carry a considerably lesser risk of cardiomyopathy as judged by serial LVEFs and clinical follow-up, than is generally associated with free doxorubicin. Heart biopsies have provided reassuring data in a small number of patients, even if pretreated with doxorubicin. However, since three doxorubicin pretreated patients were among the five experiencing drops in LVEF, more data are warranted on such patients.

Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib, a Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE Olaparib (AZD2281), an orally active poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in BRCA1- or BRCA2-deficient cells, has shown promising clinical efficacy in nonrandomized phase II trials in patients with ovarian cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiency. We assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of olaparib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase II study, patients with ovarian cancer that recurred within 12 months of prior platinum therapy and with confirmed germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were enrolled. Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to olaparib 200 mg twice per day or 400 mg twice per day continuously or PLD 50 mg/m(2) intravenously every 28 days. The primary efficacy end point was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) -assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients were randomly assigned. Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 10.1 months), 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 9.2 months), and 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.7 months) for the olaparib 200 mg, olaparib 400 mg, and PLD groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.56; P = .66) for combined olaparib doses versus PLD. RECIST-assessed ORRs were 25%, 31%, and 18% for olaparib 200 mg, olaparib 400 mg, and PLD, respectively; differences were not statistically significant. Tolerability of both treatments was as expected based on previous trials. CONCLUSION The efficacy of olaparib was consistent with previous studies. However, the efficacy of PLD was greater than expected. Olaparib 400 mg twice per day is a suitable dose to explore in further studies in this patient population.

Metastatic breast cancer: The role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin after conventional anthracyclines

Anthracyclines demonstrate significant disease activity in breast cancer and are a key component of therapy in both early and advanced disease. It has been long recognized that these agents are associated with cumulative dose-related cardiotoxicity that often limits their utility at the time of disease recurrence. The risk of anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity appears to be highest in women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer previously having received an adjuvant anthracycline-trastuzumab regimen. Clinical trials have demonstrated that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is equally active but associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiotoxicity compared with conventional doxorubicin whether administered as monotherapy or in combination with trastuzumab. Thus, PLD can be effectively and safely substituted for conventional doxorubicin, allowing retreatment with an anthracycline in the metastatic setting. PLD has also been shown to improve time to tumor progression when used as maintenance therapy. These data, when coupled with the need to maintain efficacy and reduce cardiotoxicity in the management of metastatic breast cancer, support the use of PLD in the metastatic setting, as well as support the rationale for evaluating PLD as adjuvant therapy.

BRCA Mutation Status and Determinant of Outcome in Women with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with BRCA mutations (BRCA +) benefit from platinum-based treatment more than noncarriers. Impaired ability to repair DNA by homologous recombination increases their chemosensitivity. We investigated whether BRCA + predicts for improved outcome following pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for recurrence. Recurrent EOC patients receiving second- or third-line PLD from 1998 to 2009 in 4 institutions (Tel Aviv, New York, Padua, and Jerusalem) were subjected to retrospective comparisons between 40 (25.8%) patients who were BRCA +, and 115 (74.2%) deemed nonhereditary (NH). Median age was 59 years (range 31–83); 111 (72%) had a platinum-free interval more than 6 months [PLD alone (n = 65) and PLD plus platinum (n = 90)]; 104 received PLD in second-line and 51 in third-line. BRCA + versus NH comparisons: median time to treatment failure (TTF) 15.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.4–21.6] versus 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.1–10.3; P = 0.009); overall survival (OS) 56.8 months (95% CI: 32.5–indeterminate) versus 22.6 months (95% CI: 17.0–34.1; P = 0.002). In multivariate Cox models BRCA status was significantly associated with TTF (HR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.08–2.55; P = 0.02) and OS (adjusted HR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.18–3.60; P = 0.01). Adjusted HR relating platinum sensitivity to OS was 1.58 (95% CI: 0.93–2.68; P = 0.09); no significant association found with age at diagnosis, line of PLD or combinations, or institution. In this retrospective analysis, recurrent EOC BRCA mutation carriers treated with PLD had an improved outcome, and this result seemed to be independent of platinum sensitivity. Tumors arising in a background of defective BRCA function are more sensitive than other EOCs to DNA-damaging agents such as PLD, even after acquiring platinum resistance. Mol Cancer Ther; 10(10); 2000–7. ©2011 AACR.

Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed serous ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation: Overall survival adjusted for postprogression poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy

Maintenance treatment with the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza) in Study 19 (study number, D0810C00019; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00753545) significantly improved progression‐free survival in comparison with a placebo for patients with platinum‐sensitive, relapsed serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm), but an interim analysis revealed no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. However, 23% of the patients receiving the placebo switched to a PARP inhibitor after progression. To investigate whether this had a confounding effect on OS, this article reports an exploratory post hoc analysis that excluded all patients from sites where 1 or more placebo patients received postprogression PARP inhibitor treatment.

Combined weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE To evaluate safety and outcome of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as the initial postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) patients. METHODS Patients with stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) primary peritoneal or tubal carcinoma were enrolled in this phase II study. Intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve 2) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 6-8 cycles. Cytoreductive surgery was performed as primary treatment or after 3 cycles of weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed postoperatively by an additional 3 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS Sixty-four women (median age 65 years, range 39.9-82.8) were enrolled. Fifty-six of them (87.6%) were diagnosed with stage III-IV disease. Neutropenia was the most common hematological toxicity: 25% of the subjects had grade 3-4 neutropenia, 34.4% were supported by GCSF and 15.6% received epoetin. The majority (89%) of the patients had grade 1 and only 7.8% had grade 2 alopecia. 7.8% had grade 3 fatigue and 14.1% had grade 2 and 3.1% grade 3 neuropathy, none developed grade 4 neuropathy and only 6.3% had some residual neuropathy at >6 months after treatment. With a median follow-up of 31.5 months (range 5.9-57.3), estimated median survival was 52.0 months and median progression-free survival 25.74 (8.4-57.3) months (95% CI, 21.2-30.3). Overall and complete response rates were 92.1% and 64.1% respectively. CONCLUSION Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as the initial chemotherapy for EOC is a feasible and well tolerated regimen and should be further evaluated in a larger phase III study.

Metastatic uterine leiomyosarcomas: a single-institution experience.

Background: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare disease and, when it recurs or metastasizes, can rarely be cured. In a retrospective study, we summarized our experience in treating a large cohort of patients with metastatic uterine LMS. Materials and Methods: Cases of recurrent or metastatic uterine LMS diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 were analyzed. Survival was determined from the time of initial diagnosis to last follow-up. Results: Thirty-three patients (median age, 55 years) were identified. Eighteen patients were initially diagnosed with localized disease. Median disease-free interval was 5.25 months, and overall survival (OS) is 43.7 months. Median OS of 15 patients with initially discovered metastatic disease is 31.4 months. Different chemotherapy regimens produced approximately 30% response rates. Twelve patients underwent at least 1 surgical resection of pulmonary or extrapulmonary metastases. In this group, median progression-free survival was 7.9 months (range, 0-33.9 months), median OS was 45.2 months (range, >8.1-78.8 months), 2-year survival rate was 83%, and 4-year survival rate was 25%. Conclusions: Very few patients with recurrent or metastatic uterine LMS can be curatively treated. Our experience suggests that modern multimodal therapy or combining chemotherapy with aggressive surgery in selected patients may be significant in prolonging survival of women with this fatal disease.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity in Nonsmoking Women: A New and Unusual Complication of Chemotherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer?

PURPOSE To describe occurrences of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients who had received long-term pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In our cohort of patients on maintenance PLD for ovarian and related mullerian epithelial malignancies, we encountered two patients with invasive SCC of the oral cavity (one of them multifocal) and one with high-grade squamous dysplasia. Review of patients at our institution receiving PLD for recurrent ovarian cancer identified three additional patients. The duration of treatment, cumulative PLD dose, human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity, BRCA status, stage at diagnosis, outcome, and other characteristics are reviewed. RESULTS All five cases were nonsmokers with no known risk factors for HPV and four were negative for p16 expression. Four of the patients had known BRCA mutations whereas one tested negative. Cumulative doses of PLD were >1,600 mg/m2 given over 30-132 months. Three had SCCs staged as T1N0 oral tongue, alveolar ridge (gingival), and multifocal oral mucosa; one had a T2N0 oral tongue; and one had dysplasia. After excision, two were given radiation but recurred shortly thereafter; the others remain well and have had no further exposure to cytotoxic drugs, including PLD. CONCLUSION Awareness of this possible long-term complication during PLD treatment should enhance the likelihood of early detection of oral lesions in these patients. Decisions to continue maintenance PLD after complete response of the original cancer should perhaps consider the benefits of delaying ovarian cancer recurrence versus the possible risk for a secondary cancer.